Markets Assess Odds Of a Nuclear Meltdown

Late Sunday night, Tokyo stocks were getting savaged even as Reuters reported there was little evidence of short-term “funding shortages” in Japan’s financial system. The Nikkei Average initially dropped nearly 500 points, to 9756, when trading began, but it remained to be seen how U.S. stock would react. As of around 11:30 p.m., S&P Index futures had been down as much as 14 points, equivalent to about 100 Dow points. However, such moderate selling is usually a sign that institutional buyers are bullish and merely trying to shake loose some bargains ahead of Monday’s opening. Whatever the case, Monday is not likely to be a yawner, even though Wall Street has managed to shrug off a few other epic disasters ever since this seemingly unstoppable Mother of All Bear Rallies began exactly two years ago. On Friday, a day before earthquake/tsunami news from Japan went “nuclear,” shares of American multinationals that could conceivably benefit from the rebuilding of Japan actually rose, callous as that might seem. But we should have grown accustomed by now to seeing things the way investors see them, with dollar signs coloring even the most horrific spectacles.

Still, and most unfortunately, it’s possible this disaster will turn out to be worse than all others of recent memory combined. A “CollapseNet”(?)  e-mail bulletin we received from a Belgian  subscriber Saturday evening put things in the starkest possible terms, conjuring up a radioactive cloud that the Jet Stream would eventually disperse to all seven continents. The alert advised anyone living on the U.S. West Coast to secure potassium iodide pills as a precaution against moderate exposure to radioactivity. Although the warning seemed a bit extreme, we nonetheless inquired about the substance at the local Walgreen’s.  The product supposedly is available over-the-counter, but this store had none of it, and the pharmacist was clueless as to why anyone would even want it.

The Well-Stocked Survivalist

Readers will recall that, just last week, we published some survivalists tips related to food storage in anticipation of a possible emergency. While potassium iodide might turn up on a list of items that every well-stocked emergency cabinet should contain, like a snake bite kit, it is something we would not ordinarily expect to use. But given the events of this weekend, including a new explosion within the hour at the already-stricken Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, we can no longer dismiss the possibility of a world-contaminating nuclear meltdown.  The Fukushima explosion is reported so far as “unlikely” to have released a “large amount” of radiation into the atmosphere.  Granted, the news could have been a whole lot worse, but it is hardly reassuring that powerful after-tremors that would have been big news by themselves just a week ago continue to rock Japan, reactors and all.

Meanwhile, Brent crude is down almost $3 on speculation that Japan’s troubles will slow the global economy. Past experience suggests otherwise, since buyers of stocks have only been rewarded when they accumulated aggressively – i.e., shares of BP at low ebb during the worst of the Gulf oil spill — whenever major disaster struck. This time, though, given the potential of Japan’s already considerable troubles to spin out-of-control, it may be premature to buy stocks hand-over-fist. The Japanese are infinitely resourceful, and they have been preparing for this earthquake for a long time.  Even so, the rest of the world can only hope they succeed in containing the damage, and help Japan in any and all ways possible.

HULA POSTPONED…

I am one who keeps promises, but the hula dance I promised you on the streets of New York next week (March 16th) will have to wait due to medical concerns.  I spent last weekend in Boulder Community hospital after coming within minutes of having a pacemaker implanted.  I was discharged two days later after my heartbeat returned to somewhat normal; a 24-hour EKG done last week showed no serious problems, only a minor arrythmia.  However, when I woke up this morning, my heart rate was 50% of normal, and I was unable to raise it above 75 when I got on an elliptical trainer at the gym.  Although my heart looks structurally normal in an echocardiogram, electrically speaking it has been pretty whacky since I first showed symptoms 50 years ago.  Now, a new problem appears to have developed. Under the circumstances, I’ve decided to postpone my trip, and to consult with an electrophysiologist in Denver this week.  I am sorry to disappoint those of you who had intended to come down to Wall Street to cheer me on.  I was looking forward to getting silly for an hour and also to visiting friends back East, but it will have to wait.  For now, though, I would be grateful for your patience and understanding.

(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • Kent March 16, 2011, 4:41 am

    Rick:

    Make sure you are suplementing with chelated magnesium, ubiquinol, hawthorn berry and sea-buckthorn. All will help the arrythmia. Nattokinase wouldn’t hurt.

    Kent

  • mario cavolo March 15, 2011, 5:51 am

    Prayers and wishes on the health issues Rick,

    Cheers, Mario

  • Michael Lewinski March 15, 2011, 3:46 am

    Rick,

    I am a writer, active in the Hoosier Patriot movement. I am asking for permission to quote the below text. If you will give me permission I will do so with attribution or without at your discretion. I am going to write an essay on Croney Capitalism and your last sentence is packed with a lot of meat I wish to serve up.

    Because of my workload with Tea Party/912 groups and organizations spread throughout Indiana, it probably will be a month to six weeks before I have the time to bring together what will be a series of articles exploring the corrupting of our Republic. We recently formed a large coalition of groups [Hoosiers for a Conservative Senate] collaborating to defeat Senator Richard Lugar and rid us of one more damn RHINO.

    If you would like to contribute to that effort, we [FreedomMaker Coalition of Indiana] need $2500 to upgrade to Corporate Webinar. It’s not tax deductible, but it would provide for a valuable expansion of the communication system through which the Indiana Patriot movement works.

    Respectfully,
    Michael

    “On Friday, a day before earthquake/tsunami news from Japan went “nuclear,” shares of American multinationals that could conceivably benefit from the rebuilding of Japan actually rose, callous as that might seem. But we should have grown accustomed by now to seeing things the way investors see them, with dollar signs coloring even the most horrific spectacles.”

  • TKO March 15, 2011, 3:27 am

    Contrary to the beliefs of numerous commentators in this forum, it appears that Rick actually does have some rudimentary semblance of a heart. A heart that apparently went into uncontrollable palpitations at the thought of the impending hula dance spectacle in the shadow of “The Bull”!
    Kidding aside, take the time to get the problem fully evaluated and do what you have to do. Good Luck.

  • fallingman March 14, 2011, 9:54 pm

    Just a quick note to say that running seawater DIRECTLY into the reactor to cool the rods is a last ditch panic move following the loss of offsite power and onsite backup power. With no diesel generators to operate the emergency cooling systems (apparently…don’t know what happened to them) and a failure or insufficiency of of battery backup (as reported by the newsreaders on TV), the operators were, it seems, left no other choice. This is extreme. If there were any question before, there is none now. These plants are utterly destroyed from an operational perspective. As soon as saltwater was introduced, it was over.

    I don’t understand the technical details, but seawater was never meant to get inside the system. Seawater was only meant to cool via a closed loop. That way, no radiation gets into the outside water and no salt or other contaminants come in contact with the water that runs inside the system through the metal pipes, pumps, etc. that handle the reactor cooling.

    That’s my layman’s understanding anyway.

    You might wanna pray for the operators. While they train one helluva lot, I’m not sure you can really train adequately for something like this.

    • Ful_karboy March 15, 2011, 12:08 am

      One news blurb mentioned the US had delivered some reactor coolant materials. Perhaps boric acid which mixed with the sea water and flushed into reactor vessel would cover the rods and the boron absorbs neutrons to slow the reaction down.

      I’d guess they were already into the process of slowing things down before they lost coolant or power to circulate it but there’s still a LOT of heat.

      Speaking of hydrogen and explosions… Any Hindenburg Omens recently?

      The reactors are pretty old {40 years?} so trashing them with sea water sure beats taking the chance of a lot of radiation getting lose. Serious “loss of face”!

  • sdavid March 14, 2011, 9:35 pm

    All the best to you, Rick. I hope things will get back to normal ASAP.

  • fallingman March 14, 2011, 9:01 pm

    Yeah, no dancing in skirts. Doctors orders.

    Gotta be scary. We’re with you.

  • Rich March 14, 2011, 8:52 pm

    Gee Rick, just saw your heart situation. Praying for you to return to perfect health instantly and permanently so you can continue to make your uncanny market calls…

  • redwilldanaher March 14, 2011, 7:44 pm

    Rick, take care of yourself. Hope you begin to feel better and get to the bottom of it. Get well.

  • Jim N March 14, 2011, 6:49 pm

    I am a firm believer in using technology if you have it. It does seem to me that Nuclear Power is a very viable alternative to fossil fuels. But there has always been this “but”….I know it is expensive, and that there are waste issues (don’t want the stuff dumped in my backyard), but it seems like those would all be solveable. We have nuclear plants around the world, in big aircraft carriers, submarines, and only when something like this comes up is the question of safety publicly looked at. There seems to be no issue of safety publicly when everything is just humming away.

    OK, we had the Chernobyl and 3 mile island accidents. But we also have coal mining accidents. So do we stop mining for coal? Are the nuclear accidents that much worse than the other industrial accidents?

    Now i am hearing that Nuclear energy is not an option for this “generation” , supposedly because of the public fear surrounding it.

    Seems to me that the redundent safety systems pretty much do their job on the nuclear plants as their safety record seems to be pretty good. I’m no pro in this area but i don’t think i would have any problem living near a nuclear plant thinking it might blow up.

    Does the fossil fuel lobby have that much power discouraging all alternate energy sources? If they can get people to fear and eliminate them, certainly we are back to increased fossil fuel dependency.

    My best..Jim

    • Rich March 14, 2011, 9:20 pm

      Waste issues indeed:
      Nuclear Plant Decommissioning expenses dwarfs all previous costs, in the hundreds of billions of dollars, one reason most nuclear pants were not mothballed after exceeding their lifespan…
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_decommissioning

  • Rich March 14, 2011, 5:03 pm

    Aloha All
    While Japan and the monopoly media try to put their Pollyanna lipstick on plutonic destruction, worth rereading Bastiat’s Parable of the Broken Window Fallacy:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_broken_window
    JP website down so put Twitter@richcash8 instead.
    With Japan down a Fibonacci -6.18%, FTSE down just -0.36% and Dow down just -0.36% do not compute.
    Something is rotten, and it is worth remembering no man is an island, even with WEB buying LZ at a premium.
    Before this is over we may go much lower. Too many people still want to BTFD.
    KI by the way, in many multivitamins at 100% RDA.
    The Japanese reactors were GE Plutonium, with a half-life of 24,100 years, and the jet stream blows toward HI and the USA in about 3-4 days like the FuGo Bombs:
    http://www.stelzriede.com/ms/html/mshwfugo.htm
    Many people including WHO still in denial about the radioactive fallout from DU that does not create a pretty picture of health:
    http://www.aztlan.net/du_deformed_iraqi_babies.htm
    Power going off here in the mountains, so not sure if/when this will reach you all, but still worth the effort.
    For those who want to do something constructive:
    http://jasonkelly.com/helpjapan/
    Regards*Rich

  • Larry D March 14, 2011, 5:03 pm

    The Chernobyl RBMK reactor was a house-sized block of graphite that burned furiously after it smithereened itself in a steam explosion. It was the resultant smoke plume that poisoned hundreds of square miles of the surrounding area with radioactive particulate.

    The Japanese reactors are boiling water reactors (no graphite) which are being flooded to prevent a core meltdown. The lesser of the two devils is the buildup of hydrogen gas that occurs when the core is flooded with seawater. The roof may blow off the building, but the core will stay intact.

    The Japanese problem is a magnitude smaller than the Russian one, but to see the pictures of the Ivy Mike mushroom cloud on various blogs discussing the subject is telling of the level of ignorance posing as knowledge.

    • Benjamin March 14, 2011, 5:47 pm

      True. Chernobyl was a completely different design, as well as radicall different circumstances.

      Anyway, I read that the roof did blow off already. That was by design but still, I’ve the impression that “exploding” roofs are not supposed to be routine occurances. Or rather, such build-ups of hydrogen gas; I was surprised to find out that channeling in seawater was never intended to cool the reactors. Does this then mean that such hydrogen build-up was not expected either? But then what about the roof…?

      I don’t know. It’s all jumbled and the media is of no help (big surprise). All I know is that, no, a meltdown is not like a nuclear bomb. That, and our navy sure got of there anyway. Given all that, seems no one really knows for sure what is going on and what is “likely to occur”. And that’s worrisome. How can people be on top of a situation with so much unclear?

  • ben March 14, 2011, 5:01 pm

    It seems to me that the thing that should sell off is Yen, not the Nikkei. The burden of all the clean up and rebuilding will fall on the Japanese government…Japanese corporations will actually benefit from all the work outsourced to them in the rebuilding effort. Look at the USD after 9/11 and the subsequent wars…the increased government spending, along with reduced government income, tanked the dollar. I expect the Yen to likewise head south over the coming years as Japan spends on building while simultaneously lowering taxes to save corporations “hurt” by the earthquake.

    And what about the USD…treasuries? I don’t think Japan will be too concerned about keeping US interest rates down when they will saddled with rebuilding thousands of square miles of their coast at a cost that could run into the trillions. That $30 billion figure on the cost of the damages is as laughable as the death toll esitmate in the hundreds that initally was jauntily bandied about.

  • Cam Fitzgerald March 14, 2011, 4:18 pm

    More seriously, I think the Japanese have some options to contend with this disaster. They can sell off a fraction of their Trearies hoard of 900 million dollars, they can raise taxes, go cap in hand to the bond markets (mostly China) and take on a chunk of fresh external debt or last, they can just run the presses.

    I think they will do a little of each. This could easily cost several hundred billion dollars to make it normal again.

  • TKO March 14, 2011, 4:18 pm

    I lived for two and a half years in the coastal area of Japan that was affected by the earthquake and subsequent tsunami. Knowing the lay of the land and also having been in the disaster response business I estimated that 30 to 50,000 thousand people would be dead given the size and the extent of the wave. The Japanese government has been lowballing the figures, and I can only assume that they are also putting on the “best face” possible concerning the cascading and sequential disasters at the nuclear facilities. This is a major catastrophe and is probably going to get much worse before the situations are brought under control.
    Our thoughts and prayers go to those affected

  • Cam Fitzgerald March 14, 2011, 4:05 pm

    Somewhere in Canada a bank economist has supposedly run the numbers and claimed that there would only be modest negative consequences for the Japanese economy.

    His reason? Well all this disaster was sure to drive consumption, fresh construction and plenty of new economic activity.

    To which I quipped to my neighbor over beers, “If it is such a good thing then why don’t we all just blow up our own cities to get the economic benefits of renewed growth”

    • mario cavolo March 14, 2011, 4:24 pm

      Well this does touch on the point that a large portion of China’s economic boom has been driven by infrastructure development which has included leveling much of the older buildings in cities across the country. Its been an unprecedented urban renewal. This can’t last too many years longer and so its good to see the improvements in other industries, imports and domestic spending here, essential for growth to continue, not relying too much on infrastructure and real estate sectors. Energy development also a big growth driver including plans for nuclear, which I doubt they will abandon due to the latest in Japan.

      Cheers, Mario

    • Benjamin March 14, 2011, 4:53 pm

      Write for the Daily Bell much, Cam? 🙂

      http://www.thedailybell.com/1866/Japan-The-Tipping-Point.html

      “How people can make such points [broken window fallacy] with straight faces is always a wonder to us; if they really believed such things why are they not advocating regularized “creative destruction” at home. Perhaps they ought to be setting fire to their own cities or working out clever ways to flood their business districts with seawater. If natural disasters are so very good for economies, surely they should find ways to institutionalize them so as to better mount satisfying and profitable recoveries.”

      On another note, the demogrphic problem is very real, but oft unmentioned. And it just so happens, at least to the nutcase writing this post, that all these nuclear plants they have aren’t necessary except to facilitate their slavery to world consumption. I’m sorry, I meant maintain their status as export kings of the universe.

      Thus, me thinks, they downplay the numbers and strive to instill confidence in the “likely outcomes”. Do not worry. It’s only 10,000 people and the plants are just fine (and that pressure explosion was _meant_ to happen; nothing to see here!).

      Is it me, or is it suddenly just, like, really all warm and fuzzy inside?

    • Jim N March 14, 2011, 6:30 pm

      “If it is such a good thing then why don’t we all just blow up our own cities to get the economic benefits of renewed growth”

      What an interesting question. I lived 5 years in Germany and spent quite a bit of time with a contractor friend who has been involved with rebuilding since the war. We discussed this at length. One project was the extensive underground train network throughout the city. He told me how comparably easy it was to plan and build it with everything destroyed vs. having to work around a developed city. Perhaps Germany would be a great study for this, as we can compare where they were in 1945 to where they are now with virtually no trace of a country that was nearly 100% destroyed during the war. I don’t know how it was paid for though. But if you look at the 65 year history since then, it seems that something has worked well as they have a country entirely rebuilt with a pretty robust economic engine humming away.

      I do suspect that a lot of the success depends on the culture itself. Germany as it was rebuilding didn’t have an entitlement expectation, and for the most part put their head down and worked ( also helped to forget the past and pain they had experienced).

      I suspose if we blew up the cities to start the economic benefit train rolling again, we would have to blow up the debt too. Hmm….might work.

      But on the other hand, if we implement the budget cuts…..my goodness what farce. If we had to pick between the two….. Hmmmmm

      Regards to all…Jim

    • Robert March 14, 2011, 7:55 pm

      Broken window fallacy-

      A boy throws a brick through a shop owner’s window- the shop owner files an insurance claim, and the insurance company appoints an adjuster and hires a glass company to replace the window, and raises the shop-owners premium.

      In said scenario- the boy is a hero for “employing” the insurance and glass people…

      Nobody notices that the innocent shop owner (who had a perfectly performing window beforehand and did not need new glass until that stupid kid came along) has become poorer because everyone is so overjoyed that the insurance and glass people all got richer.

      There is NO SUCH THING as economically advantageous destruction. As a society, we’ve all decided that if 5 people gain to the expense of less than 5 people, then screw them- it must be worth it because it serves the common good.

  • fallingman March 14, 2011, 2:35 pm

    Having worked for years doing (non-technical) consulting work and training as part of a team helping to effect culture change in a handful of nuclear plants, I’ve come to understand the risks to health from an accident pretty well.

    You don’t have potassium iodide on hand? Really? You think having knowledge of it is frivolous? How close do you live to a nuclear plant? Which way does the prevailing wind blow? I’m lucky enough to live in an area where there are several well-run plants supplying the bulk of our electrical needs. I’m not worried and I’m glad they’re there, but I’m also prepared…just in case.

    KI is your only protection against thyroid cancer as a result of exposure to radioactive iodine, one of the primary isotopes that would be released. And the protection is virtually complete. It costs almost nothing. It keeps indefinitely.

    Let’s see. There’s an accident, Radioactive iodine is released. You either have the KI on hand and take it or you don’t. If you don’t have it on hand, you either get it or you can’t. Apparently, the pharmacies don’t have it! How’s that for preparedeness? (I got mine from lef.org)

    You develop thyroid cancer or you don’t. Pretty simple equation.

    You know what? We need a government agency to anticipate such needs. We could call it the Department of Homeland Security and it could keep us ready in case of emergencies. What do you think?

    Hey, it’s your choice. They say ignorance is bliss, but it seems idiotic to me to be unprepared. It’s a simple precaution. Take radiation exposure lightly if you want to. Not me. I know too much.

    See below from Wikipedia…

    Researchers at the World Health Organization accurately located and counted the cancer victims from Chernobyl and were startled to find that “the increase in incidence of thyroid cancer has been documented up to 500 km from the accident site…significant doses from radioactive iodine can occur hundreds of kilometers from the site, beyond emergency planning zones.”[21] Consequently, far more people than anticipated were affected by the radiation, which caused the United Nations to report in 2002 that “The number of people with thyroid cancer…has exceeded expectations. Over 11,000 cases have already been reported.”

    Today, nearly half (44.8%) the survivors of Nagasaki studied have identifiable thyroid disease, with the American Medical Association reporting “it is remarkable that a biological effect from a single brief environmental exposure nearly 60 years in the past is still present and can be detected.” This, as well as the development of thyroid cancer among residents in the North Pacific from radioactive fallout following the United States’ nuclear weapons testing in the 1950s (on islands nearly 200 miles downwind of the tests) were instrumental in the decision by the FDA in 1978 to issue a request for the availability of KI for thyroid protection in the event of a release from a commercial nuclear power plant or weapons-related nuclear incident. Noting that KI’s effectiveness was “virtually complete” and finding that iodine in the form of potassium iodide (KI) was substantially superior to other forms including iodate (KIO3) in terms of safety, effectiveness, lack of side effects, and speed of onset, the FDA invited manufacturers to submit applications to produce and market KI.

  • Joe March 14, 2011, 2:14 pm

    Yes it does spread around the world, and our dairy cattle have had increased radioactive levels in their milk, after past disasters. In the 50’s we were told that the atom bomb testing would result in additional cancers in humans around the world, but not to worry, there would be no effect for at least 40 years or so.

  • Benjamin March 14, 2011, 9:44 am

    I’m going to have to side with what Mario said. Plenty large doses have been released over the years. If it blows, it’s going to be yet another disaster only for those nearest to it, not the world. I’d worry more about them than me.

    On the other hand, yeah, they’ve been saying “not likely” from day one, but seems with every passing day the unlikely just happens to occur. I’m of course hoping that it won’t blow any more than it already has, but sheeze… can’t they cease with all this denial crap already? I mean, it’s not like it was during Three Mile Island or even Chernobyl. The area is a flooded _ruin_, evac and other emergency response is limited… Don’t they dare take this into account when they say “unlikely”?

    The other thing is, why would oil prices be expected to drop? Hello! Big time emergency? More need for fuel? And come time to begin cleaning up and rebuilding? Anyone home, McFly?!

    Unlikely…

  • mario cavolo March 14, 2011, 6:28 am

    Disaster-monging is unfortunate. Does a nuclear reactor give off more radiation than a nuclear bomb, of which dozens have been detonated all over the world including the Nevada desert? Did people 3000 miles away need to be concerned? Didn’t the radioactivity dissipate to harmless concentration levels? As the article I just posted at my site indicates, my family lived through the Three Mile Island nuclear disaster, the biggest in U.S. history. We evacuated to my grandma’s in New York for 3 weeks until it was confirmed the coast was clear. Back then and til now, I have never heard that the concern over nuclear fallout was anything beyond the proximity of the area where the exposure takes place, which could be perhaps even 100 mile perimeter, but across oceans? What was the danger perimeter and impact around Chernobyl?..that was a genuine 100% nuclear core expulsion into the atmosphere. No wonder the pharmacist is wondering why anyone would ask.

    Cheers, prayers and good wishes for this and all such tragedies happening around the world in our days,

    Mario

    • Rich March 14, 2011, 9:04 pm

      The answer is yes, chain reaction nuclear reactor meltdowns and explosions like Fukushima and Chernobyl do release more radioactivity than nuclear bombs, which are designed to consume all their fuel and release all their energy at once, one reason DU with a half life of 4.468 billion years is so deadly over time.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depleted_uranium
      The radiation reaches the West Coast within a week by jet stream. How’s your thyroid and KI level? 150 mcg a day RDA can save lives…
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F70jpw_LT-Q&feature=player_embedded 3:38