Global Money Blowout Trumps Fiscal Austerity

With China’s central bank in tightening mode, the bad guys had their best chance in months to knock down the price of gold last week. Their best efforts proved feeble, however:  When the dust had settled, gold quotes were down just five percent from the record $1388 peak recorded on October 14.  And although Silver fared somewhat worse, falling eight percent over the last seven days, even in the throes of this relative weakness, Comex futures resisted getting shoved lower for more than a single day at a time.  “Up” days alternated with “down” days, suggesting that the playground bullies of the precious metals world – i.e., Fed-sanctioned bullion bankers — were having trouble suppressing the price of precious metals, gold in particular.  Indeed, if last week’s moderate decline was the worst damage they could inflict on bullion when the news was on their side, then we shouldn’t doubt that precious-metal prices will soon be bounding higher once again.

The announcement last week that China’s central bank would boost the yuan lending rate by 25 basis points was like a kick in the teeth to global markets that had been wafting blithely skyward on the prospect of perpetual global easing. China has good reason to shun the party, however, since, even in weak fiscal quarters, GDP growth is running at eight percent or better. Last week’s announcement was an attempt to rein in speculation and to quiet inflation, and it should have surprised no one that bourses around the world reacted hysterically, as is their entrenched habit even when the news is stale from anticipation. This time the dollar’s response was worse than merely hysterical, however, since the greenback initially rose sharply on news that should have caused it to fall (i.e., stronger yuan = weaker dollar).  Go figure — and heaven help us if the prop-desk yobs who drove up the buck that day did so under the pale illusion that they were fleeing to safety/quality.

 Mass Delusion

Whatever the case, gold and silver came down because speculators believe that China, the world’s remaining economic engine, will continue to tighten in the months ahead. That would be deflationary, the thinking goes, and bullion prices should ease in anticipation.  The thinking is wrong, however, for the simple reason that the move toward fiscal austerity around the world, especially in euroland, is no match for the rampant monetary stimulus that is being used to counter the worst global recession since the 1930s. Beggaring-thy-neighbor via currrency devaluations is not merely in vogue, it is the Tulip-o-mania of these times. If such a fiscal and monetary environment is capable of causing the price of gold and silver to fall, then pigs can fly and the world is entering a period of unprecedented peace, prosperity, harmony, with high-paying jobs for everyone.  And if you believe that, you should be hoarding all the paper money you can get your hands on, and stuffing it in your mattress and in Treasury Bills and Notes that yield almost nothing. For our part, we’ll put out trust in gold and silver, which for the last decade have climbed steadily in value no matter what investment story was in vogue, regardless of whether it was inflation or deflation that we feared, and even as the world’s financial system edged toward the darkest imaginable abyss.

(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • Kent October 26, 2010, 4:41 am

    Mario:

    It is not easy to open an account in HK. You must have an identity/resident card. No ticket, no laundry.

  • gary leibowitz October 25, 2010, 11:39 pm

    I still can’t get on the bandwagon when gold enthusiasts ignore the equities rally. There has not been a disconnect yet. In fact every time equities falls, so does gold.

    If you are in the deflation camp then you must assume the dollar will fall to allow for gold to shine. I don’t see it. Since most countries, including China, will be hurt by our deflation cycle a more likely scenario would be a world deflation contagion.

    I still think this will be settled only when equites falls hard. I suspect even if gold holds up well in such a time, it will still fall. Its the relative strength afer the equities drop that I will be looking at.

    Getting on board now before equities has broken down doesn’t make sence to me.

    • BRUCE October 26, 2010, 7:27 am

      Gary,
      You raise an interesting point that I have considered. However, I thing severe deflation now would be fatal and the government will avoid it at all costs (money printing). More likely we will have inflation or hyperinflation, then followed by fatal deflation.

  • GlennH October 25, 2010, 7:24 pm

    I think that there is too much in much of the recent gold bugs discussions in most forums, the Fed does this …and tomorrow this will happen. Not a chance. All this commodity inflation and the bust from 2008 is from the first round of stimulus earlier this decade. I am not sure which metric will tell us that (2002/03)money is through the system and readjusted and then the 2008 to present stimulus will kick in. 2012-14? I do not know.

    I like to look at housing using long term charts. Since 2000 these rising trends have been very strong, both capital costs to contruct and operating items to hold a property are rising, some a lot more than others, commodities have in general risen 100s of %. I just bought a sheet of drywall for 13 $. 5 years ago it was 5 $. 10 years ago it was 3 $

    Housing is just coming back to the 2003/4 levels. Certianly not back to the 1981 levels or anything like that. Operating costs have not backed up at all. There is huge inflation in this area but it is quiet and hard to see and measure. No one talks about it.

    There is no mystery. The longer term trends on everything priced in fiat are up. If you wake up in Oct 2010 and decide my God this is not my beautiful life I am living, and decide to plow all savings or cashflow into things that are ‘real’, (like a CME futures contract haha) you are probably going to strand a little capital at best or wipe yourself out if you are using leverage. Gold is easy to buy and hold, a little harder to trade. Silver is easy to buy, hard to sell and for me, impossible to trade profitably. Mining stocks, they are just plain fun but like any investment you have to trade them.

    People who are whining about the corrections in the PM markers are simply trying to locate and buy a short term trade to ease the pain of a long term situation. They need to align their time horizons to match the investment.

  • Steve October 25, 2010, 4:48 pm

    I’ve spent the morning reading the news about the group of 20 and the agreement to allow the fed note to devalue. At least that is what is expected by the newsmen. I have read the posts here in the forum over time. I have looked at the stock market this morning. I have looked at the metals prices this morning. History says that QUII will come at a market top, not a bottom. Yet, why is it that I feel like throwing in the towel and betting on the moon in both stocks and metals? I’m a very long term bear, yet; I am very tired this morning of being WRONG !

    Not to worry, I’ll get over it pretty soon. Or, maybe not this time. Maybe it is time to lick my wounds, head to the cave, and go to sleep.

    • brutlstrudl October 25, 2010, 6:12 pm

      Steve, long term bears are already in the cave. Hang in there. ‘The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent” so play with the money you can afford to lose and keep your eye’s on the fundamentals which suck the big one. The winners in this environment are those that lose the least.

  • BRUCE October 25, 2010, 4:07 pm

    It’s the never ending debate—inflation or deflation. Once again I say it will be whatever the government chooses. The government will choose austerity or inflation. In 2008 I would have said let the banks fail. By now the Americans would be back on the road to recovery. Now it is obvious that their debt has reached the tipping point and cannot be paid by simple austerity. Money printing is the only viable option. The Republicans may win the election, but if they try to force austerity, they will immediately drive the country into the deepest darkest depression in history. Obama knows this and will proclaim it in advance, setting up the Republicans to take the blame. If the Republicans realize that they have to print, then they will be accused of being the same as the Democrats. Either way, the Republicans lose, even though they won the election. Ironic, isn’t it!

  • Benjamin October 25, 2010, 3:26 pm

    Correct me if I’m wrong…

    These tightenings (or speculations of) always throw me off. On the surface it should seem that currencies would see greater strength. But isn’t this like closing the barn doors after the horses have bolted? Wouldn’t it have been more prudent to never let rates fall so low in the first place?

    And so the debt levels will hurt more, thus, in a short time, probably, drive rates right back down. Barring that, some other kind of political action would try and deal with the new psuedo reality.

    In either case, dollars < gold & silver is just a mirage. Right?

  • JimK October 25, 2010, 2:47 pm

    Consider the possibility that on it’s way to 5K/oz, that gold may drop along with everything else due to the scarcity, or denial of access to funds – bank failures, capital controls – “I’m sorry Sir, but like all of our other depositors, you may only withdraw $2,000 per month from your account…” and “Yes, of course Sir, you will be fully compensated by the FDIC for your savings account – fill out this form and we will let you know when the funds become available… next year” and while the price of gold is dirt cheap, the common man will not be able to buy any, regardless of his brilliant analysis, because he will be denied access to his funds until they become worthless, unless they are FRNs under the mattress.

    On a parallel point, the same may be true wrt the mining stocks – what if your account is full of them and the brokerage firm goes under, and because of some ‘faulty paperwork’ your stocks are sucked into the flames? It won’t be “I’m sorry sir, your stocks will be replaced” it will be a padlocked entryway and no one answering the phone – you can talk to the other people hanging around the front door scratching their heads.

    These are just my own musings – I am no expert, but this is the scenario I feel a need to plan for. For the experts here, I ask which method offers adequate security:

    Opening a stock and bank account in Canada, Hong Kong
    Simply getting a named account – not ‘Street’
    Taking possession of stock certificates
    American Depositary Receipts
    International Depositary Receipts
    Owning U.S. mines, in the U.S.
    Avoiding U.S. mines, in the U.S.

    I don’t really know the ins and outs of this, but I carry an ugly picture of picking the winning horse and not being able to cash in my ticket. I am the least important creditor in line, and I know it.

    • mario cavolo October 25, 2010, 6:01 pm

      JimK and all, in any possible way, open an account in HK or mainland China and have a sum of your cash assets in HK dollars or Chinese RMB. Its not that difficult to do…

      Cheers, Mario

    • ben October 25, 2010, 10:36 pm

      Mario…is that some kind of joke about buying HKD’s or renminbi as a safe way out of dollars? The HKD has not moved more than 1% from the dollar in how many years? My charts are only going back 5 years and the peak to trough is about half a percent. What will be the impetus to drive the HKD up against the USD? And the renminbi? Please. China is paying about 3% interest while increasing the money supply about 20% per year. What kind of a clown are you to recommend these as ways of preserving capital?

      The bottom line is this…if the dollar collapses it will drag down every currency in the world. If the US places restrictions on dollar withdrawals…expect retaliation against US citizens at foreign banks. If the US and China go to war…even if it’s just a serious trade war…be prepared for your Chinese and Hong Kong bank accounts and stocks to be nationalized. Physical metals is the best way I know of to keep liquid and mobile in case you need to escape the USA…but even this is no foolproof way to protect your wealth. You could have your gold confiscated while attempting to cross the border. And of course there is always the long-shot chance of a crushing deflation that will drive gold to $500…but I think the political fallout from such a deflation would cause a revolution long before $500 gold.

  • Avocado October 25, 2010, 1:37 pm

    The gold/silver trade got VERY crowded at the last top. I think something like 97% of traders were bullish. You don’t think perhaps the reversal has anything to do with the idea that the crowd is always wrong vs. whatever the news background used to justify price movement?

    Everyone knows the US is bankrupt, so why isn’t gold selling for $5000 or more an ounce today? Could it be that demand for dollars might one day exceed demand for gold, and this is why it hasn’t gone into the stratosphere?

    Perhaps the price of gold and other commodities is just a reflection of all the money sloshing around in the system in the hands of very large traders, and doesn’t really have a lot to do with economic fundamentals.

    Its pretty obvious to me that we are sliding into a deflationary depression, albeit a lot slower than in the past, and that demand for dollars to pay down debt may one day exceed supply. The BRIC’s are experiencing global growth, but how long can that be sustained if the rest of the world that matters is in decline?

    And the DOW continues its relentless climb up in the face of those declining fundamentals. How does THAT make any sense if the market is paying any attention at all to economics?

    Andy

  • Flight of Pigs October 25, 2010, 4:41 am

    Excellent read, Rick – concise and pithy. People have had it with the pervasive corruption and pollution! They have “seen the light” and it’s NOT a pretty sight. The cat is out of the bag (buy metals) and Elvis has left the building ($).

  • Bay of Pigs October 25, 2010, 3:46 am

    Thank you. Rich please listen to Rick at some point. You haven’t been doing this for quite some time now in regards to gold. Saying it’s going to fall by 50% is beyond stupid. Wake up.

    • Steve October 25, 2010, 5:46 am

      Personal assaults now is it. The guys that are right at the top are nearly always in an extreme minority. I’m still saying – is this all there is, is this all there is, is this all there is to trillions in simulation, abuse of free markets, and the fed buying debt to artificially create an inverse bubble in interest rates. Ya got to admit it, trillions in, and little to show. How about the wizard above doing some math to figure out what the price of gold should be with how many trillion of stimulation all calculated to work before November 2? What was the bang for the buck? How does artificially depressed interest rates affect the price of gold? Last year it cost just about 1m to make a 50k job. What is the return in gold based figures? In other words, how much has it cost to bring gold up to 1350? Gold may go to 5k, but; what is going to keep it there, 8 dollar/hour/jobs? In real terms in 5000 years of history that means a suit will cost 5k, just an average one to go in the casket with.

    • Robert October 25, 2010, 4:03 pm

      Steve-

      Salient point about the popular “Gold to Suit” ratio, and what $5000 Gold portends in an era of stagnant wages, falling prices on non-essentials, and general economic misery.

      However- I have two counter-thoughts for you:

      1) Gold, being in what I believe is a very strong primary Bull Market, will most certainly detach from many of it’s allegorical indicators (suits included)- the fact that it has not made this detachment yet (ie: at the present moment suits are still roughly correlated to Gold prices) means (to me) that this primary bull has lots of room to run still. In January 1980 at Gold’s $853 intraday top a single ounce did not just buy you a typical men’s suit- it just about bought you the finest custom tailored Armani (which ran about $1200 back then)/ The equivalent suit would cost you 10k or more today.

      2) Given circumstances, I’m more inclined to use the Gold to Corn, Gold to Rice, and Gold to Wheat ratio to measure divergent performance from the long term mean. Doing that, you can clearly see that Rice, Wheat and Corn have been better bets than gold over the past 3 years, and yet they still their trends still support the argument for higher Gold prices.

      TEOTWAWKI may indeed make Gold Bulls regrettful over the fact that their Bullion has no nutritional value, but my bet is that things will only get ALMOST that bad, and that Gold will preserve purchasing power and utility as money, so even if you are not speculating in the Gold and Silver markets attempting to get rich, there is still a valid argument for having some ounces stuffed away for a possibly very rainy day… yes?

    • Steve October 25, 2010, 4:37 pm

      Robert,

      I recently wrote about survival. Yes !

    • Bay of Pigs October 25, 2010, 7:15 pm

      Steve,

      No, it’s not a personal assualt. I’ve been wrong on lots of things. Just trying to report the facts and stay on point with the uptrend in gold. Yes, it should be much higher right now. How high? I don’t know. I am not a math wizard. What I do know is that Rich said much the same thing when gold was at/below 1000. I believe 500 was his target then. I like to hold the gold bears accountable on what they say, as I believe they are sincerely mistaken about gold and silver bull market.

    • ben October 25, 2010, 11:03 pm

      Steve..this is what can keep gold at $5000…all the people becoming wealthy off those that are working for $8 an hour. The middle and lower classes in the best of times never have enough left over after paying off their bills to buy even a gram of gold…most are lucky if they are not going a little further into debt every month.

      As for the wealthier classes…if every person with a net worth over ten million decided to keep 10% of their wealth in gold and silver…we would probably see $50k gold and $10k silver. And that’s without the throngs with less capital to invest jumping in.