It takes some getting used to whenever the phrase “flight to quality” pops up in print or on the business shows these days. Supposedly, that is what has been driving Treasury Bond prices sharply higher since June 11, when futures contracts on 30-Year U.S. Treasurys bottomed at 111^21. That equates to a yield of about 4.84 percent. Yesterday the same contract settled at 117^11, so eager were buyers, evidently, to lock in 30-year rates of around 4.37 percent. (For the record, we are predicting that yields on the long bond will fall a further 17 basis points, to 4.20 percent, before this lemming-driven fad feints toward sanity.)

We’re tempted to say the buyers of these bonds are out of their minds, since, in the newsletter world, if not in the mainstream press, Treasury paper is intrinsically worth no more than toilet paper. This isn’t conjecture, mind you, it’s just simple math. Pile up enough trillions in debts, and eventually repayment of those debts becomes impossible. That’s where the U.S. is now, mathematically speaking, even if the institutional biggies who live off the yield curve would prefer to act as though things will somehow turn out better for us all.
They, Too, Can Read
Save $200 on
The Hidden Pivot Webinar.
Offer extended through Friday (9/3).
Actually, in their private lives, T-bond buyers probably have faced the facts. After all, they read the same headlines that you and I read, and they know, as you and I know, that all is not well with the financial system. They know, for instance, that 40 banks have failed so far this year, and that the pace of these failures shows no sign of abating. They also know that so-called quantitative easing has been a failure, since long-dated Treasurys, even when buoyed by a flight to alleged quality, are in real terms close to inflicting a fatal burden on long-term borrowers. As our colleague Levente Mady at Institutional Advisors notes, real rates are at close to 6 percent when you factor in a CPI decline from -0.7 to -1.3% year-over-year through May.
Deflation at Work
That is deflation perniciously at work, and we shudder to think how much worse it could get if the dollar strengthens; for that would make dollars even harder to come by, and to repay. Homeowners with negative equity are feeling the pressure of this acutely, even if institutional investors, in their professional lives, are not. The latter clearly do not base their investment decisions on such mundane realities. Rather, they are driven by the need to be invested in assets with maturities all along the yield curve. And they are insulated from responsibility simply because it is Treasury paper they are buying, for the love of Mike, not the junk bonds of some corporate zombie. This rationale is highly unlikely to produce losing results over the short term. However, given the speed at which financial crack-ups have been occurring globally, it is clear that we no longer have the luxury of seeing the long-term as something our children will have to deal with. For those who have been snatching up Treasury Bonds, the long-term may not even stretch past 2010.
(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)








{ 9 comments }
So you see deflation along with rising intrest rates… That does not make sense to me but maybe I am missing something.
&&&&
With public and private debtors in the worst shape ever, any increase in the real burden of debt IS deflation. RA
Hello Mr Ackerman,
I always like it when you talk about deflation. Well… not REALLY, because the subject is always depressing, but you know what I mean! Anyway, I’ve come around to the “deflationist” school of thought, have been studying it for the past few months, but only truly began to understand it maybe a week ago. No particular reason, the tumblers just clicked!
But people talk about inflation, rising prices to the moon, “green shoots” and all that jazz. I just don’t see how they can, though. I mean, haven’t bubbles taught them anything yet? True, money supply has shot up but the trouble is is that it isn’t circulating. At the same time, credit is drying up like a (merely) damp sponge in the Death Valley high-noon Sun.
And yet I can see a relative meaning in the inflationist camp. I mean, what is the difference between a million dollar loaf of bread that you can’t afford vs ,say, a ten dollar loaf of bread that you can’t afford? Nothing, of course…. Neither is affordable!
Am I right?
&&&&&&
You are very right, Ben. Thank you for sparing me the effort of having to explain for the umpteenth time what you have observed, understood and explained so well yourself. RA
I suppose you noticed Karl Denninger point out in ‘The Market Ticker’ two weeks ago Bernanke’s pulling of liquidity just before the market turned down. Seems karl also rang the bell on Sept 24 last year when Bernanke deliberately pulled 100 billion then. Seems they gotta get money into treasuries by draining the stockmarket. It’s staggering that the manipulation is so blatant and calculated.
rising % rates and deflation is the order of the day, I think it’s called stageflation; where things you don’t need go down in price and things you have to have go up in price, and we have to have credit so % rates go up, the dollar goes down, we are the new banana republice!
As John Law showed you can only crap so much paper before it becomes trash.
&&&&&
Stagflation is what is NOT happening — nor can it, not even remotely so, since the forces in opposition are vastly too powerful to allow for a stasis. Deflation is winning by every metric I can think of — except at the grocery store. RA
When I read (not from you and your follower’s) huge amount of negative thoughts on gold and silver, that combined with an historical positive bias going into the July 4 arena. I bought gold and silver stock’s yesterday for, at least a short term bounce into the first or second week of July.
I don’t get it either Rick? What your saying seems contradictory. How does rising rates = deflation again?
\&&&
Rising real interest rates increase the real burden of debt. That is the very crux of deflation as far as I’m concerned, and you should tune out all of the bozos who use money supply as their inflation/deflation metric if you want to be un-confused. RA
Rick, when you say “Rising real interest rates increase the real burden of debt” do you equate “real interest rates” with the published yields minus CPI? What is your metric for quantifying real interest rates?
Also, are you proposing that this effect (which you call deflationary) impacts the holders of existing fix rate debt, or only new borrowers or variable rate borrowers?
An interesting dynamic I am studying is the prospect that many underwater homeowners are going to invest all their cash equivalent assets into riskier investments in an attempt to create enough capital to pay cash for an equivalent house (at lower current market prices) and then they will simply walk away from their existing loan. I’m curious to see what effect this will have on the deflation/inflation argument as more home purchases will stabilize the housing market data while increasing loan defaults will de-stabilize the banks even further. Would such data be interpreted as good or bad for the economy?
Aloha All
The economy is contracting at depression rates (-12% the last three quarters) and the long bond made it up to 5.066% this month. The real cost of borrowing is the 17% spread.
When Volcker was Fed Chair, remember the Misery Index? Add 10.8% unemployment to the inflation rate and you had a new President.
The 1980 inflation rate hit 14.6%, T Bills 15.6% and the long bond made it up to 14% briefly. The real cost of borrowing was negative. Then RR reduced the tax rate from 70% plus a 2% Vietnam War surcharge to 28% and GDP peaked in 1984 with over 8% growth.
A different world, long ago and far away. That was inflation.
http://www.buyandhold.com/bh/en/education/history/2000/paul_volker2.html
We may be closer to 1929 to 1934 in USA or Russia from 1992 – 1999.
(The more government the longer the refractory period.)
Wait until transfer payments stop or taxes are hiked:
Defaults, depression, then desperation.
The scramble for cash, food, housing and survival.
This is deflation.
Regards from a Kamaina…
I don’t have time to argue but all I really care about is what are the consequences for gold holdings in deflationary times?
Comments on this entry are closed.