Jitters Over Greece Quelled by…Lunch?

The stock market’s miraculous recovery in the final two hours of Friday’s session could have made one lose sight of why stocks were down in the first place. Come to think of it, why were they down?  Investors began the the day supposedly concerned about whether Greece might have to hock the Acropolis to buy time from creditors.  Amidst all the nail-biting, U.S. shares fell hard in the early going. But when the selling began to dry up around mid-afternoon, DaBoyz squeezed shorts with the kind of viciousness we haven’t seen since the running of the bears in the weeks before Thanksgiving. And Greece? As the weekend drew to a close, analysts were debating whether the country’s problems held any implications at all for U.S. stocks, much less dire implications. “Should the woes of a country with fewer people than metropolitan Los Angeles really roil the massive U.S. markets,” asked the Wall Street Journal, evidently having fogotten how just one company, AIG, nearly took down the whole world, financially speaking.

Darth

We don’t know whether the Journal’s bold insouciance portends a mood change at the opening bell on Monday morning, but the Darth Vader-types who supposedly move the markets will have their hands full trying to reverse a selloff that is about to enter its third week. The Dow Industrials have fallen about 900 points during that time, or a little more than eight percent, bringing them down to 9835 at Friday’s lows.  However, our forecast calls for still more slippage to at least 9628 before it will be safe for bulls to come out of their bomb shelters. We’ll want to load up the truck for a robust short-squeeze rally if the target is reached, but in the meantime we wouldn’t touch stocks other than to short them. Since we never want to chisel any forecast in stone, we’ll use a 10433 benchmark to warn if bulls return to life with sufficient vigor to push the market to new recovery highs.

(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • Rick A. Fan February 9, 2010, 9:04 pm

    President Obama, Bernanke, and Jim Cramer are in a MOVIE about hedge funds called “Stock Shock.” Even though the movie mostly focuses on Sirius XM stock being naked-short-sold to near bankruptcy (5 cents/share), I liked it because it exposes the dark side of Wall Street and reveals some of their secrets. DVD is everywhere but cheaper at http://www.stockshockmovie.com

  • Rich February 8, 2010, 8:32 pm

    And here it is right on schedule as the sobering market reflects fiscal reality,
    This headline on CNBC:
    Will Baby Boomers Bankrupt Social Security?
    http://www.cnbc.com/id/34941334
    As if two generations of Congress, Courts and Administrations borrowing
    and spending FICA on the budget and replacing it with non-marketable IOUs did not already do that?
    The article has the temerity to quote experts that Social Security is sound
    until 2017 or 2037, when it can only pay 75% of benefits.
    Then it even suggests 78 M Baby Boomers are stealing from GenX because they paid less in and gave themselves COLA and free drugs.
    Actually, COLA was repeatedly defined down and delayed by the Greenspan Commission (THAT Greenspan Fed Chair who did not see 2008 coming), so 2010 COLA is definitely not 1980 COLA. See Shadowstats for the differences.
    If Social Security were actuarially sound like a privately regulated business or like Chile, there would be no problem. But Reid Pelosi and Obama so far refused to fix Social Security except with a backdoor tax scheme and spending cut called Healthcare. Medicare is in far worse shape, upside down in a few years. But the CNBC article does n0t dare go there. The article concludes with the message that taxes will have to be raised and spending cut, something Congress, Courts and Presidents avoided for generations.
    A weak economy is hardly the time to do that. As Harry Dent and others suggested, the real economic destroyer is demographics with upside down entitlements and destroyed retirement savings. (The average person has less than $10,000 saved for retirement.)
    Just in case Baby Boomers do not get the message, Tom (The Greatest Generation) Brokaw will have a special report called Boomer$ out on March 4. Get the KY Jelly or vaseline ready…

  • TahoeBilly February 8, 2010, 8:32 pm

    It seems like this Tea Party is just a standard Republican resurgence. Have they stood up against the unconstitutional undeclared war in Iraq, or just the same old song? It just feels like the Ron Paul movement is getting overrun by the Fox news crowd wearing different hats.
    Ug!

  • Chris T. February 8, 2010, 6:26 pm

    “…SEC wants to ban shorts…”

    That’ll be the day. There go most of the streets profits. Never happen, BUT it would be the PROPER thing to do.

    Short selling is fraud, just as fractional reserve banking is fraud.
    Not just naked shorting, all shorting is fraud.
    Why?

    Because while the shares are on loan, the original owner (whose account the loaning institution took them from) is still the owner (in fact, he is probably not even aware the shares were loaned out) and he would exercise full ownership rights if any voting these shares were coming up.

    But the new owner (the one who bought the borrowed shares from the short seller) would also deem himself an unencumbered owner, and would exercise his voting rights if that came up during the open-short period.

    Thus two “owners” of the same shares with “full” ownership rights, that is fraud.
    The egregious overvoting of shares, where more are voted than outstanding (which has been documented) is due not just to the naked shorting, but to the “legitimate” kind as well.

    Shorting could be made legitimate, IF the borrowed-from account would give up its ownership rights (ie, unable to sell or vote the shares) and become creditor only for the duration of the open short, so that only the new buyer enjoys those rights until closed.
    But, who would be so stupid, especially as currently the “creditor” is not even compensated one dime?

  • Rich February 8, 2010, 4:28 pm

    Apparently the G7 emergency weekend meeting in Canada’s Arctic Inqaluit failed to come up with any solutions for the STUPID PIIGs, so Ambrose Evans Pritchards sees
    the third Lehman style Tsunami in 18 months. And China declared cold war on US because of arms sales to Taiwan. Usually fade headlines, but we may have a lot further in deflationary default implosions to go…

  • bill February 8, 2010, 2:22 pm

    When will the legal eagles send the banker gangsters to :THE BIG HOUSE”. ??

  • Dusty February 8, 2010, 7:56 am

    ::Geithner claims there will be no double dip and USA will never lose its top credit rating, Palin hits a populist home run at the Nashville Tea Party putting DC on notice, the SEC wants to ban shorts, GS investigated for manipulating AIG and sentiment as bullish and complacent as it was four weeks ago…::

    With all of the BS coming out of DC lately, by both sides, I often wonder if it was 2 feet of manure that fell on them over the weekend. Now that’s a sight I’d like to see on FoxNews. LOL

    Dusty

  • Rich February 8, 2010, 6:57 am

    Speaking of defaults, John Thain back from MER failure to head CIT,
    Geithner claims there will be no double dip and USA will never lose its top credit rating, Palin hits a populist home run at the Nashville Tea Party putting DC on notice, the SEC wants to ban shorts, GS investigated for manipulating AIG and sentiment as bullish and complacent as it was four weeks ago…
    Interesting times to be short with Big4 using trailing stops…