Is the dollar in the initial stages of a hyperinflation? We very strongly doubt it, although we would no longer assert categorically that such an outcome is impossible. Even so, there is only one course of political action we can conceive of that would put the U.S. economy on a hyperinflationary path, and it is not one that we have heard discussed. Indeed, while inflationists have always insisted the Fed would do ‘whatever it takes’ to avoid deflation, they’ve always fudged the details. And even when details were forthcoming, the scenarios they described were preposterous ‘ such as that wage inflation was about to come on full-bore. Does anyone actually believe that United Airlines, Chrysler, Beazer Homes et al. will somehow find a way to pay their employees enough to scrape by in hyperinflationary times?
![]()
Another crackpot vision of the inflationists has Helicopter Ben dropping $100 dollar bills from whirlybirds. This tableau was metaphorically appealing but implausible, since the only legal and legitimate way to put fresh money into people’s hands is to get them to borrow it. And by the way, this is true even of the stimulus checks the IRS recently mailed to taxpayers. It may have seemed as though the money dropped from the sky, but in reality the hundreds of billions of dollars worth of free lunches disbursed by the Treasury Department will increase the federal deficit and therefore the amount for which taxpayers are ultimately on the hook.
No Need to Speculate
In light of the above, what options does the Fed have to fend off deflation? Actually, we needn’t speculate any longer, since, by its recent attempts to arrest the collapse of America’s financial system, the central bank showed us exactly what it would ‘ and will — do. Recall that the Fed did not simply fork over hundreds of billions of dollars to the banks; rather, Bernanke & Co. employed subterfuge to make a still-bottomless bailout look like a series of business loans. Banks simply ‘exchanged’ their dubious mortgage paper for superficially less-dubious Treasury paper ‘ ‘new lamps for old!’ — and that was that.
All of this, by the way, was well within the intentions of the Monetary Control Act of 1980, which gave the Federal Reserve emergency authority to acquire the bonds of, say, a bankrupt auto manufacturer, a poultry distributor, or a municipal stadium. In practice, though, we see that the Fed has done nothing so transparent as purchase assets outright; rather, it has swapped Treasury paper for subprime confetti, enabling the banks who were warehousing the confetti to pass muster with regulators who are all in on the con.
These sham transactions have given the banks the temporary appearance of solvency, but, as is becoming increasingly obvious, the loans have done nothing to stimulate the consumer economy or the housing market. Taken together, however, the measures could be seen as a template for a future, potentially hyperinflationary, bailout at the household/consumer level. Surely nothing less than that will suffice to get consumers spending again, and that is why we might expect the government’s so-far token aid to a relative handful of down-and-out homeowners to expand as real estate deflation begins to asphyxiate more and more neighborhoods across the nation.
Why Lenders Matter
But we shouldn’t confuse such a course of action with a deliberate strategy to hyperinflate, since any political decision to do so would have grave and presumably unacceptable consequences — not only for savers as a class, but for all of the institutional conduits and repositories of savings. Think of an economy operating without credit or bond markets for perhaps a generation and you begin to see the devastation that hyperinflating the dollar would cause. After all, who would be willing to lend even a dime to the U.S., or to U.S.-based businesses, if hyperinflation had screwed them out of tens of trillions of dollars worth of interest and principal? Pensioners and widows would be wiped out too, since their nest eggs and life insurance annuities would be rendered effectively valueless.
It is at that point, perhaps, that debtors might collectively begin to understand that by walking away from those whom they owe, they would only be screwing themselves. It happened easily enough in Germany, you say? True enough. But anyone who cites the Weimar hyperinflation of 1923 as a reason for why it could happen here has contrived to ignore the crucial fact that post-War Germany, physically in ruins and economically devastated, had relatively little to lose. Americans, on the other hand, have everything to lose, since we would be plunging from a civilizational pinnacle of affluence into destitution. Under the circumstances, a vote for Total Debtor Relief ‘ for hyperinflation, that is ‘ would be a vote to destroy any chance of the ‘good life’ returning for decades. A deflationary course would at least have the moral virtue of visiting pain on sinners more or less in proportion to their sins of borrowing.
Real Estate Vortex
So how could a hyperinflation occur in this country if it is politically out of the question? The answer is that we would get sucked into it — slowly at first, but then inescapably as the vortex of real estate failures accelerated. In such desperate times, bailout measures could grow increasingly reckless, until they reached a point where the government effectively assumed all of Americans’ mortgage debts. The sums involved would dwarf the Treasury paper currently held as rescue reserves by the Fed, so that the government would wind up literally printing money to take over the bailout where the central bank had left off.
Compared to a wholesale bailout of America’s home ‘owners,’ the government’s measures so far to prop up the banking system have been timid and opaque. In the end, we doubt Congress will have the stomach to tell mortgage lenders they will have to accept confetti as payment. And that is why the housing-sector bailout is unlikely to reach the vortex stage. More likely is that real estate deflation will at some point become precipitous, outstripping any rescue package that Congress might be able to throw together. Ruinous deflation would be a fait accompli by then and there would be little point in effecting a hyperinflationary rescue. Deflation would simply be allowed to run its course, with the government restructuring mortgage contracts so that each of us would continue to make monthly payments commensurate with our means.
***
Get a Chat-Room Pass
The Rick’s Picks chat room is the place to be if you’re looking for tradable ideas in real time. Gold and silver traders in particular can benefit, since the room attracts experienced traders from all over the world at all hours of the day, particularly during U.S. market hours. If you would like a free one-day pass to check it out, click here, and then on the green banner.









Is There a ‘They’ Pushing Inflation?
by Rick Ackerman on May 30, 2008 7:11 am GMT
We argued here yesterday that although hyperinflation is remotely possible, it will not be the result of a political decision, since the consequences would be too grave, devastating the savers who are the life’s blood of credit markets. If hyperinflation does come, we believe it can do so only via a mortgage bailout effort that mushrooms out of control, eventually encompassing all debtor households. Our essay elicited an interesting response from, among others, ‘Karl,’ a self-described gold-bug with whom we have corresponded regularly. He believes the powers that be made a conscious decision years ago to hyperinflate, and that the process is designed to transfer wealth to those who silently rule our financial lives. Karl’s thoughts, immediately below, are followed by our brief response.
Metals Hold Key
‘I found myself nodding my head in agreement with your latest. I think the point that is lost on many who are in the hyperinflationary camp is that we want to equate a parabolic rise in prices being the end result of whatever the Feds of the world are doing. I want to equate this to the metals and what it may mean down the road.
‘First off, I don’t feel that we need to see a Weimar-type scenario for the metals to continue higher. The bottom line is that the rest of the world still looks at gold as a monetary metal (or a store of wealth) and acts accordingly. That we took Our currency off the gold standard was because the accountability that gold held bankers and countries to, became too restrictive. Gold and silver have always been money, and as much as we in the U.S. haven’t looked at it that way since Nixon took closed the gold window in the early 70’s, we still need to look at the two, gold and dollars, in relation to each other. By that, I mean that it’s not so much how much (and when) prices rise or have risen, but the relationship between the amount of dollars created against the amount of gold that is out there. At least, this is how I feel we should be viewing it.
Obscene Relationship
‘When you do that, you see some sort of obscene relationship that puts gold’s value relative to the number of dollars created in the 30 to 40 thousand-dollar range.
The world is shifting away from dollars because of our perceived inability ‘ ever — to get our fiscal house in order, and folks still want to think that the inflation is about higher and higher prices. Granted, we may continue to see higher prices for goods, but we don’t need a hyperinflation in prices to tell us hyperinflation has arrived: We already have it in the number of dollars (and yen and euros and pounds, etc.) created.
‘Consumer confidence is everything, and keeping the consumer confident that his currency will remain valid is paramount. But that is here in the U.S. The next economic powerhouse will be Asia, and that mantle was passed on by the bankers. They love gold over there. India too. I think everything that is happening is designed to keep the consumer confident no matter how many lies have to be told. I recall Paulson saying of the stimulus plan that if more stimulus was needed, it would come. It doesn’t sound as if they are going to do the responsible thing. As a matter of fact, I think they took this path intentionally.
Why Continue Pumping?
You said this: “Ruinous deflation would be a fait accompli by then and there would be little point in effecting a hyperinflationary rescue. Deflation would simply be allowed to run its course, with the government restructuring mortgage contracts so that each of us would continue to make monthly payments commensurate with our means.” But answer me this: If allowing the proper economic consequences [i.e., deflation] to take hold is where this will lead (rather than continuing to print money ad infinitum), then why continue to pump up the money supply now?
If I were to answer that myself, I would say that they want to accelerate the transfer of economic power. I really don’t think this stuff just happened. Many discussion forums have talked about our being led down this path intentionally over the last ten years. I could talk about other things at the risk of sounding like one of the tin-foil-hat crowd, so I won’t go there.
It appears they have two options: Inflate or deflate. Both lead to the same place eventually.
Our response:
Thanks, as always, for you insightful reflections, Karl. I had thought to mention in my essay, as you have below, that hyperinflation and deflation do indeed lead to the same place; however, I decided I’d gone on long enough already. But you are surely correct about this, since hyperinflation is by definition unsustainable. And once it has peaked, how could it possibly precipitate out other than as a deflationary bust, bringing abject and widespread destitution in its wake?
However, I have a real problem with the idea that ‘They’ have engineered things so that all of the wealth and power will wind up in the hands of the usual bunch of trilateralists/zionists/masters-of-the-universe/Goldman Sachs Directors, etc. In fact, much of the West’s wealth is simply going to vanish — just as it has begun to do with the demise of Bear Stearns and other financial behemoths. The bondholders have been spared so far, mostly at taxpayers’ and shareholders’ expense, but I’m not so sure there’ll be much of a carcass left for the supposed cabal to feast on when the K-wave deflationary trough bottoms in perhaps another 6-8 years.
By then, the real wealth of the world will have shifted ‘ organically ‘ to Asia and the oil producers. And while they may revere gold in those places, I doubt they will feel compelled to tie their money to it. They won’t have to, since their currencies will be strong without the artificially induced buoyancy of global reserve status the dollar has enjoyed. Also, there will be no financial powerhouses in the world that emerges from the Second Great Depression, only economic powerhouses. Financial clout should be merely a side-effect of economic clout ‘ a fact that Americans seem to have lost sight of long ago, so busy were we enjoying the benefits of our illusory, paper-thin prosperity.
***
Get a Chat-Room Pass
The Rick’s Picks chat room is the place to be if you’re looking for tradable ideas in real time. Gold and silver traders in particular can benefit, since the room attracts experienced traders from all over the world at all hours of the day, particularly during U.S. market hours. If you would like a free one-day pass to check it out, click here, and then on the green banner.