***
As GM Goes…
There was a time when GM’s fortunes were held to be inextricably bound with those of the nation. The fact that America has since grown a “service economy” and become the foremost purveyor to the world of gaseous financial products, may have diminished the automaker’s role in dollar terms, but not necessarily in other important respects. The company still supports hundreds of thousands of workers and retirees, and the company’s slow death spiral will continue to feed the vortex which engulfs America’s manufacturing sector.
If things at General Motors were not looking grim enough already, we have the following to add the firm’s growing list of problems. The story hit the tape after the stock market closed on Wednesday.
DETROIT (The Wall Street Journal) -- General Motors Corp., whose accounting has been under scrutiny by the Securities and Exchange Commission, said it must restate financial results for 2001 and possibly subsequent years, in the latest blow to the beleaguered auto giant and its embattled chairman and chief executive, Rick Wagoner.
Late Wednesday, after the close of New York Stock Exchange trading, GM said it overstated income for 2001 by as much as $300 million to $400 million -- equivalent to about 50% of the profit it reported at the time -- by "erroneously" booking credits from suppliers. The company said its accounting for credits from suppliers is "one of the matters" being investigated by the SEC.
GM's admission ended a day in which its shares were battered, falling to their lowest level since November 1992 -- during the company's last financial and management crisis -- in 4 p.m. Big Board trading, closing down $1.23, or nearly 5%, at $24.63. Also Wednesday, Fitch Ratings cut its already junk-level rating on GM's debt by another two notches.
GM spokeswoman Toni Simonetti said GM's audit committee had met earlier this week to discuss the accounting issue.
"The issue here was that we basically booked the income in the wrong period. We're going to restate it rather than taking it all in 2001," Ms. Simonetti said. "That income still exists. Its not like that income shouldn't have been booked, it just shouldn't have been booked in all of 2001.