Despite Gold's labored price action near the midpoint Hidden Pivot (p=4950.00), it looks like a certain bet to reach the d target at 5476.70, about 3.4% above Friday's settlement price. Since it delivered a perfect, effortless trade at the green line a month ago, there is a good chance that a tradeable top will occur at d. I am not recommending a short there, however, unless you have made money on the way up. You should also be aware that if buyers blow past the target, the next logical objective would be 5732.00, a Hidden Pivot resistance that is likely to show more stopping power than the lower one. ________ UPDATE (Mar 1, 10:49 p.m.): Tonight's breakaway gap has raised the short-term minimum target to 5510.40, a Hidden Pivot with the potential to reverse the rally for a little while. The other rally targets remain viable. _______ UPDATE (Mar 7): The 5510.40 Hidden Pivot remains viable as a minimum upside objective for the near term, but you can add another at 5732.00 if buyers easily push past it. This chart shows the provenance of the target.
It took buyers all of three days to gnaw through heavy resistance at the 90.165 midpoint Hidden Pivot of the pattern shown. Adding to the challenge was the 92.015 peak recorded on Feb 4. It had served as a stop-loss for a 'mechanical' short from 10 points lower that I had suggested paper-trading to gauge the strength of the uptrend. Although Friday's rally did not impale p, which we would have taken as a sign that more upside to d=116.43 was in-the-bag, bulls made such short work of it that there is little doubt the target will be reached. For now, however, let's use p2=103.298 as a minimum upside projection for the near term. It should show enough stopping power to get short, if only briefly, but I am recommending the trade only to subscribers who know how to manage the risk by using a small-interval trigger (aka 'camouflage'). _______ UPDATE (Mar 2, 3:11 p.m.): Check the chat room for timely posts related to Silver -- and please note that they all reference the MAY contract. Basis the May, d=117.485, p2=104.279 and p=91.073
GDXJ had a constructive week, exceeding p2=152.56 just days after shredding the midpoint Hidden Pivot resistance at 142.01. This one-two punch has all but guaranteed more upside in the days ahead to at least D=163.11. Given the clarity of the pattern, there is almost certain to be tradeable resistance there. But the coordinates are too visually obvious to expect precise stopping power, so you'll need to fashion a 'camo' trigger if you plan on getting short. Naked-shorting call options is another way to go, provided you understand the risks. This is the best way to get short if you expect a few days' worth of evasions, feints and obfuscations as GDXJ attempts to shake off traders who will be trying to get short at 'our' D target. ______ UPDATE (Mar 5): So much for my seppuku-worthy guarantee. Bears turned tail at 157.49, nearly $6 shy of the 163.11 target. wouldn't it be crazy if the 'mechanical' buy about to be signaled at x=131.46 went on to achieve 163.11? I wouldn't bet the ranch against it, since stranger things have happened. ______ UPDATE (Mar 8): Actually, the 'mechanical' buy alluded to above does in fact have a chance of reaching the 163.11 target. Last week's low at 136.11 not only came within 0.05 of the target, it gave way to a bounce that has so far gone as high as 137.81. No one mentioned this in the chat room, so I can only infer that none of you much cares about this symbol, let alone trades it. Correct?
Friday's tedium was murderous, although the half-dozen-or-so trades that I posted in the chat room, most of which went against the trend, were all winners. (Check the time stamps if you want to retro-engineer my tactics on the lesser charts.) Choppy action in this vehicle consumed the entire week, but it did not change the likelihood of a corrective decline to at least 6720.00, a Hidden Pivot target that should be familiar by now. A feint to the green line (x=6938.75) would trigger a 'mechanical' short, stop 7012.00, but I am recommending it only to subscribers who know how to counterpunch the little sonofabitch.
The bullish view of Gold (see inset) is somewhat different from the one shown in the current Silver tout. Both were on 'mechanical' sell signals, and that is what the latter chart was intended to visualize. However, this chart has taken the further step of extrapolating the next, likely rally leg. It projects to 5476.70, and while price action at the 4950.00 Hidden Pivot midpoint does not quite guarantee the target will be achieved, it's a reasonable bet as a minimum upside objective for the week ahead. A stall at p2=5213.30, the secondary Hidden Pivot, would confirm that the pattern shown will continue to control Gold's movement until such time as 5476.70 is achieved.
I posted a moderately bearish note in Silver in the chat room Friday, but by day's end the little monster was threatening to trash my logic. The March contract was on 'mechanical' short signals in two different time frames, one big, the other small, and things could have gone either way. In fact, things went bonkers, stopping just shy of the 86.13 print needed to negate the lesser 'sell' signal. Above it sits 91.285, which some may recall as the location of a stop-loss for the bigger-picture 'mechanical' short. We should wait until these numbers are actually exceeded before we open a can of whoop-ass, but bullion looked primed to blow higher when trading resumes on Sunday.
The 149.79 target shown corresponds to the 5476 target featured in the latest gold tout. If it is decisively exceeded, however, especially on first contact, that would imply the bull trend is bound for 163.11. That target, a Hidden Pivot, is derived from a lower point A -- i.e., the 110.04 bottom recorded on the first trading day of the year. The sharp pullback over Valentine's Day did not qualify as a 'mechanical' buy because some key elements were missing. However, if GDXJ were to swoon to the green line (x=128.12) now, that would trigger a legitimate buy signal, stop 120.90. Stranger things have happened, so you should be prepared to act if the opportunity arises.
Last week's decline in 10-Year rates was the biggest since September, catalyzed by Fed easing of 25 basis points. The chart implies there could be a further fall to as low as 3.706%, but I have my doubts. In fact, the steep slide triggered a 'mechanical 'buy' at 4.073% that suggests rates are more likely to rise from here or perhaps a little lower, to at least 4.452%, than they are to fall below 3.937%. If they crack that last number hard, however, odds of more slippage to 3.706% would be no worse than 50-50. FYI, I've substituted the 10-Year for the 30 because the shorter duration is a more sensitive indicator of interest rate risk. ______ UPDATE (Feb 20): As anticipated, rates have taken a so-far modest bounce from just beneath last week's settlement level. If the upward trend is going to get legs, a push above the 4.206% peak recorded on Feb 11 would announce it.
From a Hidden Pivot standpoint, the only thing of interest that occurred in this vehicle last week is that it failed by 11.50 points to hit a juicy target at 7023.00 that I'd advertised. We were therefore unable to get off an opportune short, not because the target was front-run, but because the gratuitous daily blips that have been passing for rallies lately were too weak to reach it. A logical conclusion is that the clueless meandering within the channel shown is starting to break down, and that the two recent breaches of the lower line might be significant. I promised to be sparing in my use of the words 'topping process', but that 's what we are lookng at, it would seem, and it has become almost too tedious to watch. However, since I always try to leave you with a price target no matter how muddled the price action, I'll proffer a bearish one at 6748.00. which comes from conventional A=7027.25 on Feb 3. It can be traded despite the pattern's obviousness, but I'll recommend it only to those of you who know how to execute a CI (counterintuitive) entry.
I restored AAPL to the core list last week with reservations. The company is a dim also-ran in the AI race, having only recently found a partner in Google, the creator of Gemini. There is also the chance Musk will eventually make iPhones obsolete. He keeps insisting that Starlink has no phone on the drawing board, but he's probably just trying to screw with Tim Cooke's head. When the XPhone finally arrives, with superior hardware and no monthly service charge, that will be it for Apple. Concerning the chart, AAPL's steep slide on Friday triggered a 'mechanical' buy at the green line (259.09), stop 243.41. Ordinarily, we're supposed to feel queasy about excuting such trades, since they will always be going against the trend. In this case, however, I will recommend it only to Pivoteers who know how to fashion a reverse-pattern trigger that risks no more than $3.00 per share theoretical on the entry. It should be good for a one-level ride to p=274.76 if it works. _______ UPDATE (Feb 20): The long position suggested from 259.09 ended the week $5 in-the-black. Continue to hold for a shot at 274.76, or even 306.09. You can raise the stop-loss to 255.81.