The Greenspan School of Free Lunch

We have “Easy Al” Greenspan to thank for a new generation of reporters and economists as blissfully ignorant of the basic principles of economics as he was.  Recall that during Greenspan’s tenure as Fed Chairman, he repeatedly referred to inflated property values as “wealth,” thereby encouraging millions of homeowners to spend up a storm with home-equity lucre that had fallen from the sky. We all know how that turned out.  And now it’s threatening to happen all over again as 3% mortgages, courtesy of the Fed and of tax laws skewed pathologically toward housing “investment,” lift millions of underwater-property owners at least temporarily from the muck.  So whom did Wall Street Journal report Conor Dougherty seek out for a quote on this happy turn of events?  One Sam Khater, an apparent disciple of the Greenspan School of Free Lunch.  Khater, who works for a firm called CoreLogic, showed himself to be Greenspan’s kinda guy – i.e., an economic slut – with this paean to consumerism: “Home equity is the biggest source of wealth,” he averred, “so if equity is increasing, that has a very large effect on household spending and consumer psychology.”

Khaner is unfortunately not alone in his belief that home values inflated by the central bank’s monetary wilding spree constitute wealth, nor that the highest purpose of such “wealth” is to buy furniture, appliances, automobiles and other big-ticket items on credit. Khaner’s economically destructive ideas would undoubtedly find support from the likes of Paul Krugman, Nobel prize-winning disgrace to the already dismal science. Krugman would have us believe Americans are not doing their patriotic duty if they fail to convert every dime of inflated property values into consumer goods. This pernicious idea reigns supreme in the thinking, not only of every economist, but among editorialists who are either too stupid, or too lazy, to depart from the conventional narrative.

Re-Fi Boom’s Downside

WSJ reporter Dougherty mentions gratuitously that “some” newly-above-water households are still too close to break-even to loosen up financially. What he and other reporters have completely missed, however, is that the supposedly healthy trend of refinancing at today’s super-low rates has soaked up a huge portion of Americans’ savings. That’s because, in order to do the re-fi, buyers have to bring enough cash to the deal to lift their equity stake to 20%. This means household savings that would otherwise have been available for investment in productive assets has instead gone into housing.  As long as most Americans, economists and politicians continue to regard residential real estate as the best investment of them all, this country will never extricate itself from the economic mire. To make matters even worse, if and when the brazen stimulus prop beneath the housing market fails, real estate valuations – i.e., the bulk of America’s supposed savings – could disappear overnight. This is not a mere possibility, in our estimation, but a likelihood. We continue to predict a relapse in the housing market that will reduce property values by an additional 35% on top of the 33% losses that have already occurred . If we were to cite one reason for our certitude about this, it is the surreal boom in property prices in New York City, where $100+  million penthouses are under construction; and in the Bay Area, where housing prices have risen far above the threshold of affordability for nearly all workers.

***

Trading stocks, options and commodities in these treacherous times calls for great patience and skill. Click here if you’d like to see how Rick’s Picks approaches the challenge.

  • Chris t. March 27, 2013, 6:16 am

    less, more, none at all?
    what do you call the Q’s then?

  • Cam Fitzgerald March 26, 2013, 8:32 pm

    Recovery first. Sort out the details later.

  • redwilldanaher March 26, 2013, 6:49 pm
  • Mac March 25, 2013, 8:14 pm

    order to do the re-fi, buyers have to bring enough cash to the deal to lift their equity stake to 20%.

    Usually, not always. I just saw a refi for 100% of value. 20 years. This keeps the debt serviceable and the home “owner” a debt serf.

  • Chris T. March 25, 2013, 4:50 pm

    Gary:
    “I find it interesting that every action taken by governments to plug the dam is met with outrage”

    Gary, PLEASE SPARE US:

    All those actions are only necessary because the breaks in the dam, nay the dam itself, was created by the government in the first place.

    As the edifice itself was errected with erroneous assumptions and lack of full knowledge of all consequences (as if that could EVER be possible), no fix to these SYMPTOMS can ever be effective, other than dismantling the system itself.

    Sometimes though, dismantling in an orderly fashion is just not possible, if the point of no return has been exceeded.

    Fukushima is a perfect example in the physical realm

    • gary leibowitz March 25, 2013, 6:51 pm

      You must have missed my point. I have already agreed with all your talking points: Government created mess to begin with, and I believe it will end badly.

    • redwilldanaher March 26, 2013, 4:51 pm

      This is a sea change for you Gary. Before it was “republicans” and now it’s the government. For the first time in what seems like eons, I see progress coming from you…

    • gary leibowitz March 26, 2013, 5:17 pm

      Out of the 2 parties you know which I align with. To ask for the abandonment of social programs and a tax cut for corporations and wealthy is outrageous. The disparity between the 2 classes are already at the highest it’s ever been. Now they want to finish the job.

    • redwilldanaher March 26, 2013, 5:39 pm

      2 crooks Gary. Each has a different assignment. All assignments benefit TPTB.

      That’s all you really need to know.

      Bookies are much more honorable than either party, any part of the government, the banksters, industry, bureaucrats and so on…

      Stop treating criminals of any kind as if they deserve respect.

  • Mac March 25, 2013, 4:35 pm

    Russians tycoons reaction?
    Putin foe, exiled Russian oligarch found dead in UK home.

  • Chris T. March 25, 2013, 4:34 pm

    Gary:
    “The amount U.S. households have in bank deposits, savings bonds, fixed-income mutual-funds and municipal securities increased $500 billion last year”

    WAIT:
    bondes, mutuals and other securities ARE PART OF the bubble fed by 6+trillion of fresh money.

    That’s just as much of an illusory “wealth” as when people connted their house as part of their wealth..

    So what does that prove as to your point?
    It flies in the sense of logic too with the amount of people receiving assistance, living pay-check to pay-check, the true unemployment rate etc.

    It also DOES NOT disaggregate between the increase seen by the 1% and everyone else, whether or not that is fake-bubble increase or real savings…

    • Cam Fitzgerald March 26, 2013, 9:37 pm

      There is not 6 plus trillion of fresh money, Chris.

  • Chris T. March 25, 2013, 4:26 pm

    Vegas Bob writes:
    “First and foremost, a house is a place to live. Period. It is not really an investment. Except in a few heavily built-up areas, …”

    Too true, but think it’s more differentiated than that.

    A house as mentioned in this context is really TWO things:
    the land / property the house sits on
    the house itself.

    The former actually is, or better often is, an investment, esp. when the constraints you mention exist.
    But the structure most clearly is just a depreciating asset, albeit so slowly, as compared to other assets, that people can’t, or don’t want to, see it.

    You can’t find anyone who buys a new car (next to a house the most expensive depr. asset people tend to buy) who thinks that its value over time, no matter how well maintained, will NOT decline.

    Yet, tell them that a house is just like it, and they look at you like “what?”.

    Yet instinctively they know that if they were to move out, lock the place up, and come back a few years later, that the place will have declined, physically and in value, and STILL they wont see the context.

    Some major cognitive dissonance, but fed and maintained by the system.

    Just look at how many people get conned (by the realtors) into believing that they can get a better sale price when they make improvements to larger house things that might be “outdated” (even if perfectly functional), one that exceeds what the improvement costs.

    Yet, even Nat. Brokers Assoc. own statistics prove that virtually none of that type of work returns >100% (and logically why should it ever: itself depreciates the moment its finished, and it’s the previous owner’s taste, not the prospective owner’s).
    The only project that tends to (still illogically of course, can’t remeber what, prob. bathroom) return >100% only does so by a few percent, hardly enough to justify the bother and inconvenience of doing so.

    But none of that will ever change minds, the level of economic ignorance, and just plain lack of logical thinking, stands in the way.

    As an “investment” model, feeding of the suckers out there can certainly work, but the suckers themselves just follow the illusion.
    (Case Shiller proves too, that prior to the really cranked up Fed inflation of circa 25-30 years ago, these “investments” just kept up with inflation, and really that will have to be attributed to the land, as it also does not consider the carrying costs of the structure…)

    Tend to think of real estate in the buy vs. rent like this:

    if the annual rent is 4% or less of the buy-price, then buying makes no sense at all, but if the annual rent is 8% or greater, it COULD, but that still makes major assumptions about the future.

  • Jill March 25, 2013, 2:23 pm

    This whole Cyprus bail-in is unbelievable. If the stock market and/or the dollar end up rising a good bit more this year, I guess it will be because people living in the EU area, who currently have their money in banks there, will have a “flight to quality” across the ocean– where they hope & pray to become safe from having to kiss their assets good bye like the Cypriots are doing.

  • Buster March 25, 2013, 12:29 pm

    The whole immoral & corrupt ‘commoditization’ of our homes has been just another example of a necessity of life that’s been sacrificed on the altar of the debt based monetary system & Corporate Fascist economic model.
    In the UK at least, owing to a lack of business some years ago due to so many real jobs being exported to China or taken up by cheap foreign imported labour, the Banksters instigated a plan whereby a growing market for their debt pushing operation could be developed via a scheme known here as ‘Buy to let’, which gave commercial investors, or more importantly, borrowers, certain advantages over ordinary citizens, for a fee of course. This advantage, while only slight, enabled this class to outcompete & outgrow the private householder to the point where today millions of ordinary folks who even have good jobs can’t afford to buy a home & are forced to rent from the ‘Buy to let’ merchants, who in turn keep their payments streaming in to the Banksters coffers. It’s incredible to hear the debates over this national scandal get discussed without any mention of the root cause of the problem, which is instead hailed as a solution, but then as I’ve spoken of previously regarding the debt monetary system itself, heaven forbid people focus on the real ones. So instead the Sheeple scratch their heads, perplexed at what to do about being stuck as tenants paying exorbitant rents forevermore, & the government & media prattle on about how terrible it all is & offer dishonest ‘solutions’ such as a nice shiny new scheme declared in the latest budget last week that will offer billions of pounds in government backed (taxpayer funded) guarantees for Banks who lend to buyers trying to buy property inflated out of reach due to this whole sorry mess of a housing market, that’s incredibly now reached new all time highs in this ‘recovery’ based mainly around ‘The City’, of all places!, as here the money just seems to be rolling in??
    So, maybe I’m beginning to make sense of what all this craziness is really achieving? The jobs get exported to cheap labour markets or cheap labour is imported for bigger corporate profits. The economic consequences are that the local populous aren’t able to buy a home so this vacuum is filled by a steroid injection into the property investor corporate market that in turn bolsters loan sales & taxes that prop up the debt system, thereby , & with quite a few rabbits pulled out of the hat in the meantime -as in bailouts & ZIRP, the whole dysfunctional & corrupt Corporate Fascist model & debt based monetary system is able to stagger to it’s feet once more & keep stumbling till it’s next fall, meanwhile crashing into all & sundry who happen to get in it’s way; namely millions of Sheeple who, judging by the blogosphere & comments left to these big news events, definitely appear to be beginning to put one plus one together & at least figure out it doesn’t make three! as we are being told. No, I can confirm that the Sheeple are thinking the whole thing stinks & that something is seriously wrong with their sorry lives & maybe even the SYSTEM??!!. Now they just need to figure out what it is exactly & it’ll all be sorted, surely? Not likely. Speaking such things will more likely get one fired in this joint, for sure. Got to get with the program or else! Jump on board the debt train to nowhere & strap yourself in, ‘cos it’s not gonna’ stop till something big hits it, so jumping for your life seems the only way off.
    I don’t really believe there’s much of a solution out of this situation for the majority. Most are just gonna’ get screwed remorselessly & with no recompense. The boom days are fundamentally over by my calculations, leaving just nominal gains to alleviate the pain of higher taxes, inflation & interest payments by one means or another, meaning that now the roadmap would be entitled ‘A race to the bottom’, & in this vein (or maybe in vain!) it could be best to find somewhere that’s cheaper to live relatively & pocket the difference, if at all possible. As an example, I’d be a seller of an overpriced UK property & a buyer of a Spanish battered priced one in the present situation, & if personal circumstances allowed. Prices may be headed up with inflation, or they may be awaiting another plunge in the ongoing debt deflation (read: real asset transfer mechanism), but at least with such a course you have a little advance, plus the weather’s a damned sight better, I can tell you!

    “… The modern theory of the perpetuation of debt has drenched the earth with blood, and crushed its inhabitants under burdens ever accumulating.” -Thomas Jefferson

  • Rich March 25, 2013, 8:01 am

    Thinking the Euro may be up because there are a whole lot less of them in Cyprus…

  • bc March 25, 2013, 4:09 am

    The dollar per se will soon be problematic just as the euro is now sputtering for Cypress. No longer a store of value or a medium of exchange exists for Cypriots. Falling home prices on a list of problems becomes a sick joke for them now and for us soon.
    Geographic wise the resource shy islands seem to be going down first. Shocker. Japan is the big island economy with a target on its back. Timber!
    Here it looks like the banks hold sway which means we will print until the dollar collapses as a trading currency. Until then we will flood the world with dollars after our bankers take first dibs. The same fools who got us into this mess will not help reflate housing simply because no greater fool will buy the paper. It’s too soon to run that scam again. They will use the printed funds to bid up equities and domestic resources because greater fools may buy them. The US will become a very odd creature: a kind of beauty contest winner because we have the most fingers on a planet of lepers. Who knows what a house will bring in that FUBAR world market? Or should I say, who cares? We still won’t have many fingers and will be living on planet of the lepers.

  • gary leibowitz March 25, 2013, 3:24 am

    From 1950’s on housing valued were either flat or higher. Had a great run for 50 years. Can you say the same for any other investment? The notion that house prices never fell was true before the bubble manifested.

    The single most destructive segment of our economy is the housing collapse. Uncle Ben keeps rates very low to refinance and create a lower monthly payment, stabilize the bleeding, and allow banks to clear out their huge inventory. How can you see that as a bad thing. Would you rather people focus on spending their money on discretionary things? Did you expect this government to abandon hope of saving the housing market? It is logical, and expected.

    I will agree that in the end there will be another round of home devaluation, but that doesn’t mean this government should assume defeat and abandon the housing segment.

    I find it interesting that every action taken by governments to plug the dam is met with outrage. I also find it to be an easy target to vent instead of giving real concrete solutions. Given the fact that the FED and congress allowed this mess to manifest, how do we solve this going forward? Should we have allowed all financial institutions that were in trouble to fail 5 years ago? Should we just allowed market forces to find its own equilibrium with no intervention? If so where would we be today? Jobs, homes, commerce, standard of living, you name it would all be in a deep depression today, 5 years after the event.

    I can understand the frustration and anger over how this government allowed this to happen, but I haven’t heard any real problem solving solutions.

    • bc March 25, 2013, 4:22 am

      The one huge favor we did for Germany right after the occupation was we declared all debts null and void because we were pretty damn sure those holding any paper were nazis. This set the stage for the German economic miracle that followed. This has no chance of happening here. Too bad because I think it would work like magic again.

    • Chris T. March 25, 2013, 4:45 pm

      Actully, the creation of the D-Mark, AGAINST the wishes of the allies, and how IT was related to any Reichsmark debt, is the major cause for what you describe, not the allies’ repudiation.

      Until that unilateral act, Germany just was a place of shortages and no recovery.

      See the Wiki article about Wilhelm Roepke, the the theoretical father bhind the D-Mark (Erhard being the father of it in the execution/conversion stage)…’

    • redwilldanaher March 26, 2013, 4:49 pm

      Let those fall that should fall. Let everyone fall fairly. Why not Gary? Fancy yourself a connected central planner?

  • Rich March 25, 2013, 1:46 am

    Martin Armstrong shared his thoughts on Cyprus and the IMF, but the link was wiped:

    March 22nd – Just Amazing | Armstrong Economics
    armstrongeconomics.com/693-2/2013-2/10062-2/Share3 days ago – by Martin Armstrong … This is just astonishing because tomorrow, March 22, 2013 is the end of the American … That even was amazing as well.
    More results for march 22nd just amazing by martin armstrong princeton economics

    • Rich March 25, 2013, 5:03 am

      March 22nd – Just Amazing

      Friday, March 22, 2013 8:36
      0
      (Before It’s News)

      by Martin Armstrong
      Armstrong Economics

      The European Central Bank (ECB) effectively said they were unwilling to continue providing emergency liquidity to Cypriot banks and would not guarantee funding beyond Monday, unless a bailout deal emerges. This is just astonishing because tomorrow, March 22, 2013 is the end of the American Era for it is the peak in the sphere of American influence. Cyprus is being forced to invite in Russia and this will be an amazing turning point. I said at the Sovereign Debt Crisis Conference I would be stunned if something took place precisely on this daily target. It looks like this is THE event of all time and is the start of the rise of Russia to the world stage. It may be like the assassination of the arch duke that started World War I.

      Continue Reading at ArmstrongEconomics.com…

      Tweet
      2013-03-22 08:31:16

    • Cam Fitzgerald March 26, 2013, 8:24 pm

      What is so significant about March 22nd?

    • Rich March 28, 2013, 12:12 am

      Cam, MA posted a 224-year political cycle change that all but disappeared from the internet:

      http://totalinvestor.blogspot.com/2013/03/martin-armstrong-224-year-cycle-of-usa.html

  • Rich March 25, 2013, 1:20 am

    Right on VB.

    Re ” Except in a few heavily built-up areas, such as San Francisco, it is always possible to build plenty of additional housing units to meet any new demand.”

    If San Francisco got rid of height requirements or built Internet Cafe Closets and Subway Lockers for overnight housing like Tokyo, or developers put in more High Rises outside city limits like East Bay and NYC, the rigged housing scarcity would disappear overnight.

    That FAA is closing 11 airport control towers in CA, 13 in TX and 14 in FL does not bode well for the economy either:

    http://www.faa.gov/news/media/fct_closed.pdf

  • VegasBob March 25, 2013, 12:37 am

    It boggles my mind to think that so many people are so gullible as to believe that housing is some kind of “investment.” First and foremost, a house is a place to live. Period. It is not really an investment. Except in a few heavily built-up areas, such as San Francisco, it is always possible to build plenty of additional housing units to meet any new demand. As such, housing is not really a scarce “good” whose price should rise in response to increased demand. Wherever it is possible to easily expand the housing stock, there really is no particular reason why housing should increase in price, other than as a response to property improvements or inflation.

    The fact is that housing is a WASTING ASSET which ALWAYS comes with a long list of liabilities, such as property taxes and a plethora of maintenance and repair items. I can’t think of any other “investment” which requires the payment of annual property taxes in order to continue to hold the “investment.” That fact alone should disabuse people of the idea that housing is somehow an investment.

    Unfortunately, as long as most Americans remain steeped in economic ignorance, they will continue to get royally screwed, which is precisely what they deserve.

    • Bam_Man March 25, 2013, 5:27 pm

      Well said, Bob!

    • Dave March 25, 2013, 6:52 pm

      Guess the British and Welsh deserve it too…

      March House Price Rise Biggest in 3 Years in England, Wales
      http://www.cnbc.com/id/100586639

    • Mac March 25, 2013, 8:12 pm

      Property values rising will entail higher property tax bills. This is a BAIL OUT for county government and real estate brokers. Higher prices == higher fees… for the same item.