Wall Street Parties as Great Cities Fail

With the Mother of All Bear Rallies about to enter its second year and the banking business going like gangbusters, one could lose sight of the fact that quite a few American cities, counties and states are facing the most dire economic circumstances since the Great Depression.  San Francisco became the latest casualty of hard times when it put more than 15,000 of its 26,000 workers on notice that they will be laid off at the end of this week. Most supposedly will have the option of being rehired to work shortened hours, but they will not be returning to the same jobs. For one, employees with many years on the job will lose their seniority and many supervisory positions will be eliminated. And for two, the city will no longer be bound by certain past agreements with the unions.  By cutting workers back to 37.5 hours and reducing their paychecks by 6.25 percent, Mayor Gavin Newsom hopes to save $100 million. However, the total budget shortfall for the 2010-11 fiscal year is $522 million, so the city will need to come up with additional, presumably drastic, ways to close the $422 million gap that will remain.

San-Francisco

Mind you, this is not some depressed town with a down-and-out manufacturing base and no economic options. In fact, the tourist economy has remained relatively robust, and redevelopment has turned the once-dingy South of Market area and warehouse district into thriving incubators for new businesses. But like so many other large cities, San Francisco has been expanding its payroll at several times the rate of the private sector in recent years, resulting, for one, in more supervisors making six-figure salaries than any of the rank-and-file workers and taxpayers can comprehend, much less pay for.

A Bloodbath

Newsom calls his plan a “pro-job alternative,” since the goal is to keep as many workers on the payroll as possible and to allow them to keep their health benefits. But because it is overly generous benefits that have been dragging most large cities toward bankruptcy in the first place, it seems unlikely that he will be able to make good on his promise. Workers are describing it as a bloodbath, but in view of the enormous budget cuts that remain ahead, tomorrow’s “Black Friday” could be just the beginning of San Francisco’s downward spiral. A close acquaintance of ours who works for the city notes that the carnage is as bad or worse in numerous other cities, including Pittsburgh, San Diego, New York,  Charlotte, Baltimore, Seattle, Atlanta and Los Angeles.  As the Great Recession drags on, the idea of raising taxes to cover huge budget deficits will drive under not just marginal businesses, but strong ones that have so far managed to eke out survival.  There are no easy answers, and even the difficult choices that are being made now hold no guarantee of success.

(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • Rantly McTirade March 5, 2010, 6:06 pm

    At a year on, its’ a cyclical bull market within a secular, perhaps supercycle, bear market.

  • Rich March 5, 2010, 1:30 am

    Just to keep things in perspective,
    despite growth of government bureaucracies faster than economy and population,
    there are 12 M local government employees,
    5 million state employees and
    2 million Fed employees earning an average of $75,000 a year plus benefits like healthcare and pensions, every jib at the expense of private prosperity.
    That approaches $2 T a year, one seventh of Treasury debts.
    An obvious humane solution is to cut their pay 20% across the board for seven leans years.
    Then let’s see what kind of politicians they vote for.
    Bunning for President…

    http://www.data360.org/dsg.aspx?Data_Set_Group_Id=228

  • Pat March 4, 2010, 11:19 pm

    I doubt the SPX will be “stuck” below 1150 for long. I think the bears will be very surprised how high and long the market will run this year. All the doom and gloom is WAY overblown IMO. The market is looking ahead to better times, and thats why its going up. If the US economy was about to fall off a cliff or come tumbling down, the SPX would be trading at 500, yet it just keeps powering up. The bears have no explanation, only excuses like “excess liquidity, or stock are being manipulated, or its a short squeeze”. There are no shorts left in the market, they’ve been blown out long ago. Oh wait, maybe its the Tooth Fairy thats buying stocks and pushing the market higher! LOL

  • Chris T. March 4, 2010, 11:00 pm

    ‘What would be the overall economic effect to the U.S. economy, if large numbers #of civil servants were laid off or had pay cuts of 20+%? Regards!’

    Not as bad as zou think. Many of them get paid now for doing NOTHING, so sending them home and giving them less (from the same hand as now too) just saves. Cutting has the same effect.
    This does presuppose that this ‘savings’ is passed on, and a big presupposition that is indeed.’

    Of course the fraudulent GDP calculation will show this, but this leeching of true productive work actually has little benefit, a reduction, despite the statistics is verz beneficial.
    How much of this caste exists solely to enforce their own creations (rules, regs,etc), and does nothing other than to come up with new , confused and confusing rules to broaden their reach?
    Same for the private sector leeches, whose sole purpose is to help a peon deal with this state of affairs.
    CPAs, lawyers, etc.
    If I were a CPA I would be opposed to the recent income tax proposal which would–
    tax 10% of the first 50k
    25% of the rest
    39k deductible
    all 2x for married joint filers.

    Thats it, 3×5 card to file, and at 200k couple, a total liability (not couting deductible) of 17.5%.

  • gary leibowitz March 4, 2010, 9:29 pm

    Now that the housing numbers are being hit by the reality of low wages, benifits cut, less available “good” jobs and a corporate mind-set that wants to continue to “streamline” its operations, there is no escaping the fact that we are headed for a deflationary depression the likes of which have not been seen.

    Pardon my run-on-sentence.

    I believe the reason the market is stuck below 1150 (SPX) is because reality is indeed setting in. If it can’t break out expect a fast drop to perhaps 980 (SPX) followed by one more rip-roaring (sucker) rally. That is of course if human nature is a constant and history does repeat.

    Gonna be interesting.

  • S. Aprov March 4, 2010, 8:28 pm

    What would be the overall economic effect to the U.S. economy, if large numbers of civil servants were laid off or had pay cuts of 20+%? Regards!

  • Chris T. March 4, 2010, 7:55 pm

    Good news.
    It seems that the fleecing of the public by the ‘public’ employees is finally hittin the wall so hard, that it`s coming to a halt.
    Same here in NJ, where we don´t have the large cities mentioned above, but the whole state is like SF (we like to do it with 600 school boards instead, all the more entities for the NEA et al to rip-off)

  • Jimmy March 4, 2010, 7:47 pm

    Californians should have joined in and paid more attention to the tea-party taking place across the country some months back.

  • Steve March 4, 2010, 6:08 pm

    What Social Security TRUST. There is no individual account in my name holding I.O.U.’s, as in a Trust Account. The money has always gone into the general fund, where the congress is allowed to give the ‘gift’ of benefits to whomever it chooses. The tax has always been a Right to Work in democracy TAX – the benefit to the privilege of being a voluntary slave/legislative citizen created of the Master Legislation. I’d need to dig out the letter from the Social Security Administration when I asked why I was not going to get the promise from when I was 16 that I could retire with full benefits at age 65 to establish this factually.

    Good dreams, nice ideas. The little paper SSA sends out is a little sham to cover the grandest PONZI scheme ever created.

  • rmsimc March 4, 2010, 4:55 pm

    As Rick and most onthis forum realize, deflation continues to be the immediate risk. The Monetarist have it wrong. It is not the QE that produces inflation but rather the tendency of the populous to spend or devalue the importance of the fiat paper with easy money and secure employment. When the folks are scared…they hoard…even the fiat paper. As more and more people opt out of the consumption party, the prices will slide…ask Japan. Add in the one trillion of excess reserves that the banks are holding, as well as the credit contraction, and it is easy to see that the money in circulation has and will continue to decline. But as the fear of default with the sovereigns rise, the long end of the yield curve should go higher, in spite of the deflationary pressures. This assumption, imo, produces an actionable model for investment of part of my capital…shorting the long term paper.

    As for the stock market: I think the oft espoused buy-and-hold strategy is suicide and most casual 401K-type investors are in for another potential 50% haircut within the next couple of years. Thats when I’ll look to be adding long-term postitions in equities. Until then, I’m satified keeping my equity exposure to 25%.

  • Benjamin March 4, 2010, 11:52 am

    It makes me wonder if the talk of extending unemployment benefits has anything at all to do with local governments not firing their employees. Spend or spend, what will it be? Hmm…

  • Rich March 4, 2010, 7:46 am

    Rick et All
    How this can be bullish or inflationary is well beyond comprehension.
    Human lives downsized, total debt to GDP ratio 370%, higher than the Great Depression according to Washington Times, income tax revenues fell -34% last April and not covered government spending for decades but for the raiding of the Social Security Trust, also upside down and inside out now.
    Who are they kidding?
    It took a child to say Wall Street has no clothes…