Gold Revving for Pop to $1245?

Having spent more than a month in limbo, gold now lies just inches from triggering a potentially explosive rally. Before yesterday’s sharp surge, disappointment in the form of leaden price action had dogged bulls since early March, when Comex futures failed by a hair to surpass an important prior peak after trending higher for five days. A Formula 1 racer might as well have blown a head gasket a hundred yards from the checkered flag.

According to our proprietary Hidden Pivot forecasting method, a healthy rally re-energizes itself by surpassing two prior peaks with each new thrust.  So far in 2010, however, gold has conspicuously failed to do this on its daily charts. Now, however, the June Comex contract has a chance to blow past no fewer than four prior peaks without taking a breather, and to develop enough thrust in the process to all but clinch a test of last December’s all-time high at 1230.00.

To be sure, we have detected no underlying weakness in bullion, even if it has been reluctant to pop to the next level. If it were otherwise, pullbacks would have reached their Hidden Pivot targets.  Instead, selling has dried up well short of the targets, and the subsequent rebounds have been relatively strong. The recurrence of this pattern in recent months has bullish implications, and they are corroborated by anecdotal evidence suggesting that physical gold has been difficult to buy in quantity whenever prices have dipped below $1100.

What to Look For

Now to specifics. The chart above shows that June Gold has risen without correcting since March 30, when it bottomed at 1102.40. With yesterday’s push to 1154.20, the rally has surpassed two peaks, but it need rise only a further 17.70 to exceed two more. That would create a powerful impulse leg indeed, leaving the June contract in excellent shape to sprint to at least 1245.60 before even a short breather would be needed.

We should mention that the Hidden Pivot Method provides the most powerful and accurate forecasting tool we’ve come across in more than 35 years of trading. You can judge for yourself by visiting our archive. It is open to paying subscribers, but a free seven-day trial available by clicking here will give you access to all Rick’s Picks features and services, including the 24/7 chat room, educational pages and a detailed description of the Hidden Pivot Method.

(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • Mitch April 10, 2010, 10:34 am

    Hey Rich,
    You care to explain why silver went from 20 to 8 when I could not find an ounce to buy from any retailer? You know why? There wasn’t any. Yeah, keep chirping away. Your c**p on GLD/SLV is insulting to anyone with half a brain. You don’t know anything concerning the topic of PM’s.

  • Rich April 9, 2010, 2:43 pm

    Agree Gary
    So many positioned for higher prices,
    we may not see them ere long.
    All the corporate government debt, spend and tax
    intervention into markets bound to fail.
    Only savers may survive…
    Regards*Rich

    &&&&&&

    Deferred learning … some of the young adulthoods don’t understand economic and social policy … they don’t understand that the depression has begun.

    &&&&

    OP
    Loved #5 so much, looking to sell opening strength today.
    BP noted bonds and precious went up together the last decade, so no reason they can’t go down together…
    Regards*Rich

    &&&&&

    Retail’s doing so swell, GS decided to foreclose on the Tiger Apology location, location, location…
    http://www.cnbc.com/id/36307421

    &&&&&

    Mark & Rick
    Also liked http://www.financialarmageddon.com/2010/04/just-like-2007-2000-1987.html
    Regards*Rich

    &&&&&&

    Must see for sentiment reality check:
    http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1463714869&play=1 5:29

  • Guavasofts April 9, 2010, 11:30 am

    Your views on this topic are really interesting and give a clear cut view. Thanks for sharing the knowledge.

  • gary leibowitz April 8, 2010, 8:15 pm

    Lets try and decipher this move. It has moved in line with most commodities, yet again. That suggests demand increases and/or supply shortages. It does not suggest an end-of-the-world scenario at all. In fact the dollar is doing just fine and so is the stock market.

    The last time gold moved up in sync with stocks and other commodities they all fell when stocks crashed.

    Call me cynical but a deflationary spiral, even with a possibility of world turmoil, does not always translate into a run to Gold.

    I believe we are nearing the peak in stocks. The SPX could hit 1270 or so but not much more. The debt/borrowing/spending formula of the past 6 decades will be broken soon.

    The real test is when the stock market falls hard. Will money exit all commodity bets? we shall see.

  • Rich April 8, 2010, 6:53 pm

    Always tough to draw lines in the sand.
    Scepticism toward new highs in gold might be bullish anywhere but here, where posters are more market savvy than say, ZH, to pick one at random.
    Most ads and sites exuberantly bullish Smedley Golim precious, seeing inflation behind every news release, buying all precious dips, generally a pretty good sentiment indicator of lower prices to come.
    Only gold scarabs seem more rabid than oil bulls, to pick a more useful commodity that is going up.
    People in thrall may do strange things.
    Previously disclosed the experience of twice accepting the other side of Peter Grandich’s $50,000 and $100,000 wagers that gold would close above $1200 before below $1000, and his repeatedly taking them down and disappearing them. Now see that he and his sponsor are parting ways: http://grandich.agoracom.com/
    The truth will always out, sometimes sooner rather than later.
    Gold and silver may in fact go to new highs sometime, not likely soon with so many bulls. (Check the lopsided P/C open interest on GLD, SLV and related stocks.)
    Precious has a lot more than a wall of worry to climb with COMEX defaults, counterfeit tungsten gold, financial alchemy seeking to turn photons into precious metals, a monetary base contracting -89% this last year, and a money multiplier below one at 81%.
    Looks like we’re on the last gasp train to Clarkston, so bought some ABX puts. Time will tell…

  • FranSix April 8, 2010, 3:41 pm

    India may import more gold on a per capita basis, and publish thoroughly questionable statistics on the matter since the complexion in the bullion market has changed radically since the collapse of jewellery markets. If the COMEX is obliging cash settlements on gold futures contracts in the form of GLD units in lieu of physical delivery, and the IMF itself is refusing to sell gold to buyers demanding any gold they propose to sell, there is a very strong argument for bullion bank illiquidity.

    This goes far beyond any scrap recycling statistic conjured up to promote the illusion of supply over demand.

    • Robert April 8, 2010, 7:28 pm

      “If the COMEX is obliging cash settlements on gold futures contracts in the form of GLD units in lieu of physical delivery, and the IMF itself is refusing to sell gold to buyers demanding any gold they propose to sell, there is a very strong argument for bullion bank illiquidity.”

      – Add to that Jeffrey Christian’s confirmation (revelation?) at the March 25 CFTC meeting that the major “physical” gold markets (LBMA and COMEX most notably) have a leveraged paper contract to real metal ratio of 100 to 1….

      Fractional reserve commodity markets? Doesn’t that defeat the purpose of the physical commodity exchanges in the first place?

      I mean, can I sell corn that hasn’t been grown?

      So it seems there is a legal, legitimatate way to buy “physical” gold that actually looks remarkably like a flat, white, wood fiber product embossed with
      ink. Funny, but I thought “Physical Gold” meant that I was buying a coin or bar of a rare yellow metal.

      I mean, what’s next? How about fractional reserve Cattle futures:

      “I have this cow for sale, but I can’t/won’t deliver him to market, so instead I’ll sell a piece of paper that “guarantees” that the cow I’m selling actually exists- the “buyer” of the cow must pay me the current market price for the paper, and will agree via contract that I will keep the cow on my farm until such time that the buyer chooses to drive out to my farm and demand their cow from me- at which I will deliver:
      a) A cow, but not necessaritly THE cow that they agreed to purchase,
      b) A replacement piece of paper that guarantees the buyer an even BETTER cow if they will wait a little longer, or
      c) Their original purchase price, plus an additional 50 bucks if they agree to keep quiet about the fact that I’m not really a cow farmer at all”

      Gold is Gold, Cows are cows, paper is paper, and promises are worthless…

      Wall Street has to be the MOST intellectually retarded place on Earth- and I don’t mean that in a derogatory sense- I mean it in a literal sense.

  • mario cavolo April 8, 2010, 3:17 pm

    First of all, it seems way too soon for this gold/silver big breakout to be coming along unless gold finally starts being regarded increasingly enough as a genuine safe haven asset indicated by it rising with the USD when the proverbial S$%T hits the fan and capital starts moving out of the risk asset classes. That could be happening and we’ll know soon.

    Secondly, trying to gauge how good a student I am, I’ve heard one thousand times over that the stock market LEADS the expected economic future state by at least six months and up to one year. That being said, this rally in risk assets is then – TOAST. The most likely state of the global economy six to twelve months from now does not have any analyst, economist, statistician, forecaster or other guru leader talking head that I’ve heard expecting joy and sunshine for six to twelve months down the line from here….sideways at best.

    So then….? Enlighten me otherwise with other factors not considered here and their impact…

    Rising spreads, rising yields, rising risk, U.S. subprime resets coming soon, China must tighten and is, oil priced too high…none of this sounds good for the world economy…no way it can last; it was a sentiment rally and its toast and if I would ever dare to tell an investor what to do I’d say get the heck out of all longs with cash long in the USD/AUD/CAD, and if you’re more aggressive, short the EURO/YEN, plus look at the variety of possible short positions to enter in the various asset classes.

    Cheers, Mario

  • Daman Prakash April 8, 2010, 5:03 am

    I have learnt and benefited from your touts reflecting price action in Gold and silver.

    In today’s commentary, I share my experience as physical trader in India on following comments:
    Quote:
    “The recurrence of this pattern in recent months has bullish implications, and they are corroborated by anecdotal evidence suggesting that physical gold has been difficult to buy in quantity whenever prices have dipped below $1100.”

    Unquote:

    We have not experienced any difficulty in sourcing any quantity of Gold at lower prices.

    I can also add that despite media claims about growing Chinese liking for Gold it will take them years to challenge India’s status as world number one consumer of physical Gold. We are probably only country in world where dependency on import is total as we neither have mines nor have large refinery facilities and rely on Imports for physical Gold.

    If there was indeed any difficulty in sourcing Gold, it should have been felt by us first. All our suppliers know our compulsions of total import dependency. Premium charged by foreign suppliers have also been benign at sub 1100 prices further vindicating that supplies were smooth at sub 1100 levels.

    However I do believe that Gold prices still can go up even if physical demand doesn’t emerge at higher prices. We have never seen any evidence of immediate direct link between price of Gold and physical demand in India at a given price point or technical levels. The perception about physical demand and supply visits much later after the fact in terms of periodic observation in media and regular GFMS and WGC reports.

    &&&&

    I’d intended to qualify the statement about tight markets below $1100 as a London phenomenon, since you have commented on this whenever Andy M. has mentioned it. Thanks for the input. RA