APPL

We wrote here recently that as Apple shares go, so goes the U.S. stock market. How has the stock fared?  Last week there was quite a bit of excitement when the broad-tossers who manipulate the stock for a living short-squeezed the bejeezus out of it after the close, leveraging a strong earnings report that could have surprised only Wall Street’s clueless analysts. Moments after the news hit the tape, AAPL gapped up 9% in a blink, recouping two-thirds of the losses it had suffered the previous two weeks, when it plummeted $90 from an all-time high at $644.  From a technical standpoint, what was interesting about the  decline is that it reversed from within 29 cents of a “Hidden Pivot” correction target we’d disseminated to subscribers a few days earlier. For if the stock had exceeded that number by more than a couple of dollars, it would have held bearish implications for the short-to-intermediate-term. However, because the pivot survived, there was no way to judge the mettle of bulls until Apple rallied out of the hole. This it did, in spectacular fashion, with last week’s gargantuan short squeeze. The goosing instantly added $50 of value to each share of the world’s most valuable company. Nothing like a little volatility to keep the crowds coming back for more, right?  Putting aside the comical spectacle of a $600 billion whale flopping around wildly in NASDAQ’s bathtub, the rally put Apple shares in play once again as a bull-market bellwether. That said, we have our doubts that new all-time highs will be achieved any time soon. Notice in the chart how last week’s gap-up rally, powerful as it was, narrowly failed to surpass peak #1.  If buyers had more guts, shouldn’t they have taken on that last, niggling resistance before settling back triumphantly?

With the world in the throes of an unprecedented credit blowout, gold’s failure to crack $2000 barrier can sometimes seem mystifying – the moreso as the correction begun in 2011 stretches on, now into an eighth month. Gold has acted more like wheat or corn than like money. Shouldn’t it reflect the fact that dollars, euros and yen are available to an insatiable group of borrowers, mainly large banks, at no cost and in practically unlimited quantities? Indeed. And yet, lately, gold has been unable to muster the ire, even, of crude oil, which appears to be gathering thrust for its first foray above $120 since 2008.  Meanwhile, Comex Gold has been lazily backing and filling since last September. If gold is not oblivious to the steady and relentless destruction of currencies, it seems unpersuaded that this is what the central banks are accomplishing by design. From a purely technical standpoint, gold’s reluctance to get in gear with crude, and to start acting like it knows what the central banks are up to, is not so mysterious. Let me explain.  I have written here many times that it is not bullish buying that drives stocks relentlessly higher in bull markets, but short-covering by bears. This was a dynamic I got to observe first-hand in the dozen or so years I spent on the trading floor of the Pacific Exchange. While bulls often rationalize their buying strategies by citing “fundamentals,” they probably understand at a gut level that PE ratios are no more useful a predictor of where a stock will be trading in six months than tea leaves. Small wonder, then, that bullish sentiment alone cannot summon the kind of torpedoes-be-damned buying it takes to drive shares through massive levels of supply.  But short-covering can, since the buying is rooted

Suh-prize, suh-prize. Someone posting in the forum said Apple was up $40 in after-hours trading, although I cannot confirm it at the moment using my deaf-dumb-blind-and-recalcitrant Tradestation application. If true, it would have no bearing on today's wait-and-see tout for the stock.  Technically speaking, the rally could augur another six weeks of false Spring for U.S. stocks.

An amusing coincidence: I was posting to the Rick’s Picks forum a moment ago about how exchange trading has come to resemble a sleazy carnival operation, and lo, the E-Mini S&Ps have shot up six points in mere seconds. This was an after-hours move – the best time to stage these heists, since there is little legitimate buying or selling to get in the way of the perpetrators. I don’t wish to insult carny operators by comparing them to exchange dealers and market makers, by the way, since the guys and gals who work the midway at least come face to face with the rubes they are ripping off.  Not in the world of electronic trading, though.  The pros who are doing the fleecing operate under a veil of secrecy that can be lifted only by securities regulators or the FBI. The forum thread concered trading against phantom bids and offers that seem to be there only when you don’t need them.  Café Americain’s Jesse had posted the following at his own blog: “I am not trading nearly as frequently or aggressively as in the past because a) I am getting older b) these markets are almost ridiculous. It’s like playing cards with the little girls. If I put in an order for a few thousand shares, the liquidity from a large offered set of multiple positions evaporates instantly and I close on maybe 100 shares. If I offer to buy above market but below ask I get ten ‘friends’ appearing instantly along with my bid.” Phantom Markets Just so. This has been our experience as well, mainly in the equity option markets. On a Level 2 trading screen, one might see 5000-up bids and offers for call options that rarely trade. So who would be offering thousands of them,

Poring over the charts of bullion and the E-Mini S&Ps, we stalked a few trades but found no promising camouflage triggers to exploit. We also took a close look at Apple’s (AAPL) charts, finding things to like, although perhaps no longer to love; and at the charts of Research In Motion (RIMM), which could fall to as low as 5.67 from a current price of about 16.