10 Tips for Day Trading Stocks Successfully

Use these tips for day trading stocks with greater success [Day traders have been abandoning the game in droves because it supposedly has become too rigged to beat. In fact, the markets have always been rigged, and it’s never been an easy way to make a living. Yes, thinking machines programmed mostly by nerds who know little about the psychology of trading have added a new layer of complexity. But the nerds are hardly unbeatable. Below is the advice we gave traders in a column that originally appeared in the Sunday San Francisco Examiner.  It has been modified to suit the times, but the advice still applies. RA]

The late John Scarne, legendary card manipulator and gaming wizard, used to tell a story about how he and his pal, heavyweight boxer Jim Braddock, walked into a crooked card game and won a pile of money. Knowing that they were being cheated put Scarne on his guard, and he lost no time taking countermeasures to ensure his and Braddock’s great success that evening. Whenever it was Scarne’s turn to deal he went to work, peeling useful cards from the bottom and even the middle of the deck.  At one point, in full view of all, he surreptitiously stacked the cards while shuffling them, allowing him to deal Braddock a hand that beat a tableful of exceptionally good hands.

10-tips-for-day-trading-stocks-successfully

Scarne surely would have feasted if he’d lived long enough to day trade and play the stock market today, since the game has come to be increasingly dominated by thimble-riggers and keister bandits who would not think twice about bankrupting some widow or stealing from an orphan’s college fund. With stocks pushed ever higher by a tide of virtual money from the central bank, Wall Street’s wolves have set upon an unwary flock of short-term traders with unusual voraciousness, jacking shares up and down with the skill of a carny man working the roly-poly board.

It is in times like these that cynicism and street smarts can help the day trader and active investor eke out gains in markets that have alternated between tedium and hysteria.  On balance, stock have trended higher, and this alone creates opportunity for day traders patient enough to be at their monitors when the inevitable spasms occur.

Here are some tips to avoid getting fleeced when day trading stocks. They come from long experience in the trading pits and from close observation of certain patterns that have repeated themselves throughout history, to wit:

1.) Visualize the competition.  If you would not sit down at a poker table with a bunch of guys who wear $2,000 lizard-skin boots, then pick another game.

2.) Forget everything you may have heard on the business channels about what causes stocks to move up and down, because it’s not “fundamentals” that drive them.  In fact, most of the time shares fluctuate at the behest of institutional heavies whose skill at manipulating the herd would make Machiavelli weep for the little guys.

3.) Many traders follow the adage that “the trend is your friend.”  However, we’ve found that trend reversals are more easily tradable and that swing highs and lows that are easily exploitable can be predicted within pennies.

4.) Use the leverage in put and call options whenever possible by purchasing options that are far enough out-of-the money to be selling for $1.00 or less. Stick with the near-term expiration at all times, since longer-term plays are a sucker’s bet.

5.) Never trade options without using “contingency” orders, such as, “Buy four December 60 calls for 2.30 or less as long as the stock is trading 53.50 or higher.” If you do not understand and employ such strategies routinely, you are no more likely to make money with options than the blackjack player who always splits fives and doubles down on sixteen.

6.) Nothing improves a trader’s horse sense and timing like taking a small partial profit early in a trade.

7.) For options traders in particular, high-flying “lunatic stocks” like Priceline, Netflix and Google offer a particularly juicy bet, since the $20-or-greater intraday prices swings such stocks frequently trace out can cause a $1.00 option to quadruple-or-more in within hours.

8.) When a stock that has been strong gets socked for a sudden $10 loss, keep in mind that the illusion of weakness has been deftly engineered by the shakedown artists. Typically, they have just unloaded shares into a steep rally and wish to accumulate more stock at lower prices before repeating the cycle. The bunco artists who jerk the high-flyers hither and thither are among the true masters of the game, and you can learn a great deal just from watching their swoon-and-recover antics.

9.) Don’t be afraid to trade in the opening hour, before the dust has settled. Price action may seem crazy, but if you look at it on a one-minute bar chart, you’ll see that it is not only predictable but opportune. It is only when the trend has been established that a stock becomes increasingly difficult to trade. That’s because the stock will take increasingly devious evasive maneuvers to prevent “everyone’ from making money on what is obvious.

10.) Don’t swing for the fences, and be sure to take at least a small partial profit on any trade that goes your way. That’s the best way I know of to put your mind in a relaxed state that will help you make better trading decisions.

These day trading rules work for me, but you can probably come up with equally effective ones by paper-trading for a while. Trust your own observations, since they are capable over time of identifying profitable patterns and quirks that the algo nerds don’t necessarily see. *10 Tips for Day Trading Stocks Successfully*

  • Jason S June 29, 2014, 11:13 am

    Interesting. I had always thought most of the reason for us entering WWI (a war the great majority of the population was not interested in joining) was because of Woodrow Wilson (and the Democrat party) wanting to get more involved in building an overseas empire not to mention having a say in how Europe was redivided after the war; as long as the US was on the winning side.

    • John Jay June 29, 2014, 8:42 pm

      Jason,

      A very nice follow up piece by David Stockman that continues the trail up to the present day is now posted at Zerohedge.

      Between the two chapters we have a modern version of Gibbons “Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire”.
      With a similar, although a much shorter list of villains this time around.
      I never knew that WWI Liberty Bonds were financed by loans from banks to the general public.
      So that scam has been going on for one hundred years!
      And, other than Eisenhower and possibly JFK, every President has had a hand in the financial suicide of the United States.
      All the pieces seem to fit, don’t they!

      **tips for traders**

      • mario June 30, 2014, 12:50 am

        Well yea, I get it guys, but you can’t just call it financial suicide. They issued the war bonds, went to war, etc. The final result was that the U.S. rose up from Europe’s ashes to then become the world’s superpower and we entered the modern age, warts and all. That result is pretty much the antithesis of suicide. I say this as friendly encouragement for us to keep an open mind, let ourselves always look at both sides of the macro picture. Getting too stuck in our own narrative is not wise. Some of the guys here like articles found at ZH, most of the time I find them to be ridiculous, not because they aren’t well founded and intelligent, but because the narrative is far too narrow in scope, they delete the rest of the story, which of course is the point. When you don’t know the rest of the story, the narrative sounds great, but its not.

        Cheers, Mario

  • John Jay June 28, 2014, 8:05 pm

    There is an outstanding article right now at Zerohedge about the consequences and influences of WWI on our civilization.
    “Sarajevo is the fulcrum of modern history”
    Some excerpts:

    “Here’s the crucial background: When Congress acted on Christmas Eve 1913, just six months before Archduke Ferdinand’s assassination, it had provided no legal authority whatsoever for the Fed to buy government bonds or undertake so-called “open market operations” to finance the public debt. In part this was due to the fact that there were precious few Federal bonds to buy. The public debt then stood at just $1.5 billion, which is the same figure that had pertained 51 years earlier at the battle of Gettysburg, and amounted to just 4 percent of GDP or $11 per capita.”

    “And this brings us to the Rubicon of modern Warfare State finance. During World War I the US public debt rose from $1.5 billion to $27 billion—an eruption that would have been virtually impossible without wartime amendments which allowed the Fed to own or finance U.S. Treasury debt. These “emergency” amendments—it’s always an emergency in wartime—enabled a fiscal scheme that was ingenious, but turned the Fed’s modus operandi upside down and paved the way for today’s monetary central planning.”

    “As is well known, the Wilson war crusaders conducted massive nationwide campaigns to sell Liberty Bonds to the patriotic masses. What is far less understood is that Uncle Sam’s bond drives were the original case of no savings? No credit? No problem!

    What happened was that every national bank in America conducted a land office business advancing loans for virtually 100 percent of the war bond purchase price—with such loans collateralized by Uncle Sam’s guarantee. Accordingly, any patriotic American with enough pulse to sign the loan papers could buy some Liberty Bonds.

    And where did the commercial banks obtain the billions they loaned out to patriotic citizens to buy Liberty Bonds? Why the Federal Reserve banks opened their discount loan windows to the now eligible collateral of war bonds.”

    Amazing narrative.
    A long article, but worth the time it takes to read it for sure.
    It is the best, most concise explanation of the forces, motivations, and consequences of the First World War.
    I have been a history buff since childhood and most of this articles contents are new to me.

  • Rick Ackerman June 28, 2014, 2:51 pm

    Go ahead and spin conspiracy theories if you want, Vlad, but your latest flight-of-fancy ignores the organic consistency of Gary’s intellectual obtuseness, political tone deafness and slippery moral pretensions. In the context of the ongoing discussion here, such as it is, he seems neither more nor less than what I have always judged him to be — i.e., an insufferable narcissist (like you) with way too much time on his hands. To give him his due, however, he is a clever enough narcissist to keep at least a few forum regulars obsessively engaged while he somehow remains at the center of nearly every discussion.

    Those who stopped taking the bait and who have left the forum far outnumber those still here. That’s one reason I’ve been tempted to kill this venue. Coming up with a weekly topic, let alone a daily essay like those of yore, is no longer worth the effort. Too many posts, including this one, concern El Garo. Why should I be tasked with sustaining a co-dependency involving a dwindling number of participants, especially when their comments so often address only the gratuitously provocative blather of just one individual?

    I keep the forum nominally alive nonetheless on the chance that it will increase my visibility at a time when the guru business is dying. That’s right: dying. This is despite the fact that the stock market is trading near record highs. I am in a good position to assert that no one gives a rat’s ass about the stock market these days, especially day-traders.

    • Gary leibowitz June 29, 2014, 6:09 am

      Jayson. Your personal decisions to help is great. To suggest people will pitch in on a global scale to shore up the destitute and needy is naive. In bad time when everyone feels the pinch it is unlikely generosity increases. History shows the opposite. How well did charities pull us out of the depression? Please review all the data available on this subject and tell me gov intervention is not needed.

      As for Ricks ridiculous accusations against me I can’t even begin to figure out where to counter. I will let my tiny single voice speak for itself. Placing blame on one person that disagrees with this groups premises. Does that strike you as rational? Especially when the highly charged voices mute me out every single time.

      &&&&&

      In two years, you’ve posted the equivalent of an 1800-page novel here. I rest my case. RA

  • Jason S June 27, 2014, 6:28 pm

    Gary, this is in response to you berating us for complaining about entitled pan handlers.

    I have a daughter who will forever need assistance. I have set up a 501(c)3 charity and in a few years when she graduates high school will change careers and become a fulltime caregiver and philanthropist to provide a home and a meaningful life for as many disabled adults as the good Lord decides to give me.

    So shut up about us being mean people who don’t care! I am giving everything I have to others. I complain about the pan handling because from the time my daughter was diagnosed I felt obligated to her care (and others) for her entire life because that was my responsibility. I don’t believe I should foist that on your shoulders or anyone else’s! MY RESPONSIBILITY!

    &&&&&&

    With his careless rhetoric, Gary is what the political philosopher Kenneth Minogue, referring to an adversary, called “a pyromaniac in a field of straw men.” Here’s a link to the George Will essay, “The Adolescent President,” from which that quote was borrowed.
    RA

    • Edd June 28, 2014, 12:31 am

      God Bless you and keep you always Jason. I can very ,very closely empathize with you. I will leave my own family responsibilities, my personal challenges and any past and current endeavors I involve myself with, between myself and the Lord.
      I would usually, almost without exception, bristle at the sanctimonious admonitions Gary continually foists on everyone and anyone here, never, ever knowing any of us in our personal lives. His pompous, generalized judgments on complete strangers, if not spurious, is simply maddening. Alas, my Lord commands me to turn the other cheek. In those moments when I endeavor to do just that, I feel an overwhelming sadness for him.

      I have spent everyday for years now following along with Rick in his trading room and absorbing all of the true wealth of ideas to be found on his editorial board. My admiration and appreciation for him is boundless, deservedly so. There is no man who has had a greater beneficial influence on my trading abilities than RA. Rick is a literary maestro.I personally think he is wasting his true talent in the financial world, even though it is a benefit to me.

      It came to me one night, late, once again reading through a particularly obnoxious piece from Gary, he is not real. That’s it! He is NOT REAL! Rick, you amazing, artful, creative genius. Gary is a creation. Gary is a fiction. Gary is a device, the foil that prompts thought, debate, anger and fosters so much conversation. I shut down the laptop, and went to bed. I laid my head down, smiling, laughing, as I dozed off peacefully into that good night, comfortable and secure in the knowledge of this revelation to me. I look forward now to Gary`s (ha!) posts, for the verbal repartee it engenders is stimulating and inspirational, on par with any editorial / opinion sites on the web. As always, many thanks Rick.

      • VILE VLAD June 28, 2014, 5:11 am

        “It came to me one night, late, once again reading through a particularly obnoxious piece from Gary, he is not real. That’s it! He is NOT REAL! Rick, you amazing, artful, creative genius. Gary is a creation. Gary is a fiction. Gary is a device, the foil that prompts thought, debate, anger and fosters so much conversation. I shut down the laptop, and went to bed. I laid my head down, smiling, laughing, as I dozed off peacefully into that good night, comfortable and secure in the knowledge of this revelation to me. I look forward now to Gary`s (ha!) posts, for the verbal repartee it engenders is stimulating and inspirational”

        edd, I suggested this very same thing, over 3 years ago. however, after further thought,
        I don’t think ackerman has the fknn time himself, to create gary, unless–‘he’ works for him.
        however, it is logical. gary does NOT belong here–period. yet, he’s attached, like glue.

        so, why is ‘he’ here. with his occasional ‘jill’ appearances. don’t know. maybe he’s insane.
        maybe gary is on a ‘mission from god’, like the blues brothers– albeit, communist brothers.
        who the fkk knows. and who the fkk cares. except for redw, who lives to kick his face. ha.

        vainglorious vlad. better than despicable vlad, phonetically.
        like redwill, soon’ll be nil. like red, soon’ll be ded. yep.

    • Gary leibowitz June 28, 2014, 2:12 am

      Yes the church and family will help the needy. Shelters broken families impoverished will somehow find that kind patron. It’s a wonderful life. Myopic view wouldn’t you say? Can’t see beyond your own immediate situation. What if she had no family? Ding dng dng

      • Jason S June 28, 2014, 10:37 pm

        Gary, my final reply before I ignore you completely, because that is all you deserve; complete disregard.

        My wife and I looked at the situation and said there is a desperate need for care for the disabled adult population. If we will care for one, we may as well care for as many as possible.

        Evil is pervasive but I believe people are inherently good. Private charity will care for the needy far better than government. Always has, always will. My views are not myopic.

        Good bye, Gary. May you enjoy your parasitic existence as long as you can before you either kill your host or are exterminated as all parasites should be.

  • Stephen G June 27, 2014, 3:53 am

    TWTR back over $40? Revolting.

    Sticking to my call. DOW will not hit 17,000. We had a double-top in the 16,970s. That’s as high as it’ll go.

  • dk June 26, 2014, 11:18 pm

    Great advice, Rick, as well as the other contributions. Beyond those, there are all kinds of little nuances a trader should remember to keep in mind to stay as sharp as possible.
    I know a lot of people who stay focused on the lesser charts and have gotten zinged by something going on in the bigger picture – I’ve certainly gotten my clock cleaned in the past for not being prudent enough.
    Rich credited trailing stops a short while ago… couldn’t agree more.
    To me, the partial profits point is huge. Winning in smaller “skirmishes” can be a huge confidence booster and it can give you a bit more breathing room to take on some of the bigger “battles.” That point touches on the capital preservation point above as well.

    Good stuff.

  • Gary leibowitz June 26, 2014, 9:39 pm

    Jet Blue and panhandlers. Sure is staying on topic. Banned the lot of you. I guess that all poor that need assistance are greedy just like the white collar criminals. Nice way to justify your Angry White Man position. Just wait till you or a family member need assistance. It’s never personal till it envelopes your world.

    I can kick myself pre 87 crash. I had a strong feeling a deep drop was brewing and had my folks divest of stocks. Index options were so new that the public didn’t use it. Zero premiums. A few people made a killing with a thousand to one bets. Can’t ever see that again.

    • John Jay June 27, 2014, 12:15 am

      Gary,

      NUGT and DUST have some very good moves tracking gold prices up and down as straight up ETFs.
      If you buy/sell options on them, you can probably get some real high percentages.
      Lots of 3X long/short ETFs for various market sectors.

      • gary leibowitz June 27, 2014, 3:03 am

        I tried playing Gold. Not for me. Too volatile and hard to find long term direction now. SPX 3x ETF’s is my comfort level. Much better track record.

      • redwilldanaher June 27, 2014, 3:51 am
      • redwilldanaher June 27, 2014, 3:52 am
      • redwilldanaher June 27, 2014, 3:55 am

        Isn’t it odd that when ‘officials’ are no longer part of the status-quo-sustainers, how the truthiness flows… As former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh explained this morning, “on the fairness point – if you have access to credit, if you’ve got a big balance sheet, the Fed has made you richer,” concluding rather too honestly for some people’s liking, “I would say [Fed policy] has been in some sense Reverse Robin Hood.” The bottom line, he chides, “this is a way to make the well to do more well to do because that’s all the Federal Reserve can do.” – From ZH

      • redwilldanaher June 27, 2014, 3:56 am

        Let’s hear more about how you’re for the little guy Garo.

        Let’s hear more about how we’re angry white guys with black hearts.

      • redwilldanaher June 27, 2014, 3:57 am
      • Troll June 27, 2014, 4:40 am

        A big yawn to your orgasmic affection to ZH, Red.

        They already sucked me out of a bunch of money back in 2009 and 2010 (let alone 2011) when I thought they knew what they were talking about.

        The bottom line is, all the brilliant hubris hasn’t made you or me one nickle.

        So, please, we get it.

        You are a sheep who makes no money.

      • Redwilldanaher June 27, 2014, 3:05 pm

        Too bad Tool. What you and your comrade El Garo can’t seem to do is to walk and chew gum at the same time. Aside from vaingloriousvlad, I know of no other rick’s regular that has fought the bs market, in fact most, as with rick and myself, have used TA to ride stocks higher.

        Start with juicy fruit, it’s for beginners…

      • Gary leibowitz June 27, 2014, 4:03 pm

        Red same old tiring story. The Fed lied with the low ball GDP number but grew a concience? They can slice and dice every economic indicator but one. Earnings. Has anyone wrote an article showing that is also manipulated? Buy backs, mergers, and other means to increase shareholder value is transparent. Funny that when negative news hits the tape this group believes it, yet if the same source shows positive results it’s fake. The fake productivity numbers are accepted when wage component is discussed. When bottom line profits result from that productivity it is thought to be manipulated.

        Red, I thought you agreed profits were expected? Your one trick pony arguments never reconcile with quarterly earnings. 5 years of hiding the massive earnings scam. If this can be done stock prices will also stay in the stratosphere forever.

      • Redwilldanaher June 27, 2014, 7:35 pm

        Two tools walked into a forum…

      • redwilldanaher June 27, 2014, 7:55 pm
      • dk June 27, 2014, 10:27 pm

        “They already sucked me out of a bunch of money back in 2009 and 2010 (let alone 2011) when I thought they knew what they were talking about.”

        So, wait, explain how THEY “sucked” it out of you?

        Correct me if I’m wrong, but, that smells pretty bad.

        THEY were on the other side of the investment/trade? THEY took your money?

        Based on what you wrote, it sounds like you didn’t know what you were doing and didn’t even think to do your own due diligence, just blind faith….
        Kind of like…. never mind..

        Yeah…

        Wait, who’s the “sheep?”

        Please, we get it.

      • Redwilldanaher June 28, 2014, 1:04 am

        Just for the record there have been many pieces published with regards to fraudulent earnings. I would furnish one but I know you’ll deny that it even exists if I do. You remaining on the leading edge of self deception/delusion and you may be the most committed propagandist this side of Jay Carney…

    • Troll June 29, 2014, 5:16 am

      Oh!

      dk

      The guy who said he wouldn’t post here anymore because of me is back!

      What a surprise.

      Give it a rest, boys and girls.

      If you are telling me ZH has made you money, you are lying.

      ZH makes their money from the idiot banks that bother to post “commercials” on their site.

      And why do banks post commercials on ZH’s site?

      Because banks and ZH are in business together, and idiots like DK and Red are too stupid to figure as much out.

      &&&&&&&

      Standing firmly with the stupid idiots, let me say for the record that I regard ZeroHedge as absolutely vital to the world’s store of information about current events. Speaking as a former newspaper reporter and editor, I would further assert that ZH is one of the last remaining places one can go to find out the ugly truth about the economy and the global financial system. Concerning the motive of those who post there , ZH is far too robust, and its audience too diverse, to ascribe all of the comments there to self-promoting bankers.
      RA

    • mario June 30, 2014, 12:39 am

      Speaking of fraudulent type transactions that cook the books. The Chinese do it too. In big business, there is always a chunk of it going on that is being manipulated and massaged that results in fake numbers. This is nothing new guys. For example, here in China, we see the recent news about how a lot of the copper and other commodity trading numbers have absolutely nothing to do with using the commodities, such as copper. The transactions are just being used as collateral for LOC’s and other financial/trade transactions. On another note, many businesses purposely own more than one company; they arrange a transaction between the two companies, which is perfectly legal on paper as a purchase transaction, but the cost/retail numbers are faked, the sole purpose is to wash out and profits on the books of the company. One company buys a container of $3 bottles of wine, or similar cheap item from an importer. They write an invoice to sell it to their other company for $30 a bottle. End of transaction. Meanwhile, they have a container load of drinkable $3 a bottle wine which they’re now just selling for cash on the side to friends, family ‘n clients or consuming.

      Businesses in every country figure out how to work the loopholes in the system. The little guy doesn’t know how and feels afraid to try…

      Cheers, Mario

  • John Jay June 26, 2014, 6:48 am

    Rick,
    I forgot to add that Jet Blue has the first checked bag free, $25 for the first checked bag on American.

    • Chuck June 26, 2014, 3:53 pm

      JJ, if you want no frills try Sprint Air. Not only is there a $25 carry on bag fee (they let you take a small backpack size bag free), they charge $3 for a can of soda. The seats are not as padded or as comfy as usual and they are smaller – I assume they have more seats on the plane than normal. I believe I flew an average size Airbus plane. But, man! CHEAP fares if you get them 3 weeks out. Even beat out Southwest……I’d use them again, but only when I don’t need to bring much with me

  • SA1 June 25, 2014, 8:21 pm

    The single most important rule for a trader is to keep his or her capital intact (ie: Money management). Lose your capital base and it’s game over. Keep your capital intact and sooner or later, you will stumble into a great trade.

    No matter how you select a trade… Hidden pivots, charts, Elliott Wave, indicators, discretionary or systematic methods, macro-econonic modes, value investing, momentum, you name it – there will be trades you screw up royally and trades you miss completely. Through it all you need to protect your capital.

    Secondly, you must learn to “pull the trigger” when your system says you should. If you do not pull the trigger when you should, you must WAIT on the sidelines for the next trade. There will always be another trade.

    &&&&&

    A pretty good game plan, Dale. Thanks for weighing in. RA

  • John Jay June 25, 2014, 6:07 pm

    Good advice Rick, but it is getting tougher compared to the days when the ES was trading 500 contracts a minute and the trends were slow and steady.
    And when one year T-bills yielding 5% could be used for margin!
    Oh well, you can’t trade in the past, only the present.

    On the inflation front, I just checked airfares and my, my, my!
    Seems like they have jumped up about 30% since my last flight back East in January!

    And, on a purely anecdotal level, I was shocked when some bum in an old van asked me if I could let him have $10 to help buy some gas!
    Jesus, Inflation has reached the panhandlers now!
    It used to be they asked you for a couple of bucks, but, wow, a gap up to $10.
    Just “Noise” to the Fed Chair I imagine!

    &&&&&

    Airfare inflation recalls what I call the ‘Hershey bar paradigm’ — that the cost increase is secondary to the less-visible inflation of shrinking bars and the removal, over time, of actual chocolate from them. Similarly, airfares have risen even as nearly all air-travel amenities have been eliminated one-by-one.
    RA

    • John Jay June 26, 2014, 6:46 am

      Rick,
      I stuck it out with American for a long time because they were the last big carrier that did not outsource heavy maintenance work to Central America etc.
      I finally gave up and switched to Jet Blue for much more coach leg room, free seat back TVs, much cleaner aircraft, and much friendlier flight crews.
      American offered cramped seating, dirty aircraft, no TV, and angry, bossy flight crews, (some were insane, I am not kidding).
      I always take a red eye from LAX/JFK so I don’t care about meals, drinks, etc.

      Anyway, they both increased airfares by almost the exact same amount.
      I think jet fuel is up over $5 a gallon now.
      The bum asking me for $10 was a bigger shock than the increased airfares!

      &&&&&&

      Frontier always did well by me — until William Franke, who turned Spirit into flying cattle cars, ported over his nickel-and-dime-’em-to-death business model. Now, Frontier’s trick is to fly everyone everywhere at ungodly hours, and to land them in places no one could possibly want to fly to, such as Trenton and Wilmington. RA

    • Jason S June 26, 2014, 5:29 pm

      JJ,
      Thank you for bringing up the pan-handler asking for $10. The family was in Seal Beach last weekend and a young adult (who appeared to be homeless) asked if we would get him some food. My wife being the softie said yes (we donate substantial money to the local food bank to avoid this scam, but alas…) So I went to get him a slice of pizza and he all but demanded the three pieces and a drink special which cost $10.

      • mario June 27, 2014, 12:56 am

        The only street people I individually donate to are the ones who are visibly and obviously incapable or handicapped or working for it, such as street musicians. Those musicians are literally working for their living and they deserve a couple of bucks. People we see with obvious problems truly need help.

        Then there’s people in good clothes and a clear mind who walk up to you and ask for money, unbelievable. Here in China its grandma’s with kids (who often aren’t their kids) and students!…Three students actually walk directly up to you and say “We’re students here in Shanghai looking for jobs, its difficult, would you mind giving us some money to help us?” And they’re dressed nice!

        Cheers, Mario

      • VILE VLAD June 27, 2014, 5:04 am

        couple of stories…

        &&&&&

        Clean them up if you want to see them in print. RA

      • John Jay June 27, 2014, 3:38 pm

        Jason,
        That pizza panhandler is the final product of what LBJ initiated back in his administration.
        His little scheme was to “give them a little, not enough to make any difference, just enough to get their votes”.
        Every administration has continued to give them a little more, until now half the country is employed by, or gets a check from some level of the Government.
        Begging, which used to be a disgrace, is now aggressive and in your face.
        From the street bum to the F-35 contractors.

        It is so much a part of our society/economy that I hope they can keep it on the rails for the rest of my life.
        Can you imagine the chaos, misery, and violence when EBT, Section 8 housing, Medicare/Medicaid, pensions, Government jobs et cetera just vanish?
        Even the gainfully employed have no savings to speak of.
        What follows will be a brutal game of catch up for 50 years of fiscal folly, compressed into one or two months as it all unravels.
        I truly hope the DC gangsters hold it together a while longer.
        The alternative will be too brutal to contemplate.

  • reader June 25, 2014, 7:53 am

    Chang here. What do you mean when you say “sucker bet”? Bad bet? Why? Is this tradition (must not bet like that) or there is reason some for why not? Also I hear same about pigs but nobody explains what it mean and why.