Housing Market

U.S. Would Sell Visas to Prop Up Real Estate

– Posted in: Commentary for the Week of March 8 Free

[John Skerencak, known to denizens of the Rick’s Picks forum as John Jay, is outraged by a Senate bill that would effectively sell visas to foreigners willing to buy expensive homes in the U.S.  The story, reported recently in the L.A. times, is linked below, and you’ll see in the comments it provoked that he is not the only one who thinks this deal stinks.  RA] Selling U.S. visas to prop up the real estate market? You’ve got to hand it to the banking and real estate lobbies, they never give up.  They always have a new scheme in the works. Here’s the story, from the October 20 edition of the Los Angeles Times: “American consumers and the federal government haven't been able to bail out the sinking U.S. real estate market. Now wealthy Chinese, Canadians and other foreign buyers could get their chance. Two U.S. senators have introduced a bill that would allow foreigners who spend at least $500,000 on residential property to obtain visas allowing them to live in the United States.” And there you have it. You can read the article for further details, but the bottom line is that it eliminates the old requirement that a foreigner invest money to create jobs in the USA to get a residence visa. As if that law were not already demeaning enough to America. My synopsis:  You need only pay $500,000 or more in cash, and buy at least one property worth at least $250,000 to live in, and the rest of the money can be used for rental properties.  This legislation proposes a list of regulations that are unenforceable and will never be checked in any case. Think about SEC enforcement of securities regulations: Showcase the law, but don’t enforce it once it has been enacted. You can

Prepare to Be Forgiven, Ye Mortgage Sinners

– Posted in: Commentary for the Week of March 8 Free

Although we waxed skeptical here the other day about Warren Buffett’s just-announced $5 billion stake in Bank of America, we allowed for the possibility that the deal will provide a handsome payoff to him no matter what happens to the bank.  B of A could implode, after all, a victim of sinking collateral values for its mortgage loans, and of litigation over its securitized-lending business.  There is also the wild card of homeowners challenging lenders in court to show clear title to properties that are in line for foreclosure. In fact, this issue alone has the ability to capsize the global financial system, since “clear title” is exactly what ceased to exist when the feather merchants of the banking world leveraged out real estate to-the-max earlier in the decade to create an $800 trillion derivatives edifice – the Mother Lode of Digital Money, as it were. All of that sum must be viewed at the moment as deflationary overhang, by the way – not to mention, a key stumbling point for those who argue that The Great Economic Crisis must eventually precipitate out as hyperinflation. So, how do you produce even mild inflation, let alone hyperinflation, with the housing market in a full-blown Depression?  Most surely not by expanding the capacity of banks to make mortgage loans. That’s been tried to death – first moderately, then aggressively, and finally desperately -- with zero success. Despite trillions of dollars worth of mortgage stimulus and supports both implied and real, the residential market looks even grimmer than it did a few years ago.  Existing-home sales fell 3.5 percent in July despite the fact that prices were 4.4 percent lower than in July 2010. Now that’s deflation. There’s also the $6.6 trillion loss of home equity that has occurred since the onset of the

As Housing Slump Deepens, Rental Market Booms

– Posted in: Commentary for the Week of March 8 Free

Vacancy rates here in Denver are as low as they’ve been in more than a decade, pushing rents sharply higher even as the housing market continues to slump.  This reportedly is happening all over the nation as tightened mortgage-lending rules move home ownership beyond the reach of millions of would-be buyers.  Many of today’s renters could probably have qualified for mortgages under the loose standards that obtained just a few years ago.  These days, however, even if they could get their hands on the money, a growing number of would-be homeowners are passing up the American dream in order to avoid the hassles and expense that come with it. So many are doing this, in fact, that they’ve even sparked bidding wars for rental units in Colorado and elsewhere. We heard about this from the bank president of a local branch, a 27-year-old who owns eight rental properties and first became a homeowner himself when he was 19. He said that demand for rentals is so strong these days that he no longer even has to advertise properties to get them leased quickly; word of mouth is all that’s needed.  Run a rental ad on Craig’s list, he says, and in just a day or two you’re swamped with applications. And in numerous instance where apartment-hunters have shown up, only to learn that a unit had already been rented, they’ve offered to pay more for it -- much more. Just recently, the banker said, a guy offered to pay $1450 a month for an apartment that had just been rented for $1300. Some are willing to sign extended leases for two, three or even five years, the banker said, but with demand so strong, there’s little incentive for landlords to accommodate. “Honey, Let’s Sell the House…” Who’s doing the renting? 

Flat Tax Could Be the Cheapest Way Out

– Posted in: Commentary for the Week of March 8 Free

We’ve been treating the debt-limit donnybrook on Capitol Hill as a joke, just like everything else that goes on in Washington, but it now seems more than remotely possible that the issue could turn gravely serious. Even allowing for the usual brinksmanship, it’s hard to imagine what concessions either side might make at this point  that would be significant enough to break the logjam. For its part, Moody’s – as big a laughing stock as D.C. politicians since the Great Financial Collapse of 2008-09 – has put America’s AAA credit rating “on review” for a possible downgrade, sending the dollar into spasms late Wednesday afternoon. Of course, there’s no way in hell Moody’s would actually downgrade U.S. credit, since that would trigger financial Armageddon.  Consider the mayhem that downgrades have already caused in Europe, where credit spreads for the PIIGs have widened as much as 250 basis points over German bundts. This has put the PIIGs in a financial death spiral that all the official happy-talk in the world can no longer counteract. Now try to imagine how a mere 50-point widening of spreads would affect a U.S. credit edifice that dwarfs Europe’s.  Add just a paltry few basis points to the interest paid on nearly $15 trillion of federal debt for a year or two, and pretty soon you’re talking about real money.  And then you could start worrying about how it would affect adjustable-rate mortgages in a depression-bound real estate sector, and the interest paid by households on revolving charge accounts. It would also knock Obama’s fiscal assumptions for a loop, since he’s counting on the fed funds rate to average 2.5% between now and 2020. If credit problems should cause this rate to revert to the 5.7% average that has obtained since the early 1980s, the additional