Not much has changed for Citi, even if the stock has quadrupled in just two weeks off its all-time low of 97 cents. Even under the most optimistic assumptions, Citigroup may be worth no more than a buck or two per share when stripped of all the businesses that once fattened its bottom line. What’s left? Soliciting passbook deposits in order to make consumer loans? Not much fun in that, but anything fancier will require the kind of leap of faith on borrowers’ part that may be dead for 50 years. In any event, we don’t see the nuttiness in this stock going much further, and that could put a drag on Goldman shares, even.
From the monthly archives:
March 2009
Let’s see if a Hidden Pivot resistance at 112.31 can tame this psycho-ward escapee. Despite the violent price action, our position is showing a $90 paper profit at the moment and that could increase to as much as $1900 if the stock is trading around 115 when the April calls expire. We are short three of them, long two July 115 calls as well, and long two April 85-90 put spreads for 1.20 apiece. I’ve included a snapshot of an option calculator that shows how I arrived at the $1900 figure. It has the July 115 calls worth $1497 each on April 18 with GS trading around 115. If you do the math, you’ll be rewarded with an insight into how a calendar spread — slightly ratio’d in this case – works.
Okay, Monday’s commentary was intended as a little tough love for goldbugs. But it doesn’t negate the bullish fact that last Friday’s spike exceeded a look-to-the-left peak at 964.00 from February 27, engendering a bullish impulse leg that could still bear “C-D fruit”. To calculate the odds of another leg up, we can use a simple Lindsay calculation. Assuming 936.00 is not first breached to the downside, the entry trigger for longs would come at 946.50, midpoint resistance at 957.00, and a price objective of 978.00 thereafter. These numbers are offered to help you gauge the strength of any rally, and I am not recommending getting long at 946.50 unless you know how to use “camouflage” to do it. I can offer no useful downside possibilities at the moment, since Monday night’s waft is making a point high ‘C’ elusive. But once ‘C’ appears to be in, use a 10-minute chart, where A=952.90 and B=936.00. _______ UPDATE (3:55 a.m.): The fledgling recovery has turned south, creating a ‘C’ high that allows a downside projection to a Hidden Pivot at 927.70 if its midpoint sibling at 936.10 gets trashed.
Today’s forecast isn’t rocket science, since there are only two rally targets to engage our speculative interest. The first, a Hidden Pivot at 824.00, lies a mere 3.00 points above the apex of yesterday’s joyride; the second is at 855.00. A move to the higher number should be considered an odds-on bet if the futures close above 824.00 or exceed it by more than 2.50 points intraday. I’ve included a chart that shows how the B-C segment of the pattern I’ve used here is chiseled in granite, there being no credible alternatives. I have not provided any downside targets for today because, frankly, why bother? For the record, though, a 50% retracement of the joyride would equate to 791.25; a 0.618 retracement, to 784.25
Member-only content. Please Login or get a free trial of Rick's Picks to view.
Member-only content. Please Login or get a free trial of Rick's Picks to view.
The selloff into last week’s final bell set up a presumably corrective downtrend that projects to 753.25. That’s assuming its midpoint sibling, 762.50, is breached. (It was, but only by one tick — not seriously enough for us to infer that its supportiveness has been compromised.) We are putting out this analysis before Sunday trading has begun, and it’s possible the futures will head higher rather than lower. If so, and if they do it without first breaching 762.50 decisively, it would then require an upthrust exceeding 780.50 to reinvigorate the short squeeze responsible for driving stocks higher last week. _______ UPDATE (11:45 p.m.): DaBoyz have applied a rather vicious short squeeze Sunday night, although there is not a headline in sight at the moment that would nominally justify such brazenness. So that we don’t mistake a good bluff for the real thing, let’s use a 789.50 print as our benchmark, since that’s what it would take to turn the hourly chart unmistakably bullish. Above 789.50, the futures would have an implied minimum rally target of 809.50, a shortable target, stop 810.25, given here earlier; or if any higher, 817.00.
The chart shows the derivation of some short-term targets mentioned near the end of today’s commentary. Although Friday’s point ‘B’ low did not surpass a distinctive low to the left of it made the previous day, the pattern itself is sufficiently compelling in its symmetry to warrant our consideration. Its ‘D’ target lies at 938.50, subject to a possible bounce off 949.00, the midpoint Hidden Pivot. Based on this chart, the first hint of a decisive bullish reversal that we could identify Sunday night or Monday would come on a print exceeding 960.30. Of course, the implications would be the more bullish if this were to happen without 949.00 being reached first, or certainly 938.50.
In forecasting gold’s price trends, Rick’s Picks has generally been careful not to let our long-term bullish bias color our observations from one week to the next. We think readers deserve straight talk, even when it has less than bullish implications for the precious-metals sector. Such as now. We are not so much negative on bullion as we are more cautious than usual. Specifically, we don’t expect gold to leave the $1000 barrier behind any time soon — meaning within the next three or four months; rather, we » Read the full article









Stocks Exceed Preposterous Forecast
by Rick Ackerman on March 24, 2009 12:01 am GMT
Our most recent price targets for Gold and the Mini-S&P were more ambitious than usual because we’d planned to be away from our desk for a couple of days on a family ski trip. Imagine our surprise when we came off the slopes and discovered that the extravagant,
cover-our-butt targets we’d computed for these two trading vehicles had actually been surpassed by day’s end, albeit not by much. In the case of Gold, our worst-case downside target for the near term was 938.50 — a $17.70 decline. In actuality, the June contract traded down to 936.00, hinting of further weakness to come.
At least one subscriber, Phil D., evidently made hay with these numbers, and graciously wrote to tell us about it: “I exited the full contract position today. Actually, I rolled it over to June this morning but exited on the break below your midpoint number. An attempt to re-enter at the D point was stopped out…[but] even with the June losses subtracted, my net gain of over $6,000 is now locked in » Read the full article