Bitcoin is due for a bounce, so I've focused on the smallest possible instance of it on the hourly chart. It tripped a minor buy signal at 82,617 on Friday, then delivered an opportunity to take a small partial profit 86,685, the pattern's midpoint Hidden Pivot resistance. The overshoot of p was slight, but it is still sufficient for us to infer the bounce will achieve the 'd' target at 88,821. Scalpers can short there provide they've made a profit on the way up and that they are able to keep entry risk down to 0.1% or less. The short squeeze powering this oversold rally could be nasty, so be prepared for significantly higher prices, albeit not to a new record high. (UPDATE: Bitcoin is a nuisance for me to track because it never stops to observe a sabbath. The analysis above was prescient and precise, as you have come to expect from Rick's Picks. However, between the time I prepared the forecast a day ago, when this symbol was trading for around 84,630, and now (Sunday morning), it has frog-leaped higher and will soon be at my 88,821 target. I don't ordinarily publish a new slate of touts until late Sunday afternoon, but I'm going to hit the send button on this update now, since I don't want it to appear as though I am predicting the little s.o.b.'s every move with hindsight. As long-time subscribers will have observed, it is no great trick to forecast Bitcoin's hysterics precisely and consistently using the Hidden Pivot Method.)
My hardcore deflationist point of view has saddled me with a bullish bias whenever I ponder a T-bond chart. Although this allowed me to catch the October 2023 bottom just off the low, it also caused me to see the nearly two-year dirge that has occurred since as base-building for a long bull market that has yet to materialize. I don't doubt that it's coming, presumably in conjunction with the next recession. But TLT's chart suggests it could take many months before it rises and, inversely, yields begin to fall. In the meantime, look for it to scuddle sideways, with a moderate bias to the downside that would correspond to merely somewhat higher long-term rates. Altering our expectations in this way can help diminish the distraction of believing Trump can do something about it -- i.e., about rates determined by markets, and about high levels of debt that are crushing America's middle class. He can't, and his expansionist, credit-driven economic policies will only exacerbate the bearish trend in bonds. Suppose the small rise in their price over the last two years has completely discounted the global appeal of Trump's bold leadership and the additional demand this has created for U.S. Treasury paper. In that case, it's hard to imagine a bullish surge in T-bonds when the President's inflationary policies produce the opposite of instant economic miracles: stagflation. ______ UPDATE (Dec 3): TLT is breaking down in the context of a bearish head-and-shoulders pattern begun three months ago. This is within the scope of my original tout (see above), which was intended to provide a much more accurate picture for long-term rates than the guys and gals with degrees in economics who toss darts to predict such things. Rising rates and inflation are going to increasingly hurt Trump's credibility and popularity
Friday's carnage left the futures on track for a likely relapse to the 3976.20 target shown in the chart. A bullish alternative would start with a rally exceeding Friday's intraday high at 4215.10. New record highs would become an odds-on bet at that height. Because the reverse pattern yielding the 3976.20 target, a Hidden Pivot support, is not obvious, bottom-fishing there is recommended. I'd suggest using a 'camo' trigger from a lesser intraday chart to do this, however, since there are several prior lows to the left that are likely to attract competition from overly eager buyers, some of whom are as clever as we are. ________ UPDATE (Nov 18, 10:29 p.m.): Buyers came back to life, giving the futures a possible reprieve. The uptrend projects to 4144.60, and a pullback to 4034.20 can be bought with a 3997.00 stop-loss. The rally will still need to exceed 4215.10 to tell us that bulls are ready for a charge to new record highs. _______ UPDATE (Nov 20, 9:03 a.m.): The futures have rallied as high as 4096 after lightly kissing the bid I'd suggested above at 4034.20 with a 4034.00 low. The subsequent rally could have produced a profit of more than $6000 per contract, but I have not established a tracking position because no one mentioned it in the chat room. The 4144.60 target has yet to be achieved, and the effort is not pretty to watch, but it remains valid nonetheless as a minimum objective.
We've vested our confidence in a 91,358 correction target that was signaled more than a month ago, when Bitcoin fell from a record 126,296 on Oct 6 to a sell signal at 117,561 a few days later. This week's update features an alternative at 89,864 that is nearly as likely to arrest the damage, at least for a while, as the higher number. As a practical matter, we can attempt tightly stopped bottom-fishing at either using a 'trigger' pattern extracted from a lesser chart. I expect a tradable bounce to come from within 0.2% of these Hidden Pivot supports, enabling us to hold entry risk down to perhaps $100-$200. Tune to the chat room for guidance if the opportunity gets close. _______ UPDATE (Nov 18, 10:10 p.m.): Bitcoin has turned higher from an 89,183 low that missed the target flagged above by 0.7%. The bounce so far has traveled 4592 points to a so-far high at 93,775, but it will need to exceed 95,950 before bulls are out of short-term jeopardy. ________ UPDATE (Nov 21, 9:19 a.m.): Expect Bitcoin to continue falling to 72,808 before it turns around -- and not for good. It will have shed 42% of its peak value at that point. A low there would generate a robustly bearish impulse leg on the weekly chart, something that hasn't happened since a weak leg formed in May 2022, on the way down to 15.460. The implication is that whatever rally follows the low will be corrective and therefore a sale or short sale.
The ‘affordability' issue percolated to the top of the news last week, but in a peculiar way. On the right, the debate was not about whether things in general are becoming less affordable for most Americans, as they unmistakably are, but whether the left has blown the issue far out of proportion to create a wave of discontent ahead of next November's general election. The discussion was catalyzed by abysmal consumer sentiment numbers that registered lows not seen since the Great Depression. Trump courted controversy over this in an interview with Fox’s Laura Ingraham. The economy is going great guns, he declaimed, and what’s the problem? He then stepped into quicksand by owning an issue far more real than political. Although he didn't say these words exactly, what America heard was: "I'm going to give you affordability like you won't believe." This is a promise he cannot possibly keep, and his stumble on this key issue eventually will be seen as the beginning of the end for boom times on Wall Street and the Everything Bubble. In stark actuality, the Second Great Depression has already begun for half of America. As my colleague Charles Hugh-Smith notes, the rich have grown increasingly wealthy from a price bubble in real estate and financial assets while barely noticing the descent of the bottom 50% into penury. “While the top 10% busy themselves with using AI to improve work flow, obsessing over geopolitics and the decay of their perks of their Titanium credit card, other Americans are concerned with finding a second or third side-hustle as the soaring costs of utilities, rent, auto insurance and repairs, childcare and healthcare are forcing choices nobody wants to make: What [necessities to forgo.]” The Best of Times? Trump risks failure by amping up his spiel about how
Bears looked pathetic on Friday when they failed to crush the opposition following hard selling overnight. Even so, I continue to believe that stocks have entered a bear market. This implies that a 7057.50 target drum-rolled here earlier will not be reached. I am not chiseling this forecast in stone, however, and I'd suggest using the details of my 15:07 post in the chat room to follow the play-by-play yourself. The critical thing to notice about Friday's bounce is that it came from below the 'd target of the pattern shown in the chart (inset). The overshoot may not look like much, but it is significant in the context of an aging bull market that until now has produced weak corrective ABCDs. To determine how significant, keep a close eye on two 'hidden' impediments above: 6786 and 6918. The provenance of both is explained in my chat room post.
I've shifted to a bigger picture that aligns with gold's, where indecision rules. Bulls have been stymied so far by a midpoint Hidden Pivot at 49.043 that precisely contained the last big bounce. Now, they've got a running start to attempt once again to smash through. A success would put d=52.575 in play. There's little point in trying to predict the outcome, but if the futures pop through p and then return to the green line (x=47.276), we should be prepared to bottom-fish there aggressively with a small-pattern trigger. Alternatively, a breach of C=45.510 would be bearish, although not necessarily fatal. ______ UPDATE (Nov 10, 1:14 p.m. EST): The futures have broken out today, impaling p=49.043 with sufficient brio to get them to d=52.575 eventually. Be careful up there, since this Hidden Pivot resistance does not look like it will surrender quietly. There are significantly higher targets outstanding, so stay tuned for Sunday's updates.
GDXJ entered its third week in purgatory, unable to attract the buying power to wreck the corrective pattern shown. That would take a push above the pattern's point 'C' high at 97.76. Sellers evidently were equally spent after failing to reach the secondary Hidden Pivot support, p2=86.38. My hunch is that bulls eventually will prevail, but there's not much to entice unless you're a scalper. The turgid price action reflects similar indecisiveness in bullion futures, which have lacked direction since completing a 350-point selloff on October 22.
Sellers dragged Bitcoin kicking and screaming toward a 91,263 target that was first signaled a month ago. This was shortly after this vehicle topped at a record 126,200 on October 6. Although bull-market corrections often take a strong bounce from the secondary Hidden Pivot, in this case p2=99,997 produced only a modest bounce last week after it had been pounded for four days. That suggests we should attempt a 'mechanical' short at the red line, p=107,731. The textbook stop-loss would be at 114,554, but we can craft a much tighter stop with a 'camo' trigger if the opportunity arises. ______ UPDATE (Nov 14, 10:12 a.m.): In my zeal to conceal the top-secret coordinates yielding the target above, I somehow transposed one of them. The correct target is 91,358. Any lower would indicate 89,964, but you could bottom-fish either aggressively with a stop-loss as tight as 0.2%. At the moment, Bitcoin is enjoying a lunatic bounce precisely from the secondary Hidden Pivot (p2=94,344) of the pattern associated with D=89,964.
[ My friend Doug Behnfield, a wealth manager and senior vice president at Morgan Stanley in Boulder, has contributed many commentaries to Rick's Picks over the years. Below is the Q3 report he sent out to clients several weeks ago. Like many observers, he is troubled by the enormous concentration of investment capital in the AI space. Can the eventual payoff ever be big enough to justify the estimated $10 trillion that will flow into AI technology by 2030? Read why Doug thinks there are better places to park your money. With apologies to him, I have dispensed with his meticulous footnotes and several graphs to simplify typography. The Jetson's illustration was also my idea, based on his original headline, 'Thoughts on the Jetsons and Rope-a-Dope'. RA ] In late 1962, CBS introduced the Hanna-Barbera evening cartoon The Jetsons. It was inspired by their hit series The Flintstones, but set in the future. It lasted for only 24 weekly episodes, but it made an indelible impression on the Baby Boom Generation. Along with flying cars and Rosie the robotic maid, George Jetson worked two days a week, one hour per day (not remotely), and all he did was go in and push a button to start and stop a machine. (the Referential Unisonic Digital Indexer Machine, at Spacely Sprockets). I was reminded of The Jetsons when reading a Wall Street Journal article describing the rivalry between Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk in developing robots. In it, Elon Musk predicts that there will be “at least 10 billion humanoid robots in the world, remaking the idea of work and life” by 2040 (The Jetsons was set in 2062). Zuckerberg’s humanoid robotic aspirations are dependent on gathering data from the microphone and camera in his Artificial Intelligence (AI) Glasses. With them, he intends to
