A Savvy Advisor Prepares Clients for More Deflation

[With unemployment above 9% and productive capacity heavily underutilized, the U.S. economy is slipping back into official recession. In a letter to clients, our friend and financial advisor Doug Behnfield has predicted that deflation is about to return with a vengeance — presumably with bullish implications for high-quality bonds and, get this… municipal bonds. For Doug’s take on the stock market, fixed-income securities and a Baby Boomer cohort that is ill-prepared financially for retirement, read on. RA]

Over the last few weeks, stock, bond and commodity markets appear to have played “catch up” to fundamental economic changes that began early in the first quarter. In early February, 30-Year Treasury Bond yields peaked at 4.8% and started down sharply as bond prices rose. The municipal bond market did the same. The S&P 500 hit 1300 and essentially stopped rising, creating a volatile topping process that lasted until late July. Since then, the bottom has been dropping out of both stock prices and bond yields. The Fed has promised to keep very short term interest rates at 0% for at least the next two years.

The economy now appears to have rolled over early in the year. Employment and housing prices peaked in the first quarter and GDP growth was revised down to 0.4%. At year end 2010, Q1 2011 GDP growth was widely expected to exceed 3.5%. State and local governments began aggressively tightening their budgets and it seems clear that the federal government will be doing the same. Standard & Poor’s (and the other rating agencies to a lesser degree) have put congress and the administration on notice that the debt bomb must be defused immediately and the vast majority of voters seem to agree. The fiscal drag could be enormous. Or we become a Banana Republic. The median age of the Baby Boomer is now 56, and as a result of extremely poor saving patterns and an ill-timed rush into leveraged real estate investment, they are likely to radically change their approach toward budgeting now that they are in the home stretch to retirement.

It is difficult to imagine that another rabbit can be pulled from the hat. Considering that household credit contraction has been joined by government credit contraction as a secular theme, the most likely economic outlook includes deflation, and it could be severe for asset prices. For the stock market in particular, the near term risks still seem great. The S&P 500 sports a mere 2.3% dividend yield. Bear markets have historically ended with yields above 5% (chart attached). Over 70% of the daily trading volume on the New York Stock Exchange emanates from air conditioned warehouses in New Jersey with no humans in them, just computers running algorithms (what ever they are). On the other hand, deflationary trends are generally favorable for high quality bonds.

No ‘Escape Velocity’ Now

It seems to me that the trend in stock and bond prices that we have experienced over the last several weeks in particular, are likely to persist for the near term. I have not forgotten that I held a similar belief last summer, only to see a dramatic reversal as the Fed convinced the investing public that they had the tools to engineer “escape velocity” for the economy. But QEII failed to deliver any more than temporary rhetorical monetary stimulus and back then, federal fiscal stimulus was still in full force. Now we are faced with fiscal drag at all levels of government and a growing threat from foreign economic events. It is increasingly likely that we have already entered a recession, but this time we are starting with 9% unemployment and very low capacity utilization.

The stock market was down as much as 17% from early May’s highs, but even after the strong bounce in recent days it is still down by 10%. Garden variety bear markets typically produce declines of 25% to 35%.  Recently, the 10-Year Treasury Bond yield touched 2.03%, undercutting the December 2008 modern-era low. Back in December 2008, when the previous low occurred, the 30-Year Treasury Bond yield hit 2.51%. Today it is 3.51% and it seems that yields on the long end have some catching up to do. During the 2008 financial crisis, municipal bonds performed poorly, unlike Treasury bonds, which were the best performing asset (including gold). But in 2007- 2008, several factors occurred that had a negative impact on municipal bond that cannot be repeated. One event was the failure of the auction rate securities market and the other was the failure of the municipal bond insurers. Neither exists today. It is my belief that, this time around, municipal bond performance will be similar to Treasurys.

In conclusion, I am comfortable with my current asset allocation recommendations for the present time, even with the degree of positive relative performance we have achieved so far this year. In addition, I would be delighted if you would share this email with friends, family or associates who could benefit from a more defensive, fixed income view toward financial planning.

***

(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • richard j August 18, 2011, 3:13 am

    Municipal bonds??Return of capital does not seem like a good bet to me. Tax free status of no huge benefit at the moment. Municipalities finance themselves through realty taxes and municipal bond issuance, questionable outcomes in my opinion.

  • Benjamin August 17, 2011, 11:45 pm

    Did anyone else hear of this…?

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-14553127

    That wasn’t the exact article I initially read, but it pretty much sums it up. Bernanke is no traitor, and should be praised as a shining example of the independence the Founders fought for! Only a few nutcases in Texas would think otherwise!

    If that isn’t an indication of future “ZIRP”, I don’t know what is. And since that is the future that has been decided and defended…

    “If the American People allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the People of all their Property until their Children will wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered.” — Thomas Jefferson

    Since the stakes of THE Game only increase, at some point the players are going to find themselves squeezed by the dealer. But if Jefferson was right about anything, they’ll find a way to pass that on to some other party. Better us first, than them, into that Fed-created super-blackhole.

  • John Jay August 17, 2011, 8:03 pm

    warren,
    Obama is not that much of a “patsy”.
    In exchange for towing the line, he gets to push his own agenda, just look at Eric Holder, his collection of “Czars”, the willingness of Congress to cede ever more power to Obama. How about his “guns and bibles” wisecrack. Two armoured buses he bought in Canada to drive him around talking about his plan for American jobs. If it all goes smash on his watch, do you think he is going on trial or something? No, another retired President making speeches for 6 figures, and selling a ghost written book. As usual, the power elite can’t lose.
    Speaking of deflatiom, MGM is planning to implode their Harmon casino tower in Las Vegas because of poor construction that the building inspectors say is likely to collapse in an earthquake. Never finished, never occupied, cheaper to just control demo it. I wonder if the construction loan has been sold to Fannie or Freddie yet at par. I know it’s a commercial loan, but anything is possible now in this country.
    To be continued……………

    • warren August 17, 2011, 8:57 pm

      I respect your opinion but, I say Holder is just another poor sap to point at later. By who?? There have been almost twice as many Atty Gens as there have been presidents. Gotta go now….bye
      Oh and yes…Rick, thanks for the forum boss.

  • Marketace August 17, 2011, 7:32 pm

    Time to step back and see the forest for the trees.

    It certainly seems to me that the US has given up on recovery ad ready for a Japanese style lost decade. Interest rates do not have to rise – especially when the FED is guaranteeing no increases in the next two years and the bond vigilantes have low hanging fruit to pick all over Europe for years so the US will get a pass for awhile yet..

    Bernanke said load and clear that QE3 has started under the code name “creating certainty”. That was an obvious signal to the banksters that they can borrow for “free” for the next two years and invest in US Treasuries (that the Gov’t needs to sell a lot of) and collect the 3-4% spread and make a lot of money doing nothing.

    Of course some asset classes will depreciate (think real estate, stocks and bonds), but having just come form the grocery store I can guarantee you that inflation is running wild on the other side of the street and all asset prices will surge as soon as Wall Street realizes that there is a currency crisis and cash is trash.

    In my humble opinion, precious metals and related stocks are the only sane long term investments.

  • C.C. August 17, 2011, 6:51 pm

    History may not repeat, but it sure does rhyme? Last year – at almost this exact same time, the howls were coming in fast & furious regarding an upcoming ‘collapse’; to get yer ass out of equities and into cash and U.S. paper. Gold was set for a drop to $650, and – well, you know the rest.

    There was an interesting commentary this weekend on FSN with Jim Puplava on Bernanke’s ‘tool kit’ – what he has at his disposal and how he might implement them going forward at the appropriate time. If the indicators are pointing south – in particular, unemployment data, you can bet that on August 26th another ‘tool’ will be employed. It doesn’t have to necessarily be an announcement of further ‘QE’. It could be a cleverly thought out program that dovetails with the President’s upcoming September ‘job creation’ speech.

    This could all set up to be a great M.O.P.E. Fall heading into the Holidays – if one is positioned right.

  • mario cavolo August 17, 2011, 4:39 pm

    A great article Doug. Your warning about fiscal drag is indeed scary stuff. With respect, I question your reliance on general past indicators when the rules of the economic world are shifting significantly. I wonder do you really think the stock market is way overvalued today, as your comment about S&P’s current 2.3% yield implies? If for example, the USD continues dropping, as most expect. then internationally exposed companies will do very well and that will be reflected in their stock valuations too.

    Question: Is it a reasonable idea that strong expanding economic growth in one area might reconcile / balance weakness in another? Now I don’t intend this question as a direct reference to the China vs. U.S. paradigm. I mean it in terms of money supply ( believe me I don’t know anything about money supply stuff)

    So I mean that China has had a massive surge in wealth. Please folks, it really has, I’m talking huge beyond what you’re thinking and then some more thick huge on top of that, in practical daily reality, not my rhetorical dreams. I’m talking millions of poor people who had, for example, 3 homes worth $20 grand each which are now worth $120,000 each. They sell one, and vavoom these previously poor folks have $120,000 cash to do as they please and they are spending / investing it, because they still have the other two homes with zero mortgages on them…$240,000 pure equity! Hoo Hoo…now multiply this point further; at the upper middle class and corporate level too in Asia. HUGE HUGE liquid wealth AND rising salaries….

    So then to my point, with a massive buildup of wealth such as that in one part of the global economy, and with the United States the largest economy in the world deeply interconnected with that entire global economy, then looking at the extra few trillion which they’ve pumped in the economy, its not then just an “America” thing.

    That extra few trillion of money supply of USD is out there along with these new trillions of new wealth in Asia side by side in the global economic system. Its all there in the global pot. Considering that the U.S. is by far the largest economy and USD is the world’s reserve currency, then can’t we attempt to suggest there is some balance in this scenario, while inflationary it may be.

    Cheers, Mario

    • John Jay August 17, 2011, 5:25 pm

      Mario, I think how it all shakes out on a global scale will depend upon which of the fiat currencies goes under first, the Euro or the Dollar. Japan’s Fukshima problem seems to be ongoing and getting worse, that’s a factor to consider. Russia and Germany are getting closer it seems, that would be a powerhouse combination to be reckoned with if Russia plays their cards right. Putin seems to be firmly in control. Over here South America seems to be steadily rising now.
      That leaves India and China and I have no idea about the soundness of their finances or political situation.
      As for the USA I can only say I remember this place back in the day when what has happened in the last 10 years would have been unthinkable. All the politicians we have now have far outstripped any SNL skit about politics. Rick Perry reminds me of that Steve Martin movie about that phony preacher.
      Other than Ron Paul they are all clowns, over acting the part of a sincere candidate for public office.

  • mikeck August 17, 2011, 4:17 pm

    Rick,

    Thanks for the “vent” forum. Holding on to and adding to my precious metals of gold, silver and lead has served well for the past decade…replacing that which has been used has, so far, been the best way I’ve found to stay in the game.

    Bonds???I’m not all that good at math, but if the metals do as well for the next decade as they have for the past decade, (I think that is conservative considering the road the guvmnt has us on), I wonder what the yield would have to sink to for bonds to equal the return of roughly 500% in Gold and 900% in silver. If that is a simple calculation for anyone here, I would appreciate it if you would pass it along.

    One of the primary problems I see with bonds is that they are denominated in depreciating currency and are only marginally better than a passbook savings account if, and only if, rates do not go up.

    Other than that, bonds look great to this country bumpkin. BTW, the last time I opened a bank account, I insisted that it not pay any interest…I wanted to be sure I was not even tempted to leave any “assets” in depreciating currency.

    • rmsimc August 18, 2011, 9:58 pm

      The 10 yr UST would have to drop to 0.42% for a 500% return from here…or to 0.24% to hit a 900% return.

  • Mava August 17, 2011, 3:52 pm

    What deflationary trends is this author talking about?

    Are prices going to fall down across the board? (price deflation)

    or

    Quantity of money is going to decrease? (monetary deflation – the one and only correct definition).

    He does not say. I guess he is predicting one of the two, just in case…

    • Rick August 17, 2011, 4:15 pm

      He is acknowledging deflation in virtually all asset classes but bullion and Treasurys, as well as cutbacks in government outlays — even, imminently, at the Federal level.

    • Mava August 17, 2011, 8:38 pm

      Bullion is money, and while the value of a FRNote (a game point) falls, it has to be reflected in raised nominal “price” (exchange rate of real money to FRNs).

      Virtually all asset classes then are falling in their nominal dollar price, is that it?

      If yes this has nothing to do with deflation. Firstly, because a fall in price is not deflation proper. And secondly, because this fall in price is not due to otherwise secular fall in demand, but simply to all those classes being extremely overvalued during the preceding years.

      Housing, for instance, is a money trap, but it was way overvalued, and so, of course it has to come down no it’s real (almost no-value).

      We could say the same of Tulips in Denmark (was it Denmark?). They did fell in price, bot it was not deflation by any means.

  • Pete Giovine August 17, 2011, 3:40 pm

    If deflation is the future, then bonds that pay off seem a
    good investment. If a set of New Jersey computers is
    responsible for 70% of all stock trades, then it would seem that we are due for more “flash crashes.” In the slice of lower mid-America that I see I am the only one who buys stocks, and I only buy gold stocks. I know quite a few people who are jobless, losing houses, or selling their house for less than they expected. Houses
    are going vacant. People have doubled and tripled up with whoever the strong family member is. There aren’t many “investors” left in the people I talk to.
    The US Gov’t as usual is trying to counter the downturn with deficit spending. The FED has eased monetary conditions. This latest promise of no increase in short-rates til mid 2013 would seem to facilitate people who can borrow at that rate borrowing short term and lending to the gov’t to lock in the higher long-term rates. The effect of this would be to lower long term rates and thus the bond investment strategy.
    At some lower rate stocks again become a good investment. If the economy dips low enough, the FED will monetize something else. In an election year it is likely that the gov’t will act again to, perhaps to create jobs this time. Seems like this will create a lot of Yin-Yang.
    May we all buy dips and sell at the crests.

  • John Jay August 17, 2011, 2:42 pm

    We are a banana republic, just look at us.
    Overbearing tin horn dictator in charge that travels around in a huge armoured convoy with surly, suspicious security guards.
    The dictator and his inner circle enjoy a lavish lifestyle of parties, vacations and recreation while preaching sacrifice to the people.
    The dictator issurrounded by a circle of obsecenely wealthy cronies that are above the law and get special treatment and government contracts as a matter of course.
    A huge military that views the average citizen as the enemy and a threat to their ever increasing demands for public money.
    A rubber stamp Congress with carefully screened candidates offered at each “Election”, that also views the average citizen as the enemy.
    Endless supply of worthless currency supplied to keep the creaking economy from collapsing.
    Dangerous barrios full of the unemployed masses and the criminal gangs that sell drugs and otherwise prey upon them.
    The government has a greedy finger in every pie, and intrudes upon every aspect of life with vicious attacks upon anyone who is seen as a challenge to their authority, a la Amish dairy farmers, California organic food co-ops or airline passengers.
    As for the delation- inflation question, that depends upon the whims of the corporations that are calling the shots and the Fed and its machinations.
    They can make gasoline $1 or $4 a gallon.
    They can make electricity rates and heating oil prices anything they like.
    Ditto for food prices.
    In spite of the governments CPI calculations that is the bulk of the increasingly poorer average citizens expense after housing, which is a whole other story of government intervention.
    We are a banana republic, n’est pas?

    • mario cavolo August 17, 2011, 3:34 pm

      Ouch…

    • mikeck August 17, 2011, 3:44 pm

      Yes, the truth hurts, but better to know thy enemy, than to be a slave who thinks he/she is free.

    • fallingman August 17, 2011, 4:14 pm

      Yes sir, we are. BUT…the Feds do seem to have controlled the threat from the Amish dairy farmers.

      Thank god for that protection.

      Oh, and don’t forget about the protection we got from the walnut producers. Walnuts are now considered “drugs” by the Federal Death Administration. No kidding. This is real.

      And, they’ve confiscated plenty of hair conditioner from grandmas and sippy cups from toddlers, foiling their plots to take over airplanes.

      You think maybe the whole damn thing is launching into the abyss?

      I do.

    • redwilldanaher August 17, 2011, 6:26 pm

      Great job John. Might I be allowed to add a tremendously powerful state run media complex to keep everything else nicely stitched together?

    • C.C. August 17, 2011, 6:34 pm

      Yo-MTV Raps meets Pimp my Ride – or perhaps, Big Shiny Black Buses, courtesy of the secret service, courtesy of hot, steaming, stinking government logs rolling down hill, the Taxpayer.

    • warren August 17, 2011, 7:11 pm

      fallingman, No I don’t think “abyss”. I think “new world order” or “one world government”, and they will sell all the fear they can to realize it. If we don’t buy the fear, they have no customers and thus no power.
      John Jay, The present “dictator” is a “patsy”, a “fallguy”, invented to take the blame for everything you are supposed to be afraid of. Notice that he is an “African American”. I don’t think it’s his fault. I think he was duped into becoming a leader just to have somebody to point fingers at.

      “BLAME: is the all purpose garment….the “leisure suit” of justice.” Oswald Spengler 1880-1936

    • fallingman August 18, 2011, 5:26 am

      Warren. Yeah, I agree. The New World Order lies at the bottom of the abyss. They have to create chaos first in order to save us from it.

  • Dan August 17, 2011, 2:06 pm

    “There will be growth in the Spring”
    Chauncey Gardener, 2012 Presidential Candidate

  • Thomas August 17, 2011, 1:48 pm

    when food prices go down, I will concede that the dollar is appreciating. When equities and beanie babies go down, the market is simply pricing in a change in perception of their worth. Is it any wonder that they were mispriced?

  • Benjamin August 17, 2011, 2:20 am

    I don’t know… Treasury yields have been on the decline for 30 years now, haven’t they? The supposed failure of the QEs is no certain indication that yields will reverse, either. Rather, it could very well be an indication of the Fed’s desire to absolutely crush prices in any and all assests. Those whom the gods would destroy, they first drive mad! Scoop up all Da Stuff, on the cheap, and so what if government runs out of borrowed money just paying down past debt? People want them to stop spending, so the Fed faces little resistence in that regard.

    Like taking candy from a baby, really.

  • Rich August 17, 2011, 12:27 am

    MUB and USB targeting +19% and +10% higher respectively. OEX targeting +12% higher.
    Santelli called this the trade of the decade…