No Escaping Deflation’s Fatal Drag on Economy

Gotta love those inflationists!  We enjoy getting in their faces now and then because their nutty ideas, particularly that inflation is worth worrying about at the moment, can only confuse and misdirect people who are struggling to sort out the facts for themselves. Imagine waiting…and waiting…and waiting for inflation to “break out,” as the inflationists have been doing all too patiently since 1991.  That’s when the Fed put pedal to the metal to escape the drag of recession. At the time, virtually every monetarist in the land was predicting that a nasty inflationary spiral lay just ahead. All we got in the end was the kind of inflation that no one noticed, let alone complained about: asset inflation. Greenspan sealed his reputation as a bubblehead forever by finally noticing the bubble, although, to his further discredit, he was only explaining at the time that no one with a trained eye who was watching for a bubble could be faulted for having failed to see one.  

And now, finally, deflation is overpowering the myth of monetarism itself – the myth that the Fed can fine-tune economic cycles by creating “money” out of thin air.  Turns out it’s not so easy. In reality, the banking system’s feather merchants succeeded only in building, one nearly indiscernible layer at a time, a debt juggernaut that can no longer be controlled, let alone reversed. Deflation has suffocated the monetarists and is about to do in the Keynesians for good measure. It is also continuing to tighten its grip on just about anything that can be bought or sold.  We’ll say more about that in a moment, even after conceding up front that inflation eventually is going to be a huge concern, since an outright hyperinflation will be needed to wipe hundreds of trillions of dollars’ worth of unpayable debt from the world’s books.

Failure Begets Even More Debt

But don’t believe even for a minute that this will occur in time to save eighty million U.S. homeowners who are, or eventually will, be underwater on their mortgages. That’s the kind of inflation the Guvvamint has been trying to promote since the housing market began to implode in 2007.  The effort has clearly failed – not that the inflationists would have noticed – and the trillions of dollars we’ve blown in the process now sits on the ledger as yet more debt that can and will come back to haunt us.

As for the chances of a hyperinflation in the real estate market, you need only consider who would come out on the losing end to understand why it’s not going to happen. Lenders, savers and the supposed Masters of the Universe would perish overnight. And that’s why we continually chide the inflationists, admonishing them to wake us when we can sell our home for a quadrillion dollars.  Imagine going to your mortgage lender with a suitcase stuffed with confetti money. Fat chance. More likely is that mortgages will ultimately be rewritten to resemble leases.  That way the lenders will not have to evict half of America from their homes, even if this means the banks and their shareholders will be forced to settle for 20 or 30 cents on the dollar.

You Must Read This!

All of which brings us to Ron Hera’s pellucid essay at GoldSeek, “Into the Abyss: The Cycle of Debt Deflation”.  If you’ve got time to read just one essay on the economy in 2010, make it this one.  He sets the tone with a quote from Ludwig von Mises:  “There is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion.  The alternative is only whether the crisis should come sooner as the result of a voluntary abandonment of further credit expansion or later as a final and total catastrophe of the currency involved.”  We especially recommend Hera’s think-piece to those who believe that just because their monthly expenses have been rising, we are actually in an inflationary spiral.  We’ve referred to this in the past as “grocery store inflation,” but Hera puts it in proper perspective, ticking off a long list of black-hole deflators including high unemployment, shrinking real incomes, rising personal bankruptcies, soaring mortgage defaults and delinquencies, and a growing wave of credit card defaults. There are also enough hard statistics to bury the astounding lie, repeated often by the news media and politicians, that the economy is recovering. Most recently, for example, we were told that consumer credit had turned the corner and begun to expand. In fact, as Hera notes, consumers have stepped up borrowing to pay off old borrowing. Scary.

This essay is an eye-opener and a must-read.  We can’t recall reading anything on the topic of inflation/deflation that has gotten so many things right.

(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • mudturtle June 4, 2010, 6:04 am

    OK Rick, what about what is happening to the few slobs like me that saw this coming for a decade. I have no debt and no debt in my business. There is no reward for doing the right thing.
    If I was a bankster or FED maggot I would have gotten any number of bailouts for doing the wrong thing.
    Why should anyone in the middle class that is in my position do anything other than go into maximum protection of what I have saved?
    The utter incompetents of OSHA showed up in my place to investigate claims of unsafe conditions that was filed by a hopeless drunk woman that wanted to punish her son that was an employee. OSHA couldn’t come up with any violations other than that we allow “uncertified” folks to drive a forklift truck.
    The fine was 1250, but was marked down to 450 if paid immediately. How long do they stay with the small extortions? The next time will be for bigger loot. The deflation of tax receipts will only encourage this theft. Ignorance of their regulation is no excuse, so they will be back.

  • Chris T. June 4, 2010, 2:17 am

    Tend to be a fence sitter, as there are (taken in isolation) good arguments on both sides.
    Ultimately, though, who cares?
    The only thing that should really matter, is what will happen to the ultimate hard-money in both cases.

    Can a supposed commodity like gold, decouple from every others’ depreciation (relative to cash) or not?

    Here, Antal Fekete has provided some valuable insights., as does Mises’ quote above.
    There will not be a voluntary abandonment of anything by anyone, as the short term cost to those deciding such an approach is always greater than the long term benefit (accruing not to them).

    Thus, Mises ultimate collapse. Then he who has gold has more than most, and it did not “deflate”.

    The much-made analogy to the Reichsmark circa 1923 is wrong insofar as one really should focus on the Reichsmark at 12:10 AM on 5/9/1945.

    “an outright hyperinflation will be needed to wipe hundreds of trillions of dollars’ worth of unpayable debt from the world’s books.”

    They will simply be repaid in the promised coin, one made of pulp, fiber, and ink, or, more up-to-date, little digits in the electronic ether.

    Finally, if in a fiat system, debt=money, then with the formers disappearance, so should the latter.

  • Benjamin June 4, 2010, 12:00 am

    Now that was a read! I can’t say I understand everything in that article, but the picture is clear (and grim indeed).

    I also agree that, as Mr Ackerman said, that hyperinflation in real estate is not going to happen, though I never considered that lease-like terms would be drawn. I always figured they would have to just take a bath on most mortgages, and just let it be a lesson learned to not play with central banking.

  • Steve June 3, 2010, 11:24 pm

    Good,
    F.D.R. created the gold dollar territorially in 1933, I’m impressed Rich. Dollars, and Eagles, (silver specie Money) and F.D.R. criminality. The Gold Bullion Act of 1985 was supposed to return Lawful Money to the People according to the Senate Record. Reagan was shot, the title changed, and here we are. Call the Mint – specie (silver specie) Legal Tender is still minted for the several States, but; where are they, those several States ?

  • Max Power June 3, 2010, 11:21 pm

    “those who fervently believe, as nearly all economists do, that Government has all the answers”

    Unfortunately, governments do not have all the answers as evidenced by the mess this world is in, even though the answers many time are fairly apparent – answers that the big herd of clueless folks do not want to hear. Governments essentially reflect the big herd they are a part of. Look at Europe. The (big herd of) Germans do not want to bail out the Greeks. Okay, so German and French banks will take the hit then. Who winds up being the real loser here? Greece? Nope. The Germans. Worse yet, Greece would then be forced to leave the Euro and devalue its currency. Then how many BMWs will the Germans sell to the Greeks??

    And on an on…. this type of problem is being played out many times over throughout the world in one form or another…

    So who should solve this type of problem? Business? How does one get millions of businesses around the world to agree to a common good and solve such issues? Wasn’t it business that was behind the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act, which opened the door to the financial abuses that followed and the major problems being experienced now?

  • Max Power June 3, 2010, 10:50 pm

    “So where is all that M1 going?”

    This is a very good question that I have asked myself many times over. As to the answer, I do not know. I can only speculate without having access to the inside numbers. My guess is that a number of things have happened to it – from being socked away in a mattress to sitting in a savings account to just circulating in the system right now. But probably the biggest factor here is the reduced velocity of money. When folks are fearful, things slow down. Fewer purchases, fewer loans, fewer everything. Those that are unemployed are not spending and those that are employed have reduced their spending. And more spending is needed to get things moving again, not less. The only way to have 100% employment is to consume 100% of output. If folks save 5%, the economy shrinks by 5% unless government compensates by adding more money to the system. The trouble is, not only is the US government faced with having to compensate for the change in spending habits of its citizens, it is also being forced to compensate for others such as China, where folks save way too much.

  • Larry June 3, 2010, 7:57 pm

    DonF,
    American railroads used to crisscross everywhere, yes. Parallel lines on different companies. Still others from nowhere to nowhere.

    The tire and rubber companies did not buy efficient railroads up, the burgeoning highway system rendered the weak ones redundant, and they dwindled away. This was a trend that started after WWI and accelerated after WWII with the completion of the Interstate highway system and the emergence of passenger airlines.

    American railroads move more stuff today than they ever did, but move what they are best at: bulk things, on a rail network more closely resembling the Interstate highway system than the spiderweb that existed at the turn of the 20th Century.

  • Steve June 3, 2010, 7:42 pm

    Great article Rick. How is it that legislatively a ‘Dollar’ is 371 4/16ths grains of fine silver in a Coin struck by the mint as Legal Tender for the several States, and an Eagle is a gold Coin valued in Silver Dollars ie; 20 Dollar “Silver” value gold Coin ?

    I called the Federal Reserve and they refused to call their ‘notes’ Dollars, and stated the ‘federal reserve note’ have no value under Article I, sec. 8, cls. 5 of the Constitution.

    How is it, that there is a gold ‘dollar’ Standard ? I know, but; do you all ?

    • Rich June 3, 2010, 9:02 pm

      Both the US Constitution and the US Mint Act of 1792 define dollar certificates in terms of equivalent gold and silver weight, an ounce of silver per dollar, and an ounce of gold per $20. Unfortunately, We the People traded the promise of security for freedom and let FDR and Nixon violate both, taking us off the gold standard. Ford, Jackson, Lincoln and Kennedy went around the Fed with legal gold and silver tender and were shot.
      Old Hickory survived thanks to his walking stick and two misfires.
      After legalizing gold again, Ford survived two assassination attempts in 17 days by Manson’s lover Squeaky Fromme and FBI informant Sara Jane Moore. Both received life sentences and were paroled…

    • Benjamin June 3, 2010, 11:55 pm

      Thanks for answering, Rich, as I wasn’t quite sure what Steve was asking. But where in the Constitution does it say “an ounce of silver per dollar, and an ounce of gold per $20.”

      The only thing I’ve ever seen concerning gold and silver is in article I section 8 and article I section 10. I was under the impression that the weights could change, if Congress saw fit to.

  • Max Power June 3, 2010, 7:02 pm

    Monetary inflation always has and always will be an increase in the money supply. By that measure, there has been significant monetary inflation. You can see for yourself right here – M1 stats:

    http://forecasts.org/m1.htm

    At the same time M3 money supply has contracted, because M3 includes assets. So yes, asset deflation is alive and well at the same time monetary inflation is alive and well. To some extent, one has neutralized the effect of the other. So some prices are up while other prices are down. As to why all this new money added to the system hasn’t eliminated unemployment and reignited real estate, the answer is primarily China. The US continues to run a huge trade deficit that has resumed growing. What do you suppose would happen to the US economy if there was no trade deficit (currently running at about $500 billion per year)??? You can see the numbers here:

    http://www.census.gov/indicator/www/ustrade.html

    That deficit is enough to keep 10,000,000 people unemployed. If that deficit were ended, unemployment would be eliminated, and asset inflation would be alive and well; and we would be in a world of very high price increases. As it is, China and others have prevented this from happening. Despite this, Joe public is putting the pressure on governments to stop borrowing. What are they thinking??? How will this fix anything??? If all governments in the US were to have a balanced budget, what will be the result??? Easy. More unemployment, more real estate foreclosures and huge bond defaults. Kiss the banking system goodbye and kiss most pension plans goodbye in this environment. Also, how will this benefit the employed as only more will become unemployed??? How will this benefit the employed as there will be dozens of folks willing to do their job for 1/2 price??? Do you suppose in this landscape all those who are left out will sit back and say “Gee,.. I wish I were one of the lucky ones to not be in this situation, so I guess I will just have to sit here under this bridge and hope things turn around before I die from exposure, or lack of medical attention or starvation.” I doubt it. Perhaps having a lot will only make one a target for those having little.

    As for all this borrowing that is being done, much of the borrowing is coming from the government itself in the form of newly printed money. Keeping it on the books is only a convenient way of managing M1. If its paid back, it will mean pulling it out of the M1 supply. But if it cannot be paid back, then the government can decide to just cancel the debt, and presto, its off the books. So, this is not the big problem its made into. Probably the most fearful thing at this time is this immensely ignorant and stupid herd of people out there that are pretty much clueless in everything and can only be expected to do something stupid. And they will. Their track record is unabated. They always want the impossible, and believe its their right to such. They live in a fantasy world. They are never prepared to deal with reality and stampede unpredictably in every which way believing there is a pot-o-gold at the end of a rainbow.

    The solution to this mess can only start with full employment. This can only be achieved in one of three ways: (1) keep devaluing the currency by adding more and more money to the system until the point is reached that jobs outsourced overseas return in quantity; (2) invoke trade tariffs or (3) come up with a single banking system for the entire world that prevents countries such as China from willfully devaluing their currency at the expense of others.

    What is the most likely outcome in all of this?

    &&&&&&

    You sound like an economist, Max. Well, letting you sound off in here is surely proof that this forum is open to EVERYONE — even those who fervently believe, as nearly all economists do, that Government has all the answers. RA

  • warren June 3, 2010, 6:09 pm

    Patience is a virtue, and there can never be too much of it.

    The only deflation I see happening is in the value of paper currency. The only ones who do not see the truth are the ones with way more than they need.
    Expanding numbers in bank accounts past what is necessary to eat healthy, stay warm and dry, and have clothes on ones back, is inane. NO, that’s not a typo. Idiocy is well represented by those who think they are in control and think that by increasing the size of digital prosperity, they are serving some good. It is more like they are serving some god; and the wrong one at that.

    Go ahead moderate me into submission. The only books worth reading have already been written.

  • cameroni June 3, 2010, 6:01 pm

    Well said Rick, contracting credit and money supply….the writing is on the wall alright. You would have to be delusional to hold on to the myth of inflation brought about by government intervention and stimulus. It has only postponed and deepened the inevitable outcome. Now the bills will have to be paid with fewer resources available to do it and in a time of high unemployment. I can see a whole new class of dispossessed developing that roam the country in RV’s and living like Gypsies awaiting economic salvation.

  • Richard June 3, 2010, 5:45 pm

    Interesting Reading.

    Ordinarily, supply and demand factors govern the value of money and the prices of goods, but money has another, deeper level of value apart from its role as a medium of exchange and unit of account. When money is not redeemable, it is, in effect, a contract and, as such, it can instantly become more worthless than the paper it is printed on if the agreement that gives it value is null and void.
    Rather than a crisis of confidence, hyperinflation results from a crisis of credibility. Hyperinflation results when the social, legal and political structures that create the value of paper money break down. When a government borrows excessively and its promises to repay are contradicted by mathematical realities, the value of its currency cannot be maintained. If a government so lacks credibility that it cannot issue bonds because there are no buyers other than its own central bank, the value of its currency declines faster than money is printed to cover its obligations. Perhaps the most important indicator of impending hyperinflation is whether the statements of a government or of its central bank, e.g., with respect to the government’s budget or the central bank’s balance sheet, are evidence based or ideological. If they are not evidence based, the credibility of the government or central bank, and its currency, will weaken and eventually fail.

    In 1999, referring to the sale of British gold reserves, Alan Greenspan, then Chairman of the US Federal Reserve, said that “Fiat money paper in extremis is accepted by nobody.” The reason for this is that there are two fundamental kinds of value. De jure value exists because of, and is dependent upon, social, political and legal arrangements between human beings. In extremis, agreements are often broken and unenforceable. The value of fiat currency and of government bonds are examples of de jure value. Ultimately, de jure value actually exists only in the minds of human beings and does not exist in an absolute sense, in the real world, independent of human belief. De facto value, on the other hand, exists in reality, independent of human thought, e.g., lumber or farmland. The value of real, tangible things of value ultimately devolves to biological survival and to material standards of living. Possessing a physical asset that supports survival does not require human belief in order to have biological value.
    When social, political and legal arrangements are strong, reliable and endure over generations de jure value may be preferable for any number of reasons. However, when social, political and legal arrangements prove to be unstable, or fail, de facto value trumps de jure value in every case.
    When the balance sheets of US banks are maintained by suspending accounting rules and when banks hold financial derivatives liabilities greater than world GDP, both the stability and credibility of the banks is questionable. When US economic data consistently seems to reflect a Pollyanna bias and the US federal budget contains unrealistic projections of GDP growth and tax revenues, while public debt and government liabilities (which now include unlimited bailouts for government sponsored entities Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) are obviously unworkable and the US government’s own central bank is already a major buyer of US Treasuries, the federal government’s credibility is questionable. When private financial losses and toxic financial assets are transferred to taxpayers while profits and bonuses abound on Wall Street thanks to accounting rule changes in the midst of the worst economic contraction since the Great Depression, the credibility and competency of the US Treasury and Congress, with respect to the finances of the nation, is questionable. When the US Federal Reserve defies the US Congress, resists independent auditing, engages in ongoing QE and is the lender of last resort for banks that under normal conditions would be insolvent, its credibility is questionable. When the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, who failed to detect the largest asset price bubble in the history of the world and who has been consistently wrong in his assessment of the US economy is reappointed following the worst financial and economic disaster in generations, both his credibility and that of the Obama administration are questionable. The plethora of red flags spewing from Wall Street, from the Federal Reserve and from the federal government point to a breakdown of de jure value that is already in progress, thus to a hyperinflationary outcome for the US dollar.

    • Rich June 3, 2010, 8:35 pm

      Somehow missed something here.
      Speaking of de jure, faith or fiat, rather than evidence-based, can someone please explain how banking, consumer, government and derivative defaults with the -90% annual rate of change (second derivative) in the monetary base create hyperinflation other than red tape and taxes causing a declining 10% CPI?
      Maybe the underlying issue is how few people still functioning in the markets witnessed the decades of US Deflation in the last Great Depression as adults.
      WEB clearly did not, having sold the silver his Congressman father advocated, that outperformed BRK four times, and cited stocks as a refuge from government spending 185% of tax receipts.
      Everyone depends on the system to keep working as usual. What if it stops working?
      What happens when the mountain of debts and unfunded government promises default and crush everything, with real interest rates soaring to gobble up scarce cash?
      Yet to see those Ben Franklins wafting from the Fed Bernanke Helicopters.
      $25o checks for entitlements, like the breaking of gold contracts and the 75% devaluation of the dollar to gold in 1934 were hardly inflationary. The $23 Trillion sucked out of the economy to bail out shadow bankcorps sitting on bonds, derivatives and mortgages was certainly not inflationary, or gold would be $40,000, instead of below 1980 highs in real prices.
      Show us the evidence!
      The last person that ate gold died.
      A lot of born-again golden calf worshippers may be shocked to learn we are no longer on the gold standard, gold profits are neither guaranteed to miners or hoarders and gold is just another barbarous market subject to margin call relics…

  • Rich June 3, 2010, 5:39 pm

    Rosie Rules, although volatile relief rallies remain:
    http://www.cnbc.com/id/37488868

  • Rich June 3, 2010, 5:32 pm

    Unless you’re Military or offshore Fed employee getting an extra year, the $8000/$6500 housing tax credits stopped the end of April 2010 for houses closing by the end of June, so the housing rally may be already baked.
    That does not stop Tahoe flippers from buying foreclosures, fixing up and flipping for good money.
    The 1980 methodology CPI is rumbling along around 10%, below the 15% peak in 1980, so even CPI corporate government costs are in decline as more people are out of work with lower real wages since then.
    Propping up the economy with more fiat debt money creation does not work when the money multiplier is below one and governments and consumers cannot service their debts.
    Nature is taking her own slow inexorable course of remedy, as we see with dying dolphins, sick BP Fishermen and destruction of Gulf fishing grounds.
    Only remaining thought re today’s fine epistle and comments is this:
    “an outright hyperinflation will be needed to wipe hundreds of trillions of dollars’ worth of unpayable debt from the world’s books.”
    Doubt it. Banks, Corporations and Governments love to inflate assets with debt so their cronies can foreclose and repossess at low prices and impoverish borrowers.
    Even WEB admitted on the Hill Grill yesterday the derivative defaults are far from over.
    Debts are repaid out of the hide of the borrowers and innocent taxpayer bystanders, not the lenders who make and enforce the rules…

  • DonF June 3, 2010, 4:50 pm

    Methinks Rick is not really wanting to figure CPI, ex food and energy, as guv wants to do. But “grocery store inflation!” Oh, I love that! It SO minimizes the effect of living on a fixed income in these deflationary times. So, when my social security check no longer covers the Necessities of Life, so called “grocery store inflation,” then I’m actually experiencing real wage deflation. OK, I see that. Yes, I’ve realized that, ever since I could no longer work in the US for six months then go live in Europe for six months on my savings. Ah, the joy of living in a strong, debt free, imperialist nation was so much better than living in a paranoid, deeply indebted, declining imperialist nation. So it looks like we’re just discussing semantics in the inflation/deflation story.

    Oh, I almost forgot, as we humans are so prone to do. America used to be criss-crossed with railroad tracks that went to every little burg, just like in Europe! Then, in their almighty wisdom, the tire, oil and automobile magnates bought up these efficient means of transport and thereby, more or less, forced us into automotive and oil dependence. So now some people suggest that we should take individual responsibility for fuel economy and cram ourselves into tiny little transport devices and go into battle against the behemoths that can crush us and not even know it! Give me back the trains and the bus. Only make them nice, like in Scandinavia. Public transport can be good. Even some buses in Mexico are good and have decent schedules.

    In conclusion, I’m betting on continued Necessities of Life inflation, while conceding that deflation in wages and assets, ex gold and silver (real money), will indeed, wreak havoc on the unprepared majority for many years to come.

  • JohnJay June 3, 2010, 3:35 pm

    TC, if you shop around you can live in a deflation world right now, except for specifics like gasoline, gold, etc. In the LA area, with 4 or 5 major grocery stores someone always has a sale so I can buy tomatoes, chicken, etc. for 99 cents a pound, or milk for 99 cents a quart.
    Wait for Progresso soup on sale for 99 cents or pay as much as $3 a can full price. The cheapest 900 SF shacks out in Hemet were 150k at the peak of the boom, now there are plenty to be had for 50k. Wages for the proles are headed back to 20k a year. It will just take a little time for it to all deflate. The bond vigilantes were gunned down by Easy Al Greenspan a long time ago.

    Mario, I do not think the upcoming mortgage resets will matter much short term. The word is out, just stop paying your mortgage if you feel like it and bank or spend the money you save. The banks will just ignore non performing loans with government approval. There are no consequences for the banks or homeowners, so why not do it.

  • DG June 3, 2010, 3:24 pm

    On the Foxconn rant above, either you care about this and hold a powerful company like Apple’s feet to the fire (ditch the iphone and all of your electronics -I have to quit typing now), or you don’t. Likely, most don’t give a rip what is in the sausage. I realize this is callous, but In the grand scheme of things, as bad as conditions are at Foxconn, they are likely a better situation than what they had 20 years ago when they manufactured nothing. Chinese are pretty independent so maybe there is some way to gently nudge them towards civility.
    It is pretty lame for Jobs to dismiss the suicide issue with “for a factory, its pretty nice.” http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1283389/Apple-boss-Steve-Jobs-defends-China-Foxconn-factory-conditions-10-suicides.html
    Maybe this is his public message, saving their face, but in private, doing some Jack Bauer moves on Foxxy’s management….

    This deflationary wealth death spiral is amazing. I would love to see some data on networth trends, particularly at the middle of the distribution, because I would bet that it has been decimated by the housing wealth/I mean poverty effect. The foreclosures seem to be just starting to bubble up to the surface, in size, in places where you never imagined they would occur. What happens when the credit expires this month? Anyone care to wager that the purchase credit doesn’t get extended? Grows?
    On the BP front, I think this is what happens when we put global warming in front of Peak Oil. We have blown so much capital on crazy expensive “clean” energy when we should have been focusing our capital on just energy and demanding that it be implemented in a safe way. If that offshore find down nearly three miles from the surface of the ocean near Brazil does not illustrate the basic tenet of peak oil, I don’t know what does. 3 freakin’ miles down. “and out from the ground came a bubblin crude…oil that is..” no more. We either need to figure out how to cut back or supply more with real solutions. solar and wind (maybe Simmons offshore windfarms) can not do it. Know Nukes – and get really good at it. Get really good at mining uranium, building smaller plants, recycling spent fuel, storing the miniscule remaining toxic stuff – to be later exploited when we figure it out. Seriously, remove that abortion of a plant in Russia from the argument, as it was an engineering embarrassment, and nuclear’s known affect on the environment is spotless. I’ll bet solar panels have done more damage with installers simply falling off a roof once in a long while. Lots of hyperbole in the danger of nukes argument. It is all hyperbole. There are nearly a thousand nuclear power plants running around the globe – energy plants, subs, ships, research….for 60 plus years – and the data is obvious. nuclear is solar power, just removing the horribly inefficient photon to electron translation…(btw, we should figure out fusion while we are enjoying fission…”sun in a can” if you will)
    sorry for the rant. FYI, new plants are literally a billion times safer than the ones built 30 years ago, cost about $4k a kw and have an operating cost of a nickel a kwhr. Those 70 cent a kwhr subsidies for solar are insane capital punishment. Ask Spain.
    Who knows? Maybe the deflationary death spiral will solve the crisis, reducing energy demand via unspeakable methods.

  • FranSix June 3, 2010, 10:02 am

    Wage deflation was set in motion years before when wages lagged inflation, and this has been the case since the 1980’s and the very first “jobless recovery”.

    In fact, wages are probably the inverse of the bond market price trajectory in inflation-adjusted terms.

    Wages can only be said to be catching up in the sense where prices have fallen behind inflation the most. And in bankrupt industries like the auto sector, a 50% wage cut certainly turns the clock back.

    And many, many a chomeur will ever have their wages tallied ever again, possibly ever again in their foreshortened lives.

    But, you can’t take the Dr. Pangloss out of the monkey.

  • JohnJay June 3, 2010, 5:22 am

    Yes Rick, deflation looks like the future for awhile.
    There is no way to get enough money to the proles to stoke massive inflation, with systemic unemployment, off shoring and open borders in place. It will take some wrangling to get government wages and pensions to deflate, but a furious electorate should help out. Real estate should just continue to drift lower over the years.
    Any inflation should be specific, (like gasoline prices), and will just take more money out of the hands of the massses putting more pressure on other prices.
    ZIRP should keep those with big savings accounts strapped for cash flow as well. Damn it! I can remember getting 15% tax free I believe on a 5 year CD from BofA back in the early eighties. The tax free deal was a Reagan deal I think to get people to save more.
    I could be wrong about that. But I remember getting 11% on WPPS muni bonds for sure that got called 10 years later. Those were the days!

  • TC June 3, 2010, 5:05 am

    “Imagine waiting…and waiting…and waiting for inflation to “break out,” as the inflationists have been doing all too patiently since 1991.”

    Oh how I wish I could pay a 1991 price for ANYTHING at this point. God that was $70,000 houses, 15 dollar oil, $1.15 a gallon for gas and 300 dollar gold. $3.25 minimum wage, 29 cent postage stamps. A dozen eggs were 85 cents. The average worker made in the high 20’s! The Dow Jones closed the year at 3000.

    So the inflationists have been waiting????

    How has deflation been doing during this timeframe? 🙂

    \&&&&

    Deflation wasn’t a “timeframe” kinda thing; it developed irresistible force when the housing bust — which is far from over — began in 2007. Anyway, most of the inflation has been in assets, as I made clear, and not in the CPI, as every monetarist (and the Austrians, for that matter) had expected. Housing inflation alone more than offset all of the grocery-story items you’ve listed (except gold) and one much bigger one that you did not: stagnant real incomes.

    If inflation had been perceived as a problem, would the Fed havebeen able to ease, ease, ease? RA

    • TC June 4, 2010, 4:16 am

      “and one much bigger one that you did not: stagnant real incomes. ”

      I actually did list that one. The average worker was making in the 20’s in 1991. Of course when it cost a buck a gallon for gas and the Dow was 3000… 20 some thousand was a lot of dough before all the inflation set in. Average rent was only $400 a month!

      I will give you that since 2007 there has been some deflation…. heck maybe you will be right and it will be a deflationary depression as well. My point was only that the deflationists have been the ones waiting and waiting… Maybe their day has come?

    • TC June 4, 2010, 4:18 am

      And the CPI? Please…. We could have hyperinflation and the CPI would not show a figure above 7%.

    • ben June 7, 2010, 10:12 am

      And that ease, ease , ease is leading to the hyper-inflation. An economy can lumber along for decades under the yoke of deflation…but once that inflation genie is let out of the bottle, the currency goes down the toilet in the blink of an eye.

  • mario cavolo June 3, 2010, 5:03 am

    Thanks much for the heads up Hera’s article Rick. Meanwhile, I’ll call the recent upside action nothing more than the market’s desperate last gasp squeeze before the current list of disastrous realities all around us can’t be ignored any longer.

    1. After this end of June home buyer tax credit thing in America expires, we move into a huge round of disastrous mortgage rate resets, which is what precipitated the last disaster.
    2. The Gulf disaster – there aren’t words worthy of the econological and economic nightmare beyond nighmares coming.
    3. Pick a winner…China slowing down, Europe’s debt woes, America’s debt woes, spreads, bonds, credit ratings, unemployment…

    Short equities long that shiny stuff….

    Another thing – China and India are the last big countries still getting away with slave labor and its an outrage. FoxConn’s founder is a BILLIONAIRE on the backs of his workers who stand 12 hours a day, six days a week on a fume-infested assembly line and aren’t allowed to talk to each other, for $140 USD per month. Oh they just got a 20% raise because of excess suicides to $170 USD per month.

    So now, HP and Apple say “oh we’ll do our part and go investigate worker condictions” Huh? What’s to investigate? The worker condition are already printed for all to see in the media.

    I’ve worked on cruise ships and I can complain about worker conditions on luxury cruise ships. Philipino kitchen contract workers do 15 hours a day 7 days per week, its tough. But they are paid well over USD $1000 per month cash in hand plus sleeping quarters, all meals and medical. So in comparison, the condition and pay rate at FoxConn is appalling. Yet the world of course ignores it and we buy I-Phones.

    Yes, for most people on planet earth, life is not a very nice experience. It is a very unfair experience, very much on the edge of miserable for around 70% of the world’s inhabitants.

    Cheers, Mario

  • Zane Binder June 3, 2010, 4:45 am

    (extract from an email)

    Am disgusted by many (not all) of the idiots and TV commentators writing about the BP environmental disaster in the Gulf. Things ARE really bad but the dolts cleaning the birds and little fuzzy animals saturated with oil are wasting their time. Studies done months AFTER the Exxon Valdez/Joe Hazelwood problem (he’s now doing commercials for Smirnoff [just a joke]) and other oil spills clearly show the clean up of critters did as much harm as the oil. They
    all died within short time periods from BOTH oil and DETERGENT poisoning. This is ALL public record, undisputed fact. You know, of course, I wanted to
    be a veterinarian at one time rehabbed possums for 10 years so you’re familiar with the fact I LOVE critters. But I also know the REAL answer is not clean-up, it’s
    prevention. AND THAT brings me to the point of this RANT, and that’s the VERY PEOPLE who decry oil use are the SAME ones to blame for our “oil
    addiction.” Take the May car sales figures, for example. At least 50 percent (go to the Wall Street Journal site) of vehicle sales are gas guzzling
    TRUCKS. Call them SUV’s, SAV’s whatever they and heavier trucks actually make up MORE than 50 percent of the vehicle market (and they DON’T get their EPA ratings (by MY actual, on the road tests). Most people are hypocrites and, when judged by their ACTIONS, NOT WORDS, don’t REALLY give a damm about the price of gas, oil conservation, etc.
    Moreover, ANY attempt to build alternate energy infrastructure is useless. In California, for example, “environmentalists” have filed suit against the wind farms near both Palm Springs and up by San Francisco (I know you’ve seen it) because the rotating turbines kill (mostly) birds of prey, many of
    whom are on the Endangered Species List. Solar? You probably remember when I did that series of stories about my getting a NJ grant for solar hot
    water and found it would take about 3,000 years (actually 20+), even with the grant and tax credits, just to break even financially. I looked into
    this again when I bought the house I live in and came to the same economic conclusion. The upshot of all the above is that, when judged by ACTIONS and not WORDS, people don’t REALLY give a crap about conserving oil, alternate energy, etc. It’s just politically and popularly regarded as obscene to say this … but apparently NOT to disregard it in REAL life.

  • TahoeBilly June 3, 2010, 4:38 am

    Funny, I had just read Hera’s bit and passed it along to a New York Time’s/Paul Krugman reading friend of mine (who owns a restaurant in the Mission). I am trying to “save his soul” so to speak, though he is determined to go down with his New York Times/UC Berkeley indoctrinated/educational ship he sailed on as a young man!

    If I can just talk him “out” of buying any real estate, I will have done my job. Silver bullion, more like it. Changing peoples “beliefs” is not easy, and I understand that, they want to hold onto what they have built their world around….me I am buying .44 Mag and heading for Alaska. 🙂 Oh not really..