Using Put Options to Bet on a Junk-Bond Crash

Here’s an easy play for those who have never cashed a winning ticket trading put or call options. Specifically, I am going to tell you how to bet on a junk-bond crash without risking your shirt — even if junk bonds continue to defy gravity indefinitely. First, let me assert that straight-up directional plays with stock options almost never win. Your odds are better trying to predict precisely when a shooting star will flash across the night sky. Similarly, if you buy call options with the expectation that a stock is about to surge, your timing had better be perfect, since the options you’ll be buying will be priced to discount any such event. Indeed, to make money on the calls, the move in the underlying vehicle would need to be so steep as to lie well outside the stock’s historical behavior.  Moreover, as implied above, you would need to initiate the trade just before the rally takes off, since, if you get in early, time decay will sap the value of your calls quickly. And you can forget about getting aboard after the rally has begun, since option prices will be goosed into the stratosphere mere minutes after the stock lurches higher.

put-call-options-junk-bond-crash

Our bet on a junk-bond disaster entails calendar-spreading put options on Barclay’s High-Yield Bond ETF (ARCX: JNK). This trading vehicle is shown in the chart above. As you can see, except for a couple of nasty dips that occurred several years ago, JNK hasn’t done much of anything since recovering from the Great Financial Crisis.  In retrospect, the only way an option trader could have made money on price movement this boring is to have sold straddles (i.e., puts and calls in combination) against JNK, and to have presciently refrained from doing so during the killer declines of May 2010 and August-September 2011. If you’d been caught flatfooted on either of those selloffs, you’d probably have given up all the profits you’d made being right the remaining 90% of the time.

Improving Our Odds

You may be wondering at this point how we’re going to make money buying puts if the puts already “know,” as I’ve implied they do, that the bull market in junk bonds is fated to end badly. The answer is that we are not buying puts outright, but in calendar-spreads where, for each option we buy, we short another against it. This hardly guarantees a winner, since even the value of calendar spreads falls to zero over time.  But suppose we were to “roll” the spread forward each month, remaining long a put option with a distant maturity while selling closer maturities against it from one month to the next. To illustrate, with JNK currently trading for around 40, we can “anchor” our spread by buying January 35 puts for around 0.20. Yes, JNK would have to fall sharply to make that a winning bet — about 13% between now and January 17, when the puts expire. Our profits would come only with JNK trading below 34.80 at that time.

However, we can reduce our risk significantly, possibly even eliminating it, by “rolling” the calendar  spread each month.  In this example, against long January 35 puts, we would short October 35 puts for a current price of 0.05 . That would give us the January 35/October 0.35 put spread for a net debit of 0.15. Come October 18, when the puts we are short are due to expire, we would cover them (i.e., buy them back) while selling November 35 puts.  If JNK has moved lower over that time, we may even be able to short the Nov puts for 0.10 or more.  If we were to get 0.15 for them, assuming the October puts expire worthless, that would cover the entire cost of the January puts we would continue to hold. Under ideal circumstances, with JNK falling slowly toward 35 over the next four months, we could conceivably be holding the January puts for a net credit at the time they expire or even before then.  Holding “free” puts is a great place to be in these all-too-interesting times – especially on the junk-bond market, and most especially if you believe as I do that sooner or later, investors will be reminded of why junk bonds came to be called “junk” in the first place.

Follow This Trade in Real Time

My take is that the bull market in junk paper since 2009 is egregiously overdone. It was caused mainly by investors grown dangerously hungry for yield at a time when the interest  paid on “safe” paper has been abysmal. By using a conservative calendar-spreading strategy, then further reducing our premium risk by rolling the short side of the spread on a regular basis, we can bet on a junk-bond crash till the cows come home without paying a significant penalty even if we are wrong.

We will be tweaking this strategy in real time in the weeks ahead. If you want to stay closely apprised, including via intraday updates and e-mail bulletins , the Rick’s Picks chat room is the place to be. To  access the 24/7 virtual room and all of Rick’s trading “touts” and services, click here for a free trial subscription.

  • Jason S October 3, 2014, 5:54 am
  • Kirk Kim October 1, 2014, 11:12 pm

    Rick

    Why not use a long dated bearish risk reversal instead? Seems to me that the premium offset would be similar and I think the risk of HY spreads tightening is probably asymmetrically attractive to the chance of them blowing out. This way you don’t risk missing a large chunk of profit in the case your scenario comes to fruition while you still happen to be short puts in the spread.

    I love the idea of being short HY and will probably put on the trade mentioned above. Thanks for the idea.

    &&&&&&

    Do you mean HYG — High-Yield Corporate Bond ETF? You’ll need to be more specific in any case, since the strategy I’m recommending has only a small gamma risk — and only below the targeted strike.
    RA

  • Jason S September 30, 2014, 1:06 am

    Rick,
    It seems like a well educated play, especially considering the junk bond spread has been increasing recently and the Russell 2000 has been weak. Small companies have likely borrowed to the hilt in a general sense and with global growth slowing, their ability to pay back the debt is looking dubious at best.

    As an investor, I want more than 460 bp spread for the risk I take with small company debt. Then again, in a world of declining income you have to push he envelope.