‘He Is One Sneak Guy’

We’ll lighten up today with something I’ve wanted to do for a long time – i.e., help propel a great new word into common English usage. The word is “sneak” — as in “he’s a sneak guy (or gal)” — but it doesn’t mean what you’re thinking.  For far from describing someone of low character, a “sneak guy” is someone who is supremely accomplished but who would never boast about it. Typically, one would find out about the person’s amazing background in an off-handed way — perhaps from a relative or third party, but never from the person himself.

As far as I can recall, the word was coined in the 1960s by a ZBT fraternity brother of mine, Dave “the Ripper” Shaw.  I have never heard the word used by anyone but a Zeeb who attended University of Virginia during the late 1960s.  Dave was a year ahead of me, and there were some unusual success stories in his Class of ‘70. “Scheins”  went on to become a movie producer of, among other films, For a Few Good Men, The Princess Bride and When Harry Met Sally. And another Zeeb, “Bob K,” managed Bjorn Borg’s tennis career before

going on to even bigger things as CEO of the top sports-talent agency in the world. Both were sneak guys, but not because of their spectacular careers. Bob was sneak because he had been a yo-yo champion as a child. He and his brother used to travel to tournaments on one bicycle, so certain were they that one of them would win a second bike for the trip home. And Scheins, a skinny little runt-of-a-guy, was a supremely gifted tennis player, baseball shortstop and touch-football quarterback.

Strong as an Ape

As for Shaw, he was an athlete, built like a lowland gorilla, with a jawline to match.  One cool spring night, he was sitting on some steps with a friend, waiting for a ride back to UVa after a date at a college down the road. Wearing a t-shirt and no jacket, he was hunched up on the steps to keep warm when some townies looking for a fight evidently took him and a friend, Danny, for wimps. Four of them emerged from a car, but before they could even approach, Danny set upon one of them with a flurry of punches so violent that he broke his own nose trying to demolish the would-be thug. When the other three men approached Shaw, he stood up, unfurled his massive upper body, and uttered the legendary line, “Why don’t you guys take a few on my stomach while my friend finishes up.”  What made Shaw very sneak, however, was not his toughness or ape-man strength, but the fact that he was ranked as the top student in an honors program offered by UVa’s government department. He currently practices law.

Below are a few more examples of sneak people I’ve known. After you’ve pondered the descriptions, please try to think of people you know who are sneak, or perhaps even very sneak.  Then, by all means, use the word whenever you please.  Like some great Yiddish words, such as mensch, schmuck and goniff, you’ll discover that “sneak” is uniquely suited to describing a certain type of person who is more than merely amazing. Some examples:

  • Martin A: My college roommate for two years, he got us and three others evicted from a farmhouse we’d rented when he came home very drunk one Saturday night, as always, and crashed a tractor into a tree after attempting to jump-start it. (He’d already ruined the engine by pouring kerosene in the gas tank, thinking it was diesel fuel.) He was such a party animal that even the Animal House frats — Sigma Nu, Phi Gam and SAE, among others — decided it was too risky to pledge him and took a pass. Martin, who had an identical twin named Stedman, graduated near the top of our class and went on to get an MBA, retired in his mid-thirties after making a killing in real estate. He’d always said that all it takes to get rich is one good trade. He also figured prominently in John Krakauer’s best seller Into Thin Air, having survived the disastrous Mt. Everest expedition that was the subject of the book. Pilot-trained, Martin recognized an ominous cloud formation as he approached the summit and, as he later told me, “got the hell out of Dodge.”
  • Rae Lynn J: movie-star beautiful, she starred in a low-budget production called I’m Hot.  She has skied the steeps in Crested Butte, where she once owned a health food store, and also water-skied at speeds above 100 mph. A self-taught architect, she designed and built her home – bricks, pipes, wiring and all — with her husband, a plumber and avid cross-country skier. Her paintings could hang in a museum — really — but she gave it up to pursue other interests.
  • Gerry C: For years, I and many others knew Gerry as a nice, if unusually soft-spoken, guy. He worked as a mailman, but after a Thanksgiving dinner one year, when the discussion turned to Vietnam, we discovered that he had been a war hero, much decorated for deeds of astounding courage.
  • Richard K: The ‘significant other’ of a cousin of mine, Dick is a mathematician and also a walking encyclopedia of baseball trivia. When I stayed with them for the first time, I put my keys and spare change in a silver bowl in the guest room, not realizing that it was the A.M. Turing Award. Dick, too modest to mention it himself, turns out to have solved the Traveling Salesman Problem, among others. At 78, he heads up a research project that aced out Harvard, Stanford and MIT for a huge federal grant. Someone else would have to tell you these things, though, since Dick would much rather talk about the Red Sox than about himself.
  • Milton Ackerman: I was about eight when I learned that my father had graduated first in his medical school class and been editor of the yearbook. It was while flipping through the book that I discovered these facts, along with another told in news clips stashed between the pages. Fresh out of medical school, it turns out, he had used his forensic skills as a pathologist to solve a notorious murder case in Pennsylvania that had been made to look like a suicide.  We all have egos that need to be stroked in some way, but if my father, a truly humble man, had one, neither I nor anyone else I know ever felt it.

And now, dear readers, I would be sincerely grateful if you would take the word “sneak” as your own and spread it far and wide.

  • Cam Fitzgerald May 4, 2013, 3:04 pm

    “Pride Cometh Before the Fall”. Perhaps that is what is most interesting about true sneak guys (and gals) who understand this so well. They don’t seek the social rewards of great accomplishment but rather are heartened more by a private and personal knowledge of a job well done. Some no doubt think they could have done even better. They are loathe to boast and seek recognition even where they have done outstanding works. Perhaps they are more devout than the rest and take their rewards from prayer and communion rather than rejoicing in accolades and public displays of their brilliance. It is hard to know for sure because we live in a world where success is often measured by the opinions of others and wealth accrues to those whose accomplishments become well known and publicized.

  • Deer in Headlights May 4, 2013, 7:03 am

    160,000 jobs added (to be revised later to suit one’s needs), but total time worked is -12 min (to be revised later), for a total of -140,000 jobs (to be revised later). This = buy stocks and short gold/silver? What kind of idiots are running this puppet show?

  • Deer in Headlights May 4, 2013, 3:33 am

    Every major nation is printing billions by the month and yet gold is sitting at below $1500? SP, Dow, German stocks at all time highs? Europe is in a recession yet the stock market is at all time highs? Am I the only person seeing something wrong with this picture?

  • Rantly McTirade May 3, 2013, 4:05 pm

    If ‘things’ were really going to ‘really pick up’, they
    already would have by now.
    The birth/death job creation assumption for April was
    193K. The number translates at less than 1:1 into the final
    number, but still 85-90% of this job figure today was simply assumed to come from new or tiny existing businesses. This is how close to economic reality?
    And 165K new jobs is terrible in the current context(size of labor force/population, etc.,)-even the pimped out 268K in February is a weak # in context. We
    should have been north of 300K every month for the last three years, with at least 12 million cumulative new jobs in the payroll report.

    • redwilldanaher May 3, 2013, 9:37 pm

      Rantly, Gary will be back shortly to explain to you why you are wrong.

      Gary keeps trying to make a legitimate case for things that have never been more illegitimate. The PSYOPS/Propaganda that he feeds off of is all that he needs.

    • gary leibowitz May 3, 2013, 10:57 pm

      I guess I am wrong and so is the street. What is it now 5 years? Hmm. Lets see earnings? I know it’s one big conspiracy. No real earnings. After all for 5 years now they have cut the work force to 1 person to be the warehouse foreman, loading dock operator, stocker, trucker, inventory counter, creates the bill of lading, and still manages to bring his/her own lunch to save the company time.

      The proven fact is that a lousy slow growth economy is EXACTLY how corporations get rich. I mean the highest earnings and gross margins EVER! Yes we had a lousy quarter. yes it was as always UP, and while 3 to 4 percent growth isn’t much it is 5 to 6 percent ahead of expectation. For the future we have a consistent employment range, dwindling unemployment, lower commodity prices, very low interest rates, and no demand issues that would drive costs up for the employers.

      BTW, I believe in is now 17 or 18 months ago I said we were entering the “sweet spot” for earnings specifically because of what has taken place. All this on top of the really bad president and his really bad decisions. You got to love it when people insist on complaining no matter how sunny it gets. I suggest you stay indoors with your attitude.

      If 5 years is not proof that the formula worked then its time to turn off this reality show. Please do not confuse powerful corporate earnings with a robust healthy economy. You are in the business of making money in stocks, not crusading the “liberal” cause. I also want it understood that I personally believe the end result will “NOT” be a long slow growth economy where real debt can be reduced till it becomes manageable. I also believe the choices at the time of this crisis was just one, that being the one taken. There was no other option.

      So once again please tell me the only participants is the government and all the mutual funds were cashed out years ago. Please tell me that for 5 years all investors on the long side was duped. If a market takes this long and goes this high for you to still insist it’s an illusion I suggest you reevaluate your emotional bias. If you can’t admit to being wrong you can’t make money in this market.

      This market goes higher for a 7th wave run. I still see the top hitting more towards end of July/early August followed by a 1 year downward bias of 20 to 25 percent. Given the world economy as it is, I see nothing that would indicate a crash is around the corner. Maybe my bullish inclination is a reason for you short. Be my guest.

    • gary leibowitz May 3, 2013, 11:18 pm

      Sorry for the obsessive posts but I do well when I display my bets. US Dollar about to break out. Gold is going to re-test lows or break below, s/b within the month.

      I usually don’t play gold, but it looks pretty darn enticing. The upward move in the dollar should provide some nice roller-coaster swings in equities.

    • Larry D May 4, 2013, 12:19 am

      Preachy, self-lauding and long-winded.

      Very un-sneak.

      (Say – that’s a good name for Garebear’s new supremely confident investment/rant website… Un-sneak.com)

    • gary leibowitz May 4, 2013, 12:38 am

      I am from the post generation Sneak. Un-sneak, de-sneak, dis-sneak perhaps. Humble and unassuming is not my character. I can boast a little considering how I was up against TITANS on this board, with constant ridicule, yet my “words” had an accuracy rating of well over 75 percent. This goes back a long way. Nothing and no one can take that away from me.

      Coming from the same mindset as most on this board (over 1 year ago) it is startling to step out of body so to speak and view your previous behavior. I am shocked to realize just how hard it is to break from a cult like trance. I don’t quite know the exact event or moment I changed course and behavior, but it has allowed me to navigate with minimal baggage. I don’t claim I will have any better success in the future, just more clarity and acceptance. If you accept your mistakes hopefully it will prevent you from plowing thru a disaster. Adapting is a good word. I guess I still ramble. In truth I am a bit upset with myself for not trusting my intuition and bet the long side. Staying on the sidelines is vey hard for me. Impatience will be my downfall.

  • gary leibowitz May 3, 2013, 3:31 pm

    WWII vets. My father just one among many. They all did their job without questioning. Was wiling to die for the cause. Came out of war determined to establish a new life even if it meant working 2 or more jobs, seeing their children grow up infrequently, and unwilling to take handouts. Unquestionable ethics.

    BTW, the market just broke out. Employment, unemployment, high corp. gross margins, lower commodity prices, low interest rates will all contribute to the next leg up. The real danger to this market is very good economic numbers. The market has doubled on borderline economic activity. Once things really pick up, so will wages, inflation, etc… I think the deflation forces will prevent that from happening. We should have 2 more months for the next wave up to finish.

  • Benjamin May 2, 2013, 6:55 pm

    Thanks, Rick. That was a refreshing and riveting article!

  • Sam May 2, 2013, 6:27 pm

    Great essay Rick.

    A masterful concept. In a world that openly rewards bad and immoral behaviour, we are left little recourse but to act in good and moral ways in secret.

  • jeff kahn May 2, 2013, 12:17 pm

    Tellus of Athens, the original sneak guy – a man of his word, never let down a friend in need, worked his land productively, saw his sons and daughters happily married, honored in death by his family and community. At least according to Herodotus

  • buck novak May 2, 2013, 8:23 am

    I assume Turing is for the great mathematician Allan Turing who was key in cracking the German Kriegsmarine Enigma coding machine during The Battle of the Atlantic in WW2.

  • Rich May 2, 2013, 8:00 am

    Your essay reminds us Rick of the power and virtue of modesty.

    Thank you for reminding us of the good in people like Jackie Robinson in 42.

    Did not learn until after his death laid to rest in the National Cemetery my father was a War Hero in Normandy and Okinawa, powered the Detroit Auto Industry, a Master Mason Philanthropist and Master Investor like his father before him.

    Never too late to look at the world in a better way…