Wall Street took a hawkish speech by Helicopter Ben in stride Tuesday as stocks turned in a mixed performance on signs that inflation evidently is still a concern at the Fed. It's hard to understand why the bankers should be so worried, given that home prices on Tuesday recorded their biggest drop since the government began tracking the statistic 38 years ago. Although sales of previously owned homes were up moderately, the national median home price plunged 3.5% to $221,000 from a year ago. That comes on top of price declines of 2.2% in September and 1.7% in August. Does that sound inflationary to you? Considering that pumped-up real estate has been the main growth engine of the U.S. economy for nearly five years, Bernanke & Co. should by now be frantic to find ways to re-energize the housing boom. Instead, in a speech that must have come from the cold depths of his obsidian heart, the Fed chairman dissed the working man, whose paltry wage gains in recent months supposedly are to blame for driving up the core rate of inflation. Should workers perhaps voluntarily return a portion of their paychecks to employers in order to goose 'productivity,' the Federal Reserve's favorite statistic. If productivity growth is so good for the economy, as economist, wonks and journalists seem to believe, then why hasn't it boosted the working man's real wages in more than a generation.? In fact, paychecks have not grown at all when discounted for inflation, and without the miracle of cheap, fabulous manufactured goods from China, the steady decline in Joe Sixpack's standard of living would seem egregious. Austrian economists such as Kurt Richeb�cher, whose work has been featured here many times, attach no special importance to the concept of productivity growth. They are wont to say
LATEST TRADES
