Can Coke Counter Sugarphobia with More Ads?

Depending on whom you believe, Coke is either mildly poisonous or a miracle elixir that enhances the quality of our lives. The beverage giant spends billions of dollars every year trying to convince us of the latter, but consumers literally aren’t buying it – have been buying steadily less Coke over the years, much to the consternation of the company’s top brass in Atlanta. For in the end, no amount of advertising can undo the salient point made so obvious by the picture below – i.e., that every can of Coke is loaded with sugar, an ingredient for which no health benefits have ever been claimed. Indeed, no less an authority on the subject than Fidel Castro once averred that America’s concerns about Communism were misplaced – that sugar, once exported by Cuba to the U.S. in immense quantities, was rotting our nation from within.

No wonder we like Coke so mcuh
The idea of sugar-as-toxin has gained traction as Americans have inched their way over the last decade toward healthier foods. At the same time, the blog world, with all the latest information on why too much Coke will kill you, has provided an informational counterweight to soda-pop ads that would have us believe that a no life well-lived should be without carbonated sugar-water. All too predictably, Coke has responded to our increasing reluctance to believe such claptrap by boosting its advertising budget, which was $3.1 billion in 2013, by $1 billion over the next three years. Similarly, McDonald’s, which has been killing us with fat, sodium and beef raised on hormones and antibiotics, thinks the correct marketing approach is to hit us with more, and “better,” advertising. Do you think it will work? That’s the question of the week, all comments welcome.

  • Traveler March 31, 2015, 8:02 pm

    I can remember someone saying one can use Diet Coke to clean battery terminals … should give you an idea what yer drinking.

    Many years ago, I was a Coke fanatic, think 4 to 6 cans a day, then decided I needed to cut down the sugar in my diet. Turned out I was addicted to Coke. It took me 3 full weeks to get rid of that. I was actually having withdrawal symptoms.

    One side effect of giving up soft drinks in general: I’ve saved a lot of money asking for a water cup instead of a regular drink.

  • Jason S March 31, 2015, 6:11 pm

    Here’s an article on it from a reliable (well, sorta) source. It reminds me of my high school chemistry class when my teacher told us that sugar as a toxin was debated fiercely by the FDA early in the FDA’s history. He said that the money behind the business of refined sugar won out.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/17/magazine/mag-17Sugar-t.html?_r=0

  • Larry D March 30, 2015, 10:51 pm

    Can I still have my Cherry Garcia triple scoop Ben & Jerry’s sundae? They assure me it’s from humanely raised Vermont cows sans BGH, therefore it must be good for me.

  • Rich March 30, 2015, 7:27 pm

    The only thing worse than having a longstanding addictive successful product is refusing to innovate and listen to the market. We approached KO a decade ago to provide a healthier beverage line for Coke, one of the largest user of natural coca leaves and vanilla, and they punted. Anyone who thinks Warren Buffett is healthy, wealthy and wise because he drinks five Cherry cokes, eats 2700 calories in Big Macs, Fries and Dairy Queens for breakfast like a six-year old, doesn’t know his mother lived for 92 years.

  • John D. Wilson March 30, 2015, 2:28 pm

    Well, they’ve sold the bill of goods that “freedom” still rings in the u.s.a.and europe when we all know it’s just an illusion.
    So, advertising more to induce you to drink a sugar based soda that’s bad for you?
    Should be a piece of cake for the “madmen” of the advertising world.
    Look at europe, look at the u.s.a. – it’s all a hoax – we are debt slaves to a ruling oligarchy and yet few are those that really see the abyss that we are headed for.
    So, put out MORE of the tantalizing girls, the “feel good” songs, and all the other “hooks” that will make the masses flock to their own obesity by buying the garbage that is known as Coca-Cola.
    As McD advertising offers “I’m loving it” all the way to bad health and the morgue.

  • Sutton March 30, 2015, 1:34 pm

    Coke. McDonalds. Nice White People view this stuff like smoking. Giving these products to their children is like giving them a cigarette. No advertising will ever undo this thought. Coke and McD’s will have to continue to be ghetto foodstuffs. Prosperous and aspirational White Moms will never come back(but the White trash are still available).

  • Iceberg March 30, 2015, 12:39 pm

    Wasn’t it Warren Buffet that said, “No one’s ever gone broke selling sugar to Americans.” ?

  • mari cavolo March 30, 2015, 11:31 am

    Unfortunately, the extra ad spending will pay off, but fortunately, only partially. People are wising up about their diets. It’s funny, the extremists say to completely cut out table sugar and refined plain empty cars like white flour. Such extremities are not necessary. I drink an espresso every morning, nice and strong with one teaspoon of sugar as it should be. How does that compare to people who drink two sugar drinks a day, idiots, consuming just in those two drinks over 20 teaspoons of sugar. Gee, I think my espresso won’t give me diabetes…

    Cheers, Mario

  • Bc March 30, 2015, 7:38 am

    Me? I’m doing paleo. No sugar for me. It works too. Pepsi long ago saw the trend and began a strategy of low sugar product development. Coke deserves to suffer IMO. The future seems to be bottled water. No brand loyalty there. Inputs are polymer resin and tap water. Output is blow molded bottles of RO permeate with minerals added. No marketing. Just price. Welcome to the future. It’s here today.

  • moi123 March 30, 2015, 5:43 am

    My quickie take is that Coke is the iconic refreshment of an older white America that is becoming a smaller proportion of the population. The newer emerging populations are not as enamored of it (hooked) nor are the young white kids. Coke has too many competitors, too many alternatives compared with 30 years ago. The same with McDonalds.

    Did you ever think absurd crap like Vitamin Water would be an enormous seller? Or energy drinks? Or Starbucks lattes? All are chipping away at Coke sales. There are too many non-Cokes around these days.

  • Sigmund Fraud March 30, 2015, 4:28 am

    Japanese media during WWII said, “We’re winning, we’re winning, we’re winning, oops we lost, who knew? An upside result was the immortal Kurosawa film, Rashomon, questioning the veracity of everyone. Was there an attendant shift in the perceptual framework of the Japanese? Will the high-fructose corn syrup and piles of sugar in Coke eventually scare the modern public as they should? Or is Edward Bernays right, that it will be propaganda uber alles? The historical record certainly affirms the overwhelming power of propaganda, and the electronic era makes it increasingly difficult to have direct personal knowledge of matters of import. Is there any basis for optimism?

  • Wayne March 30, 2015, 12:26 am

    There seems to be more health consciousness in America lately. How certain companies and quasi-state corporations react to consumer choice and dollar sovereignty can be frightening. Since there has been a well deserved backlash against over vaccination, unnecessary vaccination, and down right dangerous, unproven, and non-beneficial vaccination, the pressitutes in the media starting a “debate” on the merits of compulsory vaccination for the benefits of pharmaceutical companies of course, there paid advertisers.

    Ha, not even N. Korea has compulsory and forced vaccination, this is eerily similar to the eugenics movement of the early 20th century. It’s hard to imagine that fast food vendors and sugar drink producers could sell the “merits” of their product in a compulsory system, but I will not underestimate their abilities to use brain dead glitter bug puppets like reid, pelosi, feinstein, and others to carry forth their agenda on a captive population.