<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geithner Unconvincing as Friend of Dollar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rickackerman.com/2009/11/geithner-unconvincing-as-friend-of-dollar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rickackerman.com/2009/11/geithner-unconvincing-as-friend-of-dollar/</link>
	<description>Trading Newsletter for Gold, Silver, Stocks and Mini Indexes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:42:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris T.</title>
		<link>http://www.rickackerman.com/2009/11/geithner-unconvincing-as-friend-of-dollar/comment-page-1/#comment-3126</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickackerman.com/?p=11676#comment-3126</guid>
		<description>Senior:

&quot;Also gold has failed to reach a new high in the other currencies. &quot;
Does that not demonstrate the dollars weakness then?

&quot;I say we’re ripe for a dollar rally very soon, no thanks to Timmy&quot;
Perhaps then, the gold high in other currencies will be set, like it was in EUR early this year? 

&quot;This is deflation and gold will be strong, but the moonshot talk is all inflationista delusion. $1100+ was a good strong stab higher.&quot;

If gold is not a commodity, whose value, measured in dollars, would decline during dollar-appreciation (=deflation), but rather if gold IS money (as it was for about 98+% of history), then should it not increase in value during money*appreciation (=deflation)?

Things above money on Exter&#039;s pyramid decline in deflation,  the lowest layers appreciate... 
Though I do not know where to lump the layer+1 above money (T-bills, bonds, etc), they should decline too, but will they?  Or will the sheep treat them, as so often before, as (better than) cash-equivalents, thus shuffling the layers?

My $0.10 (the copper-clad kind)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senior:</p>
<p>&#8220;Also gold has failed to reach a new high in the other currencies. &#8221;<br />
Does that not demonstrate the dollars weakness then?</p>
<p>&#8220;I say we’re ripe for a dollar rally very soon, no thanks to Timmy&#8221;<br />
Perhaps then, the gold high in other currencies will be set, like it was in EUR early this year? </p>
<p>&#8220;This is deflation and gold will be strong, but the moonshot talk is all inflationista delusion. $1100+ was a good strong stab higher.&#8221;</p>
<p>If gold is not a commodity, whose value, measured in dollars, would decline during dollar-appreciation (=deflation), but rather if gold IS money (as it was for about 98+% of history), then should it not increase in value during money*appreciation (=deflation)?</p>
<p>Things above money on Exter&#8217;s pyramid decline in deflation,  the lowest layers appreciate&#8230;<br />
Though I do not know where to lump the layer+1 above money (T-bills, bonds, etc), they should decline too, but will they?  Or will the sheep treat them, as so often before, as (better than) cash-equivalents, thus shuffling the layers?</p>
<p>My $0.10 (the copper-clad kind)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mthomas</title>
		<link>http://www.rickackerman.com/2009/11/geithner-unconvincing-as-friend-of-dollar/comment-page-1/#comment-3125</link>
		<dc:creator>mthomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickackerman.com/?p=11676#comment-3125</guid>
		<description>i personally don&#039;t think it&#039;s a good idea to be shorting gold here.  I can understand the rationale behind not being long given all the bullish news on gold now, but I still like gold over the long term.  and i read a good article on the gold price called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.goldalert.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gold Price Trades Near Record as Budget Deficit Explodes&lt;/a&gt; which discusses some comments made by Barrick Gold&#039;s ceo on gold mine supply and production, as well as the views on gold of a bunch of well known investors like Jim Rogers, John Paulson, and David Einhorn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i personally don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a good idea to be shorting gold here.  I can understand the rationale behind not being long given all the bullish news on gold now, but I still like gold over the long term.  and i read a good article on the gold price called <a href="http://www.goldalert.com/" rel="nofollow">Gold Price Trades Near Record as Budget Deficit Explodes</a> which discusses some comments made by Barrick Gold&#8217;s ceo on gold mine supply and production, as well as the views on gold of a bunch of well known investors like Jim Rogers, John Paulson, and David Einhorn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nitram</title>
		<link>http://www.rickackerman.com/2009/11/geithner-unconvincing-as-friend-of-dollar/comment-page-1/#comment-3112</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickackerman.com/?p=11676#comment-3112</guid>
		<description>nice Call on Gold Rick-------  The tumble followed a new high by the contract of $1,123.4 an ounce, hit during the session in electronic trade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice Call on Gold Rick&#8212;&#8212;-  The tumble followed a new high by the contract of $1,123.4 an ounce, hit during the session in electronic trade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.rickackerman.com/2009/11/geithner-unconvincing-as-friend-of-dollar/comment-page-1/#comment-3111</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickackerman.com/?p=11676#comment-3111</guid>
		<description>Hi Rick,
As the ole saying goes, &quot;Talk is Cheap&quot;. The dollar IMO however will go up short term to save face, on Mr. Obama&#039;s trip to China.  IMO buy gold next Tuesday (turnaround Tuesday).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rick,<br />
As the ole saying goes, &#8220;Talk is Cheap&#8221;. The dollar IMO however will go up short term to save face, on Mr. Obama&#8217;s trip to China.  IMO buy gold next Tuesday (turnaround Tuesday).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senor Cuidado</title>
		<link>http://www.rickackerman.com/2009/11/geithner-unconvincing-as-friend-of-dollar/comment-page-1/#comment-3110</link>
		<dc:creator>Senor Cuidado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickackerman.com/?p=11676#comment-3110</guid>
		<description>Rick, what do you think of the silver non-confirmation here? Also gold has failed to reach a new high in the other currencies. 

I say we&#039;re ripe for a dollar rally very soon, no thanks to Timmy. 

This is deflation and gold will be strong, but the moonshot talk is all inflationista delusion. $1100+ was a good strong stab higher. 

...rents are dropping all over the USA. This is not the 70&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick, what do you think of the silver non-confirmation here? Also gold has failed to reach a new high in the other currencies. </p>
<p>I say we&#8217;re ripe for a dollar rally very soon, no thanks to Timmy. </p>
<p>This is deflation and gold will be strong, but the moonshot talk is all inflationista delusion. $1100+ was a good strong stab higher. </p>
<p>&#8230;rents are dropping all over the USA. This is not the 70&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.rickackerman.com/2009/11/geithner-unconvincing-as-friend-of-dollar/comment-page-1/#comment-3109</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickackerman.com/?p=11676#comment-3109</guid>
		<description>Rick, you nailed this major story trashing the markets.
Timmaay in Singapore told them US borrowing coming down as TARP has a surplus. Surplus? Must be that new government accounting that doesn&#039;t mark things to market or anything real. Pay no attention to the markets behind the curtain.
Today, as Bridge Player Railroad Buff Billionaires Buffett and Gates hold their Summit at Columbia Business School, we have the largest October government deficits ever on receipts down -18%. CNBC experts are telling US why it doesn&#039;t matter and taxes aren&#039;t going higher except for the very rich. Right.
I&#039;ve got a railroad to sell them and it isn&#039;t Lionel...

http://www.cnbc.com/id/33883098 

http://www.cnbc.com/id/33888348/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick, you nailed this major story trashing the markets.<br />
Timmaay in Singapore told them US borrowing coming down as TARP has a surplus. Surplus? Must be that new government accounting that doesn&#8217;t mark things to market or anything real. Pay no attention to the markets behind the curtain.<br />
Today, as Bridge Player Railroad Buff Billionaires Buffett and Gates hold their Summit at Columbia Business School, we have the largest October government deficits ever on receipts down -18%. CNBC experts are telling US why it doesn&#8217;t matter and taxes aren&#8217;t going higher except for the very rich. Right.<br />
I&#8217;ve got a railroad to sell them and it isn&#8217;t Lionel&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/33883098" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnbc.com/id/33883098</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/33888348/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnbc.com/id/33888348/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senor Cuidado</title>
		<link>http://www.rickackerman.com/2009/11/geithner-unconvincing-as-friend-of-dollar/comment-page-1/#comment-3108</link>
		<dc:creator>Senor Cuidado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickackerman.com/?p=11676#comment-3108</guid>
		<description>The bad news out of EuroLand has just begun. 4% GDP contraction in Spain? The EU is a mess.

Meanwhile UK and especially Japan are in basket case debt load territory. 

The dollar crash is against gold. No way can the dollar crash against these other garbage currencies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bad news out of EuroLand has just begun. 4% GDP contraction in Spain? The EU is a mess.</p>
<p>Meanwhile UK and especially Japan are in basket case debt load territory. </p>
<p>The dollar crash is against gold. No way can the dollar crash against these other garbage currencies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris T.</title>
		<link>http://www.rickackerman.com/2009/11/geithner-unconvincing-as-friend-of-dollar/comment-page-1/#comment-3107</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickackerman.com/?p=11676#comment-3107</guid>
		<description>Cramer bullish on gold?
now there is a contrarian indicator.

Rich:
&quot;That there are so many gold vehicles should be warning enough that even with a parabolic spike, gold may have come a long way&quot;
If only 20% of the demand for gold that was met by these vehicles, and thus had not been diverted away from the real thing, where would the price be now?
That is ultimately the bottom line when it comes to the allegations of many of these vehicles being naked, though they claim not to be.

This is also true for unallocated storage.
If the contango in a future reflects (in part) the storage and other costs (and gold is not in backwardation yet) being borne now by the writer of the future (long), then how can allocated storage be completely free, unless those allocated accounts actually are naked, as alleged?

IMHO, even if the demand for gold were to collapse by 50%, but all remaining went into the physical only, then we would not be at 900-1100.

Like with JPM and the restitution they paid for storage fees on silver which they never bought nor stored some years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cramer bullish on gold?<br />
now there is a contrarian indicator.</p>
<p>Rich:<br />
&#8220;That there are so many gold vehicles should be warning enough that even with a parabolic spike, gold may have come a long way&#8221;<br />
If only 20% of the demand for gold that was met by these vehicles, and thus had not been diverted away from the real thing, where would the price be now?<br />
That is ultimately the bottom line when it comes to the allegations of many of these vehicles being naked, though they claim not to be.</p>
<p>This is also true for unallocated storage.<br />
If the contango in a future reflects (in part) the storage and other costs (and gold is not in backwardation yet) being borne now by the writer of the future (long), then how can allocated storage be completely free, unless those allocated accounts actually are naked, as alleged?</p>
<p>IMHO, even if the demand for gold were to collapse by 50%, but all remaining went into the physical only, then we would not be at 900-1100.</p>
<p>Like with JPM and the restitution they paid for storage fees on silver which they never bought nor stored some years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.rickackerman.com/2009/11/geithner-unconvincing-as-friend-of-dollar/comment-page-1/#comment-3102</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickackerman.com/?p=11676#comment-3102</guid>
		<description>Aloha Jeff, Mark et al
Right. Of the two, we prefer ETF GLL above 10.13 with Trailing Buy Stop:
http://www.moneyandmarkets.com/why-etns-are-riskier-than-they-look-29589
The Leveraged ETNs and ETFs leave a lot to be desired, with time-wasting derivatives (options) and geometric compounding, one reason for FAS and FAZ reverse splits and changing terms. http://www.direxionfunds.com/index.html
But they do not have margin calls like the derivatives WEB likes. If we can borrow with conservative margin to short their opposites (UBG, IAU, DGP, DGL, UGC, HBD.To, BLL.L, BULP.L, LBU.L, PHAU.L, PHGP,L, GBS.L), then time and men&#039;s mistakes may be more on our side. That there are so many gold vehicles should be warning enough that even with a parabolic spike, gold may have come a long way from 252 in 1999. Rick&#039;s made a lot of good money here being long gold...
Regards*Rich

****

Submitted on 2009/11/12 at 4:02pm

Leveraged geometric compounding to zero….


*******

Submitted on 2009/11/12 at 4:36pm

Time to fade Crazy Cramer?
How he learned to stop worrying and love gold:
He says strong gold and a weak dollar are good for business (if not lenders, savings, budget and trade deficits, buying power and the middle class – so long Lou Dobbs).
He says high gold prices mean deflation’s not a threat (or high real interest rates and defaults either?)
He says higher gold prices mean earnings and price recovery (like CIT?)
He insists gold and oil do not compete with equities (or leveraged ETFs?)
And the coup de grace? GDXJ, which he says is small gold miners (over $500 M is small? – wonder what Chuck thinks)
He concludes gold is good. Two legs bad, four legs good, two legs better anyone?
Straight out of Animal Farm and 1984 Doublespeak.
If gold is good, where is WEB?
Out buying BNI coal for Christmas.
Meanwhile, BHOs about to have a Jobs Summit after new claims dropped four weeks. As if government can add anything to the GDP…

http://www.cnbc.com/id/33829650


************

Submitted on 2009/11/12 at 4:48pm
$1122 Peak Gold?


ABX short-squeeze capitulation buying back their million ounce hedge book for billions with equity dilution may be one key to understanding what’s going on with gold and Big Banks. ABX bought back maybe just in time for a powerful price peak, and now insist gold won’t go below $900. (It can.) Do we have the makings of another deflationary Aubrey McClendon CHK financial suicide with ABX?

http://www.cnbc.com/id/33875450


*******
Submitted on 2009/11/12 at 8:11pm

$TYX just broke out to new 3 month highs with the 30 year auction
http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?s=%24tyx
Look out below for the giant sucking sound of debt default implosion…
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aloha Jeff, Mark et al<br />
Right. Of the two, we prefer ETF GLL above 10.13 with Trailing Buy Stop:<br />
<a href="http://www.moneyandmarkets.com/why-etns-are-riskier-than-they-look-29589" rel="nofollow">http://www.moneyandmarkets.com/why-etns-are-riskier-than-they-look-29589</a><br />
The Leveraged ETNs and ETFs leave a lot to be desired, with time-wasting derivatives (options) and geometric compounding, one reason for FAS and FAZ reverse splits and changing terms. <a href="http://www.direxionfunds.com/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.direxionfunds.com/index.html</a><br />
But they do not have margin calls like the derivatives WEB likes. If we can borrow with conservative margin to short their opposites (UBG, IAU, DGP, DGL, UGC, HBD.To, BLL.L, BULP.L, LBU.L, PHAU.L, PHGP,L, GBS.L), then time and men&#8217;s mistakes may be more on our side. That there are so many gold vehicles should be warning enough that even with a parabolic spike, gold may have come a long way from 252 in 1999. Rick&#8217;s made a lot of good money here being long gold&#8230;<br />
Regards*Rich</p>
<p>****</p>
<p>Submitted on 2009/11/12 at 4:02pm</p>
<p>Leveraged geometric compounding to zero….</p>
<p>*******</p>
<p>Submitted on 2009/11/12 at 4:36pm</p>
<p>Time to fade Crazy Cramer?<br />
How he learned to stop worrying and love gold:<br />
He says strong gold and a weak dollar are good for business (if not lenders, savings, budget and trade deficits, buying power and the middle class – so long Lou Dobbs).<br />
He says high gold prices mean deflation’s not a threat (or high real interest rates and defaults either?)<br />
He says higher gold prices mean earnings and price recovery (like CIT?)<br />
He insists gold and oil do not compete with equities (or leveraged ETFs?)<br />
And the coup de grace? GDXJ, which he says is small gold miners (over $500 M is small? – wonder what Chuck thinks)<br />
He concludes gold is good. Two legs bad, four legs good, two legs better anyone?<br />
Straight out of Animal Farm and 1984 Doublespeak.<br />
If gold is good, where is WEB?<br />
Out buying BNI coal for Christmas.<br />
Meanwhile, BHOs about to have a Jobs Summit after new claims dropped four weeks. As if government can add anything to the GDP…</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/33829650" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnbc.com/id/33829650</a></p>
<p>************</p>
<p>Submitted on 2009/11/12 at 4:48pm<br />
$1122 Peak Gold?</p>
<p>ABX short-squeeze capitulation buying back their million ounce hedge book for billions with equity dilution may be one key to understanding what’s going on with gold and Big Banks. ABX bought back maybe just in time for a powerful price peak, and now insist gold won’t go below $900. (It can.) Do we have the makings of another deflationary Aubrey McClendon CHK financial suicide with ABX?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/33875450" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnbc.com/id/33875450</a></p>
<p>*******<br />
Submitted on 2009/11/12 at 8:11pm</p>
<p>$TYX just broke out to new 3 month highs with the 30 year auction<br />
<a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?s=%24tyx" rel="nofollow">http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?s=%24tyx</a><br />
Look out below for the giant sucking sound of debt default implosion…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senor Cuidado</title>
		<link>http://www.rickackerman.com/2009/11/geithner-unconvincing-as-friend-of-dollar/comment-page-1/#comment-3098</link>
		<dc:creator>Senor Cuidado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickackerman.com/?p=11676#comment-3098</guid>
		<description>Man, a lot of yuppies were laid off, let go, and otherwise downsized in the past couple of months. Rosenberg&#039;s oncoming 13% means at least 25% U-6. Pretty soon this vortex is going to start sucking down &quot;people who matter&quot; and assorted &quot;beautiful people&quot;. 

That AP story about the 10 states going deep into insolvency should be a wake up for all of the sleepwalkers still out there. This situation is getting more ominous by the day.

Mostly darkly amusing thing I read today: Bailing out California is the economic equivalent of bailing out France.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, a lot of yuppies were laid off, let go, and otherwise downsized in the past couple of months. Rosenberg&#8217;s oncoming 13% means at least 25% U-6. Pretty soon this vortex is going to start sucking down &#8220;people who matter&#8221; and assorted &#8220;beautiful people&#8221;. </p>
<p>That AP story about the 10 states going deep into insolvency should be a wake up for all of the sleepwalkers still out there. This situation is getting more ominous by the day.</p>
<p>Mostly darkly amusing thing I read today: Bailing out California is the economic equivalent of bailing out France.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

