One More Reason to Shun Hot Tips

[The following is a personal favorite that I re-publish from time to time. I wrote it more than ten years ago for the Sunday San Francisco Examiner, but the theme is still relevant for investors who believe there’s an Easy Street. RA]

Talk about a sure thing! Here was the kind of inside information that one imagined tumbled from heaven into the ears of the anointed. It concerned not the stock market – we’ll get to that part soon – but a pacer named Happy Yankee A that was running in the seventh race at Roosevelt Raceway outside of Philadelphia one evening nearly four decades ago. According to my source, this horse was not merely a strong bet to win, he was an absolute lock, lead-pipe cinch. This horse absolutely could not lose. What’s more, the Yankster had looked so tired the last few times out that he would probably go off at fat odds.

My tipster was Willie D, a storied acquaintance and unusually gifted confidence man who could loosen a mark’s checkbook the way a starfish pries open a clam. Here he was on the phone one Saturday morning – probably to everyone he owed – trying to burnish his karma with an offer of timely investment advice. One seldom saw or heard from Willie D around breakfast time, since that was when he usually went to bed. But that day he had stayed awake, he said, to get the word out. He wanted to give his pals enough time to borrow, beg or steal as much cash as they could by post time, the better to wager on the seventh race.

If word of Happy Yankee A’s expected trip to the winner’s circle had come from anyone else, I might have shrugged it off. After all, how many touts die rich?  But a hot tip from Willie? It seemed too good to pass up.  Although he had a serious jones for the trotters – one that often left him too depressed to get out of bed and too broke to buy a decent meal – Willie also had occasional winning streaks that would put him on top of the world, if only briefly. Over time, however, it was Willie’s peerless ability as a salesman that paid the rent.  He could in fact sell just about anything to anybody: Persian rugs, estate jewelry, sterling tea sets, tires —  and at county fairs and flea markets, a mysterious-looking gizmo known as the “SparkMaster” that was guaranteed to double one’s gas mileage.

But handicapping horses was his first love, if not a steady source of income, and he followed the sulkies around the U.S. to create an endless summer of betting opportunities: at Santa Anita, Freehold, Meadowlands and Kentucky’s Red Mile. It was  one summer, nearly 40 years ago, that he stumbled onto a fabulous secret that for a short while produced more sure-fire winners than a set of loaded dice. It was based on an observation that seemed to have eluded not only the attention of the rubes in the grandstands, but the astute instincts of the $100 bettors in the clubhouse. You see, Willie’s million-dollar ticket was to wager only on trotters hitched to a single-pole bike, the rig on which a driver sits. The shaft trailed directly behind the horse, using advanced principles of physics to reduce torsional drag. Only a relative handful of drivers ever came to use single-shaft rigs, and few outsiders seem to have realized what a considerable advantage they provided over conventional two-pole bikes that were attached to the horse on both sides. But Willie D surely did, and before the monoshaft was banned from the circuit later that season, it was his ticket to Fat City.

‘This Horse is a Lock-Up!’

As chance would have it, neither Happy Yankee A nor any of the other entries in the seventh race would be pulling a single-pole bike on that particular night. It didn’t matter, though, Willie reassured me. “The horse is a lock-up,” he said, “and it’s got nothing to do with the bike.” That was the clincher. I hadn’t wanted to rely on mere physics to give me and edge, but rather on some criminal scheme that made the seventh race as predictable as the next day’s sunrise. But I didn’t have much time left that day to raise a decent stake. It was a weekend morning and most banks back then did not have ATMs, so I spent the rest of the day cashing personal checks at local stores. By the time I’d hit up the hardware, the five-and-dime, a pharmacy, a supermarket and a candy store, I’d scrounged about $300, equal to about a week’s pay for me back then.

We digress now to a story that may sound familiar to many of you. It concerns the hot tip that is bound to come the way of any investor who is looking to double his money fast in the stock market. My tipster this time was not a confidence man, however, but a highly successful lawyer who told me that a large publicly listed company was about to be acquired by another at a price well above the market. He said he was too close to the deal to take a stake in advance of the buyout, but that anyone who jumped on the stock in the next day or two would be handsomely rewarded. How sure was he about this? “The ink on the contract is already dry,” he said. The buyout would be consummated by midweek.

Saved from Greed

As it happened, I did not take the plunge, but I would be lying if I were to tell you that my first impulse was to abide by the law, which strictly prohibits trading on insider information such as my source presumably possessed. No, it was only my inability to raise the approximately $6,000 it would have taken to buy 100 shares of the stock that saved me from my own greed. That, and the still-pungent experience of having waited six years for another such “done deal” to materialize.

If you can sense where all of this is leading, perhaps you’ve been burned yourself acting on a supposed tip from the inside. The truth is, most of the time even the insiders themselves don’t know how or if a deal is going to turn out. Over the course of my adult life I’ve probably heard about 50 such buyouts, but only a relative handful ever panned out.  And the ones that did were consummated months or even years after the date the tipsters had specified.

Fading in the Stretch

The lesson in all this is that next time someone phones with a hot tip about a stock whose price is about to double, you should grab your checkbook and run the other way. If it’s a well-connected friend who says the ink on the deal is dry, tell him you know someone who got his just desserts after acting on those very words.

As for the Yankster, he went off at 5-to-1, bolting like greased lightning from the gate. Out front by two lengths – make that four lengths – he blazed down the back stretch. At the final turn, it was Happy Yankee A by a two lengths, now a length, now a neck, uh, now . . . trailing . . . by a neck. Fading, fading, fading . . .

And you know the rest. Willie D went home that night zero-for-seven, too disgusted to stick around for the eighth race. I went home broke, never to bet again on a horse or to be so easily swayed by a tipster.

(If you’d like to Rick’s commentaries delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • Jill March 29, 2012, 1:26 am

    Well, Gary, if you are right about the rally continuing for the next 12 months, then you will continue to be lonely, like you’ve been during this rally so far– at least on this board.

    BTW, are you the Gary Leibowitz who is a bankruptcy lawyer?

  • gary leibowitz March 28, 2012, 7:52 pm

    On the general market it looks like a re-distribution is going on. Energy sector taking a hit as is commodities.

    I suspect it is short lived but equities should be the net beneficiary. Hedge funds are lightening up, and the big runs we had with energy and commodities might place money on the sideline or into equites.

    In the end I still maintain all assets will do well this year. In fact I see more and more signs that we could see the next 12 months as a massive blowoff rally.

    There is no news on the horizon relating to defaults. Without the debt structure unwinding there will be no fear in this market.

    Three years of the public missing out on the doubling of stocks. I await for the final indicator telling me we are off to the races. Until the public comes back we should have a steady upward bias and boring market.

    • redwilldanaher March 28, 2012, 9:30 pm

      You may consider updating your paradigm. The “public” are now the clients of Goldman Sachs et. al. If they can be killed due to overleveraging/undercapitalization then it will be done. The market didn’t fall to 6600 to shake the public out and it hasn’t risen to here to draw them in. It is now a PSYOPS tool so that the sheeple believe that things are getting better only it hasn’t completely worked so far. A push to new nominal highs is what will turn the trick IMO…

    • Rich March 29, 2012, 12:23 am

      Guess I have the other side of your trade for now Gary.
      The market may be telling us the SCOTUS decision on 0Care Individual Mandates and who the next President is…

  • Radek Z March 28, 2012, 7:29 pm

    Hey everyone,

    Great stories. BUT – back to Hidden Pivoting for a sec (this does tie into today’s article on “hot tips”):

    I’m surprised there is not one comment on the GDXJ successfully creating a “bullish impulse leg” that passed the 2 targets as identified on Monday in Rick’s post, only to turn south aggressively yesterday at 10:18am and currently trading at 23.82. Anyone have any insight into what happened? It’s almost as if the Market heard Rick’s comment, and decided to screw everyone that followed the HP method.

    It seems like trader sentiment is easily swayed. Looking at my Google Finance page, news articles section:
    Yesterday, from Investorplace.com: Gold, Silver Higher on Lower U.S. Home Prices
    Today, from the same: Gold, Silver Lower on Durable-Goods Report

    I’m just wondering – are these articles and economic data really the cause of short-term price swings like we’re seeing? I’m sure they’re a factor, but can they be quantified? And if so, it almost makes more sense to put together some sort of calendar of when the Gov’t publishes and trade based on that (assuming you’d have a good idea what the data looks like).

    Had we gotten on board when GDXJ broke 25.45 on Monday afternoon, we’d be down 6.5% in 2 days as of now. That’s scary!

    Now – I know that there are no guarantees in life, nor am I looking for one. But I would love to get more experienced traders’ opinions on what happened over the last 2 days, including an explanation from an HP perspective (I am a HP course ‘graduate’ – but if there was a final exam, i’d fail miserably).

    • Rich March 28, 2012, 7:57 pm

      News follows price, at least from the day Nathan Rothschild knew Wellington whupped Napoleon at Waterloo before anyone else, publicly sold British sovereigns on the Bourse while his agents bought for him near the bottom, making him the wealthiest man in the world. The Rothschields at one time owned Reuters or AP with Thomson Knight Ridder who provide price quotes, and may still control majority media through nominees:

      http://www.flickr.com/photos/marktjones/4195205298/sizes/l/in/photostream/

    • John Jay March 28, 2012, 8:34 pm

      Radek Z,
      GDXJ is just following the Gold and Silver market lower. $31.09 and $1627.50 were the short term bottoms a couple of days ago for them. And Natural Gas is scraping along at $2.19 right now. Someone here predicted a $1.50 bottom for NG on the spot market.
      It may come to pass. As LNG facilities come on line and drilling slows down it might be worth some sort of long play on NG. Japan is importing energy like crazy now.

    • Rick Ackerman March 28, 2012, 10:05 pm

      I offered the trade with a consolation prize, Radek: If GDXJ were to slip below the original target, as it now has, an even better buying opportunity would present itself. To find out precisely where the new target lies, consider taking a free trial subscription. Incidentally, by taking partial profits on the position when GDX rallied, we were able to reduce our cost basis to 23.79, below where we initiated a 400-share position.

  • gary leibowitz March 28, 2012, 3:20 pm

    One horse story I have is based on pure intuition. I decided to make a bet on the 1980 Kentucky Derby race. The OTB store was 2 blocks from my home. I occasionally followed the trotters but had no idea, or tip, on this race. My girlfriend gave me 3 horses as a trifecta. Her first choice was Genuine Risk. I immediately discarded her choice since female horses almost never win these races. Well as luck would have it she picked the trifecta. I of course ignored her picks. It paid over 1,000 for every dollar bet. My 10,000 dollar mistake.

  • John Jay March 28, 2012, 2:33 pm

    Did anyone else see Bernanke on the ABC Nightly News last night? I think it was Dianne Sawyer that interviewed him at his office at the Fed. He certainly was not his smug, smirking usual self. I thought he seemed like a man who had lost confidence in himself by the tone of his voice. Maybe he understands now that he is trapped in ZIRP, and when the Dollar collapses he is going to go down in history as the perp. A long shot bet is that he actually feels some remorse for the millions of ordinary people he has destroyed with his inflation and 1% CDs. In any case he is no dummy and everything he has done is according to the Big Plan he was handed by Greenspan and the Big Banks. Maybe the night weighs heavy on his guilty mind?

    • Robert March 29, 2012, 1:34 am

      “Maybe the night weighs heavy on his guilty mind?”

      Of course it does…

      Simply look at a series of pictures of Ben Bernanke taken between early 2008 and today…

      He has aged 15 years in the past 4. But then, wouldn’t you if you knew you were a liar, and you knew that the world you “serve” also knew you were a liar, and yet your job, your career, and indeed your legacy, would not let you out of the lie?

      If Ben Bernanke is a man of conscience who continues on his present path, he will surely end up going insane.

      If he were a certifiable sociopath/psychopath, then he would not be so aged in his appearance.

      As an Academic, it is easy to justify the presumed righteousness of advanced scholars, but as a human being of sound mind and principles based in simple ethics, I can not…

      He knows the policies he pursues are damaging to the people who can least afford to be damaged, and yet he continues. This is the ultimate violation of the social contract.

      I pity his sanity

  • mava March 28, 2012, 4:31 am

    Wow, Rick. Really. Seriously.

    You know what I was doing before I read this piece of yours?

    I was driving home from a meeting, where after the close I was chatting with a fellow participant. He told me something that literally completed a whole picture of something I had suspected for a while myself, and then he freaked out and just shut up. I don’t think he even realized that since I was just missing that one last bit, it had made complete sense to me.

    Anyway, as I was driving home, I can assure you that the thoughts I had rolling around in no way included anything to do with the laws currently on the books. I was consumed by one consideration and that was should I or should I not.

    As I arrived, I checked mail and then looked at your page and here it was, your advice. Unless you are a part of a setup team, I do not know how to explain the coincidence. But, I have seen such strange coincidences few times in my life. Makes me think of what my mother would say about “guardian angels” (I am not religious).

    I am going to pass up on that tip. And the reason that made the decision is what you said about those closest to the deal being frequently just wrong about it themselves. I am not a gambler by my nature, never had any interest. I only “bet” when no one else has a chance, but that isn’t really gambling. More like what Mercurious describes himself.

    Anyway, whatever it was that made you think of this again and post it exactly today, I surely appreciate a piece of timely and wise advice.

  • Steve March 27, 2012, 10:29 pm

    Seems like everyone is taking the bet that democracy will not turn into what James Madison opined. I gambled that People would not continue to accept the lies of corporate america – I lost BIG TIME!

    • Rich March 28, 2012, 7:45 pm

      One of these days…

  • Robert March 27, 2012, 10:01 pm

    I think the closest I have come to gambling has been my recent doubling down in shares of XRA…. 🙂

    That chart looks AWFUL.

  • Mercurious March 27, 2012, 6:59 pm

    I know this will sound fabricated, but it’s 100% true. My family on my father’s side owned large swaths of Oahu in the 1880s. There was even a long-running newspaper column in Honolulu in the 1960s about them and their lifestyle. They were already rich and I would have been…well…a hell of a lot richer than just rich if they hadn’t played the ponies. They lost most of the land paying off bets that went south, past Diamond Head and into the deep blue sea. Many of the family members who followed also were gamblers, including my brother. This leads me to believe it is largely a genetic trait, like retardation.

    I followed my mother’s side of the family and avoided gambling. I’m such a control freak, when I lose money I like to think it’s because I chose to rather than was taken to the cleaners by Lady Luck. But that’s just me…

    • Rich March 28, 2012, 7:44 pm

      George Clooney and The Descendants…

  • Carole March 27, 2012, 6:05 pm

    Ok here is my racetrack story.

    I was 20 yrs old waiting tables in the clubhouse trying to make enough to put myself through college. The Maitre D in the said clubhouse was a Dr. at Johns Hopkins during the day but at night he worked at the clubhouse to make his gambling career look more “upscale”. He came to me one night and told me (about a hour before the races started) that he had a sure thing and that he knew I was working hard to put myself through college so he wanted to help me out. He told me the horses to bet for a TRIFECTA (the horses to win, place, show in the specific order) for the first race. Now winning a TRIFECTA if very difficult but he assured me I knew the inside scoop. So I only had about $20 in tips on me at the time and I intended to “bet it all”. However, being that I was working, I got distracted and failed the place the bet. As luck would have it the TRIFECTA hit exactly as he told me it would. If I had placed that $20 bet I could have finished my education on my winnings.

    Oh well I guess my story sort of negates Ricks but such is life.

  • C.C. March 27, 2012, 5:27 pm

    You can take the gambler out of the Casino, but…

  • gary leibowitz March 27, 2012, 2:59 pm

    My story is a bit different. I was in my early twenties and happened to read an article in a local paper that announced a big contract for a small company. I can’t remember, or refuse to remember the name of this company. Anyway, I decided to see if this company was traded on the exchange. It was and the price of the stock was around 1 dollar and hadn’t moved from that price for the last 6 months. I brought this up to my father who told me the price must already reflect this news and perhaps it was anticipated they get this contract. He assured me if it was in the papers investors would have capitalized on it. At that time I was not an investor and knew very little about the market. Well you can guess the rst. Two weeks after the local paper’s article, the NYTimes mentioned it. The stock went up 20 fold.

    The moral of the story is bet your own tips.

    • gary leibowitz March 27, 2012, 3:27 pm

      As an aside. The big recession on housing is showing signs of easing. There are now many sections of the country where there is a bidding war on homes.

      “Bidding wars, absent from most parts of the U.S. residential market since its peak in 2006, are erupting from Seattle and Silicon Valley to Miami and Washington, D.C. The inventory of homes hovers close to a six-year low, while an increase in jobs and record affordability are tempting more buyers. The number of contracts to buy previously owned homes jumped 14 percent in February from a year earlier, the National Association of Realtors reported yesterday. ”

      If housing nationally starts to show strength then I suspect the stock market will act in kind and participation will pick up dramatically.

    • Robert March 27, 2012, 9:59 pm

      Hmmmm…

      Housing starting to ease:

      1) 700,000 new home starts reported in Q4
      2) 300,000 new home sales reported in Q1

      So, where did the other 400,000 starts go? I know there is data overlap because not all houses get completed in 90 days, but the start rate has outpaced the sell rate for the past 4 quarters.

      Menawhile, resale inventories (listings) are down, but foreclosure rates are climbing again, and the rate of “re-foreclosures” is rising.

      Ergo: The banks are keeping the “shadow inventory” of houses in the shadows.

      I do not equate this with bullishness- I equate it with market distortion.

      Bank-owned property has to hit the listings eventually- the banks are not going to sit on these empty houses forever.

    • Jim N March 28, 2012, 5:50 pm

      Gary….nope. i don’t believe it. It is amazing how much credance we give to statistics, especially from the govt and these clowns. Showing signs of easing….LOL

    • Rich March 28, 2012, 7:42 pm

      Gary, you might enjoy MA suggesting a three-year RE bounce:
      http://www.martinarmstrong.org/files/A-Forecast-For-Real-Estate.pdf

  • D. Barber March 27, 2012, 11:37 am

    Stick with what ya know. (Unless it’s solar I guess; Article today- Averaging down to zero).
    Had Barbaro picked for the Derby and possible Triple Crown. I mean I knew this horse, I knew the jockey, they knew each other. In the second leg of the Triple Crown. On the day of the race. Some things hadn’t added up as normal for Barbaro for several days, I felt something was not right, we reluctantly dropped him from the ticket, and I had no ticket prepared without him.

  • Rich March 27, 2012, 8:13 am

    Was it Baron Lord John Maynard Keynes who said with enough inside information he could lose all of the Bank of England’s exchequer?

    George Soros came close…

    • D. Barber March 27, 2012, 1:13 pm

      Was Keynes born in Kenya?

    • Rich March 28, 2012, 7:38 pm

      Whelped in Cambridge, Kings College, Kenya and Pennsylvania Ave DB…;

  • Bradley March 27, 2012, 6:48 am

    Friends of my wife rode the JDSU, (known at the time as “Just Don’t Sell Us”) rocket all the way to the top, selling enough to pay off a house, buy some land, build another house, pay off future college tuitions for their two kids.
    Then, the guy who worked at JDSU, who they knew, left to work for a new company. They got in on the IPO, and told us about it. Super tip.
    We bought a fist-full of stock the first day, and it went downhill ever since.
    Tips are for icebergs and waiters.

  • Jill March 27, 2012, 5:01 am

    Wow, some good stories, Rick. And John Jay thanks for your story too. Thanks!

    I think most of us who’ve been trading or investing for a while have made the mistake of taking some hot tip or reco from someone else that lost us money. It seems that the first stage of development as a trader or investor usually includes such experiences.

    It takes a while before at least some of us mature enough in our investing methods to realize that no one has a crystal ball on the market, or even on a single stock. And that we are always dealing with probabilities, not sure things, in the markets.

  • JohnJay March 27, 2012, 12:42 am

    Here is my favorite racetrack story, as told by the late Joeseph “Joe Cargo” Valachi, first of the Mafia turncoats in his book “The Valachi Papers”. Once upon a time the mob had fixed a horse race to the max. Every thing had been arranged, jockeys, trainers, everyone was fixed.
    All the wise guys put down big bets and were ready to cash in. The chosen horse broke from the gate, took a couple of strides…… and broke a leg.

    • mario cavolo March 27, 2012, 4:56 am

      I grew up in Yonkers two blocks from Central Avenue/Yonkers Avenue….we mischievous boys used to hop the fence at Yonkers Raceway, guards chasing us like hell ..that was the harness racing track, the good ‘ole days!…M

    • Rich March 28, 2012, 7:36 pm

      Looks like a lot of us cut our money management trading teeth with the ponies on both coasts and in between…