The Morning Line

The stock market is priced for perfection in a grotesquely imperfect world. Trump provided a fleeting respite by showing us how the Art of the Deal works in trade negotiations. Fox News rightly rubbed the legacy media’s face in his success while the President took a half-dozen victory laps to muted global applause. This may turn out to be more than he deserves, since no one can predict what will come of the new taxes that have been imposed on global trade. Because eggheads, editorialists and Bloomberg’s talking heads have no deep understanding of tariffs, here’s an interesting thought from someone who does — Reagan budget director David Stockman. The point he makes is too basic to ignore: If capitalism is truly free and functioning, he points out, America doesn’t need a dealmaker in the White House. Affordability is our big problem anyway, as the nation’s erstwhile middle class continues to sink into poverty. Nearly everything we buy has become not merely expensive, but too expensive, particularly big-ticket items like homes and automobiles. The average price of a used car hit $32,000, up from $23,000 just three years ago. It can cost $400 or more to take a family to a ballgame, where a hot dog and a beer are now $25. The $9.99 breakfast special in Las Vegas has risen to $29.99. And if shrinkflation at the supermarket gets any worse, we’ll be buying staples by the gram rather than the ounce.                             Putin’s Hole Cards Inflation will not be the worst of our problems if the Ukraine war takes a turn for the worse. Putin is Trump’s only equal in global power and influence, and he will not bend to Trump’s ultimatums like the pantywaists

Although the biggest players in the tech world have sunk trillions of dollars into AI research and development, none of them has made a dime. Will they ever? That’s a reasonable question, considering no one really knows how AI will reshape the economic world, other than eliminating many millions of jobs. The investment frenzy continues to gain momentum nonetheless, recalling the South Sea Bubble of the ‘roaring’ 1720s. A widely quoted item from that era was a prospectus for a company claiming to be carrying on "an undertaking of Great Advantage but no one to know what it is." One could argue that it’s different this time, but is it really? Quite possibly not, considering that Bitcoin, a currency with no intrinsic value, has increased in value from an initial $0.003 in 2010 to a current $118,000. These are crazy times, and nothing drives people crazier than the prospect of thousandfold returns on their savings. However, before you plunk down your own hard-earned dollars on a flight of fantasy, check out my recent interview on Howe Street. (Note: I make an exception for Nvidia shares, for reasons that are explained in the interview.)

The stock market continues to waft higher with the riskless predictability of loaded dice. DaBoyz have trained their firepower on just a few high-flyers, chiefly Microsoft and Nvidia, in order to squeeze the broad averages skyward with an absolute minimum of capital. I've explained here before in exhaustive detail how this carnival midway trick is performed, beginning with a short-covering gap on most mornings that precipitously reverses overnight selling after it has dried up. Putting aside the fakery and tedium of the seemingly endless bull market, along with the Epstein saga and Trump's tiresome tariff antics, the most interesting story in the news last week was Tulsi Gabbard's tweets implicating Barack Obama in treason. Although Biden, frequently photographed slurping an ice cream cone, would seem to have a lock on Worst President Ever, it is Obama who will go down in history as the leader who did America the most harm, all of it deliberate. A Years-Long Coup Treason is not too strong a word here, although we shouldn't get our hopes too high that his punishment, assuming he is charged and convicted, will fit the crime. When he summoned Comey, Clapper and Brennan to the Oval Office on December 9, 2016, they had already stated publicly there was no evidence Russia had interfered in the 2016 election. Despite this, said Gabbard, Obama directed them to fabricate a new narrative asserting that the Russians had in fact worked behind-the-scenes to help Trump beat Hillary. The three men and their staffs proceeded to reverse their findings, said Gabbard. Then, two weeks before Trump took office, they "unveiled the new, Obama-directed politicized assessment, a gross weaponization of intelligence that laid the groundwork for a years-long coup intended to subvert President Trump's entire presidency." Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, said she has

Nvidia became the world's first $4 trillion company last week, leapfrogging Microsoft, Tesla, Google and every other company struggling to stay in the AI game.  Our money is on Musk to compete the hardest. He is Nvidia's biggest customer for their most powerful chips, which sell for as much as $200,000. Musk has been buying them by the tens of thousands. He recently converted a vacuum cleaner factory in Tennessee into a site for the world's largest supercomputer. It draws so much power that the cooling plant alone cost will cost $80 million. The machine will be used to train Grok, Musk's horse in an AI field crowded with corporate strivers. Grok reportedly overtook competitors recently with a demonstration that showed the app capable of thinking almost like a human. Even skeptics were impressed with the way Grok figured out a novel way for hospitals to save power.  What startled them, however, was that Grok hadn't even been asked about this; the AI assistant simply inferred and suggested it based on another, seemingly unrelated, energy solution it had worked on that even MIT-trained engineers hadn't thought of. But even if Nvidia has yet a few more prospective customers in Musk's league, is the company worth $4 trillion?  A physicist friend of mine who uses AI intensively in his business said the stock is only warming up and that NVDA's current price is a certain bet to double yet again. But exactly what will their chip customers sell to the world that could possibly justify such astronomical valuations? It would have to be much more than mere gains in productivity -- or even that old investible standby, a cure for cancer. Monsters from the Id In an earlier commentary, I suggested facetiously that Nvidia and companies immediately downstream of it were

We're all waiting anxiously to see whether Trump's bold initiatives usher in a golden economic era. If this is going to happen, we should see the Dow Industrial lurch toward 100,000 at any time. Just a few short weeks ago, you could have counted me among the skeptics. It is a habit that has become deeply ingrained in me after writing collapsitarian essays and editorials for the last 30 years. However, I have been so wrong about this for so many years that I would never, ever insist that such a seemingly outrageous rally is impossible.  Skeptics aside, there are perhaps 80 to 100 million Americans rooting with all their might for the President to fall on his face. This is Trump Derangement Syndrome at its stupidest and most hateful, since a really bad year for the President could mean our children will have to suffer through a Second Great Depression. The good/bad news is that we should know soon how things are likely to turn out. That's because the stock market is in fly-or-die mode, so dangerously pumped with crazy, Wall Street hype and AI hubris that it cannot possibly sustain altitude unless investors decide to go all-in, and soon.  It would be a peculiar time for stocks to take flight, since U.S. consumers are tapped out and falling increasingly behind on car and house payments, and GDP shrank by 0.4% in the first quarter.  We may have entered a recession, and it has the potential to become a devastating one because, publicly and privately, the nation is so deep in hock. It is not yet so deep, however, that an adroitly engineered bear squeeze could not prevent a potentially fatal, contractionary mindset from taking root. America Ascendant The graph above holds the key to our best hopes and

The S&Ps and Nasdaq hit record highs last week, a surreal milestone that only the Wall Street toadies at Bloomberg and the Wall Street Journal who fabricate the news could take seriously.  These are the same folks who bestowed the name 'Magnificent Seven' on a bunch of high-flying stocks whose short-squeeze histrionics qualify them for membership in a stock-market Hall of Shame. Portfolio managers, who surely know better, are go-along buyers at these heights and will remain so until a tsunami of redemptions bends them to the impending reality of massive deflationary write-downs when the Everything Bubble bursts. That reality darkened last week with news that the U.S. economy shrunk at an annualized rate of 0.5 percent in the first quarter.  Perennially giddy investors would seem to be betting either that the recession that probably already has begun will be short, or that the statistic itself is a meaningless outlier caused by the world-class uncertainties of Trump's tariff policies. A popular explanation for the staying power of the bull market against a backdrop of global storm clouds, geopolitical mayhem and economic sclerosis is that AI will save us from...everything. As the story has it, artificial intelligence will boost worker productivity, improve outcomes from brain surgery, make steering wheels obsolete, turn $20-an-hour paralegals into Clarence Darrows, and lay to rest the arguments of Talmudic scholars. In unfortunate reality, the driving force behind AI is its ability to put people out of work, particularly white-collar employees whose jobs have been untouched so far by robotics. Can Joe Six-pack Deliver? That raises the question of how lunatic-sector companies that have invested trillions of dollars in AI development, and who say they plan to invest much, much more, can ever hope to recoup their money, let alone multiply it voluminously as they seem to

Tulipmania and the South Sea Bubble have nothing on the bunco game Wall Street has been running with Microsoft shares. I write on this subject often because the numbers are so huge, and because the game, which is intertwined with the biggest financial con-job in history, is not one you will ever read about in The Wall Street Journal or on Bloomberg.com. It thrives on the madness of crowds and grows bigger with every uptick in MSFT and the galaxy of stocks in its vortex. Microsoft's share price has gone from 393 to 483 since April, adding roughly $687 billion to the macro ledger. That is twice the size of California's budget for 2025. It would buy a Porsche 911 for every man, woman and child in New York and Chicago, or a super-deluxe Disney World vacation for every family in America. A clue to how the game works lies in the relentless smoothness of MSFT's ascent. You could comb through a thousand charts without finding one remotely like the one pictured above. You don't have to be a technical analyst to see that the long rally has been tightly controlled every step of the way.  This kind of price action is quite rare, but what makes it extraordinary is that it is not happening to just any stock, but rather to the most valuable stock in the world, a $3 trillion company with a lock on the operating systems of a billion-and-a-half desktop computers. The stock has been ratcheting higher on relatively thin volume and a dearth of bullish buying. Short-covering has done most of the lifting, with more urgency and power than merely optimistic investors could ever supply. Ka-Ching! MSFT's manipulators knew what they were doing when they goosed the stock into a sensational short squeeze on April

There were few headlines out of the Middle East over the weekend, mainly because only Israel and Iran are capable of judging the damage, and neither is saying much. Wall Street, on the other hand, seems quite confident that whatever is happening, and irrespective of the outcome, it will be quite bullish for stocks. As much was evident on Friday, when the lunatic sector (aka 'the Magnificent Seven') bounced back from heavy losses early in the session, then spent the remainder of the day building a plateau from which stocks can launch anew when the all-clear signal comes. This would be appallingly reckless behavior, but we have become used to it as the stock market has increasingly decoupled from geopolitical and even economic reality over the last decade or so. It's possible investors are simply envisioning a brighter tomorrow, with Iran no longer able to export terror to the world. China and North Korea will continue to threaten, of course. But their ability to spread malice and death will be significantly impaired once Israel has cut off the arms and legs of their Iranian proxies. Jihadism will still be with us, and active to the extent its chief sponsor, Qatar, has plenty of crude oil to sell. But perhaps with the inspiration of nuclear terror in remission for a few years, and an entire generation of jihadi leaders rubbed out by Israel, the world might enjoy a period of relative peacefulness. How odd would that be?  [Check out my latest interview on This Week in Money. It delves into the mania that has seized investors in stock and real estate assets.]

The stock market is in a topping process, brazenly manipulated by white-collar carnies who cut their teeth at Sloan, Wharton and Stanford. These newly trained ass-bandits have been working Microsoft shares to hold the broad averages aloft while they offload inventory to widows, pensioners and assorted other bag holders. I described in detail how this game works in a previous commentary. Even though Microsoft, the world's most valuable company, has a $3 trillion capitalization, it costs the perpetrators almost nothing to drive the stock vertically higher, adding hundreds of billions of dollars of gaseous asset inflation (aka 'wealth effect') to the global ledger. Flimsy Reasons When last week ended, the world's largest-cap stock was poking its greasy little snout marginally above the previous all-time high at 468.35 recorded last July. This breakout will not have gone unnoticed by a million dip-buying homunculi, since it is no longer a dip they are buying, but the latest move into thin air. Although MSFT will continue to outperform all other stocks for reasons implied above, I doubt it's short-squeeze histrionics can drag the lumpen mass of securities significantly higher. At best, the also-rans will make marginal new highs until the last buyer runs out of flimsy reasons later this summer. It has never been clearer that mass mental-illness, far more than invented 'fundamentals', is what drives stocks higher in the late stages of a bull market. If news mattered, the 1914-ish darkness of today's headlines would have crushed the Dow six months ago.