Member-only content. Please Login or get a free trial of Rick's Picks to view.
COMMENTARY for Tuesday
TODAY'S ACTION for Tuesday
Rick's Picks for Tuesday
The darned thing did practically everything a bear could have asked of it yesterday –except continue to fall after the overnight lows got taken out. What could account for sellers’ apparent faint-heartedness when they had bulls on the ropes? Lack of conviction? More likely it is fear that was lacking, although we shouldn’t rule out its emergence this week, since it could easily start to snowball if the futures fall even moderately over the next day or two without finding good traction. Night owls will find scant camouflage if the futures pop above 988.00 in the wee hours, since this seems likely to excite enough buyers to necessitate our entering after the first point ‘C’ has been stopped out. I have sketched this scenario in the accompanying chart for your guidance.
A print at 968.10 this week would be needed to turn the hourly chart bullish again; failing that, the futures could grope their way down to early July’s 907.60 low in search of support. Once beneath that low, it would take an uninterrupted fall exceeding 884.80 to do even minor damage to the daily chart. More immediately, the rally off Monday’s lows has shown no particular exuberance, having stalled at a 940.70 high that is two ticks from the highest target we could have projected using the lesser charts. (A=931.80, B=937.60 at 11:15 a.m., 5-minute chart.)
I’ve just mentioned in the chat room that the 13.805 target is still theoretically valid but unappealing as a place to try bottom-fishing, since the bounce from a somewhat higher low at 13.820 has gone on for so long. The futures would need to keep going all the way up to 15.550 to make a statement, but that appears unlikely because of the feebleness of the bounce so far. A bit of unexpected news could change that in an instant, but without it the futures appear to be headed lower — presumably to test a moderately important low at 13.370 recorded on July 31.
I’d be tempted to recommend shorting a Hidden Pivot at 31.52 aggressively were it not for its close proximity to a visually obvious high at 31.63 made two weeks ago. Let’s try it anyway, very gingerly, by naked-shorting a single September 32 call (SYJIF), stop 31.64, if and when SKF gets within a six cents of the target. By rough estimate the calls should be offered for around 2.60 at the time, but you should try to do no worse than a price midway between bid and offer. _______ UPDATE (Aug 19): Let’s bag the short, since the pattern that yielded our target is getting a bit sloppy.
Member-only content. Please Login or get a free trial of Rick's Picks to view.
Member-only content. Please Login or get a free trial of Rick's Picks to view.
Take any dozen good reasons for being bearish right now and they still don’t equal the bullishness of the chart shown. The undeniably compelling rally objective is 13085, a 4.8% move from current levels, and one can only surmise that the dusting the 12158 midpoint received on the last pullback (12/28) all but clinched a finishing stroke to the higher number. Moreover, it implies that bears shouldn’t get their hopes too high even if, in the next few days, the Dow plummets 324 points to retest the midpoint support. As of now, that would signal not weakness, but a screaming opportunity to get long. Hard to believe, really, but that’s what the charts say.
SIDE BETS for Tuesday
We took a flyer on this stock a while back and lost $200, but there’s a midpoint support where we can try again that will afford us better protection against risk. Bid 17.07 (3 cents above the actual pivot) for 400 shares, stop 16.97, day order.
Goldman’s Friends in (Very) High Places seem to have cut the stock loose these last two weeks. We’ll know soon enough whether they’re just being coy, since there are two quite-clear Hidden Pivot supports not far below. They lie, respectively, at 156.34 and 153.57. Either number can be bottom-fished at your whim with the very tightest of stops, but you’ll be on your own if you fill.
This Just In... for Tuesday
Here’s an excerpt from a must-read essay by James Lewis that you can access by clicking here:
“[Obamacare] is the result of fanaticism, not balanced thinking. That seems to be President Obama’s way. This White House defines a goal like Arab-Israeli Peace in the Middle East, or Health Care for All, and goes hell for leather, damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead — without ever pausing to think, or to listening to people who have spent decades dealing with these questions — if they dissent from Obama orthodoxy. Any opposition is interpreted as bad faith rather than reasoned disagreement. Critics must be evil or racist. That is the state of mind of jihadis going on suicide missions. It is not how intelligent policy makers operate.”
From our friend Levente Mady, who tracks and recommends bonds for Bob Hoye’s Institutional Advisors, here’s a tactic you can use to beat the high cost of gasoline. (He is responding to a post in the forum by a concerned reader):
“If you are worried about the price of gasoline, you should convert your car to run on propane. If you look at the price relationship between crude oil and natural gas, it should cost you about 3.5 times less to fill up with propane than with gasoline these days. In other words, if it costs you $100 to fill up your car with gas, you can get the same amount of mileage for less than $30 of propane. There is hundreds of years’ worth of natural gas supply in North America. It is dirt cheap! It is clean! Why not put it to good use?
“A bit of background in terms of practicality: the technology is there and it costs $3,000 to $5,000 to convert a larger automobile (SUV or truck) to run on propane. Obviously, natural gas is the cleaner fuel and there is a massive abundance in North America — that is why it is so cheap. As a matter of fact, some states – Arizona, for example – provide tax credits for the conversion expense as well as for running the car on propane instead of gas. Uunfortunately right now there just does not seem to be much talk about using natural gas as transportation fuel. Natural gas is supposed to be used more or less exclusively for heating. The choice fuels for transportation are crude oil derivatives (diesel, gasoline, jet fuel, etc.).
“The silly thing is that there is a ton of money spent on non starters that are decades away from making economic sense for the average driver, such as electric and fuel cell technology. Meanwhile, America’s energy dependence on shady foreign powers could very easily be cut in half by utilizing existing technology to replace crude oil with natural gas in the transport sector. But that is just too simple, so there is no way the government would ever make a real push for it. Cash for clunkers – yessss! Cash for propane conversion – it makes sense, so not likely!”
Hidden Pivot Webinar & Tutorials
The next Hidden Pivot Webinar will be held on Feb. 29th - Mar. 1st. This two-day event is designed to teach you the risk-averse trading strategies Rick has taken to his seminars around the world. Once you have learned his proprietary secrets, you will approach trading and investing with enough confidence to make your own decisions without having to rely on the advice of others. For more information, or to register, click here.
Consumer ‘Surge’ Downgraded to a Blip
by Rick Ackerman on August 18, 2009 2:31 am GMT · 2 comments
Yesterday’s selloff on Wall Street was attributed to disappointment over consumer spending data that suggest a hoped-for surge in recent weeks is looking more like a blip. Who could possibly have believed the economy was returning to life in the first place? Actually, one guy does come to mind – our telegenic friend Larry Kudlow — but we suspect that even he didn’t really buy into the “green shoots” story – other, perhaps, than as a metaphor that engaged the fancy of credulous news editors for a few short weeks. There’s The Wall Street Journal, for one, where editors have found reason to celebrate an uptick in » Read the full article