University Panel Sees No Evidence of Bubble

Is the worst of the economic crisis behind us?  We’d have thought answering that question with a resounding “No!” was a no-brainer, especially considering that the Federal Government’s multitrillion dollar attempt at stimulus has barely slowed the collapse of the real estate market, let alone lifted home prices as intended. And yet, when we asked the question at a recent panel discussion on “The Financial System of the Next Decades,” all but a handful of those in the audience raised their hands in assent, apparently in the belief that the U.S. is emerging from, or has emerged from, the Great Recession. We tried a different approach just to make sure: “How many of you think we are still in a financial bubble?” Three people in the audience of about 300 raised their hands.  What’s going on here? We thought only the nation’s newsrooms were oblivious to economic reality, but apparently not. Was this perhaps a roomful of die-hard  CNBC-watchers?  That, too, seemed unlikely, since the audience was comprised mainly of University of Virginia graduates and alumni, not the sort of stock market yobs who can stomach the likes of Jim Cramer.

And the panel itself was not exactly a bunch of wild-eyed optimists either. More like a bunch of staid academicians.  It included University president and professor of sociology Teresa A. Sullivan; Prof. William Wilhelm Jr. from UVa.’s McIntire School of Commerce; and Lawrence E. Kochard, chief executive of the school’s Investment Management Company.  In his excellent post-mortem of Lehman’s collapse, Prof. Wilhelm noted that, at the time the investment firm went down in flames, it was financing more than 40 percent of its portfolio with debt maturing in two weeks or less. We pointed out that the Federal Reserve is currently far more leveraged than Lehman Brothers ever was, but neither the panel nor the audience seemed impressed.

Nor did we change any minds by citing one particularly alarming trend that could hasten the housing market’s final collapse, and with it the collapse of the U.S. economy.  Specifically, we noted that homeowners faced with foreclosure have won nearly every court decision in which they’ve challenged lenders to prove ownership.  Of course, it should surprise no one to learn that clear title to property would have been a casualty of the global mortgage-securitization mania that fed the housing boom. Now the banks will face the consequences, since lawsuits are springing up like topsy as more and more underwater homeowners take advantage of a legal loophole that promises to let them off the hook scot-free.

Panelist Kochard asserted that “everyone” was looking to short “something” to leverage the economy’s intractable weakness. We suggest that he study the method used by John Paulson a few years ago to capitalize on the mortgage market’s collapse . The scheme required such sophistication that only Paulson and a handful of others were able to make big money on it. We’ve long asserted that debt deflations such as the one occurring globally right now would challenge even the savviest investors to hold onto a mere fraction of  their peak  net worth.  This is not a time of opportunity, but of defensive play, and although there are certain to be some incredible bargains after the financial system has imploded, the challenge until then will be to preserve one’s capital.  Incidentally, even Paulson is not infallible. Reportedly, he bought a ton of Bank of America stock in expectations that its price would double. By our runes, B of A’s chart looks like that of a company that is headed for bankruptcy.

(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • Rich June 14, 2011, 7:34 pm

    Back from daughter’s graduation in SoCal where the women are beautiful and the men rich, while they drive 85 mph with a 65 mph speed limit in $200 K Cars and surf all day and make love all night.

    Woke up to notice 300% ISE Opening C/P ratio on Equity Options at 9:50 NYC. Many still buying the dips.

    This may not end well when it ends…

  • C.C. June 14, 2011, 8:50 am

    “Was this perhaps a roomful of die-hard CNBC-watchers? That, too, seemed unlikely, since the audience was comprised mainly of University of Virginia graduates and alumni, not the sort of stock market yobs who can stomach the likes of Jim Cramer.”

    Rick’s take here could equally be applied to the vapid reasoning which guides the gullible (many with advanced degrees) to continually vote in office, those who support the status quo, with the exception of perhaps Ron Paul. There are Ph.D.’s who refuse to give credence to the concept of saving first and spending later or, the virtue of private property rights vs. special interest rights and so forth.

    Is it therefore any wonder, the attitudes of those on the University panel align with an economic perspective of the Shit-stains they vote into office and the attendant economic policies that landed us here?

  • Marc Authier June 14, 2011, 8:20 am

    Close the university. Filled with idiot parasites. Larry Summers made Harvard lose 19 billion dollars in its endowment fund. Universities are filled with stupid morons, specially the economics departments which should be converted in pig styes. More productive and intelligent to raise pigs than economists.

  • Chris T. June 14, 2011, 7:36 am

    Rick, share the sentiment, but:

    “as more and more underwater homeowners take advantage of a legal loophole”

    You can’t call that a loophole. Luck for the owners, that the institutions were so lax, but, as the court in NY said, the rules estalished to protec real property must be observed.

    Otherwise, anyone could just CLAIM to own your house, by filing an affidavit that they owned it (as DB tried in that first, now famous Ohio case). There was nothing and no one forcing this carlessness (other than greed), and it is not hard to imagine, that at least someone, somewhere was not nec. just careless.
    So, a boon to one side yes, but not a loophole, just long-standing rules (some of the few that actually make sense) being enforced. There is a reason, why conveyance is such an important aspect of Englsh law.

    “The scheme required such sophistication that only Paulson…”
    WELL, only Paulson AND GoSux, and sophisticated crookery at least to some degree. Still, respect to Paulson for being the one to pull it off, even if one can harldy call it “rolling up your sleve and getting to work the hard way”.

    CamF.:
    hear your dread, but the only gold and silver you should own is not manipulable.
    Gold IS as manipulated as Silver, I think GATA has demonstrated that well enough. It may not go as deep, but its breadth makes up for that.

    If (can that word reasonably even be used any longer) things do collapse, then the paper dollar equivalents will be a meaningless number, just like today, the USA Dollar vs. CSA Dollar rate is meaningless, or the Reichsmark to Mark (now Euro) rate.
    Let them manipulate the phantom all they want, at some point it will be just like that famous scene in the Grifter’s, when the camera pans into the backroom the mark wants to see…

  • roger erickson June 14, 2011, 4:20 am

    James Madison expressed the overall challenge the Framers faced in this way, “In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: You must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place, oblige it to control itself.”
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Madison

    still sums up a lot today; we’re just struggling to scale this principle up across 312 million people in 50+ states & territories

    • Steve June 14, 2011, 6:04 am

      “The state and national courts not being foreign to one another, like the State courts are, but; subordinate parts of one complete system of government. . .” Bennett v. Bennett 1 Deady 307, Oregon. Seems to indicate that there is only one corporate UNITED STATES with corporate districts 28 U.S.C. 3002(15); yes Roger! The several States died when the masses got lazy and refused to face the obligation of Liberty. There doesn’t appear to be fifty several States, only one corporate scarlet whore U.S. territory having a WESTERN District of Oregon, and Eastern District of Oregon yadda, yadda, yadda, yadda. There are no Sovereigns in Common, only corporate enfranchisees obtaining roman civil privileges by legislative act in master/servant law. The U.S. is one corporate organ with serfs serving the master/creator congress, and the C.E.O. in succession. It is hard to have a conversation when the reality of the loss of Liberty and the several States, as well as immoral use of fiat are thought to be some thing other than a reality created by a consensus of opinion, not an Immutable Law.

  • Robert June 13, 2011, 7:57 pm

    {yawn}

    I love summer time. Relaxing by the water, drinking sweet-tea, catching fish, and watching the world economy (and many governments as well) implode right in front of me.

    Meanwhile, a bunch of quant algorithms are out there using the light summer trading volumes to create unheard of price volitility and expose tremendous sale prices on valuable real assets.

    Long Natural Gas, longer WTI, and longest Dec2012 Sil-

    It’s all on sale.

    Anyone see Jim Sinclair’s commentary on how Mining CEO’s could hammer the shorts if they would just offer a dividend redeemable in real metal, forcing the shorts to have to go buy the metal on the spot market to pay the company back for the dividended metal?

    The man is brilliant, and the mining CEO’s (who are all MBA graduates of Paper Ponzi University) are probably too stupid to even comprehend the concept.

    • John Jay June 14, 2011, 4:35 am

      Robert,
      I often wondered about that big gold miner that has been making crazy hedges in an ever rising market for years. I too thought the bosses were dopes, but as usual my cynicism was set way too low. I forget the particulars but I read a revealing article about the whole deal there, and it seems the guys calling the shots at the gold company may have been making tons of money by taking the other side of the trade and letting the gold mining company take the fall. The scheme is rather complicated, and the writer may be engaging in speculation, which is what I am doing by bringing this up. So there it is, take it or leave it.
      Criminals or dopes, you make the call!

  • ricecake June 13, 2011, 6:19 pm

    Washington D.C never see any bubble. The Fed didn’t see any bubble. The bank didn’t see any bubble. The Real Estate didn’t see any bubble. The medicare/mediaid receivers didn’t see any bubble.

    Of course Education sector don’t see any bubble. They want their high pay party to continue as long as their quality product brand (best education in the world) last, they will get rich students coming from foreign countries. Until the resources running out of course. But it will run out some day. Now Taiwan and S. Korea also in the competition to get the newly rich upstart Chinese kids to their expensive private school system too.

    What everyone see and want to see is profit and income and benefit. You don’t have work. Or if you work you will be the chief and the regulators the big boss. There are plenty of immigrants legal and illegal want to come to this country to do all that low paid dirty back breaking hard work for pennies. Americans will be all highly shiningly educated and then become the boss to preside over the new comers. Problem is when many of the new comers settle down they want to move up the food chain too….. lol.

    This culture is sick telling everyone that doing honest real thing simple work is stupid, that everyone should become somebody that everyone should have audacity that everyone can be the president regardless of their personal ability. Not thing really wrong just too much unrealistic expectation.

    See this video: Spain: Low paid job used to be done by the poor Romanians now all done by the local Spanish women.

    Spain: In Debt, Out of Work and Low on Prospects | Made in Germany http://t.co/72qmfPV

  • charles June 13, 2011, 5:59 pm

    Mario,

    Exactly, there’ll always be a direction to take for profits. Who cares if it’s up or down? Just go with the flow and watch when the big fish make their turn. You can’t outguess them; so join them!

  • Alchemisteve June 13, 2011, 5:07 pm

    Bob,
    Remember that in 2008 the dollar index went up as stocks and commodities went down, creating a great buying opportunity for precious metals. At times like this, ‘cash is king’. Good luck to us all …
    Alchemist-Eve

    • warren June 14, 2011, 9:16 pm

      Alchemy: seeking to turn base metals into gold or silver, medieval shenanigans.
      Good user name. Hope the thought behind it does you well. And good luck to you also.

  • roger erickson June 13, 2011, 4:30 pm

    “Best Way to Rob a Bank is to Own One”
    please recommend this to others

    http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04032009/watch.html

    The bulk of the Moyers/Black videos are here:
    http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/about/search_google.html?simplesearch.x=0&simplesearch.y=0&q=bill+black

    inescapable corollary:
    “The Best Way to Rob a Country is to Own a Politician”

    with fiat currency, backed only by public initiative, this proves that all links between elections and campaign contributions have to be removed – if the US public is to own it’s own politicians

    if we survive on the quality of distributed decision-making, then we must have distributed ownership of the process for placing decision-makers

  • mario cavolo June 13, 2011, 3:47 pm

    Following the logic, if there is “nowhere to go?” then in fact isn’t “short” then the place to go, perhaps in a carefully crafted mix of assets and sectors? Good grief…Mario

  • John Jay June 13, 2011, 2:28 pm

    Mario,
    What are the media in China saying about the China/Philipine/Vietnam argument over the ownership
    of the mineral/fishing rights in the South China Sea?
    Vietnam is asking for our help in asserting their claim, how surreal, shades of the Sino/Vietnam border war in 1979. Any major shift in Chinese governments view of the USA?

    • mario cavolo June 13, 2011, 4:20 pm

      ahh yes got it….that’s a hot regional issue and here’s some additional background.

      In fact, China over the past 3 + has become more bold and demanding and less reasonable in their dealings/deals with their neighbors; commensurate with their economic rise on the global stage. They have undone quite a bit of good will diplomacy they had been working on for many years and its disconcerting. One of the consequences is that most of their “neighbors” in southeast asia did come for a friendly knock on Uncle Sam’s door asking for assistance, to help coax China to lighten up, soften up, chill out. Certainly, their claims on the South China Sea have always fallen into this basket of regional arguments, of which we get the impression China has no intention of backing down on; anymore than they would acknowledge the many exaggerated and absurd claims that they ruined Tibet, should somehow allow Tibet to be free, separate from China, whatever that means, for example, or that Taiwan or HK would become completely separate from what is known in business terms as “Greater China”. The political and economic ties just wouldn’t allow such changes anymore than a state of the USA could or would do so; ditto political and economic barriers “shaded” with military threat would probably be the result if such matters were ever really pushed to the brink stateside.

      On US relations, THE issue is the “currency war” between the RMB and USD. Both parties choosing self-serving selfish courses of action. Both sides very much need to make the relationship work but its not based on warm, fuzzy hugs and diplomatic joy, that’s for sure.

      Cheers, Mario

  • Jess June 13, 2011, 2:13 pm

    It really is an issue that has me wondering where to go for safety. Used to be all you needed to know was that the place to pile money was in silver and gold, now that silver has been taken down we again look for a safe place to go with no where to turn. A good read but whats next in light of what is to come?

    • bob June 13, 2011, 2:22 pm

      Jess,
      I too, wonder where to go to escape the next down-leg in the market. What are these defensive plays? A repeat of 2008 would be devistating to me.

  • Styrin June 13, 2011, 6:37 am

    I do find that same quote to be awesome too: “there are certain to be some incredible bargains after the financial system has imploded, the challenge until then will be to preserve one’s capital”. Isn’t it awesome to know there are still some men, who do know what they are talking about? Thanks, Rick!

    Some prefer to believe in magic. That we somehow can overcome reality by the pure magic of ourselves believing in recovery. Ha-ha-ha. I can’t wait to see these believers in the slum, where they truly belong. Slums, a true sign of a free country, is an indicator that the idiots had not been artificially pulled up to “pretend we all are good people” level. I do not see any slums around, do you? And this does mean that the idiots are still living their magic dream, and that in turn, means that the spending are still higher than necessary to compensate producers, and thus, have to fall further yet.

    Yes, they are countering the ongoing massive deflation with even more massive inflation, but it is only precipitates the final unwinding, not negating it. This time, the justice must happen. The only way they can pull further without a collapse, is by turning this country to absolute fascism and starting a world war. Anything less that that is going to result in default plainly visible to anyone.

    And all these people who see a recovery? Fools who discuss economics using their government-approved brainwashing they call education, and government issued fantasy numbers they call economic statistics. They don’t think that it is necessary to examine the state of the capital before coming to any sort of forecast. Nope. They are not even aware of what the capital is.

    It’s comedy before a drama.

  • John Jay June 13, 2011, 5:20 am

    Well, the housing collapse has not really bitten the banks yet. Extend and pretend is in full force in that arena. I have read that there are some people living in a house that have not made a mortgage payment for as long as three years! With the bank just ignoring the default. The banks are all insolvent, so the last thing the Federal government wants to do is let price discovery happen in the real estate markets, residential and commercial both. We are truly through the looking glass now. There are so many cross currents of intervention and manipulation in the markets, and war seems to be breaking out everywhere, and now the US government is pointing at the military threat that China has become. A threat that every administration since Nixon has helped create. The financial tornado of a lifetime is brewing, it’s anyones guess where it will touch down. On a lighter note, I witnessed an unrestrained free market in action this weekend. On a trip to the local auto wrecking yard to get parts for my old 300 ZX, I was startled to see a huge section full of old pick up trucks, vans, and SUVs. Cause and effect evidently from $4 a gallon gas. It looked like a bizarre car show of classic old pick ups for sure. Probably headed to China after crushing, I saw ocean containers in their lot.

    • mario cavolo June 13, 2011, 1:58 pm

      Hi John Jay,

      ….now the US government is pointing at the military threat that China has become. A threat that every administration since Nixon has helped create.

      Huh?!! What?!!

      Cheers, Mario

    • Wyz June 13, 2011, 5:59 pm

      During the 1930’s scrap iron was shipped to Japan. A few years later during WW2 the comment/observation was “we sent them our iron and they returned it as bombs!”

      Will similar comments be made in the not to distant future towards China? (note: I am not saying or blaming Japan or China, merely observing. U.S. and FDR went out of there way to provoke Japan to get them to attack which provided excuse to enter the war.)

    • Chris T. June 14, 2011, 8:32 am

      China a threat is laughable.

      When a school bully beats up on a kid continuously who is weaker, that kid is NOT a threat just because his hormones and growing up make it harder for the bully to keep harrassing him.
      The bully is the threat objectively, the bullied kid in and of himself not necessarily to anyone, and even to the bully because he will soon stop tormenting for fear of not getting away with it.

      That is also why we had World War I Germany was a “threat” to the then bully, Great Britain, just by being and growing.
      Look where that got Britain, and it took only about 31 years!

  • mike June 13, 2011, 2:41 am

    University Panel Sees No Evidence of Bubble
    Catherine Austin Fitts did a comparable test of an audience and had,basically,the same results.As FOFOA stated,”What you see is the result of the perspective you choose” And sadly,the biggest % of humanity does not know how to see the value of TRUTH which is our greatest Strength.

    We do not understand the nature of a relative mind trapped between polar dualities of right/wrong, good/bad etc and to play on the relative playground without understanding the rules is a no win game.One can not play with half truths against lies and expect an honest game.So, one need ask :Why am I playing this game? The Truth will tell you. It will expose your weaknesses and your greatest strengths. BUT one must be Honest with ones Self for the Truth to come out and play.

    We are so focused on the world outside us we do not
    re-cognize the moral/ethical world within.

  • Cam Fitzgerald June 13, 2011, 1:37 am

    “This is not a time of opportunity, but of defensive play, and although there are certain to be some incredible bargains after the financial system has imploded, the challenge until then will be to preserve one’s capital.” ~~Rick Ackerman
    ——————————————

    OK, that line gave me a chill. I know it is true and yet like many others out there still want to believe that everything will be OK in the end. It will not be OK of course. I know it. Most of the readers here do too.

    When I look at my menu of options to protect myself in the event of a real calamity there is very little to choose from.

    Dollars and other currencies are being devalued daily. Government debt looks like death to own. Equities threaten to tank at some unknown time in the future (although not in the coming weeks as a new up-leg is now in sight).

    Silver is as manipulated as all-get-out, Gold is slowly but surely coming under the control of central banks globally and may in the end be just as manipulated as Silver is today and Copper, while much in demand is subject to the forces of commodities trends.

    Those trends are jeopardized as China seems to be slowing. In any event, with JPM holding so much Copper supply off-line in London that trade has become subject to control and outside forces too. It is no longer a pure play where supply and demand forces indicate to investors it’s true worth.

    Defensive plays look good, but who wants to buy high if the market is indeed suggesting a killer decline in 2012? Better to wait until then, right….until after the fall? Meantime, holding cash and Government debt is perhaps not the best idea between now and the meltdown.

    This is still all about a credit bubble and debt overhang, right? That should indicate to us that if the system does implode (circa 2008 financial crisis) that no harbour would be safe anywhere and the whole damn planet would get a haircut (if that is even possible). Goodbye pensions, goodbye social security and goodbye to the good old days too.

    I am sure nothing will become quite that dire but it is worth considering how the system might yet unravel in the wake of a real estate bubble bursting in Asia and a slowdown that is now developing in China. Let’s keep in mind that China does not even need a recession to kick commodity prices to the curb. A mere slowdown in growth from 8 to 6 percent will cause heavy damage and send the speculative money scampering for safety elsewhere.

    Meanwhile, what all this suggests to me is that countries in Europe that are currently labouring under severe austerity measures would see their national balance sheets hurt badly as exports declined and debt/GDP ratios shot skyward upon the reality of a slowing China .

    I know one thing more. I don’t want anything at all to do with Government debts, Treasuries or even State and municipal bond issues. I will not go anywhere near Greek debt either for another example. Especially during a time of Sovereign crisis unfolding. I do not give a hoot how much interest is offered on that risk trade. Sell it to someone else; a different fool. Trouble is brewing and it is bigger than all of us now.

    Meantime, Corporations are still sitting on record levels of cash, have good credit lines intact and some hold very healthy assets in the ground. They are primed to reinvest as required and when the time is right. Apparently the time is not right or fresh new job creation numbers would be a big story right now. They are not.

    But if the Global economy is really slowing as most economists seem to agree then we should also anticipate earnings reports that don’t meet expectations in future quarters.

    Sales will be declining right? And most big companies have already pared away the fat so there is not a lot of cutting to be done to keep revenue numbers fat and growing. So that suggests therefore that we could go through an extended period of falling equity values as business meets the reality of retrenchment in the broader economy. Not everywhere of course but you get my idea here.

    I am thinking corporate debt is one good alternative to generate some returns while protecting the nest egg. Good quality companies with relatively low overall existing debt exposure and good prospects in whatever economy arises from the ashes. Defensive companies with a proven track record. In other words, companies I would own anyway but who’s shares I am not prepared to buy on todays valuations.

    So it is Corporate bonds and company debt for now. There I said it. That is what I am looking into this week. I want an ownership position in businesses that actually make money and generate profits and am prepared to lend to the best of them.

    That is what I see as one of the means to protect capital while achieving very modest growth despite all the uncertainty. The inflationistas can call me an idiot and I don’t care. We are not hyper-inflating yet.

    If we do, I will change my policy according to the circumstances of the day. For the moment, my real concern is that there may be a sudden price adjustment in equity markets or possibly a meltdown in Euro Bonds or municipals on the horizon that keeps me wary of buying any of them.

    I don’t want to get caught flat-footed chasing yield on the day that same yield gets splattered on my wind-screen at 100 miles an hour.

    In the meantime, I will not any touch any public debt instrument any longer. Not with a ten foot pole.
    ===================================
    Let me add the following comment and hopefully none of you objects. This is a very good expression that comes from Mathew 25 and the Parable of the Three Servants.

    “To those who use well what they are given, even more will be given, and they will have an abundance. But from those who do nothing, even what little they have will be taken away.”

    And that, in very short words, sums up why I believe sticking with strong companies during insecure times is the most prudent and sensible practice to protect wealth against uncertainty.

    Lord knows, our Governments are doing everything they can to impoverish us these days and the devaluation of our wealth continues unabated. Our standard of living will fall as it follows in the footsteps of our declining currency and as our buying power erodes in lockstep.

    So invest in strength, not weakness. That is my motto.

    • Steve June 13, 2011, 7:02 am

      Cam, What does the term “. . .use well. . .” mean ? How does that relate to usury, and false fiat money in anti-constitutional abuses of Article I, sec. 8, cls. 5, Article I, sec. 10, cls. 1, Article I, sec. 8, cls. 3 ? That is 5 being actual “value” instead of fiat fraud, not to mention fair weigths and measures. Article I, sec. 10, cls. 1, a prohibition against your state governor and US in regard to anything but gold and silver Coin, and congress only allowed coining of Coin of Value in gold and silver for the several States. And, what of Commerce Clause, where all congressional violation originates including Obamacare? One might consider the “. . .money changers. . .” and what happened to them historically ! (do not want to go into how the Commerce Clause governs everything a coporate enfranchisee subject citizen does under excises/ roman civil law contract – contract Law)

      Is Obama the C.E.O. of a foreign corporation under the executive office ? Yes! I believe all three branches of the current corporate government are covered under an Original Executive Office “Commander in Chief” which incorporated and established a new executive/ executive, executive/ legislative, and executive/judicial branch. The Organic Constitution and Organic Government have been abandoned, defunded, laid to waste, and an illusion in art of corporatism established in fraud/misrepresenation. There is a corporate charter, and it is just about like the Original Constitution. I will gurantee that each state has a new corporate constitution ‘just like’ the Original, except the corporate charter is Sovereign over all persons enfranchised. I have Cal. and Oregon’s acts, and will bet every state is the same under the Buck Act, or other abandonment of Original Jurisiction for democracy and under roman civil law. Oregon created a new law in 1973 when it ratified the 14th amendent – just facts. Just remove the scales from everyone’s eyes. Look at the Commander in Chief’s flag and where it is flown Cam – can I say EVERYWHERE ? The flag of the Sovereigns in Common is on a plain standard, with nothing above the People, the thirteen Original several States. If one reads the Veterans of Foreign Wars one knows the Commander in Chief (Eagle) flys over the silks and cords and fringes of the military colors of an irregular flag (see; 4 U.S.C. 1) which fly over all corporate states, and corporate enfranchisees.

      It would appear that many are trading with the Ceasar and lord Obama Ceasar’s money/stocks/bonds/fiat based solely on the evidence flown in our faces. If, in deed, we are trading at the corporate money changers tables in the corporate temple, we might expect to have history repeat its self. Invest wisely and morally in the things that are not of Ceasar, so that one will owe last Ceasar Bush, current Ceasar Obama, or the next Ceasar C.E.O. in succession of mobocracy nothing. Give unto- – – – –

      Federal reserve notes are territorial, and script under the Commander in Chief. If anyone knows some old military men ask them about the ‘script’ they have been tendered as money in foreign lands. If it were not so Obama would be guilty of treason and so charged, as would the governors of your several States be guilty of treason by open confession in the Court of the united States. They are immune because they are corporate, and territorial under 1-8-17, and 4-3-2 Const. Orig. Intent. A coporate executive legislature, foreign 28 U.S.C. 3002(15), can exercise any and all power territorially. And, congress has absolute dominion over its legislative creation 14th amendment U.S. citizens domiciled in the district. Read Article I, sec. 8, cls 17, and Article IV, sec. 3, cls. 2 and tell me what Thing congress cannot do to a 14th amendment corporate creation “. . .subject. . .”.

      The Great Bubble is believed by me to be corporatism/fraud/fiat/misrepresentation.

      Yes, I get it. 14th Amendment subjects have roman civil rights to contract/labor of common right something like the Constitution. And when the court cites a 2nd amendment right for a corporate enfranchisee the court says that this person has corporate privileges granted just like are Endowed to the Sovereigns in Common. (will not work on the word Endowed versus legislative grant)

      I believe it is all about Morality Cam. I do not believe “. . .use well. . .” means playing/trading/ manipulating/investing in fraud of the corporate ceasar. I would not bet on being at the money changer’s table in the corporate temple when the time of accountablity in regard to morality comes to bear, or to bare the bubbly truth, or should I say as a bear.

      Use well what we store up unto ours in good works, good things in family and friends, and use well in moral dealing as the real measure that wins in the debacle. Knowledge based upon the Immutable Law is “. . .good use. . .”.

      Rick is always good in his writing, and I wonder if the “bubble of immorality” is not the greatest issue we face. Based in the reflection that is congress’s representation, immorality exhibitited in extra-judicial murder, torture justification, total misrepresentation, and blood dancing in the streets for violation of the Conventions for Peace, International Law, the Law of Nations, and Due Process of Law is not our present BUBBLE. May I call this the Weiner Reality, or Weiner Reflection of the masses? Rick your excellent essay says it all – blind immorality, blind education, blind high degress, and blind high titles leading the blind who all say – this time is different.

    • Robert June 13, 2011, 7:48 pm

      Steve-

      Click here:

      http://www.cnbc.com/id/43357380/

      You may have to pick a candidate name in order to see the current running tally.

      You may just be suprised, and remember, this is a CNBC poll- the pinnacle of mainstream, indoctrinated in the system, false journalism media outlet…