Big Squeeze Is On in Gold and Silver

Gold and Silver swept all obstacles aside Monday, pushing already steep rallies into hyperdrive.  Even a firm dollar failed to check the buying spree. At the opening bell, we were looking for Comex February Gold to surge to at least $1425; however, by day’s end it had done even better, rallying $24 to peak intraday at 1429.40.  And although March Silver fell 11 cents shy of our minimum projection of 30.465, there was such power behind the nearly $1.00 rally that the target seems all but guaranteed to be reached during the night session.  All of this must have come as bad news to technically oriented bears who saw a head-and-shoulders top forming in February Gold. Look at it now (in the chart below) and you’ll see that the last two days’ price action have transformed the pattern into chopped liver.

Yet another head-and-shoulders pattern bites the dust

We hesitate to break out the bubbly at this point, however, because the steep pitch of bullion’s ascent is manifestly unsustainable.  This implies that it won’t be pretty when the move swoons into a correction. Even so, in the days ahead, Rick’s Picks will try to provide Hidden Pivot benchmarks that long-term investors and swing traders can use to hedge bullish exposure in precious metals. We are somewhat exposed ourselves via an 800-share stake in Silver Wheaton (SLW) that was showing a paper profit of $21,376 at yesterday’s high, 40.99.  Our forecast has been calling for a minimum 41.65 in the stock, but it has gotten there more quickly than we’d expected, requiring a likely adjustment today or tomorrow. Still, certain widely followed gold stocks appear to have room to move, assuming a 622.78 projection for the Gold Bugs Index (HUI) materializes. The index topped yesterday at 591.71, driven by a 10-point rally, but the Hidden Pivot target at 622 implies a further five percent before HUI is due for a rest.

Bullion’s Anti-Bulls

Bulls should keep in mind that there are some powerful players with a compelling interest in seeing gold throttle back. Chief among them are bullion bankers who make billions of dollars by lending gold that they themselves have effectively borrowed for nearly nothing from the U.S. Treasury. These players have always been able to keep a lid on gold by manipulating “paper” gold in futures markets.  However, with the buying frenzy starting to feed on itself, odds are growing that some very large buyers, including such sovereign entities as Russia, China, India and Saudi Arabia, will be eager to take delivery on futures contracts rather than simply rolling them forward. The futures exchanges, presumably at the behest of the U.S. government, have been known to change margin rules in mid-game to put the kibosh on uppity buyers. In this case, however, the buyers are not mere speculators; rather, they are central banks and sovereign funds with enormous exposure to dollars. For that reason, we shouldn’t expect them to be come discouraged merely because U.S. futures exchanges have increased margin requirements for precious-metal contracts.

(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • Bradley December 8, 2010, 5:58 pm

    I’ll put my comment here, as it relates to this post by Rick more than the next. With the severe sell-off in gold and silver we’ve seen starting almost immediately after this column was posted, I would think that a mea culpa is in order. Calling for a 5% additional move in the HUI, while at the same time warning about the possible downside does not an accurate forcast make. Just my opinion…

  • Silver Surfer December 8, 2010, 3:07 am

    Forget about Bernanke’s eyes and beard on 60 minutes. Did anyone notice how nervous he was? Dry mouth, quivering upper lips; I thought somebody had a gun to his head.

  • F. Beard December 8, 2010, 12:37 am

    Very funny, counterfeiting counterfeit. I love it. mikeck

    Fiat money is not counterfeit. It enables you to pay your taxes. Ben is desperately printing to bailout the fractional reserve banking system but that is not a fault of fiat other than that fiat can be printed and gold cannot be. But that’s irrelevant since we should not even have a central bank.

    Don’t blame fiat; it is the ideal government money form. However, it should only be legal tender for government debts not private ones.

  • Rich December 7, 2010, 5:45 pm

    sticky key 276 that is…

  • Rich December 7, 2010, 5:44 pm

    Congratulations to Rick et al for correct calls on PMs and many other contracts.
    AAPL targeting 27…
    http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?aapl

  • Mercurious December 7, 2010, 2:54 pm

    Benjamin, there is a printing problem with creasing in the new 100s, causing a lack of inking on part of the bill. They are going to fall back on printing the current models just to keep up with demand. Sound fishy? Yes, it does. Supposedly, they have so many of them they are having problems finding a place to store them securely. No one noticed 100s were not being inked correctly until they had mountains of them. Really? REALLY?

    • roger erickson December 7, 2010, 4:36 pm

      my first guess would always be that someone’s already noted how to counterfeit them

    • mikeck December 7, 2010, 7:25 pm

      ha, Ha HA,

      Very funny, counterfeiting counterfeit. I love it.

      Mike

    • Benjamin December 7, 2010, 7:42 pm

      Yeah, Mercurious, that’s what I heard this morning. Creases, or some such! Riiight. Anyway, for what it’s worth, fellas…

      http://www.roadtoroota.com/public/261.cfm

    • cosmo December 7, 2010, 8:42 pm

      Maybe they just noticed an extra zero that was somehow subliminally missed…They are just stocking them away for a rainy day, coming soon….

  • Benjamin December 7, 2010, 1:24 pm

    I see a couple of posts here that mention the possibilty of a strengthening dollar, so I thought this little bit I read the other day might somehow be related…

    Unfortunately, I can’t find the article. But in it, they mentioned that the new $100 bill, due to hit circulation sometime in 2011, was recalled, due to being (now get this) unprintable!

    Had something to do with the security features and the printing press. There was little detail, but I’ve the impression that “some” BS is afoot. Not that I understand this strengthening of the dollar some are forecasting, but some coincidences are too much so, I think…

  • Bob December 7, 2010, 12:49 pm

    Just a thought. If CFTC rule changing trickery is unable to stem the rise in pm demand, might Bernanke be forced to increase the value of the dollar (i.e. stop QE2 for starters) if he wants to “save” JPM, HSBC, etc. as well as any loaned out gold from the US Treasury? And that, of course, would cause a sudden and sharp drop in equities. What a tangled web these guys have woven themselves with their attempts at deception.

    • roger erickson December 7, 2010, 4:35 pm

      off a gold std no CB has much power to change Fx rates, only interest rates

      plus, QE is not at all about changing Fx rates, only further changing long term interest rates; Bernanke has admitted that multiple times

      for an clear, insider description of QE operations, see: http://moslereconomics.com/2010/11/17/qe-dynamics-one-more-time-its-about-price-not-quantity/

      note: QE is re-purchasing existing T-bonds from primary dealers, NOT new T-bonds from the Treasury (that occurs on a regular basis, as FED accountants track Treasury spending [i.e., increased currency supply])

  • Terry S December 7, 2010, 5:57 am

    Another ‘spot-on’ essay, Rick…If either BB (Uncle Ben, who looked a bit red in the eyes last night on 60 minutes) or the bullion banks should lose control maybe we’ll see M.A.’s $5000/oz AU yet. It will be an exciting ride, to say the least.
    ps. I would what the “masked man” would say to a few silver rounds.

    • Robert December 7, 2010, 7:10 pm

      Boy, besides the red eyes, has anyone noticed that BSBernanke’s beard has gone from mostly dark to bone white in 2 short years…?

      Think he’s under a little stress?

    • Benjamin December 7, 2010, 7:44 pm

      Well Robert, I heard he tried some of that “Just For Men” color gel, but turns out he wasn’t man enough for it to work.

      Sorry. Couldn’t resist a cheap shot! 🙂

  • FranSix December 7, 2010, 1:28 am

    I would think that geopolitcal needs are probably very muted as far as the bullion market is concerned. Any nation with a currency knows that the population buying gold and rejecting currency will drive that currency down.

    The recent EU bailout is probably the driver here, as even the smallest player is looking to take delivery on the odds that their respective currency can no longer hold water. And the fact that its December.

    A second lesser known way of looking at the put under the bullion markets is that the discount rate can actually fall into the negative, lower than bullion lease rates.

    I just think this is all a sign that the price fixing days in the gold markets are very much at an end.