Gold Waiting to Pounce on Summit’s Failures

With the G-20 meeting in Pittsburgh just two weeks off, we didn’t expect gold’s widely anticipated push past $1000 to be a piece of cake. Indeed, Bernanke & Friends are probably throwing everything they’ve got at gold right now to suppress its price. And for all we know, Uncle Sam has loaned every ingot (supposedly) in Fort Knox to carry-traders at J.P. Morgan and Goldman Sachs. The ability of these well-connected bullion bankers to borrow more or less unlimited quantities of physical gold is for them even better than a license to print money, since money itself is most surely not what it used to be. The feather merchants have repaid the government’s kindness by sitting on gold futures prices. This price-fixing operation is all the more impressive because its perpetrators have managed so far to peg bullion to $1000 even though the U.S. dollar has broken some key technical supports in recent days.

Pittsburgh-small

This is quite a trick, but there are some powerful reasons why the bankers are not likely to prevail in the end. For one, strong and persistent global demand for gold has been feeding on mounting fears concerning the dollar’s integrity. Those fears are not about to abate any time soon. Consider who is in G-20 besides the U.S.:  South Korea, United Kingdom, Russia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Mexico, Italy, Brazil, China, Turkey, Vietnam, Iran, Indonesia, India, Egypt, Philippines, Nigeria, Pakistan and Bangladesh.  How many of those countries do you think are comfortable sitting on a growing pile of U.S. dollar reserves? The answer, even including such Friends of Bernanke as Japan and Britain is: zero.

 Bernanke’s Cronies

Bernanke may be working behind-the scenes with a couple of G-20 cronies to keep a lid on gold, but all of them (except Great Britain, perhaps, which has shown a penchant for selling official stocks of gold at horrendous prices) would probably leap at the chance to buy a significant quantity of gold were it available. Moreover, it is safe to assume that some of the nations who will be represented in Pittsburgh – most notably Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC) — are among gold’s most gung-ho sovereign buyers.

Under the circumstances, we should view bullion’s nervous price action as a case of irresistible-force-meets-immovable-object. Something will have to give, but unless you expect G-20 to recess with a consensus favoring a return to hard money, don’t bet that it will be gold.   

(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • ben September 11, 2009, 9:03 am
  • Jeff September 10, 2009, 6:47 pm

    GATA love it!

  • Arnold September 10, 2009, 5:47 pm

    Occdude has a good point. A credit-based monetary system prevents severe inflation, as you wrote in today’s message. Yet, the USD is breaking down? If a future credit destruction will cancel Bernanke’s increased USD computer created supply, what happens to the DXY? Does gold have a role in this drama?

  • Rich September 10, 2009, 5:18 pm

    Here’s a Hummel thought:
    Take a look at the uncanny relationship of total consumer credit to the market economy since 1943:
    http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g19/hist/cc_hist_sa.html
    Check out 1943, 1974, 1980, 1990-92, and 2008-9 with 11 out of the last 12 months down. If Hummel is right and credit supply is more important than currency supply to price increases, we have the largest and longest contraction in total consumer credit since before 1943. Hardly inflationary of gold.
    ie Fed, Congress, Courts, 0 and Treasury pushing on a proverbial string like they did from 1929 on.
    Surplus trade partners holding dollars might want to hold them a little longer, as they realize the dollar is still trading above 70.70 March 2008 lows.
    The only support gold and silver have now that everyone and their cousin already jumped in, is central bank buying, kid you not, in a last ditch attempt to reinflate:
    http://news.goldseek.com/GATA/1252392300.php
    Big4COT heavily short, zero cotango, and China wants to default on derivatives which dwarf actual world economies. Hardy inflationary.
    Gold above 1033 might get our attention briefly…

    ps: Defaults on Fractional Reserve Gold Banking are also deflationary on gold and everything else trading off it.

    pps: Gold did not jump 69% from $20.67 an ounce to $35 an ounce until January 1934, some 10 months after FDR issued Emergency Executive Orders for a Banking Holiday just after being sworn in March of 1933, over 4 years after the 1929 market peak. Today that could be 2011.
    D Congress and D Courts rubberstamped FDR’s violation of the Constitution.
    0 frequently compares himself to FDR and Lincoln, who bypassed the Central Bank to issue Greenbacks, leading to the post Civil War inflation and depression.
    In April 1933 FDR made citizen gold ownership illegal with another Executive Order against Hoarding later passed by Congress. FDR confiscated gold. A year later FDR confiscated silver. Only when the confiscation was complete nine months later did FDR devalue the dollar versus gold and silver. Gold mining stocks, after declining with the 1929 crash, discounted the bank holiday and bullion confiscations and peaked in 1935.
    The devaluation was 10 months after the banking holiday, 24 months after the December 1932 stock market bottom, 52 months after the market peak. We are well behind those timemarks now. History never repeats exactly the same way, but people who do not learn from it are doomed to repeat it. Some people are smart enough to not hold gold in a bank safety deposit box or leave a trail.
    Are they putting their golden carts before the donkeys in office?
    The interesting question is whether 0 will soon hand US sovereignty over to the IMF, UN or World Bank with a formal declaration of insolvency and the creation of a new Amero SDR Commodity Currency just in time for it to devalue with continuing deflationary defaults of $700 T in derivatives. Are 0 advisers likely to wait until after the final bottom, which may be after the 2012 election?
    What is of concern is the Fed just released a puff piece on the Bank Holiday of 1933. Some people just love depriving people of their Constitutional rights:
    http://www.newyorkfed.org/newsevents/news/research/2009/rp090615.html
    Regards*Rich

  • Senor Cuidado September 10, 2009, 4:32 pm

    “…unless you believe in UFOs and Elvis sightings, you cant believe that the powers that be care enough about gold to employ all their dark powers to suppress it.” [Senor: Would you kindly furnish the source of this quote, since I don’t want it attributed to me. Thanks. RA]

    Let me cut through your fog of status-seeking nonsense and attempt to explain economic reality: Job #1 for a central banker is management of the gold price. Volcker and Greenspan have said as much publicly. It should be obvious that a fiat currency system only increases the pressure on central bankers to “manage” gold.

    As for the rest of your gold commentary, let’s review for the sake of lurkers:

    Economic depression = high default risk.

    High default risk = strong gold price.

    Inflationistas can’t handle the concept, but this is consistent with deflation.

    Gold is pure money. Gold has never been dumped in the past during extreme economic crises and it will not be dumped en masse for dollars in the coming epic phase of this deflationary crisis…or in any other future deflationary crisis on planet earth.

    USD obsession is important because USD is the global reserve currency and USD instability = systemic risk = strong gold. But remember gold is rising against all currencies. Gold is rising against Bretton Woods II.

    People may want to listen to the long Prechter interview at Puplava’s site. Great stuff. Prechter capitulates on gold and admits his huge error. Good for him. He has had a lot of great insight, but like Denninger, the gold issue needs to be gotten right. Getting gold wrong points to a failure to understand core economics. At this point Denninger should be grateful he didn’t start blogging until 2007, and therefore didn’t have the opportunity to have been dead wrong in public on gold since 2001.

    Don’t get me wrong, I respect Denninger. But at this point it should be obvious that a dismissive attitude toward gold is very much about status-seeking and mocking the anti-government types, the so-called conspiracy theorists. Or worse, it’s about toeing the Fed line.

    CNBC goons like Dennis Gartman have probably been hoarding gold for years but are too embarrassed to admit it to their friends. Because they wouldn’t want to be mistaken for a gun-toting redneck…even for a millisecond. In Manhattan that seems to be a more brutal hit to your status than losing all your cash to a swindler like Madoff.

    The future is deflation and higher gold. It’s been happening since 2006 and it won’t stop until at least 2012 when the wave of exotic mortgages finally passes.

    And remember, as Sinclair has forecast, gold will not return to pre-crisis price levels. After the 70’s and early 80’s volatility triggered by Nixon closing the gold window…gold only eventually returned to the $250 area. Gold never fell back to double digits. Let alone $35. That is the real shame for people like Prechter and Denninger. The advice of the past serveral years should have been: ACCUMULATE GOLD. Because we are never going back to the old three-digit prices, just like we never went back to the old two-digit prices.

  • Occdude September 10, 2009, 3:11 am

    I do not believe that now IAM the one making the deflationary argument around here, what an incredible twist of fate.

    Et tu Rick? Now you’re a dollar bear and a gold bug? Bad things this way come. When everyone panics and starts selling everything up to and especially the kitchen sink, the one thing they will be selling it for is DOLLARS.

    Inflection points. Gold at a 1000, Dow close to 10000 after a huge run up, Fall coming, despite extreme bearish sentiment the bucks still hangin in there. China static, commodities static everything waiting for the next move. Question is, up or down. Down and the dollar rises and gold falls despite having a chart to die for, with technicals that would stop an elephant in its tracks (and a key point) the absolute OBVIOUSNESS of the trade, I say it’s got sucker written all it.

    Sometimes you have to ignore the technicals and go with your gut. Goldman Sachs has people who study charts too and I venture to say that they know what we know and have the power to make money off that dynamic. Gold was really unimpressive on its technical follow up after it broke a thousand and unless you believe in UFOs and Elvis sightings, you cant believe that the powers that be care enough about gold to employ all their dark powers to suppress it. Somethings askew, things aren’t measuring up. Macro economics are crap and yet things still rise precariously. This has the mother of all bear traps written all over it and someone has designs on your money.

    Take off the tin foil caps folks. Things are what they are and gold is not headed for the stratosphere YET! Too many debts to pay, too many prices to correct and too much credit that needs to be yanked (not exactly in that order). Now I do give gold props for its ability to fall slower than everything else, but we got a long way to fall this Fall and “bad things do this way come”.

    &&&&&&

    I’m not looking for a moon shot in gold, Ron, just $1074 on the Comex December. And there is no change in my deflationist outlook. RA

  • FranSix September 10, 2009, 2:15 am

    Has anyone heard of the book: ‘The Rope Spinners Conspiracy?’

    Its a fictional novel about how the Soviets came up with a plan to inseminate Wall St. banking with false mathematical equations which they were sure that the bankers would fall for.

    They would be selling you the rope they will be hang-gink themselves with.

  • Edward September 10, 2009, 12:51 am

    I’d be happy to sell Gordon Brown some gold for $5,000 an ounce. Silver can be had for $300 an oz.