Another View: Canada in Pretty Good Shape

Yesterday we aired a bearish prospectus for Canada written by “Cameroni,” a regular contributor to the Rick’s Picks forum. He expects a real estate bust and sees the Canadian economy ultimately getting dragged into the same deep bog that has trapped the U.S., on whom the nation’s export economy depends heavily.  Below is a response from “Bobtor” arguing that Canada is in far better shape than the U.S. to weather hard times, for a number of reasons. For one, the retail climate remains much healthier, with few signs of the blight that has shuttered tens of thousands stores, restaurants, malls  and prime commercial properties across America. Bobtor also thinks Canada’s political and business sectors are unpolluted by the kind of lies and corruption that have become endemic in the U.S. Here’s Bobtor’s post to the forum which can be accessed by clicking here:

Thank you, Martin, for reinforcing some of the key points of my comments that seem to be lost on Cameroni. I too was not saying that Canada is in great economic shape, but that by comparison we are doing much better than the US, for the reasons you have mentioned and for many other. And Cameroni, I am not a real estate professional any more than I am a stock professional; I merely invest in both real estate and in stocks. I just like to know the rules of the games I play, hence my knowledge of real estate financing.

Real estate prices will not crash in Canada in the manner or to the extent they have in the U.S. We do not have rental stock in our cities to accommodate the people coming in. The economics of cost, and rents, and rent controls in many Canadian cities have precluded the recent building of new rental stock. By recent, I mean the past 15-20 years! Most of what young people are buying today in Toronto are tiny shoe-boxes by the standards of their parents: two bedrooms and a den in 800 square feet or less. More like the European version of a “home” than the American-based suburban dream.

Real estate prices will go down, and real estate prices will go up. They always have and always will. Like the stock market, if you can come close to identifying a trough, buy and have the staying power and capital to ride out the bad times, you will do spectacularly well, much the same as if you bought stocks at last year’s March crash [lows].

Beat the Sale Tax

The real estate markets in British Columbia and Ontario are also being driven currently by the Harmonized Sales Tax which comes into effect July 1. This will add (in the case of Ontario) 8% tax to the price of a new home (as well as similar-percentage tax on legal and real estate fees). This is driving the market for closings before June 30. Put down your newspaper and walk into the sales offices of the various condos for sale in Toronto (not the suburbs, but the city). You will be amazed to find lots of “middle aged” buyers, empty nesters, single women of all ages, some seniors, and, yes, lots of young people too, buying units.

The point I was trying to make, which you turned into a tirade against the Canadian economy and its dependence on its largest trade partner, the US, is that, quite simply, the conditions that were the root causes of the U.S. real estate crash do not and cannot exist in Canada. Of course it was designed to protect the banks — it’s the banks’ money that is put up! But it also protects the consumers against their own greed and foolishness, unlike the U.S., where those traits were encouraged. You cannot buy a house up here that you cannot currently afford. That is not to say you will be able to afford it a couple of years from now if you lose your job. In the U.S., people were being given loans that they could not service on the ruse that the price of their house would only go up, they could refinance and pay down the loan.

‘Shocking’ NYC Vacancies

I walked from Madison and 25th to Broadway and 78th in New York a short while back. That long walk takes in some of the most prestigious and expensive commercial real estate in the world. I was shocked. Huge corner-commercial spaces that commanded seven-figure rents were vacant — and tons of them. Go to the suburbs and there are malls and strip plazas that are literally vacant. Get off the oceanfront strips in Florida and such and there are almost whole blocks of homes up for sale or repossessed or foreclosed. That is not happening up here. There is in fact too little supply on the resale housing market in cities like Toronto right now, driving up prices.

Separate and distinct from residential real estate issues, there is a commercial real estate crisis brewing in the U.S. in the billions of dollars. All of those vacant properties I mentioned have mortgages but no income. Apart from the lack of capital available to finance them, the owners no longer have tenants and the required income to pay the monthly costs, so further, severe losses are imminent. Clever and well funded “bottom fishers” are salivating and digging into their war chests for long-term holds. The Reichmann’s with Olympia York did it in NYC in the 70’s and ended up collecting more in annual rents a few years later than they paid for the properties. Sure, they subsequently blew most of it in the U.K., but that’s a different story. Brookfield is making the same move today in cities like Washington. One of Boston’s commercial skyscrapers sold for a small percentage of its construction cost. We seem to be coming back to a situation where money talks…and b.s. walks.

A Land of Plenty

So do not misunderstand, Cameroni. I do not think in any way that the tail wags the dog and that Canada’s economy has become autonomous of that of the U.S. But we do have the good fortune of having lots of petroleum, which the world continues to want; as well as gold and silver and uranium and diamonds and many other commodities that remain required, regardless of the ebb and flow of quantities. Full employment in this country is deemed to be somewhere in the 5% to 6 % range in large part (in my view) due to our overly generous welfare state. The parking lots of our malls are full and it is nowhere near Christmas. Lineups at the border are hours long again for cross-border shopping participants going and coming. We went from losing 20 members at our yacht club by the 2008-2009 season to gaining the same number for the 2010-2011 season. And their boats are a lot bigger than the older folks who were compelled to give it up and sell.

Of course, trade matters, Cameroni. And of course, the universal facets of economic function apply to Canada. I consulted for a company for over 30 years that moved to the U.S. last year and took 120 jobs with it. I consulted for another multinational for 16 years that closed its Toronto manufacturing plant three years ago and moved it to Singapore, even though the cost of shipping the goods back to North America is greater than the labor savings. That put another 300 out of work. We are not immune to economic downswings. But please understand that in Canada we simply do not have the fundamental systemic banking corruption, ranging from absurdly “liberal” (i.e., irresponsible) government-sanctioned bank-reserve ratios, to outright systemically fraudulent (by Canadian standards) lending practices that were endemic in the U.S. Sure, people here may end up at times, and always at the wrong time, having a home worth less than their mortgage. But a fundamental difference is that that cannot be the case from the very date of acquisition, as routinely occurred in the U.S.

I am glad my comments have been able to stir up such spirited discussion!

And so are we, Bobtor. Thank you for weighing in with some very interesting observations and counter-arguments.

(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • Bruce March 27, 2010, 7:16 am

    Max Power,
    When I say Bond Prices are irrelevant, I am not belittling their importance. I am saying that the price is manipulated, and therefore has no relevance. Against other currencies on the dollar index the American Dollar is trading fairly high. However, aginst gold it has lost value. I believe this is what I said. At the same time Gold is undervalued. They are doing the same thing governments have always done in recessions,—printing money. The difference is that all Western Countries are doing it simultaneously. This allows them to kick the can down the road for a considerable length of time. It might have worked if there was another bubble they could inflate like housing, but there isn’t one. All of this money is going into the stock market and that neither creates jobs or increases the tax base. In other words, the end is near!

  • Max Power March 25, 2010, 9:51 am

    Bruce…..

    To say “The Bond Markets are irrelevant” is totally incorrect. Bond markets set interest rates for everything, and interest rates are a major factor on where economies go and where governments for that matter. Please research the role bond markets play in financial markets.

    You also said:

    “However, we are not seeing the American dollar drop despite their massive money printing.” Huh??? Say what??? Then why is gold at $1,100 per ounce and oil at $80 per barrel?…

  • Bruce March 24, 2010, 5:23 pm

    Max Power
    The Bond Markets are irrelevant. Western governments simply print money and buy up their own bonds to control the prices. The thing to watch is how much money is being printed and by who. The moment government prints money inflation has occurred. If they double their monetary base they devalue their currency by 50 percent. Normally, this results in wild increases in the Consumer Price Index, and shows up as a drastic drop of the value of the currency on the dollar index measured against other currencies. However, we are not seeing the American dollar drop despite their massive money printing. This is because all western governments are printing as well, and they are doing it in a coordinated way to maintain the value of all currencies on the index. They use the printed cash to buy up the bond market and control that too. This also keeps the cost of imports at a reasonable level, helping to control the CPI. They can also use some of that printed money to nationalize businesses and transfer wealth. They also manipulate the price of gold and silver down because gold and silver are the canaries in the mine. While the masses argue about inflation versus deflation, they do not realize that they have already lost half the value of their currency and investments. If gold were selling today for $1600.00 / ounce it would only break even. The increase in the Dow since last March does not cover the inflation of the currency. The only governments that are not devaluing are the one who are not printing massive quantities of currency. This is why China pegged their currency to the dollar. They are protecting their foreign reserves and not allowing the Americans to inflate their way out of their debt to the Chinese. It has nothing to do with trade. The countries that can’t print money like Greece and Portugal will be the first to go under. The whole thing hinges on Management of Perceptions. Once people realize what is happening they will quickly move their money into investments that have intrinsic value (commodities, gold, silver). People will demand delivery of their gold and silver. I leave the rest to your imagination.

  • Max Power March 24, 2010, 9:00 am

    If you want something significant to watch, then forget watching Canada or any other country for that matter and instead watch the world bond market. It will be a major determining factor as to what happens in the world. Its currently valued at about $83 trillion USD. For over 30 years now it has been growing at about 11%-12% per year. Even with no new bonds added, it will probably grow in the area of $4 trillion this year just due to interest alone. Now ask yourself, where is all this money going to come from to buy these bonds or redeem them when they mature? The answer is, many of them will probably default – even in a healthy economy. But before that happens, many holders will seek to divest themselves of their bonds before they default, and will only be able to do so by lowering their value by raising interest rates. And everyone knows what high interest rates will do to the world economy.

  • Jeff Lane March 24, 2010, 1:47 am

    You guys who are informed with Vancouver R.E. Who are the most leveraged developers in the greater Vancouver area ?…I would love to short them…..

  • cameroni March 24, 2010, 12:37 am

    Hi BobTor,

    Thanks for your thoughtful and lengthy response to my letter of Monday. It was reasoned and polite quite in contrast to my own somewhat rabid response to your earlier remarks and it is fair to say I owe you an apology for sounding personal. I wish I could share your more optimistic view of the future but find I am unable to given the many issues I raised previously and the many more that other contributors at Rick’s Pick’s have added. I am steadfast in my convictions and predictions. I think what is getting under my skin too is the idea that so many Canadians behave as though we are somehow bulletproof up here when it comes to the US recession. We are witnessing an exchange rate time-bomb as well and we need to open the debate to it yesterday if we will have any chance of scraping through.

    There are significant concerns for our country once our dollar goes above parity and we need the discussion out in the open instead of living in a pretend world where outside events cannot reach us. The biggest worry of course is the speed with which the dollar has shot up recently and I am very concerned that a big shock lies ahead if Government and business cannot adapt quickly as the US dollar continues it’s long decline. I know many people who have been stunned by this rapid change in the business environment and some who already do not know if they can adjust.

    We do have quite a bit of catch-up to do on the productivity side up here in Canada though and with new Federal Government incentives in the form of reduced (eliminated?) taxation on imported manufacturing equipment there are still some reasons to be a little optimistic. There is room for improvements and plenty of fat that can still be cut. We must adapt quickly though and hope our dollar does not rise too much further.

    My price outlook for Real Estate in the major centers in Canada going forward is dismal to outright depressing though. It is because of the swift changes to our trade markets that has brought this on. And have Canadians forgotten how it is possible for us to finance our rich social programs and health care? Don’t they realize how many of the jobs in this country depend on healthy trade nor how that affects housing prices? Perhaps many of them never knew or just don’t care. My wife and I incidentally own a free-title Vancouver property but I have been completely unable to convince her it is time to get out and realize the gains. She doesn’t give a damn about the money unfortunately. It is the home that counts and I think that is the case with millions of other Canadians. Price up or price down, a home is still the place you want to lay your head and sleep at night. By my reckoning we could buy two for one in a few years by renting and sitting on the capital. Oh well. I do feel very badly for those strung out on huge monthly mortgage payments though, especially some of the younger folk who have never seen a recession in their lives nor experienced a lengthy period of unemployment. They are in for a world of pain if the US economy does not pick up and soon. Too bad.

    Anyway, all the best to you Bob and I hope you are getting a chuckle out of this discussion. You sure stirred the pot and got the blood boiling in my veins last Friday and so your timing was perfect for firing up a worthy debate.

    Cam

  • David R. March 23, 2010, 11:28 pm

    I tend to agree with Cameroni. We are all part of the world economy and cannot avoid this catastrophe. All the debt has to be eliminated one way or another.

    I was living in Calgary in the early eighties and continuously heard, while real estate prices were tanking in the US and rest of Canada, that “It won’t happen here; we’ve got oil!”
    Believe it or not I heard that same line (from a 25yr old) just last year. I rolled my eyes and clued him in. I don’t think I made much of an impression on him though.

    Real estate is bubbling all round the world. We have Saudis, Germans, Brits etc buying real estate all round the world including Canada.
    If they need to they’ll dump it all!

  • Rich March 23, 2010, 11:14 pm

    Salt Lake City’s top the 2002 Olympics, Athens 2004, Turin’s 2006, China’s 2008.
    Will 2010 be Vancouver’s?
    RBC has liabilities 17 times their equity, $619 M in assets including mortgages in FL, $4.8 T derivatives, $4.3 T of them OTC, and was looking to hire a Derivatives Administrator.
    To paraphrase Red Skeleton’s touching Clown Art re Big4:
    Just do ’em; can’t explain ’em.
    Tried to some time ago with a post here suggesting the more leveraged the economy, the more deflationary the defaults and stronger the currency, not a popular view. (Swiss debt to GDP ratio over 400%.) Most people just extrapolate two generations of inflation because they were not adults in the 30s deflation.
    When biggies like Paulson and Soros try to lure institutional/retail lemmings into their positions, they are usually looking for the other side of the trade to get out.
    Learned not to ignore the Big4, whoever they are.
    In America the rule has been one home = 1.4 jobs. With 22% real pre-1994 definition unemployment, that can’t be bullish for RE. Right now the largest resort on HI faces auction foreclosure at a third of its last sale price. You might think MS, UBS, WFC and their OPM client owners would know better, having seen this drill with Japan Pebble Beach, Rockefeller Center and VenRock before.
    If real healthy sustainable profits are driving this market, it can go much higher. If corporate profits are derived from laying people off, corporate welfare, zero interest rates and government transfer payments such as 0Care and Crap Trade, the “recovery” may just be about over. At some point, 100% Layoffs and 100% Taxes don’t quite cut it with 78% velocity imploding the economy, Henry Hazlitt notwithstanding…

  • Ledbedder March 23, 2010, 11:09 pm

    This is a tad off topic, but I want to tell you what happened on St Patrick’s Day in Johnstown, PA. A country concert of: Leann Rimes, Josh Turner and James Otto which between them have sold MILLIONS of cd’s couldn’t even sell out an approximate (for concerts) 4,500-5,000 tickets area. You still think we’re not in a recession??!!

  • Jeff Lane March 23, 2010, 9:23 pm

    One statement jumped out from bobtor’s remarks. The 8% tax going into effect july 1st. This will have the same effect as U.S. $8K tax credit. Once it’s over, it’s over

  • Max Power March 23, 2010, 9:01 pm

    Stick with Cameroni’s commentary. If anything, Cameroni understated the problems of Canada. And there are several major problems looming. One is the massive amount of new debt taken on by Canadians, much of it going into over priced real estate. Much of the money was borrowed on short term loans (3 to 5 years) from CMHC. And its inevitable that all those folks will be refinancing at much higher rates. Many will go into foreclosure glutting out the market. That, plus higher interest rates, will collapse the real estate bubble in Canada. As the net wealth of many people shrink due to a collapsing real estate market, so will their spending. The next is the massive deficits taken on by the provinces, especially Ontario with its $25 billion dollar deficit last year – about 10 times worse than California’s on a per capita basis. When these deficits end, the substantial drop-off in spending will result in many job losses. Third, Canada has only managed to survive economically by running huge trade surpluses with the US for about 30 years or more now. Only recently has Canada begun to run a trade deficit. In time, this will take its toll on the economy as more and more jobs are lost in Canada. So, no, the future prospects of Canada are not very good. Enjoy things while they last, because they will without a doubt end. The only questions now are When? How severe” and How long?

  • Christ T. March 23, 2010, 8:27 pm

    Rich:

    One can understand the Franc, Kiwi, even Yen in your list, but what is the argument for the Pound? In what conceivable measure is the UK better than the US or anywhere else? Greek budget deficits, an economy wholly dependent on the financial sector, a housing mortgage market which went even wilder than stateside, a crappy healthcare system, maybe soon another pocket war (Falklands ?), etc. The only amazing thing is how long they have been able to drag out the substance of the corpse since the collapse of their empire.

    As to the BIG 4 shorting Gold, Silver:
    What’s new?
    That is not saying anything about what they THINK the “market” is going to be doing, but only about what they ARE MANIPULATING the market into doing or what they are attempting..
    They have been doing this for decades now, but it is getting ever less effective.
    Perhaps if someone like John Paulson were caught shorting here, that might be an indication, but JPM, GS, etc?

  • Bruce March 23, 2010, 6:57 pm

    BOBTOR—YOUR COMMENTS REQUIRE A RESPONSE

    Real estate prices will not crash in Canada in the manner or to the extent they have in the U.S. We do not have rental stock in our cities to accommodate the people coming in. The economics of cost, and rents, and rent controls in many Canadian cities have precluded the recent building of new rental stock. By recent, I mean the past 15-20 years!

    ====Rent controls—-why would anyone buy when they can live in a rent-controlled unit, especially with prices in the seven to 10 times earnings levels?====

    Most of what young people are buying today in Toronto are tiny shoe-boxes by the standards of their parents: two bedrooms and a den in 800 square feet or less. More like the European version of a “home” than the American-based suburban dream.

    ====I guess this means that Canadians have been getting even less for their dollars than the Americans, and yet you don’t consider this a bubble?====

    Real estate prices will go down, and real estate prices will go up. They always have and always will. Like the stock market, if you can come close to identifying a trough, buy and have the staying power and capital to ride out the bad times, you will do spectacularly well, much the same as if you bought stocks at last year’s March crash [lows].

    ====I guess those idiot Americans don’t have the good sense to go out and snap up all of those bargains available right now.====

    Beat the Sales Tax
    The real estate markets in British Columbia and Ontario are also being driven currently by the Harmonized Sales Tax which comes into effect July 1. This will add (in the case of Ontario) 8% tax to the price of a new home (as well as similar-percentage tax on legal and real estate fees). This is driving the market for closings before June 30. Put down your newspaper and walk into the sales offices of the various condos for sale in Toronto (not the suburbs, but the city).

    ====More government pressure to buy now—-but it’s not a bubble?====

    The point I was trying to make, which you turned into a tirade against the Canadian economy and its dependence on its largest trade partner, the US, is that, quite simply, the conditions that were the root causes of the U.S. real estate crash do not and cannot exist in Canada.

    ====I think that when prices are 7 to ten times incomes—-when down payments are only 5 percent—when the manufacturing segment of the economy is down big time—when a resource driven country is no longer selling much to its biggest customer or anyone else—when the world is awash in debt and sovereign defaults are popping up all over—then you are looking at the biggest real estate bubble of all.====

    Of course it was designed to protect the banks — it’s the banks’ money that is put up!

    ====The banks have almost no skin in this game—-the government is on the hook for everything. All of these mortgages have been securitized.====

    But it also protects the consumers against their own greed and foolishness, unlike the U.S., where those traits were encouraged. You cannot buy a house up here that you cannot currently afford.

    ====I realize that like most Canadians, you consider yourself “special”. I am also a Canadian. However, that does not make me blind to the truth. We are a part of this world and we will not escape the tough times. People buy house in Canada to profit, not just to live in. Greed is alive and well in the Great White North. Yes, the buyer barely qualifies today, and when interest rates rise, he will be done like toast!====

    That is not to say you will be able to afford it a couple of years from now if you lose your job.

    ====You conveniently leave out rising interest rates as a cause for default.====

    In the U.S., people were being given loans that they could not service on the ruse that the price of their house would only go up, they could refinance and pay down the loan.Get off the oceanfront strips in Florida and such and there are almost whole blocks of homes up for sale or repossessed or foreclosed. That is not happening up here. There is in fact too little supply on the resale housing market in cities like Toronto right now, driving up prices.

    ====Put interest rates up 3 percentage points and throw in another three per cent unemployment, and then tell me about the severe shortage of supply. I will show you a sea of for sale signs (as was the case thirty years ago). This not only can happen, but is inevitable.====

    We went from losing 20 members at our yacht club by the 2008-2009 season to gaining the same number for the 2010-2011 season. And their boats are a lot bigger than the older folks who were compelled to give it up and sell.

    ====This is the kind of information you base your economic analysis on?====

    We are not immune to economic downswings.

    ====You call this a downswing?====

    But please understand that in Canada we simply do not have the fundamental systemic banking corruption, ranging from absurdly “liberal” (i.e., irresponsible) government-sanctioned bank-reserve ratios, to outright systemically fraudulent (by Canadian standards) lending practices that were endemic in the U.S.

    ====The problem is that regardless of our banking rules, we are exposed to everything that was happening in the states. (just ask the Icelanders). We also do not know how much exposure our financial institutions have, and neither they nor the government are likely to tell us.====

    Sure, people here may end up at times, and always at the wrong time, having a home worth less than their mortgage.

    ====If this is a bubble, then almost all purchases in the last seven years will wind up underwater.====

    But a fundamental difference is that that cannot be the case from the very date of acquisition, as routinely occurred in the U.S.

    ====Anyone who overpays for a home will be underwater the moment the bubble pops.====

  • FranSix March 23, 2010, 6:57 pm

    Finally, Canada can compare itself to these various nations:

    http://www.koreaherald.co.kr/NEWKHSITE/data/html_dir/2010/03/23/201003230028.asp

  • Rick Ackerman March 23, 2010, 5:42 pm

    Posted by Rick in behalf of Brian Ripley:

    It is not often that you air a Canadian Real Estate discussion.

    I have been blogging about Canadian Real Estate for a couple of years now and I keep charts up to date of monthly prices in the 6 biggest Canadian cities going back to the 90’s.

    Take a look at this 6 city comparison: http://chpc.biz/Major_Cities_Chart.htm and ask yourself if you have ever seen charts like that before … well you have …Nasdaq, Japan, Gold etal … if Vancouver is not a bubble – which is what our Federal Government keeps telling us (although I don’t think they get out west very often) – then my advice to the “in Canada it’s different” crowd is to come on over to Vancouver and lay your money down and buy as much real estate as you want because the more our market get pushed to exaggerated heights the few buyers there will be left for a commodity that Demographia says is the most unaffordable in their study of 272 international cities: http://chpc.biz/Mortgage_Affordability.htm#Affordability … and when the turn comes, the market will be overpopulated with sellers… not buyers.

    For those of us who have lived in real estate markets when the trend in price is headed down… the pain of not being able to get an offer can be unbearable, and families who were all smiles on the way up get crushed by the emotional turmoil that gets unleashed by regret.

  • Orbit March 23, 2010, 5:37 pm

    Canadian’s and America’s economies are interconnected. But, the current global financial crisis has shaken Canada out of its cozy trade relationship with America.
    America now has “Buy American” provisions which are protectionist policies. So, what is Canada going to do?

    The provisions have pushed Canada to aggressively go after business opportunities in continents other than North America. The Far East is one of them:
    See: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/a-new-era-for-canada-rises-in-the-east/article1392258/

    Prime Minister Stephen Harper is a confirmed contentialist. Continentalist welcomes foreign ownership of Canadian companies.
    See: http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-03-03/harper-pledges-to-lead-stimulus-exit-open-canada-to-investors.html
    This helps to bring in more foreign investments to Canada.

    Canada is positioning itself to weather a looming financial storm coming from America and to make a sustainable economic recovery after it has been hit by such a storm.

    Also, the crisis has put Canada in the spotlight in front of other nations. Other nations have discovered that among the G7 countries, Canada has the soundest banking system, and they see Canada as a safe haven for their investments.
    See: http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=2572549
    and see: http://www.tradingmarkets.com/news/stock-alert/cm_cm_europe-s-sovereign-debt-crisis-could-drive-more-investors-to-safe-harbour-canada-cibc-world-marke-770761.html
    Canada is like an overlooked dark horse that suddenly got noticed for its potential to do well in the long run.

    Here’s a cheeky Cancuck’s view on O Canada to think about:
    http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2010/02/03/f-vp-pittis-economy-canada.html#ixzz0hL6RfLpW

  • Rich March 23, 2010, 5:28 pm

    Aloha All
    No man is an island, entire of itself…any economy’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in markets; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.
    The master planners have a simple goal, to subjugate all of mankind with usury tribute, from heads of state and masters of industry on down to middle class mortgages to meek and humble wage slaves borrowing paycheck to paycheck to survive.
    The MPs may not hesitate to destroy freedoms and free markets to accomplish their goal. The first shall be last, and the last shall be first.
    No nation is immune, as several here today poignantly illustrated.
    America, Brazil, Canada, China and the Middle East may go where Britain, India, Japan, Germany and Mexico were.
    Meanwhile, position builders Big4 are now shorting the Dollar, Euro, Loonie, Peso and Ruble on strength; Buying the Franc, Kiwi, Pound and Yen on weakness.
    Big4 are shorting the EEM, EAFE and NDX on strength; buying the RUT and SPX on weakness; Big4 are shorting Gold, Silver, GSCI and Long Treasury Paper.
    Let’s enjoy this Grand deflation as it becomes Great Depression, while all people learn to save themselves from usury by saving for a rainy day again…
    Regards*Rich

  • EmAn March 23, 2010, 4:55 pm

    Living in vancouver, the epicenter of real estate foolishness (IMO), I observe that the high end properties are not moving (anything over 1m) and the low end stuff (anything under 500K) is moving like hotcakes. Drive through west van (most expensive neighbourhood in Canada) and there are For Sale signs everywhere. From last fall until a few months ago my realtor friend tells me that there were occassional bidding wars for less costly properties. I’m not sure what this all means for Canada, but when one sector of society is out of sync with the others sumting is wong.

    An aside on this, one big difference between Canadian mortgages and US is that we cannot simply walk away from an underwater property without futher liability like they seem to be able in the US. Most, if not all residential mortgages here carry a personal liability. So if the house is underwater, so is the homeowner. As a consequence, when applying for a mortgage, the banks make pretty sure you are solvent, have worked in the same place for some time (3 years is typical) and they want to see your tax returns for the last few years to make sure you make what you claim. No question this has kept most sheep out of the wolves den.

    Other difference is that we pay mortgage interest with after tax dollars. I do think the american idea of allowing deductability to be an excellent idea, especially for young families. However, I do not agree with the obsession the sheep in North America have with home ownership and the government’s willingness to promote this. The americans are worse than the Canadians on this front. LARGE and fancy houses are way more common down south than up here.

    I’m a manufacturer that has over half my business in the US and no question the slow down is having effect, so I agree with Cameroni that the dog wags the tail and I agree with Bobtor on the sound loan practices up this way. If the US recovers (even modestly) over the next year or two our firm, and Canada for the most part will have dodged a bullet. If not, we will be sucked into the void. The more I reflect on this the culprit is low intrerest rates as all sheep think in terms of the immediate, monthly payments. Significantly raise interest rates now, disaster. Greenspan got psyched out by Y2K, dropped rates way too much and for too long and that was the start of the end.

  • Ron Hannah March 23, 2010, 3:02 pm

    Rather than wade into the Canada/USA economic debate I would suggest we all begin to take a “world view” and try to discern the massive changes taking place in politics, finances, personal freedoms, etc., and the tremendous implications they are going to have on both countries. All countries have now been infected with the “Gutenberg Flu” and the pandemic effects will leave no one unscathed.

    For those who are willing to take their heads out of their “local sand box”, it should be obvious that “the powers to be” are controlling the strings and have got all the puppets (governments) moving in perfect stride to the pipers tune and all the stars are lining up according to some “master plan”.

    Trust me, you are not a part of the plan. You will have to think for yourself and plan for yourself and your families. If you don’t have a long term investment plan that includes precious metals, energy, food and water……good luck! Seek out sage advise from the untraditional financial advisers who are savvy to the signs of the times and can help guide you through the turbulent waters.

    Noah Newarc

  • FranSix March 23, 2010, 1:10 pm

    Panglossian.

  • Benjamin March 23, 2010, 7:28 am

    The premise here is that because Canada is not like the U.S., things won’t be so bad.
    That’s what was said about Japan, 20 years ago, and more recently Europe, what with the PIIGS (PIIIGS, if you include Iceland).

    Six or seven countries were not like us, and look where they are now. So I have to side with Cameroni. The 85% dependency on the U.S. just doesn’t make Canada seem unlike us.

    But I will say this for Canadians: I never met one that I didn’t like! 🙂

  • Paul Broughton March 23, 2010, 6:29 am

    I just read the encouraging report on the Canadian economy as posted today. As a fellow Canadian hailing from Calgary, I should remind that author that he obviously never visited Calgary during the 1980’s–when unemployment for us
    oil men was 50%, oil crashed to near $10, and housing prices declined 40%. They were the days of “dollar sales,” when many, many houses went for $1 if you assumed the mortgage. I am not asserting that this will happen again in THIS cycle, but it has happened in the past, and the structural pins of the Canadian economy as as rotten as the US, but just out of phase right now.

  • TahoeBilly March 23, 2010, 6:21 am

    So Canada, OZ, New Zealand and China will stand tall as the rest of us go into default? Okay.
    I am ready to move anytime!

  • Pablo March 23, 2010, 5:39 am

    Sorry, I’m afraid I have to agree with Cameroni on this one; current real estate market price in Canada is based on artificial and historically low interest rates. Most current buyers will not qualify once mortgage rates increase starting this year. How does that spell higher prices?

  • Christ T. March 23, 2010, 5:32 am

    Well one can only hope that this is the more right perspective than yesterdays, for, why else has one been accumulating those nice 1988 1oz silver roudns with the Ottawa put on them (strike CAD20)?
    But if Cameroni’s vision prevails, at least there is that tr.oz…

    And beating a now 24h dead horse:

    bobtor gave a reply to Eck’s inlfationary view, which Rick praised as well.
    BUT, that post mentioned as something real the “velocity of money”.
    Other than to say what utter bunk that concept is, one which will always discredit any argument it appears in, no matter how well crafted otherwise,
    I refer anyone to Henry Hazlit’s short and brilliant refutation of the whole concept velocity.
    Simply put, the charlatan Fischer’s “V” is not an independent variable of “T”, so that this whole equation is meaningless tripe.

    Finally, if indeed we are in a deflation, then oh boy for unemployment.
    For, wages (virtually always, can’t think of when not) lag -flation.
    During inflation, wages lag behind, so that real wages decline, and people get poorer.
    Shades of 1970-2009 anyone, where we truly are the first generation +1/2 doing worse than the parents. [in Slaughterhouse 5, Vonnegut describes Billy Pilgrim — in early 1960s– as “he is rich as Croesus, he nets 60k a year”. That puts loss of value in perspective, who would call a 250-300k net salary rich as Croesus today?]?

    And in deflation, wages also lag behind, causing real wages to rise. Because the wage-earners do not perceive their rising real wage, and are unwilling to give up anything, the only option for employers is to lay-off. That is the true basis for rising unemployment, as for example seen 1929-1932 — that deflationary period also led to a rise in real wages.
    We can measure this rise in real wealth at the normal guys’ level (a loss of course to Roosevelts paymasters then, and GBW + Barry O’s now) by increasing consumption of superior goods, charitable giving, etc.
    All that obtained in the very early thirties, giving was never higher before or since.

    If we observe those things today, then we know we have deflation.
    [and if FDR hadn’t tinkered for Wall Street that episode he took over would have ended like the one Harding let pass, of which no one today speaks….]