<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Only Fools Think the Bottom Is In</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rickackerman.com/2009/04/why-only-fools-think-bottom-is-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rickackerman.com/2009/04/why-only-fools-think-bottom-is-in/</link>
	<description>Trading Newsletter for Gold, Silver, Stocks and Mini Indexes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:15:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carsten</title>
		<link>http://www.rickackerman.com/2009/04/why-only-fools-think-bottom-is-in/comment-page-1/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>Carsten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 06:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickackerman.com/?p=5115#comment-810</guid>
		<description>Rick,

As always, a short, yet precise, comment that really focuses in on the heart of the matter.

As this is a belated comment, in case you do still see it, a question:
Next to the lack of capitulation that always accompaines bottoms, what about the simple metric of bottom P/Es?

To my knowledge, in virtually all instances comparable to this decline (are there many that compare) the S&amp;P&#039; s P/E has gone well BELOW its long term average of 12-15, to hit about 6-8 at the bottom.  Yet today, we are still well ABOVE the LTA,   I don&#039;t have access to the numbers as you do, but I think that the CURRENT P/E is still above 20.  
So of course, if the market had seen its lows already, we could still get to an 8 P//E if earnings go to about $100, a mere 150% increase over the current number 
Now how likely is such an earnings outlook?

Rick, do you think this P/E metric in its simplicity for bottom evaluation is comparable to your friend&#039;s as sketched out above?

Personally, I think there is a good case  in waiting for the Dow/Gold to go from 9 now to maybe 2-3.

As I am penning this in the wee hours of Eastern Sunday, a happy Easter to all (and holidays of course)!


&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;

&lt;em&gt;The P/E multiple is a wildly variable number that ultimately reflects investors&#039; state of mind as it swings between cyclical extremes of fear and greed. Given the historical excesses of greed that we have seen in this last cycle, it seems likely that P/Es are about to fall to historical lows as fears mount. That would suggest that earnings multiples have quite a ways to fall from current levels, especially since collapsing earnings will be pushing P/Es much higher over the next year or two.&lt;/em&gt; &lt;strong&gt;RA&lt;/strong&gt;   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick,</p>
<p>As always, a short, yet precise, comment that really focuses in on the heart of the matter.</p>
<p>As this is a belated comment, in case you do still see it, a question:<br />
Next to the lack of capitulation that always accompaines bottoms, what about the simple metric of bottom P/Es?</p>
<p>To my knowledge, in virtually all instances comparable to this decline (are there many that compare) the S&amp;P&#8217; s P/E has gone well BELOW its long term average of 12-15, to hit about 6-8 at the bottom.  Yet today, we are still well ABOVE the LTA,   I don&#8217;t have access to the numbers as you do, but I think that the CURRENT P/E is still above 20.<br />
So of course, if the market had seen its lows already, we could still get to an 8 P//E if earnings go to about $100, a mere 150% increase over the current number<br />
Now how likely is such an earnings outlook?</p>
<p>Rick, do you think this P/E metric in its simplicity for bottom evaluation is comparable to your friend&#8217;s as sketched out above?</p>
<p>Personally, I think there is a good case  in waiting for the Dow/Gold to go from 9 now to maybe 2-3.</p>
<p>As I am penning this in the wee hours of Eastern Sunday, a happy Easter to all (and holidays of course)!</p>
<p>&#038;&#038;&#038;&#038;&#038;</p>
<p><em>The P/E multiple is a wildly variable number that ultimately reflects investors&#8217; state of mind as it swings between cyclical extremes of fear and greed. Given the historical excesses of greed that we have seen in this last cycle, it seems likely that P/Es are about to fall to historical lows as fears mount. That would suggest that earnings multiples have quite a ways to fall from current levels, especially since collapsing earnings will be pushing P/Es much higher over the next year or two.</em> <strong>RA</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SocialismSucks</title>
		<link>http://www.rickackerman.com/2009/04/why-only-fools-think-bottom-is-in/comment-page-1/#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>SocialismSucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickackerman.com/?p=5115#comment-799</guid>
		<description>Randy: Spring 2009 is the eery calm point in the story that comes after the first taste of bloody and costly battle, but before the epic wipeout.

2+2=5 has been the rule in America for an extended period and today&#039;s economic pain is really just the beginning of the equation shifting to 2+2=3 in order for the economy to obey the laws of mathematics. 

2+2=3 means extreme economic pain and that will have to be the rule in America for an extended period. If the money masters insist on more bubble blowing then we will eventually have to endure an excruciating period of 2+2=2. Nothing less than the end of the laws of mathematics could stop the eventual rebalancing.

Read this article: 
The &quot;Disaster Stage&quot; of U.S. Financialization
 By Kevin Phillips
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/04/07/the_disaster_stage_of_us_financialization/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randy: Spring 2009 is the eery calm point in the story that comes after the first taste of bloody and costly battle, but before the epic wipeout.</p>
<p>2+2=5 has been the rule in America for an extended period and today&#8217;s economic pain is really just the beginning of the equation shifting to 2+2=3 in order for the economy to obey the laws of mathematics. </p>
<p>2+2=3 means extreme economic pain and that will have to be the rule in America for an extended period. If the money masters insist on more bubble blowing then we will eventually have to endure an excruciating period of 2+2=2. Nothing less than the end of the laws of mathematics could stop the eventual rebalancing.</p>
<p>Read this article:<br />
The &#8220;Disaster Stage&#8221; of U.S. Financialization<br />
 By Kevin Phillips<br />
<a href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/04/07/the_disaster_stage_of_us_financialization/" rel="nofollow">http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/04/07/the_disaster_stage_of_us_financialization/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occdude</title>
		<link>http://www.rickackerman.com/2009/04/why-only-fools-think-bottom-is-in/comment-page-1/#comment-798</link>
		<dc:creator>Occdude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickackerman.com/?p=5115#comment-798</guid>
		<description>Come on folks can anybody think that with unemployment going up almost exponentially, commercial real estate yet to hit the fan that this rally is anything other than a technical bounce?

I&#039;m playing it with low cash levels now, but I know this is a mirage.  This is an intermediate term BEAR market rally which in all likelyhood will peeter out in the fall.  Then I see the bears ravaging this market until the capitulation selling guts this market.  Only when you have  rising employment, low pe valuations, rising earnings/dividends AND a plausible economic theme like rediscovery of the light bulb or some other like minded paradigm shifting entity, will it be safe to long term invest again. 

I dont see long term investing coming back for at least another 5-10 years.  In the meantime you will probably see bear market rallys-flat markets as the indices tack ever lower.

As far as gold goes.  Well the safety folks are leaving the trade and getting back into the equities market.   I think gold could go back into the high 700s before you see a snap back on inflation concerns.  So if your a gold fundy hang in there, you know why you&#039;re there.  If you&#039;re a trader subscribe to Ricks service and game the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on folks can anybody think that with unemployment going up almost exponentially, commercial real estate yet to hit the fan that this rally is anything other than a technical bounce?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m playing it with low cash levels now, but I know this is a mirage.  This is an intermediate term BEAR market rally which in all likelyhood will peeter out in the fall.  Then I see the bears ravaging this market until the capitulation selling guts this market.  Only when you have  rising employment, low pe valuations, rising earnings/dividends AND a plausible economic theme like rediscovery of the light bulb or some other like minded paradigm shifting entity, will it be safe to long term invest again. </p>
<p>I dont see long term investing coming back for at least another 5-10 years.  In the meantime you will probably see bear market rallys-flat markets as the indices tack ever lower.</p>
<p>As far as gold goes.  Well the safety folks are leaving the trade and getting back into the equities market.   I think gold could go back into the high 700s before you see a snap back on inflation concerns.  So if your a gold fundy hang in there, you know why you&#8217;re there.  If you&#8217;re a trader subscribe to Ricks service and game the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.rickackerman.com/2009/04/why-only-fools-think-bottom-is-in/comment-page-1/#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickackerman.com/?p=5115#comment-797</guid>
		<description>Should gold stock positions be sold as well?  I got really wiped out in the last stock market decline and I am holding mostly gold stocks and I saw the wipe out coming in the stock market but thought (erroneously) that the gold stocks wouldn&#039;t be affected as much.  It seems my portfolio got just as messed up as the Dow.  Any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should gold stock positions be sold as well?  I got really wiped out in the last stock market decline and I am holding mostly gold stocks and I saw the wipe out coming in the stock market but thought (erroneously) that the gold stocks wouldn&#8217;t be affected as much.  It seems my portfolio got just as messed up as the Dow.  Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://www.rickackerman.com/2009/04/why-only-fools-think-bottom-is-in/comment-page-1/#comment-796</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickackerman.com/?p=5115#comment-796</guid>
		<description>Can I offer a viewpoint from Australia?  I think this article has really hit it on the head for a number of reasons, and with respect to Randy I think he is wrong.

What is dreadfully interesting is the &quot;way&quot; this downward cycle has occurred and the type of issues that have &lt;b&gt;not&lt;/b&gt; hit the public.  I think this will pan out much much worse yet for these reasons: FIRST, there is no apparent panic in the population at large, I see no &quot;fear&quot;, SECOND, Randy points out that the guys in at the beginning are still holding on, therefore their exhaustion selling will begin at some time (are stocks going to go up 25% in the next 2-5 years??? Not unless we have a boom time again!), THIRD in Oz we have a retirement superannuation scheme of 9% of income (401k for our Yanki mates?), that saving MUST be invested in certain types of investments, so these schemes are artificially driving up prices due to artificial demand in a limited number of investments (the 9% is a mandated minimum, you have no choice on the Min, but can do more), THIS forces up prices TWICE above current inflation and therefore over 10 years has driven selected markets sky-high with an artificial demand. FOURTH, I see NO PAIN in the average person yet... not disrespecting our unemployed and retrenched brethren, the AVERAGE Joe is seeing NO real pain, I&#039;m seeing everything I need on the shelves, I&#039;m able to buy everything I want without delay and the quantity of traffic on the roads has not changed one percent - its arguably worse.  There is NO short supply YET.  With respect Randy, I believe once you see the price of a steak go up, when you cant buy a fresh Leak or fresh Thyme for a Sunday roast, or some other oddity like your favorite Laksa sauce disappear permanently then you will know these restrictions are real and therefore the real depression is starting to bite.... then its sell time baby, sell....  (I tried to use American spelling! excuse me if I made a mistake!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I offer a viewpoint from Australia?  I think this article has really hit it on the head for a number of reasons, and with respect to Randy I think he is wrong.</p>
<p>What is dreadfully interesting is the &#8220;way&#8221; this downward cycle has occurred and the type of issues that have <b>not</b> hit the public.  I think this will pan out much much worse yet for these reasons: FIRST, there is no apparent panic in the population at large, I see no &#8220;fear&#8221;, SECOND, Randy points out that the guys in at the beginning are still holding on, therefore their exhaustion selling will begin at some time (are stocks going to go up 25% in the next 2-5 years??? Not unless we have a boom time again!), THIRD in Oz we have a retirement superannuation scheme of 9% of income (401k for our Yanki mates?), that saving MUST be invested in certain types of investments, so these schemes are artificially driving up prices due to artificial demand in a limited number of investments (the 9% is a mandated minimum, you have no choice on the Min, but can do more), THIS forces up prices TWICE above current inflation and therefore over 10 years has driven selected markets sky-high with an artificial demand. FOURTH, I see NO PAIN in the average person yet&#8230; not disrespecting our unemployed and retrenched brethren, the AVERAGE Joe is seeing NO real pain, I&#8217;m seeing everything I need on the shelves, I&#8217;m able to buy everything I want without delay and the quantity of traffic on the roads has not changed one percent &#8211; its arguably worse.  There is NO short supply YET.  With respect Randy, I believe once you see the price of a steak go up, when you cant buy a fresh Leak or fresh Thyme for a Sunday roast, or some other oddity like your favorite Laksa sauce disappear permanently then you will know these restrictions are real and therefore the real depression is starting to bite&#8230;. then its sell time baby, sell&#8230;.  (I tried to use American spelling! excuse me if I made a mistake!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CB</title>
		<link>http://www.rickackerman.com/2009/04/why-only-fools-think-bottom-is-in/comment-page-1/#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator>CB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 06:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickackerman.com/?p=5115#comment-794</guid>
		<description>In any market I think it is important to look at volumes and participant interest as well as prices.  At the bottom volumes drop to next-to-nothing and there is little chat about the market - it&#039;s just too boring since so little is happening. 
This was the best indicator of the bottom of the 70&#039;s oil-shock bear market, and every property bust I&#039;ve seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In any market I think it is important to look at volumes and participant interest as well as prices.  At the bottom volumes drop to next-to-nothing and there is little chat about the market &#8211; it&#8217;s just too boring since so little is happening.<br />
This was the best indicator of the bottom of the 70&#8217;s oil-shock bear market, and every property bust I&#8217;ve seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikola Dino - Greece</title>
		<link>http://www.rickackerman.com/2009/04/why-only-fools-think-bottom-is-in/comment-page-1/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikola Dino - Greece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 06:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickackerman.com/?p=5115#comment-793</guid>
		<description>I was wondering the same as randy as I hear my american friends in tell me they are not fazed by this whole thing because they have little control of their 401K account from work.   They see the statements on their funds and they know that they have dropped but think that eventually the portfolio will go up again.   This is ok for the younger ones but what about people like my dad in canada, whacked for 35% on his funds -- he&#039;s retired.   I am not sure how your 401K works exactly, but it seemed to me, from what my friend said, that she has little control over the investments and has blind faith in the funds classes and portfolio managers she has chosen.   I just think that if she had full control over these funds she would have capitulated now, or earlier, like I did in Dec 2007 so I that I could park in gold and cash for a bit.   I am not a sophisticated investor but wise enough to see a bubble.  I did the same in Jan of 2000.   When you have control of your funds, you fear more and are more likely to run if things look shaky.   I beg to differ that investors are more educated today than before when they just throw their money into some  fund.  I bet you they put more thought process into buying a new car than they do with their investments (and a car is not and investment).

 I think there are too many americans in these plans with too much blind faith hoping for a rise that just might take too long to come.   Remember ma and pa investors, when you lose 50% on your portfolio, you need to gain 100% to get it back.   Maybe you should be capitulating.

And one last note.  Perhaps this is another Argentina &quot;rob the retirement fund scam&quot; just using another method to transfer the wealth.

Niko Santorini 
Greece</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering the same as randy as I hear my american friends in tell me they are not fazed by this whole thing because they have little control of their 401K account from work.   They see the statements on their funds and they know that they have dropped but think that eventually the portfolio will go up again.   This is ok for the younger ones but what about people like my dad in canada, whacked for 35% on his funds &#8212; he&#8217;s retired.   I am not sure how your 401K works exactly, but it seemed to me, from what my friend said, that she has little control over the investments and has blind faith in the funds classes and portfolio managers she has chosen.   I just think that if she had full control over these funds she would have capitulated now, or earlier, like I did in Dec 2007 so I that I could park in gold and cash for a bit.   I am not a sophisticated investor but wise enough to see a bubble.  I did the same in Jan of 2000.   When you have control of your funds, you fear more and are more likely to run if things look shaky.   I beg to differ that investors are more educated today than before when they just throw their money into some  fund.  I bet you they put more thought process into buying a new car than they do with their investments (and a car is not and investment).</p>
<p> I think there are too many americans in these plans with too much blind faith hoping for a rise that just might take too long to come.   Remember ma and pa investors, when you lose 50% on your portfolio, you need to gain 100% to get it back.   Maybe you should be capitulating.</p>
<p>And one last note.  Perhaps this is another Argentina &#8220;rob the retirement fund scam&#8221; just using another method to transfer the wealth.</p>
<p>Niko Santorini<br />
Greece</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.rickackerman.com/2009/04/why-only-fools-think-bottom-is-in/comment-page-1/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 05:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickackerman.com/?p=5115#comment-792</guid>
		<description>The big money came in on the Mar low 666. They didnt buy the usual suspects but loaded up on single digit PE&#039;s and single digit prices across all sectors. They have already had their big move after they grabbed cheap prices. Now or soon it will be time to unload on the dumb money. How quick that happens will be determined by the response to earnings.  The stalking horse for each sector has been getting their expectations lowered to soften the blow. This might buy them more time and a few hundred points. Then we will go down again. The drop this time might not be a fall off the cliff but a slow bleed.   
The ten million people that are on unemployment are not feeding mutual funds. That industry is dead. Sure all 401ks used to pump money into them every month. Now the public actulally knows that wall streets song and is nothing but bulls**t.  ETFs will eventually become the choice for retirement contributions.  The repeal of mark to market will put lipstick on the pigs, the return of the uptick rule, and bans on naked selling will slow the process down. But we will go down again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big money came in on the Mar low 666. They didnt buy the usual suspects but loaded up on single digit PE&#8217;s and single digit prices across all sectors. They have already had their big move after they grabbed cheap prices. Now or soon it will be time to unload on the dumb money. How quick that happens will be determined by the response to earnings.  The stalking horse for each sector has been getting their expectations lowered to soften the blow. This might buy them more time and a few hundred points. Then we will go down again. The drop this time might not be a fall off the cliff but a slow bleed.<br />
The ten million people that are on unemployment are not feeding mutual funds. That industry is dead. Sure all 401ks used to pump money into them every month. Now the public actulally knows that wall streets song and is nothing but bulls**t.  ETFs will eventually become the choice for retirement contributions.  The repeal of mark to market will put lipstick on the pigs, the return of the uptick rule, and bans on naked selling will slow the process down. But we will go down again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mario</title>
		<link>http://www.rickackerman.com/2009/04/why-only-fools-think-bottom-is-in/comment-page-1/#comment-791</link>
		<dc:creator>mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 04:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickackerman.com/?p=5115#comment-791</guid>
		<description>that IS the point....these days I notice that so many expected correlations and ratios are out of whack and its driving lots of investors and traders nuts....but Rick&#039;s article is pointing that there has NEVER been a bottom without a nasty capitulation...I&#039;ll give you a quick example with Dryships DRYS which I bought at 5.22, I watched it go down to 2.80s when the market bottomed around 670, then it recently bounced up with this rally to 6 and now its around 5.....WHY should i buy it at 5 again now? Same for Royal Caribbean RCL....up around 10 down to 6 back up to 9 now, GE at 20s!!....then down to 7 back up to 11ish now.....these are massive percentage declines that are hard to make up....I&#039;m only saying keep a portion of your powder dry for the capitulation....to pick DRYS @ 3 and GE @ 7 and RCL @ 5 and PFE @ 12 and PVR @ 9 and C @ $1 again :)  .....and get rich alot faster when they double and triple in the two months afterward... to ignore this possibility is not so wise either....Cheers, M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that IS the point&#8230;.these days I notice that so many expected correlations and ratios are out of whack and its driving lots of investors and traders nuts&#8230;.but Rick&#8217;s article is pointing that there has NEVER been a bottom without a nasty capitulation&#8230;I&#8217;ll give you a quick example with Dryships DRYS which I bought at 5.22, I watched it go down to 2.80s when the market bottomed around 670, then it recently bounced up with this rally to 6 and now its around 5&#8230;..WHY should i buy it at 5 again now? Same for Royal Caribbean RCL&#8230;.up around 10 down to 6 back up to 9 now, GE at 20s!!&#8230;.then down to 7 back up to 11ish now&#8230;..these are massive percentage declines that are hard to make up&#8230;.I&#8217;m only saying keep a portion of your powder dry for the capitulation&#8230;.to pick DRYS @ 3 and GE @ 7 and RCL @ 5 and PFE @ 12 and PVR @ 9 and C @ $1 again <img src='http://www.rickackerman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   &#8230;..and get rich alot faster when they double and triple in the two months afterward&#8230; to ignore this possibility is not so wise either&#8230;.Cheers, M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cwd</title>
		<link>http://www.rickackerman.com/2009/04/why-only-fools-think-bottom-is-in/comment-page-1/#comment-790</link>
		<dc:creator>cwd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 04:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickackerman.com/?p=5115#comment-790</guid>
		<description>How long are you going to wait? You are right, the market does fluctuate. It is now at the level it was in 1997 and if you have been adding at regular  intervals like in a 401K, you have less money than you put in. Can you wait another 12 years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How long are you going to wait? You are right, the market does fluctuate. It is now at the level it was in 1997 and if you have been adding at regular  intervals like in a 401K, you have less money than you put in. Can you wait another 12 years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

