This could turn out to be quite the week, what with Gold fixing to catapult past $800, crude oil within easy striking distance of $100/barrel, and the Fed cooking up a speedball (aka, a ‘Belushi’) to resuscitate credit addicts for a new round of binge buying. There was a time when Wall Street might have show signs of nervousness ahead of such tidings. But that would imply wild rallies and swoons intraday. In fact, what we got yesterday was a mild hot-air-balloon effect, wafting rather wilding. The DJIA was up 64 points, extending a rally begun a week earlier but without eating through any significant layers of supply. That was left for today or tomorrow, when bears presumably will be more vulnerable to a short-squeeze panic caused by the Fed.
(Click on photo to enlarge)
Why anyone should panic is beyond easy logic. After all, the Street has already priced in a 70 percent chance of a quarter-point easing. But on Wall Street, panic is fed not by the news per se, but by the fear that the usual idiots are going to overreact to the news. Can you imagine ‘nothing’ happening when word of a 25-basis-point easing crosses the tickertape? Of course not. And neither can anyone in the trading pits. In such circumstances, surviving to fight another day means making sure that you do ’something’ before the next guy does. Since it’s nearly impossible to imagine a sell-off on news of a rate cut, a buy-up seems all but ordained.
But how about if there’s a 50-basis-point cut? The Street was laying 5-to-1 against this a few days ago, but that could change at post time. Even so, there’s still room for surprise. Suppose the stock market were to get pummeled this morning, turning shorts docile and therefore spoiling a well-anticipated running start at Dow 14000? That’s about the only real surprise we could foresee, since ‘no one’ expects a selloff ahead of the same news that pushed stocks up yesterday. But once the news is out, stocks will probably be more vulnerable than they’ve been in months, since oil and gold are already trading at headline levels. If investors see more positives in a token rate cut than negatives in a further $10 jump in the price of fuel, they are crazier than we might have imagined.
***
SEMINAR SOLD OUT, BUT�
Seats for the November 3-4 seminar online are sold out, but if you are interested in attending the class at a later date, click here and I’ll let you know when the next session is scheduled, probably in December or January. If you would prefer to attend an on-site class, possible venues in 2008 include Vancouver, Boca Raton and San Francisco. Please let me know if you’d be likely to come to the seminar if it were held in one of those cities









Fate of World Riding on Google
by Rick Ackerman on October 31, 2007 10:28 am GMT
Tasked with dragging the U.S. stock market higher all by itself, Google could not quite get the job done yesterday. Although the stock ended the session with a nearly $15 gain, preventing Nasdaq-based indexes from falling, the Industrial Average went its separate way, closing with a 78-point loss. Given that the stock market’s illusion of strength is all that is keeping the U.S. economy from going over the edge, it would be difficult to overestimate the importance of Google’s continuing bluster. For, as long as Google shares remain capable of vaulting $15 in a day, the Nasdaq indices of which the stock is a key component cannot get hurt too badly. And as long as the Nasdaq can’t get hurt too badly, it will be that much harder for the Dow and S&P to trigger off an avalanche
That is not to say that the broad averages can’t continue to rack up appalling breadth divergences. That’s a particularly worrisome technical aspect of the current bull cycle, and it is only going to get worse as fewer and fewer stocks participate in increasingly ginned-up rallies. But because it takes only a handful of ebullient stocks to ward off a complete meltdown, the danger of this occurring will remain lower than if there were no tech-sector mirage to focus on.
Even so, bulls could hardly be thrilled with yesterday’s broad weakness, since it occurred with positive cyclical influences almost at red-line. We are referring to the October-November transition period, about which our colleague Jason Goepfert of SentimenTrader.com recently had this to say: ‘�we’ll [soon] be heading into a period of notable seasonality which is remarkably positive. Holding the S&P 500 during the last three days of October through the first three days of November has given a positive return during every one of the past 12 years in the S&P 500 tracking fund, SPY. The 100% winning trades returned an average of +3.3%, with an average drawdown (i.e. maximum loss) of only -0.7% compared to an average maximum gain of +3.6%.”
Dueling Cycles
So why did the Dow fall 78 points anyway? Who knows. Perhaps it would have fallen by 300 points if ’seasonals’ had not been so bullish? Or maybe the October/November ‘transition effect’ acted as an offset to a powerfully bearish cycle that has seen stocks collapse like clockwork during Octobers in years that end in 7? Whatever the case, our gut feeling is that too many bears were counting too heavily on an October sell-off for it to happen. But even if they’ve been disappointed, they seem less eager each day to cover short positions. Granted, put-buying picked up in the final hours yesterday, and that is bullish for the very near-term. But if the expected news concerning more Fed easing this morning doesn’t make shorts scramble for cover, then we had better get ready to dive.
***
SEMINAR SOLD OUT, BUT�
Seats for this weekend’s online Hidden Pivot seminar are sold out, but if you are interested in attending the class at a later date, click here and I’ll let you know when the next session is scheduled — probably in December or January. If you would prefer to attend an on-site class, possible venues in 2008 include Vancouver, Boca Raton and San Francisco. Please let me know if you’d be likely to come to the seminar if it were held in one of those cities