The glue-sniffers who pushed the S&Ps an inch above July's record high on Thursday, only to recede from this precipice like frightened sandpipers from a rising tide, may never realize this was just the bunch of them staring at themselves in Wall Street's fun-house mirror. This coy behavior was so predictable that we might wonder whether all of them made a bundle coming in short on Friday. Of course not. But they are certain to spend the coming week bumping into each other like a throng of mental patients locked in a small room. I'll be watching their burlesque over the next few days, so stay close to the chat room and your email Notifications if you want a seat at ringside.
I've given the 449.52 rally target so much ink that it's probably time to fixate on a higher Hidden Pivot just in case. It lies at 464.76, which, because of its close proximity to July's 468.35 record, should not be expected to show precise stopping power. Still, it will lie in the bowel of what we should regard as the 'discomfort zone', just shy of the bullish breakout that nearly everyone will be expecting, Whatever hysterical price action this causes will assuredly be tradable, since it is all just impulse legs. However, I will be focused more attentively on movement above the old high, since that would create favorable psychological conditions for the kind of bull trap that wants to take everybody down with it.
Crude's stab through the 69.61 midpoint resistance of the pattern shown all but guarantees more upside to at least 74.79. This will once again repeat a cyclical phenomenon that has not failed in years: a bottom in energy quotes whenever prices at the pump fall to $3. A cynic could almost believe oil's tiresome ups and downs are staged by a nefarious cabal to optimize their looting of the world's largest commodity market. Whatever the case, it trades like it's got the heebie-jeebies, an embarrassment not only to those who purport to regulate it, but to civilization itself.
No one mentioned the glow-in-the-dark rickism that had our next rally target at 31.730, below the previous one. Is anyone paying attention? Apparently not, but I'll leave Silver on the list anyway, since, without it, I could no longer promote an affinity between Rick's Picks and bullion traders. The December contract looks bound for the 33.435 target shown, but let's wait till buyers punctures p2=31.798 before we jump to conclusions. Pivoteers, please note: There are some voodoo numbers along the way to get short, if only briefly.
TLT got hit hard last week, all right, but not in the way I'd predicted. The selling followed a feint to 101.39, a few ticks above a peak recorded back in January. Actually, the feint that ended the rally was the second, following another that had occurred a week earlier. Very tricky, indeed. However, the bottom line is that buyers have generated a powerful impulse leg on the daily chart. This means that however hard T-Bonds get wacked in the days and weeks ahead, the weakness should be viewed as corrective. My rally target remains 105.49, as previously given here, and a pullback to 91.88 should be bought aggressively, stop 87.33. A red-line 'mechanical' buying opportunity could also materialize at p=96.42; it would require a stop-loss at 93.39.
The stock market went bonkers following the Fed's first rate-cut since March 2020, but it's more than a little tempting to sell the news. A return to easing had been rumored for the last couple of years, but with a pitchfork mob threatening to descend on the Eccles Building, Fed Chairman Powell finally gave in to Wall Street. The mainstream media has given him cover with the lame story that lower rates will help spur employment. Historians are more likely to recall that the central bank's pivot toward lower rates came at a time when stocks were breaking out to new all-time highs, inflation was ravaging the middle class, and home prices were at record levels. Still, it's an election year, and what did we expect? The Open Market Committee is simply revivifying the American Dream -- not with a scrawny chicken in every pot, but with renewed hopes of a leased Lexus in every garage. What will lower rates mean? For one, they could conceivably delay a crash in home prices and stocks for a while. It has been coming ever since the 2007-08 deflation failed to finish the job. At the time, one might have surmised that the nation's most popular and pernicious delusion -- growing rich simply by owning a home -- had suffered a fatal blow. Alas, whatever lessons the Great Financial Crash held for us were erased by a turbocharged recovery that has pushed home prices higher than ever. And stocks, too. Although Powell's steadfast hawkishness may have disappointed investors every month for the last three years, it did not impede the stock market's steep rise even slightly. Nor did it quell Congressional spending, which is currently adding $1 trillion of debt to the U.S. balance sheet every 100 days. Historians will recall that statistic,
To the list of trading 'touts', I have added yields on the Ten-Year Treasury Note. There seems to be a great deal of uncertainty about where rates for U.S. debt are headed, but this chart should help bring clarity and concision to the forecast. Ten-year rates have fallen from a post-covid high of 4.97% a year ago to a current 3.65%. This is a hair above a crucial midpoint Hidden Pivot support at 3.57% shown in the chart. The 'reverse' pattern from which the support was derived is a compelling one that doesn't care whether the overall look of the chart is 'toppy' -- i.e., favoring a further fall in rates. We won't pretend to have a crystal ball, since the support has yet to be tested. But if it were to be decisively exceeded, that would shorten the odds of the 10-year rate falling to as low as 2.15% in 2025-26. It would be congruent with my very bullish outlook for TLT elsewhere on this page. _______UPDATE (Oct 6): Yields signaled a move to higher levels with their recent thrust through the green line (x=3.83%). If they are headed significantly higher, we should see an effortless move past the midpoint resistance at 4.06%. To be sure, there is an alternative 'a' low at 37.85 that would raise the midpoint resistance to 4.08%. Let's watch both levels to determine how strong the rally is, and whether it is fated to die.
I've been talking about the 449.42 rally target for more than a month, which is probably reason to think it won't work. Still, I cannot imagine the futures blowing past it on the first try. The reverse pattern from which the target is derived is too clear and compelling not to stymie the thundering herd, even if only for a day or two. A shallow pullback that lasts for perhaps 2-3 days and works bears into a state of nervous exhaustion would be warning them to dive for cover. Would they even want to know at that point that there would be another opportunity to lay 'em out at 465.90. That's the D target that maxes out reverse-pattern possibilities with the lowest 'a' that is not part of a conventional pattern. (Note to Pivoteers: This is what I call a locked point 'a' high or low, a term worth remembering and asking about.)
I've put aside Hidden Pivots to consider the simple picture afforded by connecting up the last two important highs on GDXJ's daily chart. They yield a rally projection to 51.19 as the week begins, but you should factor an additional 0.05 per day (or 0.25 per week) to account for the trendline's rising slope. That would imply resistance at around 51.44 come Friday. Achieving this height should pose no problem, since gold itself is in a strong uptrend with a target about 7% above current levels. If a commensurate rally were to occur in this vehicle, it would imply upside to 52.40. Can GDXJ catch up with physical? It is bound to happen eventually, presumably when speculative juices are flowing more copiously.
The seemingly unstoppable rally since Bertie bottomed at 52,619 on September 6 will test the idea that the best shorts occur in places that inspire the most fear in bears. Friday's wilding spree tripped a fearsome but technically appealing 'mechanical' short using the green line (x=59,858). That doesn't mean you're supposed to get short at that price, only that you have a proper signal for setting up a 'camouflage' trigger that minimizes the otherwise 5158-point entry risk of a position stopped above the pattern's point 'C' high. I suggest a trigger interval of 625 points, implying $2500 of entry risk on four lots. This trade is only for those who understand the mechanism and are comfortable with the risk.