Wall Street evidently sees the war as little more than an annoyance, something to be gotten over as quickly as possible so that the monkeys who are paid to throw Other People's Money at stocks can get back to business as usual. Their main impediment at the moment is Trump-deranged media coverage that is rooting so hard against Trump that they are practically cheering on Iran. Bloomberg, the New York Times and the Washington Post et al. could almost make you believe that Iran, without a Navy, can mine the Strait of Hormuz under the watchful eye of the most sophisticated minesweeper fleet on the planet. In the meantime, the news media's relentless barrage of discouragements has made it extremely difficult for the chimps and prop desk whizzes to trigger off the kind of short-squeeze leaps that could push the broad averages to new record highs in mere days. And so they continue to bide their time, waiting for cheerier headlines. Although the Dow, Nasdaq and the S&Ps have shown little life this year, neither have they shown much weakness. In any event, investors are certain to remain obsessed with oil prices until quotes recede from the $100 threshold, and until the talking heads concede that the current price dislocations are not likely to be permanent. In the meantime, this is no bear market, just a perpetual-motion money machine waiting to lurch wildly back into gear. Oh, right, a price target: The futures look southbound most immediately for 6452.75, and a rally to the green line (x=6752.19) would trigger a 'mechanical' short, stop 6852.25. It is recommended only to subscribers who know how to cut the $5000 risk per contract to $250 or less, and it is most definitely NOT recommended to Nick. Here's a link to my latest rant
I've restored MSFT to the list because it could prove to be analytically useful. No bear market is possible as long as this stock is at least holding its own. It triggered a plain-jane 'mechanical' buy when it fell to the green line last month (x=407.04) after having failed to achieve a bull-market target at D=593.79 by a country mile. The implication is that you are likely to make money buying the stock here with a stop-loss just beneath the point C low at 345.79. I cannot guarantee that the implied rally will reach D, but it is a better bet to deliver a one-level move to p than to slip beneath C first.
April Gold will trigger a mechanical buy when (not if) it falls to the green line (x=4838.60). The trade is predicated on a 6084.80 target that looks like a 75% shot to be reached. I proffer this information not to get you salivating, but rather to clarify the picture at a time when price action has been lackluster and forecasts are all over the lot. The trade rates an '8.1', which means my confidence is quite high. Since the initial risk would be $41,490 per contract, I am recommending the trade only to subscribers who are quite proficient with 'camo' entry triggers, no exceptions.
I don't like this bullish pattern as much as the one I've featured in the Gold tout, but it is certainly good enough for government work. It suggests that May Silver will become a fetching 'mechanical' buy when it touches the green line (x=77.043). Keep in mind that x is not a support, a target or a Hidden Pivot, just a place where we organize certain types of trades. The implication is that the futures could keep falling all the way down to c=63.667 before they turn around. At that point, the position would be showing a loss of slightly less tha $67,000 per contract. Obviously, the trade is only for those who can handles the risk and who know how to set up small-pattern triggers to get aboard. Because of the look of the pattern, the trade rates a '7.8', which, although very appealing, is significantly lower than my rating for the gold trade.
The short-term bearish picture for this symbol is congruent with my outlook for Comex gold and silver. Since trading is all about avoiding bumping heads with a thousand clowns, we should wait until GDXJ stops them out with an inevitable dip beneath the twin lows from early February pennies beneath 121. On the daily chart, the trigger interval for getting long thereafter would be 3.65 points, but we can probably cut that by 90% by pulling a trigger pattern from the lesser intraday charts.
My regular commentary will resume next week when I my return from a busman's holiday on the West Coast. In its place is an excerpt from Thomas Mann’s The Magic Mountain that holds an epiphany for the way we experience and recall the passage of time. It has been published here before, but this version was masterfully shortened and simplified by ChatGPT so that more readers could understand and appreciate it. The original can be found in the chapter “Excursus on the Sense of Time” in several translations. RA There is something peculiar about deliberately settling into a new place—making the effort to adjust, to feel at home—only to leave again once that adjustment is complete. We insert such intervals into our lives as a kind of restorative break. They are meant to refresh us when the steady sameness of daily routine has begun to dull and weaken us. But this dulling is not simple physical or mental fatigue; if it were, rest alone would cure it. The real issue is psychological: when life becomes too uniform, our sense of time fades. And because our awareness of time is bound up with our awareness of being alive, when one weakens, so does the other. We commonly think that interesting experiences make time pass quickly, while monotony makes it drag. That is only partly true. Monotony does make hours feel long and tedious. Yet over longer stretches it has the opposite effect: it compresses time. Large, uniform periods shrink in memory until they seem to vanish. By contrast, rich and varied days may fly by in the moment, but they give weight and substance to life as a whole, so that years filled with variety seem fuller and longer than empty ones that slip away unnoticed.
Although I expect May Silver to rally to 117.485 (daily, a=69.850 on dec 31, 2025) eventually, it looks like it will need to correct down to 69.245 first. That's the 'd' target of the rABC pattern shown, and the forecast of a further retracement is based on sellers' decisive penetration of the midpoint Hidden Pivot support (p=83.273) on the way down early last week. If the futures rally first to the green line (x=90.286), that would trigger a 'mechanical' short with a 97.305 stop-loss (just above the point 'c' high). That' implies about $35,000 of initial risk per contract, so the trade is recommended only for subscribers who can cut it down to no more than $750 theoretical with a 'camouflage' trigger.
Yet another punk Friday suggests that the longest bull market in history is running out of gas. Considering that the war with Iran is a mop-up operation at this point, and that global jihad has suffered an extraordinary setback, the stock market should be celebrating. Instead, the S&P mini-futures couldn't even muster the last dozen or so points to reach a 6911.50 rally target I'd considered a lock-up. The futures could have returned to the green line (x=6766.94) for a running start and another try; instead, they kept falling, canceling an ostensibly bullish pattern with a dip beneath its point 'c' low at 6718.75, just ahead of the opening bell. To complete this picture of feebleness, buyers went nowhere on Friday, even unburdened of bulls who were stopped out with the gratuitous dip beneath 6718.75. Now all DaBoyz can do is wait for "news" conducive to a short squeeze, which, as I never tire of reminding you, is where nearly all of the serious buying power comes from in bull markets. But if a decisive victory against the chief agent of evil in this world is not enough to spark such a rally, then what is? Instead, the focus of the hacks who invent the news is on the disruption of oil markets. It has been years since Wall Street much cared about events in the real world, much less a mostly imagined problem with oil shipments in the Persian Gulf (as evidenced by Israel's resumption of commercial air flights.) The Masters of the Universe should be looking past this, toward the resumption of business as usual. And yet, their dim lackeys in the news media seem crestfallen over Iran's impending defeat. (Tune to CNN for 30 minutes if you don't believe this.) Something is wrong with this picture, and
[Your editor is taking a busman's holiday in San Francisco. Although trading touts will update as usual and I'll be active in the chat room, this commentary and the next come from the archive. You can judge for yourself whether they were sufficiently on-target to still be relevant. RA] Stocks looked leaden as the week ended, adding to the impression that the aging bull market is topping. The Dow tacked on a perfunctory 104 points, or 0.22%, and it wasn't pretty. There was little life in the lunatic sector (aka 'the Magnificent Seven'), which until recently could be relied on to celebrate its wildest flights of fantasy on Fridays. The biggest winner in the bunch was META, which rose 1.80% on news that Zuckerberg is having second thoughts about his all-in bet on a metaverse. If you're unfamiliar with the term, it refers to a virtual world in which users interact online through avatars. Zuckerberg evidently thought there were hundreds of millions of us, if not billions, eager to escape the pain and drudgery of day-to-day life. He was so certain about this that he changed the name of his company in 2021 from Facebook to Meta. But after sinking $70 billion into the concept, there has been precious little payback. Even more troubling to investors is that there are no obvious ways to make back what has been spent already, nor to recoup any further sums Meta might pour into the idea. Counting on Investors' Stupidity To cover up this boo-boo, and to avoid being thought clueless, Zuckerberg did what any muckety-muck CEO in the digital world would have done: a twisting somersault onto the AI bandwagon. "AI is the most important technology we are working on," he said, evidently hoping investors have forgotten that he spent the last
Rates on the 10-Year Note came within a hair on Friday of lows not seen since October. My suggestion is to enjoy it while it lasts, since the intraday bottom closely coincided with a Hidden Pivot target at 3.952%. The actual low was 3.956%, which was near enough to consider the target fulfilled. Alternatively, if the downtrend continues on Monday, breaching not just the target but October's 3.976% bottom, be ready for more slippage to 3.917%, a voodoo number worth bottom-fishing with as tight a stop-loss as you're comfortable with. _______ UPDATE (Mar 7): It looks like the prediction of an important low hit a bullseye, since this vehicle has since trampolined as high as 4.19% after bottoming a split hair from the 3.952 target. Here's the chart. _____ UPDATE (March 15): And now rates have rebounded to as high as 4.29%. Too bad the talking heads on Bloomberg and MSNBC, the Fed board of governors and the Wall Street Journal editorialists were unaware of the potentially major turn-up when my forecast caught its exact low, since precisely accurate technical forecasts are unknown in their world of bullshit metadata.
