We Applaud Google for Defying Beijing

All due praise to Google, which has put principle above money by refusing to censor search results in China. We can’t recall the last time an American company publically took the high road, ethically and morally speaking – especially when billions of dollars of potential revenues were at stake as they are in this case. More often, we read about bribery scandals abroad and cynically assume it’s the cost of doing business in the ethical swamps that lie outside of Europe, Canada and Japan. China is much worse than merely corrupt, however, and that’s why it was an ideal place for Google to take a principled stand.

In fact, China is a place where dissenters disappear from their homes in the middle of the night, and whose authoritarian government has embraced a particularly brutal form of genocide to achieve its goal of subjugating Tibet.  Since invading the country in 1949, imperial China has killed nearly a fifth of Tibet’s population and destroyed 6,000 monasteries. Concerning China’s sway over a supposedly free Taiwan, the Chinese government has threatened would-be interlopers, including the U.S., in the bluntest terms.

Writing Off the U.S.

And yet, with the singular, praiseworthy exception of Google, corporate America seems to have no qualms about doing business with China. The hope – or excuse, perhaps – is that by engaging China in trade, we stand a better chance of drawing the country into the community of nations that recognizes basic human rights, private property and the rule of law. While this calculation may have seemed persuasive ten years ago, it has been weakened by China’s emergence as a dominant economic power. Granted, they have not yet told the U.S. to take a hike. But they are very nearly in a position to do so, since they could easily destroy our economy by, for one, swapping their dollar reserves for gold.

You say they would never do so – at least, not precipitously — because it would hurt them as badly as it would us?  That is true.  But they at least know they could recover, while we would not.  Anyway, to be brutally realistic about it, it must be assumed China knows the U.S. is headed into an economic Depression.  As such, they undoubtedly have written off the nearly trillion dollars of reserves that they currently have stashed in U.S. Treasurys. That will be quite a blow when it finally happens, as it must, but it will be more our loss than theirs.

In the meantime, it is clear that China no longer kow-tows to U.S. demands. The opposite is true, actually, even if the White House would have us believe otherwise. In the case of Google, the officially sanctioned white lie — from sources both in China and the U.S. – is that China’s door is open not only to Google, but to investment in general. This cannot possibly be so if China’s door is not also open to the free flow of information. The Chinese know this, and so do we.  It is the key question that China will have to confront if it is to emerge from the xenophobic mindset that built the Great Wall.  For now, we owe a debt of gratitude to Google for sharpening the ideological boundary line between countries that are truly free and those that are not.

(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • Rick Ackerman March 25, 2010, 4:46 am

    Posted by Rick for Brian Benton:

    First, I am with you on Google’s stand. Kudos to them.

    I wanted to address your following comment …
    “Granted, they have not yet told the U.S. to take a hike. But they are very nearly in a position to do so, since they could easily destroy our economy by, for one, swapping their dollar reserves for gold. You say they would never do so – at least, not precipitously — because it would hurt them as badly as it would us? That is true.”

    China swapping its US Dollar reserves for Gold would completely defeat the purpose of why it acquired those reserves in the first place. China acquired those US Dollar reserves because they wanted to weaken the Yuan relative to the Dollar. They could have chosen to simply allow the Yuan to rise in value (due to the trade surplus net demand for Yuan). Instead, they made the explicit choice to “print” Yuan and buy Dollars … thus building US Dollar denominated foreign reserves So, until China adopts a different stance w/respect to the Yuan vs. the Dollar …

    The following is something I sent to my private Financial mailing list a few months ago (while there was still a significant trade gap), entitled “Currency Wars” …

    I often get two specific questions concerning the US trade relationship with China. One concerns the claim made by some that China manipulates its currency (it does retain a peg to a trade weighted index of currencies, with the significant currency being the US Dollar). The other concerns China being vocal about the stability of its vast amount of US Dollar based foreign reserves and its publicly voiced apprehension to its purchase of more US debt. As usual, there are two sides to every story. The below provides a synopsis of how this plays out and fills out what is not being admitted by either side.

    When the US pays for Chinese exports (and it purchases much as China still maintains a large trade surplus with the US), it does so by purchasing Yuan (using Dollars) on the foreign exchange market (see Note: below). This results in a rising Yuan … which makes sense since a net trade surplus results in net demand for the net trade surplus currency (in this case, the Yuan). But the Chinese want to keep their export sector growing (they are still an export driven economy) and this will not happen with continued growing strength in the Yuan (trade would eventually balance back as Chinese exports to the US become more expensive and Chinese imports from the US less expensive), especially relative to the US Dollar. So, the Chinese central bank intervenes and creates (“prints”) Yuan to buy US Dollars. This artificially devalues the Yuan and provides an artificial boost to the Chinese export sector (keeping the value of their currency lower than it would normally be without the intervention). This is why the Chinese central bank has so many US Dollar denominated foreign reserves … they created them. Now that they have created them, they are stuck trying to determine the best investment choice for them. It was once a mix of US treasuries, Agency MBSs, and Agency debt. But with the nationalization of the Agencies (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, etc.), China has shifted the majority of its US dollar denominated foreign reserves to US treasuries.

    So on one side, you have the US complaining (legitimately) about the Chinese manipulating their currency. But in the same breath, the US is lobbying for more investment in its debt (sorry, cannot have it both ways) as the amount of debt issuance required of the US Treasury has grown to unsustainable levels.

    On the other side, you have the Chinese complaining (legitimately) about the US devaluing its currency and making Chinese investments in US Dollar denominated assets less stable. But in the same breath, the Chinese continue to print Yuan to buy Dollars due to their trade surplus and their desire to artificially support their export sector. The Chinese can solve their own problem by not printing Yuan to buy Dollars (devaluing their currency relative to the Dollar). But like the US, they want it both ways.

    Note: Even if a Chinese exporter accepts US Dollars without first converting to Yuan, the result is still the same … these Dollars will be subsequently exchanged for Yuan on the foreign exchange market.

  • CrisisMaven March 25, 2010, 4:02 am

    I wonder how long this Chinese bubble is going to hold up. US corporations would be well advised not to put too much stock in China and so it might in the end not even be good business in the long run, making them lose out not only morally but financially as well. Maybe the two are not that mutually exclusive after all. I think Google with its youngish culture and its ties to the Open Source movement had no real choice though: for them business would have been harmed elsewhere as well. If the Open Source community which today profts greatly from Google’s support would take it onto itself to launch search engines they would be the only serious competitors in the long run and Google is aware of that. I don’t mean to belittle the decision which either way took great courage and was the right thing to do.

  • bob alper March 24, 2010, 11:33 pm

    Nothing to be gained at all by capsizing the financial system – except to write off what is already deemed to be a loss and get as much gold as is possible now while the dollar price of gold is still relatively low versus what the price will be when the jig is up and the entire world comes to the inevitable realization that the US is bankrupt.

  • bob alper March 24, 2010, 10:32 pm

    “Anyway, to be brutally realistic about it, it must be assumed China knows the U.S. is headed into an economic Depression. As such, they undoubtedly have written off the nearly trillion dollars of reserves that they currently have stashed in U.S. Treasurys.”

    If this were true, why wouldn’t China just take its lumps and be done with it now? Buy gold or silver or palladium now – take the hit and possible lose less than whatever the dollar may be worth when they would otherwise decide to pull the trigger on what will no doubt be an enormous fire sale of their massive holdings!!
    &&&&&&&

    What would be gained by capsizing the global financial system? China can be expected to continue to hedge its dollar exposure for as long as orderly markets continue to allow it. RA

  • SDavid March 24, 2010, 10:28 pm

    Mike Eck:

    It is no coincidence that cases of pedophilia have been steadily on the rise as the internet became popular. My suggestion that more strict regulations be put in place (censorship, yes) isn’t taking normal, everyday people into account. They aren’t the ones who need to have censorship imposed here, because they don’t go looking for these sites. It’s those who already pose a threat to children that do. It would be very difficult trying to explain “self censorship” to the young victims and their parents. Self censorship only works on those who had no interest to begin with.

  • gary leibowitz March 24, 2010, 8:15 pm

    Lets watch very carefully how the next round of trade sanctions play out. I suspect both sides will be forced to accelerate their rhetoric to action. No one wants to “lose face”. At stake is a precarious recovery on our part. If the Chinese give in to devaluing their currency they will sacrifice their economic growth for our benifit.

    I suspect trade sanctions will be the start of the end for this recovery, just like the last great depression.

  • Jason March 24, 2010, 6:32 pm

    Not every government is perfect. Some systems of culture/government do not work in other countries. Nothing fundamentally has changed in China, it has worked for thousands of years.

    Once in a while, you get a bad emperor like Mao. But for the most part, China tries to help the majority of their people. They are in Tibet because it is the source of much of their fresh water. They need to ensure the water for a billion thirsty people; it is a matter of national security for them.

    As DonF noted, China prefers to trade for natural resources with other countries. They do not want to impose their culture/government on others; they are just interested in the trade for natural resources that their people need. Getting the resources is the priority, and anything else would be wasting time.

    China has very big problems — over 1 billion people, and keeping them employed. The situation is much worse than what is reported (due to censorship). They are working with much urgency to try to deal with their internal problems.

    Why are we worried about GOOG, rather than our own problems? Our exploding deficit, our loss of manufacturing, our disappearing middle class. At least, China is working on solving their problems. We don’t even admit that we have problems.

  • Bob March 24, 2010, 6:29 pm

    Awesome, AWESOME, TREMENDOUS, BUSTIN – GREAT commentary!!!!!

    Rick – lots of great work and this one is a keeper!

    . . and though Google may not be perfect, and the guys who stand up for the right don’t always get applauded, rewarded, or even respected, but we are – the world is in a major battle of ethics, morals, (legalese), etc., and every little bit of effort and every step in the right direction accounts for a lot – more than most ever realize, and what Google (hopefully & apparently) and now what Rick has done recognizing this, is for sure a very significant thing and for me and my house – a damn good mark in the whole picture / battle. Hopefully a good number of people will learn of this (kind of thing) and public opinion and then international perspectives & relations will be affected and improved. The high road is always the right & best road. Thanks.

  • mario cavolo March 24, 2010, 5:39 pm

    Fabulous post Rick…and raucous, fabulous responses too!

    First of all, on your point of China telling the U.S. to take a hike, yes this is in fact what I see in the cards more than anything. There will be no warm and fuzzy “we are the world” crap from the Chinese…they are sneaky and have an agenda and they are quiet about it, very scary stuff…..the writing is on the wall and the world needs to quickly figure out which side the global bread is buttered on; the China CASH CASH CASH side plus the China property bubble wealth side. Yes, yes it is bubblicious, but all readers must understand that it can and most likely will continue for many more years here. Let’s visit our local Mr. Wang again, doesn’t even speak Mandarin!..his family home purchased for $20,000 now worth $120,000 NO MORTGAGE…multiply that by ONE HUNDRED MILLION…I’m not even talking about the upper middle class or rich or super rich here. Come on folks, my job is for you to clearly know the new reality and this IS IT for China.

    Your comments about Tibet are rhetorical nonsense…George Liu, professor for 15 years at world famous Chengdu #1 Medical University ( I lived there on campus for several months back in 2000)…they were installing millions of dollars worth of education upgrades/satellite feeds into Tibet for all university courses, etc…genocide?…no…education…try America where you have LESS freedom on a daily basis than in China…FACT…with the exception of freedom of speech…criticize the govt and I’m outta here, but what’s to criticize?…they are improving most everything these years…as said by many, they are no more corrupt than any other…

    Benjamin, nice comments….the only way government can protect you and the kids is to take away the means entirely….so here in China for example, they insist upon taking away the means….guns for example, they are NOT allowed…..I thank God for it every day of my life here in China, to live safe and calm and quiet on the streets, to be able to honk my horn without fear of being SHOT…to live in a lower income neighborhood with NO low-life gun-weilding drug dealing gangs to destroy the community and make me live in fear. Yes, boys and girls, I sacrifice some freedoms of speech here to enjoy those fabulous benefits daily.

    Biggest problem in the world today – China and America – BOTH have become countries run by the elitist rich…self-serving bastards…the Boao International Tourism Forum this week here on Hainan…goal?…to make this tropical island a destination for the elite rich….sound familiar?

    Cheers all, Mario

  • ricpent March 24, 2010, 5:09 pm

    Wow! Great article. I’ve been reading everything I can on China. (For 30 or 40 years now). Time seems to be drawing near for outright condemnation of all of China’s policies! But it seems that the indirect method would be the way to go. FREE TIBET FREE TIBET FREE TIBET

  • coolsaint March 24, 2010, 4:32 pm

    If you think america is any different then the chinese ,well SHAME SHAME SHAME The US government is the most corrupt in the world . Try and get on the bad side of the US government and see if you don;t disappear .

  • JAL March 24, 2010, 4:13 pm

    Although I agree with your philosophical point about personal freedom and authoritarian regimes, Google knew this before establishing itself in China, and had contractually agreed to behaved a certain way. They proceeded to blatantly break their contractual obligations, showing poor businessman-ship IMO. They are now looking like a bunch of power-tripping teenagers. If they didn’t agree with China’s demand, then stay out. Don’t go in for a while then behave like a bunch of Goldman-Sachs-ers.

  • DonF March 24, 2010, 4:00 pm

    Total BS China bashing! Yea for Saint Google! BS BS BS!!! China actually BUYS other countries’ resources around the world (granted the deals may be one-sided) rather than the US method of starting wars under the banner of anti-terrorism, freedom and democracy, then steal the resources and give them to their global corporate cronies. You only need examples of this if you have been deaf, dumb, and blind for the last thirty years!

    What is suddenly so wrong with Chinese imperialism? Aren’t they just following in the very well trodden footsteps of the Japanese, Americans, British, German, Spanish, French, Belgian, Portuguese, and a long list of etceteras.?

    Google temporarily has a successful business model. It has risen so fast that the people at the top have not fully integrated into the amoral corporate model of the predominating top 1% in the US. They will. GS and Halliburton come to mind among so many others. You are all kidding yourselves if you believe economics had nothing to do with Google’s decision. Businesses do not get that big by being moral.

    With respect to China and Tibet, does the US really have the moral high ground? Let us ask any impartial Native American, or Vietnamese, or Iraqi, or Iranian(first government overthrown by the CIA), or Afghani for their opinions. (Sorry for omitting all the South American dictators installed or aided and abetted by US.) Sorry, I could not find an impartial spokesperson from the above group.

    A closing quote from http://freedompool.org/HouseQuote.htm

    Edward Mandell House had this to say in a private meeting with Woodrow Wilson (President) [1913-1921]

    “[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a National system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be non the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor or to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”

  • Benjamin March 24, 2010, 4:00 pm

    When this story first broke, I had to take a moment to “ha ha” the meme of prosperity-without-consequences that had being hyped up over the years. But I’m glad Google has decided to push this, and stand up to the Chinese government. Their kids are growing up without any knowledge of Tiananmen Square, among other moments in their country’s history.

    Ah, but Google… It “looms over us all” almost as a power unto itself, if it isn’t already one. Can _they_ be trusted? After all, Google does not constantly fight/win the battle for free speech and personal privacy, and indeed they have succumbed in some ways to the dictates of the Nanny state through increased (and profitable) cooperation. But that we have powerful, influential, and “rich” governments is the cause of that concern, not a big corporation such as Google.

    Nonetheless, I see that Google (or some competitor) will smash the Great Firewall of China. And in the wake of that, maybe the Chinese will rekindle an enthusiasm for learning history and learning from it. Which is also to smash the corruption and ignorance in the West, likewise lifted up by a reborn enthusiasm for history and therefore curioisty about the modern day that it leads to.

    S David 03.24.10 at 3:57 am: “But why hasn’t Google stood up and made themselves accountable for all the sad and monstrous atrocities that perverts of the western world can access with the click of a mouse?”

    http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/8243/

    “In all countries it is important to keep a careful eye out for abuse; nevertheless offensive material should not become an excuse to violate this fundamental right.”

    Because it’s not their place to and even if it was, there is no way they can take the time to screen so much content. Whose responsibility is it to police for those truly sick individuals who are bound to utilize the internet just as all people utilize oxygen? We, the users of course. The only way government can protect you and the kids is to take away the means entirely.

  • jacques March 24, 2010, 3:59 pm

    “China is a place where dissenters disappear from their homes in the middle of the night, and whose authoritarian government has embraced a particularly brutal form of genocide to achieve its goal of subjugating Tibet. Since invading the country in 1949, imperial China has killed nearly a fifth of Tibet’s population and destroyed 6,000 monasteries.”
    – Quite similar to what the US is doing in Iraq. Puppet government. Millions of refugees. 1.5 million dead. Assassination
    of any opposition. Nation building? No. Takeover. Yes.

    “In China, the whole system is predicated on the unwritten agreement that people will tolerate the Communist Party as long as it can deliver 7%+ growth per year.” – The Communists have been in power since 1949 and most of that time have delivered
    no growth. Mao wrecked the ecomomy more than once. Communists are still in power. What unwritten agreement?

  • Francisco Almeida March 24, 2010, 3:48 pm

    .

    Yes, Google did it in style !

    Yes, I agree China is a bad guy, but …

    In Iraq the US killed 1,5 million people, so …

    Is there any western moral authority for pointing a finger to China’s much smaller brutalities ?

    In Vietnam were 3 million, plus 55k US soldiers …

    .

  • Mike Eck March 24, 2010, 3:22 pm

    Yes, it is great that Goo stood up to the Chinese government…now if they would find enough backbone to stand up to the US government, we will have real cause to celebrate.

    S David, Do you really need someone to do your censoring for you or could it be that you want to force your will upon me? Self censorship is the only legitimate form of censorship.

    Mike

  • Antonius March 24, 2010, 8:29 am

    You say China could recover, but I’m not so sure about that. That might be true ten or twenty years from now, but if the US were to enter the Greater Depression, say, tomorrow, China would be completely devastated. There simply isn’t enough internal demand to make up for the loss of exports to the American market, and there won’t be for a long time.

    In the US and other Western nations, there will be a lot of anger and some social unrest, but there won’t be any revolution. Governments will fall, but only to be replaced by the opposition party. In China, the whole system is predicated on the unwritten agreement that people will tolerate the Communist Party as long as it can deliver 7%+ growth per year. If the US market collapses, thousands of factories will be making goods nobody will buy. Tens of millions of people will be out of work, and the CCP will be unable to provide the sort of growth that people have come to expect. Everyone, from the peasant farmer forced off his land by greedy bureaucrats, to the unemployed factory worker who faces no future back home on the farm, to the university graduate unable to find a decent-paying job, will realize that it is no longer in their interest that the Communist Party remain in power. And many will realize they have nothing left to lose.

    Social and political stability requires that the US market remain able to absorb all those Chinese exports. If the US falls, China will fall too.

  • Daman Prakash March 24, 2010, 5:43 am

    Appreciating firmness displayed by Google alone would not help. All brave men and women get applause but never get backing of masses.

    If US citizens really appreciate what Google has stood for, they should individually decide and restrict their buying of ” Made in China” products for a while. This will entail sacrificing few dollars more but would certainly serve the cause of human rights better. Even a fraction would help.

    Chinese know that they have already monopolized production of many consumer items by aggressive policies on price front and control of their currency yuan. They have eliminated competition and are playing to consumer psyche of cheap products. Human rights takes a back seat at individual level when confronted with a choice to pay slightly higher prices for a product manufactured by non Chinese sources.

    Innumerable men and women gave their life to achieve human rights. We applaud them to forget what they stood for. Small gestures at individual levels are always lacking in support and substance to efforts by few brave.

  • Goerge March 24, 2010, 5:03 am

    Lest we forget – who helped China build itself up but our Wall Street friends who saw an autocratic country with union-busting wages as the perfect place to move wealth via the old stock-price-rises-while-cutting-expenses-and-filling-your-own-buckets-as-the river-of-wealth-flows-out-of-the-US. When the US goes to war with China, all Wall Streeters who have benefited handsomely from that original transfer can be the first to go fight to preserve the freedoms of the country they back-stabbed.

  • Charles Duke March 24, 2010, 4:07 am

    Excellent piece

  • S David March 24, 2010, 3:57 am

    I am not sure to what extent China’s censorship would extend.

    But it tells me if China can have certain content censored, so could the rest of the western world (ie kiddie porn sites).

    Yes, good for Google to stand up to China.

    But why hasn’t Google stood up and made themselves accountable for all the sad and monstrous atrocities that perverts of the western world can access with the click of a mouse?

  • Simit Patel March 24, 2010, 12:18 am

    i don’t think google’s actions in china can be properly understood without understanding google’s relationship with the NSA and the US intelligence community at large. google is very happy to censor certain topics. their censorship policy is related to their political allegiances, not to a desire to serve the truth.

    i recommend watching the four and a half minute interview below:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMHyjRjyzRQ