The Morning Line

You can hardly blame Trump for playing up the stock market's spectacular performance whenever anyone challenges the way he is conducting the war, or claims the jihadists are winning. Even in the editorial rooms of the New York Times and Bloomberg, where a virulent strain of Trump Derangement Syndrome still lingers, news editors are finding their caustic opinions overwhelmed by the bullish tide -- make that, tsunami -- on Wall Street. Although details of a cease-fire have yet to be worked out, never mind the terms of a peace agreement, stocks have exploded into their steepest rally ever, recouping five months' worth of steady losses in just 17 days, while racking up gains during that period equal to the amazing, six-month bull run-up of 2025. Can tens of millions of investors be wrong? Or is genuine peace about to break out, as Trump would put it, like nothing the world has ever seen before? To answer that question, harken back to an iconic graffito from the 1970s: "Eat Shit! Can a hundred trillion flies be wrong?" If you fail to see the connection, let me spell it out: A superheated stock market is the last place everyone should look for evidence that all is right with the world. Moreover, Trump's eagerness to direct our attention that way makes it even more foolhardy. Bipolarity's Sweet Spot Why? Because the stock market is a rabid beast whose mood swings have always ranged between reckless exuberance and suicidal despair. Within the broad middle of this bipolarity, it acts like a giant carnival midway, hyped by barkers who use 'research' to support extremes of overvaluation that currently make the South Sea Bubble of the 1700s look like a shingles-and-siding hustle. Moreover, the rally's aberrant strength suggests it is driven mainly by a short-covering panic

It is neither bulls nor bears who move the markets, but crooks, mostly. Spectacular but fleeting rallies draw nearly all of their buying power from panicky short covering that is easily triggered and deftly harvested. I have previously discussed this phenomenon, which is most visible when stocks take unseemly leaps at the opening bell. Although few shares will have changed hands in the gaps this creates on charts, it effectively fattens the bank accounts of everyone who held stock before the leap. How do the thieves (aka 'broad-tossers'; see photo above) who control the markets do this trick? First, in order to deplete sellers, they pull their bids in the wee hours of the morning. When there is no news of special interest, stocks will tend to drift lower, especially if there are no significant buyers on the way down. The trend will begin to feed on itself as shareholders grow uneasy. If Wall Street's Wharton-educated crooks have orchestrated the heist properly, a selling crescendo will cause stocks to bottom about 30 to 60 minutes before the start of the regular session. Then, with sellers exhausted and no offers in sight, it is bears who will start to grow anxious.  Their increasingly urgent bids to close out short positions will continue to accumulate as the opening approaches. It is then that the Masters of the Universe, mainly specialists licensed to maintain orderly markets, but also to steal from amateurs, will spring the trap, pulling their offers to reset prices to a level that can satisfy pent-up demand. That price will often be well above the previous day’s close. Voila! Instant new $$ billions for the white-collar carnies who operate the world's bourses.  Why Stocks Idled The foregoing helps explain why stocks did nothing on Friday. Until a few months ago,

Did you fade the Dow’s 1100-point rally on Tuesday, or the nearly 500-point follow-through the next day like I told you to? I’d written here a few weeks ago that shorting into strength these days offers the best odds bears have gotten in decades. Stocks had spent four months building an obvious top, and finally, there it was, a precipitously weakening market staring us down just as the U.S. joined Israel in a war against Iran. Usually Wall Street loves nightly footage of an enemy's buildings getting blown to smithereens by F-35s. The fighter jets cost $100 million apiece, and maintenance and operational costs can add another $300 million to that. But this war has another cost, and it's not the 'good' kind: a huge leap in the price of crude oil and natural gas. Investors go to sleep every night praying something will happen soon to ease the situation. It has pushed gas prices as high as $6 a gallon in California and is threatening to send already steep increases in the price of everything else out of control. The graph says Wall Street ought not get its hopes too high for quick relief, since crude looks like it could rise to the sky before quotes settle back to a more normal $70 or so someday. But how will Wall Street react if prices reach the $125-a-barrel target in the graph, or maybe even higher? Actually, buyers have shown unmistakable signs of mental illness, but with a seemingly benign twist. Before Tuesday, the broad averages had lurched both ways on a hair trigger, moving inversely with every blip up or down in the price of crude. But on Tuesday they did something so bizarre that no one could have predicted it. With oil up a few dollars, stocks went

The war with Iran has put investors in a deepening state of anxiety, since no one can say for sure how things will turn out. Wall Street’s obsessive focus has been on the price of oil, implicitly trusting that the supposed collective wisdom of markets is superior to whatever information we could glean from headlines and op-ed pages. The trouble is, the story that crude oil spins each day mutates with wild price swings that suggest the markets are an idiot, as clueless as we are. The charts I use to get a tight handle on the stock market are less confusing, however, and they are saying unequivocally that the bull market begun in 2009 is over. To state this in a disinterested, technical way, when ABCD corrections in bull markets start exceeding their ‘D’ targets, as occurred last week in the S&Ps, the major trend has changed. The small target-overshoot in the E-Mini S&P chart above tells us more about the stock market’s health, or lack thereof, than a cacophony of pundits and eggheads ever could. It says a bear market that has always been inevitable has finally begun. This will also mark the end of Trump’s heroic run, negating his magical ability to move the markets and to persuade people that everything will turn out okay if we just give it more time. Trump’s Miracles It is difficult to criticize a man who has produced so many political and geopolitical miracles. Admittedly, we have never believed in the economic kind, since Americans are much too deeply in debt to escape a Second Great Depression. When it comes, it will take down a global regime that has come to depend on America’ economic strength and, more recently, its leadership. The hope remains that Trump will put our domestic house

Although Trump has achieved many spectacular successes in his second term, he has made two big promises he can't possibly keep. The first was to bring back affordability to the broad middle class.  Anyone who believes this must be living on some planet with an all-powerful ruler who generously provides everyone with low-cost homes, apartments, childcare, senior care, pet care, car repairs, college tuition, groceries and insurance. Trump's second promise is that he will wind down the Iran war quickly. This ranks right up there with George W. Bush’s ‘Mission Accomplished’ speech in 2003, when major combat operations in Iraq turned out to have been far from over.  Few took him seriously at the time, just as few believe Trump is close to bringing the mullahs to their knees. Far from surrendering, they reportedly have been pondering whether to attack Israel’s Dimona reactor, a key facility in the nation’s nuclear weapons program.  The town of Dimona was hit by a powerful missile over the weekend, but if Iran targets the reactor, that could conceivably release radioactive material into the atmosphere, threatening not only to kill all human life in the region, but throughout the world. If Israeli were to retaliate proportionately, the destruction this could cause lies beyond imagining. The Annihilation Trade I usually try to focus on investable issues in these weekly commentaries, but they are less-than-trivial in comparison to a nuclear threat that could annihilate mankind.  No one doubts that Iran’s leaders are fanatics who are capable of doing anything to avoid defeat. This threat is not going to go away, nor are oil prices going to retreat any time soon. With interest rates rising, a pumped-up stock market and feverish global economy are facing a perfect storm.  If you are looking for a trade, there is probably

My regular commentary will resume next week when I my return from a busman's holiday on the West Coast. In its place is an excerpt from Thomas Mann’s The Magic Mountain that holds an epiphany for the way we experience and recall the passage of time.  It has been published here before, but this version was masterfully shortened and simplified by ChatGPT so that more readers could understand and appreciate it.  The original can be found in the chapter “Excursus on the Sense of Time” in several translations. RA There is something peculiar about deliberately settling into a new place—making the effort to adjust, to feel at home—only to leave again once that adjustment is complete. We insert such intervals into our lives as a kind of restorative break. They are meant to refresh us when the steady sameness of daily routine has begun to dull and weaken us. But this dulling is not simple physical or mental fatigue; if it were, rest alone would cure it. The real issue is psychological: when life becomes too uniform, our sense of time fades. And because our awareness of time is bound up with our awareness of being alive, when one weakens, so does the other. We commonly think that interesting experiences make time pass quickly, while monotony makes it drag. That is only partly true. Monotony does make hours feel long and tedious. Yet over longer stretches it has the opposite effect: it compresses time. Large, uniform periods shrink in memory until they seem to vanish. By contrast, rich and varied days may fly by in the moment, but they give weight and substance to life as a whole, so that years filled with variety seem fuller and longer than empty ones that slip away unnoticed.          

[Your editor is taking a busman's holiday in San Francisco. Although trading touts will update as usual and I'll be active in the chat room, this commentary and the next come from the archive. You can judge for yourself whether they were sufficiently on-target to still be relevant. RA] Stocks looked leaden as the week ended, adding to the impression that the aging bull market is topping. The Dow tacked on a perfunctory 104 points, or 0.22%, and it wasn't pretty. There was little life in the lunatic sector (aka 'the Magnificent Seven'), which until recently could be relied on to celebrate its wildest flights of fantasy on Fridays. The biggest winner in the bunch was META, which rose 1.80% on news that Zuckerberg is having second thoughts about his all-in bet on a metaverse. If you're unfamiliar with the term, it refers to a virtual world in which users interact online through avatars. Zuckerberg evidently thought there were hundreds of millions of us, if not billions, eager to escape the pain and drudgery of day-to-day life. He was so certain about this that he changed the name of his company in 2021 from Facebook to Meta.  But after sinking $70 billion into the concept, there has been precious little payback. Even more troubling to investors is that there are no obvious ways to make back what has been spent already, nor to recoup any further sums Meta might pour into the idea. Counting on Investors' Stupidity   To cover up this boo-boo, and to avoid being thought clueless, Zuckerberg did what any muckety-muck CEO in the digital world would have done: a twisting somersault onto the AI bandwagon.  "AI is the most important technology we are working on," he said, evidently hoping investors have forgotten that he spent the last

[Events in the Middle East have overshadowed my narrow economic critique of President Trump in the commentary below.  His alliance with Israel to knock out global jihad's command structure is likely to change the world in ways no one can predict. It will also test the idea that only military might can secure a lasting peace.  RA ] Stocks used to turn feisty toward the end of the week, but as the chart shows, the last few 'Freaky Fridays' have been pretty tame. My gut feeling is that this picture of tedium is the calm before the storm, and that stocks are being heavily distributed ahead of a major breakdown. Although I promised a few weeks ago that I wouldn't mention the words 'topping process' again, the alternative would make me sound like a Wall Street shill. The Street's best and brightest have been flat-out bullish on stocks since the 1929 Crash, having failed to issue a sell signal even on stocks implicated in some of the biggest scandals of the last hundred years. To cite a particularly notorious example, many of them were gung-ho on the shares of Equity Funding until the moment regulators halted trading in the stock one day in March 1973. Read about it here. So why have shares been unable to develop a head of steam on Fridays, when irrational exuberance has typically been highest?  There are two likely reasons. For one, the AI Bubble has popped. This occurred without much fanfare on January 29, when Microsoft shares dove $60, or 12%, overnight. The shills initially took this for a one-off event, an 'adjustment' in the share price of a big company they felt was heavily over-invested in AI. Rick's Picks saw it as the beginning of the end for AI mania and said so

Robot demonstrations are notorious for going comically awry. Seat Robby at a staged dinner and he will stab himself in the eye with a forkful of make-believe mashed potatoes. Have him put a butter dish back in the refrigerator and he'll slam the door on his head. So what, then, are we to make of this video, which showcases China's latest entry in the global competition to build robots that are more human? Stunning, isn't it? This is a kung-fu ballet, performed by acrobatic children and a troupe of robots who move with the gracefulness of dancers at the barre. When they abruptly shift gears, vaulting into ten-foot-high somersaults, they land squarely on the rubberized balls of their feet, perfectly balanced. Even more impressive is that there are a dozen of them doing these elaborately choreographed moves in perfect synchronicity. Search Google for a skeptical take on all this and you have to call up a fifth page of results to find anyone who doubts the video is real. Ever the skeptic, my instinct is to disregard all the oohs and ahhs and focus on the doubters, just as many of us do with product reviews on Amazon. Here's a jibe on X from an observer who supposedly witnessed a similar demonstration in Shenzen a month earlier: "The [robots were] slow, shaky and could barely shuffle, let alone do any of this. This isn't the first time [Chinese manufacturer) Unitree has used CGI to fake capability." "13 Billion Views" So who's telling the truth? It's an important question, since the video reportedly has attracted 13 billion views so far. That's according to Chinese news sources, but does the outside world have any reason to trust them? The country's leaders have a strong incentive to show off the nation's technological prowess,