Goldman Suit Exposes Big Banks to Legal Firestorm

Now we learn that the SEC split 3-2 over whether to go after Goldman Sachs in court. Supposedly, the regulatory agency prefers unanimous votes when bringing enforcement actions against the firms it regulates. Why the exception this time?  The Wall Street Journal made it sound like it was simply partisan politics that carried the day – i.e., the SEC’s two Republicans voted against suing Goldman for civil fraud, but the three Democrats prevailed. That is superficially what happened, and it is as much of the story as the SEC is willing to divulge right now. But it’s bound to leave many observers, particularly Obama-ites in Congress who are out to pillory the bankers, with the impression that the two Republicans were merely looking out for their fat-cat buddies on Wall Street. This thought occurred to us as well, so we’d have to concede it is at least possible.

But might there have been another reason why the Republicans backed away from bringing formal charges against Goldman?  We think there is and that it goes to the heart of the corruption in which the world’s largest banks have inextricably trapped themselves. For if you assert in a of court law that Goldman defrauded its customers, you have implicated every bank in the big leagues. Enabled by their respective central banks to create loans from thin air, every one of them – even banks run by otherwise spotless Swiss Burghers — have played the same Ponzi game as Goldman.  Now, regardless of whether the charges brought against Goldman are civil or criminal, they will open the door to an endless flood of litigation with the potential to bring down the entire banking system.  From this point forward, Goldman will be fair game for every aggrieved city, county, state, sovereign fund and class of investor with whom Goldman has done business during the last decade.  The same goes for Bank of America, J.P. Morgan, Morgan Stanley, Deutsche Bank et al.

Lynch Mob

So it’s just possible the Republicans put politics aside when they voted, in effect, to quietly sanction Goldman behind the scenes. It must also have occurred to them that it would ultimately be impossible to mask the overwhelming stench of Goldman’s actions. The firm, after all, did sell an investment to the public that had been furtively created by someone betting on the portfolio to fail. There is no way Goldman can talk its way out of this one, although that hasn’t stopped CEO Lloyd Blankfein from trying. With Goldman reporting a spectacular $3.4 billion quarter yesterday, he might as well have tried to explain to a lynch mob that he has never, ever kicked his cat and that he always helps little old ladies cross the street.

Some see the charge of civil, as opposed to criminal, fraud as reflecting a compromise engineered by Mr. Obama to help expedite his takeover of the financial sector. “He stirs up the masses with yet another example of Wall Street greed and fraud,” wrote one contributor to the Rick’s Picks forum, “but offers nothing more than what amounts to a fine to his friends at Goldman. We all know how deep their pockets are. They are quietly happy that this is the extent of the fallout.” While this seems plausible, it doesn’t reckon with the fact that just one civil suit is capable of triggering a chain of events that could conceivably put the world’s largest banks in mortal jeopardy for years to come.  If they should somehow dodge the bullet, it would be evidence that the corruption that permeates the banking system has engulfed our judicial and political systems as well.

(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • cameroni April 22, 2010, 4:47 am

    And speaking of Banks….

    Several weeks ago I wrote a letter that was published on Rick’s Pick’s under the banner “Canada won’t escape drag of the slumping US”. Since that time there has been a torrent of media analysis of Canada’s housing bubble from both within this country and from US media. There has been a surprising and candid response by the Chief Economists of TD Canada Trust and the CIBC, two of Canada’s large banks. Who knew that Rick’s site was that influential?

    There is clearly a keen interest in the US though about the state of the Canadian economy and until now, few have questioned how we Canadians have achieved so much, so fast and turned in such an impressive economic performance, particularly as it occurred during a major global downturn. These additional remarks will hopefully shed some light on those questions and while written for a Canadian audience will likely resonate with our Southern neighbors who have already seen this story played out in their own backyard.

    Within days of the publication of my letter to Bob Tor, a Rick’s Pick’s contributor, US bondholders of Canadian bank debt began demanding a risk premium as it became clear that a housing bubble was indeed forming in this country. The big four Banks here in Canada have now responded by twice raising mortgage lending rates over the past three weeks in order to cool the Real Estate market. The Governor of the bank of Canada meanwhile has strongly hinted of increases ahead for the overnight rate and analysts now speculate those increases could add up to 2 percentage points or more this year alone.

    Inflation pressures in this country since the sub-prime meltdown have been primarily driven by the sharp increase in home prices and consumption related to housing construction. This of course was the result of cheap money policies enacted to stimulate consumption and drive the economy here as it appeared we we, like our American friends, were also headed for a deep recession. It was successful.

    Too successful. Our recession never came and instead Canadians borrowed, bought and spent as if it were the best of times. That is now expected to end as a cooling phase has begun. Meanwhile, our dollar has now gone above parity and is worth more than the Greenback creating new economic risks as it now coincides with escalating interest rates. We have entered uncharted territory in Canada. My additional commentary now follows:

    With recent interest rate increases and a rapid rise in home listings in the hot markets, slowing sales in others, a chilling signal has been sent and the tide is turning on the Canadian real estate scene. I sense there will be an abrupt change in buyer sentiment as the new costlier reality begins to sink in and a panic wave of listings as sellers suddenly find they cannot get out. Domestic concerns about rising interest rates, persistently high unemployment, a much speculated on dollar at parity to the Greenback and regulatory changes being introduced by government and CMHC (Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation is our version of Fannie Mae) are now impossible to ignore unless you live in a cave.

    There is uncertainty all over the globe as well that can and will affect our markets and our ability to sell products abroad at current prices. The number of risks at play now are mind-numbing. Nothing can be taken for granted anymore. There is no status quo that can be relied on as sustainable. The risk of sovereign defaults is an example. A Euro that could spin out of control if the likes of Spain, Italy, Portugal, Greece and a raft of others cannot get their domestic economies under control.

    Britain meanwhile is in hock to it’s eyeballs with it’s own real estate markets looking to continue their free fall again in the face of rising taxes which could put that whole economy at risk. The US continues to deflate while parts of China are in a massive real estate bubble caused by cheap money and their own stimulus. What the Chinese have done is pour gasoline onto a fire and we can hardly imagine the consequences when it all unravels. The Japanese meanwhile are facing the specter of a Yen devaluation and possible hyper-inflation while German coffers are strained as it struggles to prop up others and come to grips with some of it’s neighbors going broke.

    Every one of these problems should be taken into consideration before taking on a massive personal mortgage debt. Why? Because of global interconnectedness. Because of the risk of contagion. Because we lean on each other and if one falls all could follow. If the message has not gotten through yet, debt is the poison that the whole globe is drowning in right now and more of a bad thing cannot possibly be better for the average Canadian.

    But those are only some of the looming threats. Some suggest that US commercial real estate could yet collapse the financial markets while others stay focused on the potential for more derivative unwinding. Which one of these triggers will be the one that takes down the whole house of cards? Nobody knows but any single one could do it. These are dangerous times. These are times to start stocking the larder, not buying into mortgage slavery. It is time to eliminate personal debt, cut back on non-essentials and get prepared for what is almost certainly going to be a financial hurricane and potentially a devastating deflation of asset values in this country. It will be epic.

    For those who want to take the bullet for the nation though and help plump up GDP numbers so our Country can continue to crow about it’s economic strength, it’s low debt to GDP ratio and strong banking sector, then go for it. Best of luck. Some of us know better.

    There are just so many compelling reasons to avoid buying most Canadian real estate right now, and so many more reasons to sell into this bubble and take profits if you can. You often hear the term “Timing is everything” and for those lucky enough to get that timing right the payoff can be tremendous. But timing is difficult to judge for most people. We are harsh when it comes to criticizing those who have called market tops too early with scant praise for those who got it right but in the wrong year.

    Nonetheless, a trend is a trend and with clear evidence of a bubble fully formed in the R/E market and dozens of worrisome indicators casting shadows over the road ahead it is only fools who cry about having lost potential gains, about not having drained the last bit of juice out of a doomed market. So if you took heed of the warnings to sell your home and got out alive, albeit a little too early, then don’t worry. Consider yourself one of the lucky ones. The smart money has already bailed out of this market. Time has run out for everyone else.

    So we are now at a crossroads in Canada. Our so-called economic strength has been built on the backs of an army of mostly young inexperienced real estate buyers who drove GDP numbers through home purchases, home services and consumption related to the construction industry. The kids have accomplished in two short years what no government could ever do; spend other peoples money like drunken sailors without a whimper from the media, the tax paying public or the banks.

    And vast numbers of them made us all proud by gorging on mortgage debt. Much of it is guaranteed by the Government through the CMHC (that means you and me of course). There were of course sane voices warning of the risks but they were drowned out by agenda and a media drunk on a torrent of factual lies spit out by the likes of local Realtors with little more than a grade 12 education.

    We truly have had a great success here in Canada. We are the marvel of the world with what appear to be strong banks and a vibrant optimistic economy, strong GDP numbers and low relative debt. It all looks good on paper but pulling the curtain aside you see there is another reality. A generation of Canadians who financed our economic marvel by borrowing and spending and driving the costs of the single most important investment in life to dizzying heights. By accepting mortgage slavery voluntarily and with gusto. And no warnings could stop them.

    Too many folks have mortgaged their future from ignorance of the risks. From some perspectives though the stimulus and dirt cheap money incentives have been spectacularly successful towards creating the impression for the rest of the G7 that we are the pillar of strength. What nonsense! Just feathers and fur. As in the US Canadians have borrowed heavily against the newfound wealth in their homes. We bought new cars and trucks, cottages and lake front properties, overseas holidays and gadgets. All from money that only existed in terms of vastly inflated real estate, (some lucky few do feel fat and rich though for having cashed out and are now enjoying our strong currency). We have collectively gone deep into debt with lines of credit and credit cards buying things we never needed but could not resist because it all came so easy. Too easy. Now it will all have to be paid back.

    In some corners of government and finance it was actually believed that if we could just hold on long enough it would all be OK. That easy low interest rate policies would be needed just long enough to get us over the hump. That the recession would pass and no real harm could come of the low interest rates. Granted, some of the kids would be in deep but overall it was for the good of the country and if employment held up, particularly in the home services, retail and construction sectors then all would be well. Government could bail out the real basket cases like the auto makers if only the army of consumers like you and I would do our part by borrowing, shopping and keeping everyone else buoyant and employed. It is a compelling argument actually. Too bad it was wrong.

    Unfortunately the economic whiz kids did not look outside our own borders when considering this ruinous idea nor consider the threats a high dollar might pose. Nor were the dangers of eventual (and guaranteed) higher interest rates fully accounted for. Quite frankly, many of the best minds in this country labored under the same belief many Canadians still hold; that housing prices could not truly fall and that even if they did it would not be for long. We have after all seen recessions come and go and prices have always bounced back.

    But there is something different this time around and that difference is the staggering debt levels of governments, corporations and individuals all over the globe. The difference is that we were piling on debts during a global recession as we watched one country after another lurch from crisis to crisis with some now on the brink of default. What were we thinking? That we could save the US economy from deflating? That we Canadians might rescue the Euro zone by going deep into debt here at home? What nonsense. The whole exercise has only led to damaging speculation on our currency that is surely going to destroy what remains of our manufacturing industries and lead to unemployment that will rival the estimated 22% jobless in America right now. Let’s not forget that for every position in manufacturing there are two or three jobs spun off in the service sector. (So who needs haircuts anyway, I’ll just grow it long again like it was in the 60’s, no problem)

    And it is not as though we did not know we were already too indebted. The Vanier Institute for example has been warning for many, many years, since well before the sub-prime meltdown, that Canadians were digging a debt hole for themselves. They now report the average Canadians debt to income ratio stands at 147% and that number will surely grow on average if unemployment numbers increase. But who are they to tell us our business? Just some stale old think-tank guys and gals in suspenders who don’t know good opportunities when they see them! I am sure they would enjoy the last laugh if only they were not so disgusted that they’re warnings were falling on deaf ears.

    The debt to income picture is especially dismal when you don’t have any income to speak of. So while it is a good thing that the real estate markets are now cooling we can only hope that there is no major interruptions in our countries commerce or day to day business brought on by events outside our own borders. With luck we can slowly dig our way out of the massive debt pile that was accumulated in the name of fighting off other debt problems. Like GM, Chrysler, the Banks etc. Does anyone see any irony there?

    I am not optimistic though and sadly, the road ahead does not look to be paved with gold. The greater health of our country now rests on decisions we cannot control in countries we may have never been to. Appearances are that a race to the bottom is underway with currencies large and small all over the world. A global deflation may well be in the cards. This is not a race we can win as heirs to massive untapped natural resources nor at a time when commodities rule the markets. It is surely time to get our house in order. To start paying down debts in a serious way and I for one cannot feel any sense of ease at the number of threats to our economic well being that are now percolating outside our borders. A real estate correction is welcome but it is only a starting point in bringing some sanity back to this country. Some soul searching is in line too. We need to revisit our value systems from less heady days. And we need to take cover. The worst may yet be ahead.

    Cam

  • Bernard Ebner April 21, 2010, 7:11 pm

    Whatever happened to being innocent until proven guilty?

    &&&&&

    Innocent of what, pray tell? RA

    • Steve April 21, 2010, 8:46 pm

      What does one say when the banks and congress confess in the court of the united States (the court is the house and senate floor) to High Treason under standing case law, stare Decisis, res Judicata, to constitutional breach against Article I, sec. 8, cls. 5, Article I, sec. 10, cls. 1, Const. A.D. 1787 under military colors (read; Veterans of Foreign Wars, and call the State Department on Flags and Seals)? Everyone is innocent until they confess in open court (once again a confession in the court of the United States, for the united several States) Once guilty by confession in open court, there is one appeal to the office of President of the de Jure Federal Government. In that Obama is a de Facto office holder 28 U.S.C. 3002(15) [foreign corporation A.D. 1872] in confession in the court of the united States, what can I say except “The People by their quiet assent allow the lawlessness to continue.” The People owe only one debt to the Federal Government and that is to defend her against all enemies both foreign and domestic. When an official confesses in open court to Treason, it is the duty of the Citizen to execute Due Process of Law. (once again we are at the problem, the people like PORK from a legislator more than they like Peace and Dignity) I didn’t make the Law and I may not like enforcing the Law, but; a Citizen is required to protect the Peace and Dignity of Free States – which failure is why we are where we are.

  • Steve April 21, 2010, 6:25 pm

    Find a criminal case regarding the imbasement of Coin with brass, then one can indict the offices of the president of a foreign corporation, 28 U.S.C. 3002(15)[corporate U.S.] for High Treason in administrative abuse by the commander in chief. If that case also talks of sending commissionaries out with commissions to force loans; that would be icing on the cake; against the congress. And if one could find case law indicating that the government was implicit in inquiring by force who may be forced to take loans; one might have the Native Coup of touching a downed enemy.

    We were based in two theories long ago.

    First; a Man could never be taxed off his land by a tyrannical governmental form.

    Second; that all commercial activity/sales in excess coming from a Man’s land were taxable, but; nothing that remained on the estate could ever be taxed.

    Then commeth the banker, and fee simple absolute[feudal – I suggest you get out your feudal deed on your place] to replace Allodial; and a scheme under interstate commerce to tax corporate enfranchisee persons created territorially by the 14th amendment.[anything a U.S. citizen does is ‘deemed’ internal commerce, subject to taxation, and subject to Article I, sec. 8, cls. 3 commerce power]

    HERE IS THE REALITY;
    The People by their quite assent allow the lawlessness to continue, [S.C. united States of America].

    HERE IS YOUR CASE LAW:

    The Trial of Thomas Earl of Stafford, Overlord of Ireland, for High Treason, Case No. 150, 3 T.Howell, A Complete Collection of State Trials (1812) at 1382.

    The constitutional citations are:

    Article I, sec. 8, cls. 5
    Article I, sec. 10, cls. 1
    Title 31 [criminal public policy to imbase and steal]
    H.J.R. 192 (1933)

    Obama has confessed to High Treason in the court of the united States, as well has Reid, Pelolsi, and every one of the 535. Every banker, and act under the Banking Act of 1913, based in the 14th, has confessed to High Treason according to the Law in imbasement, forced loans, and inquiring against private estates by commission/agent/agency.

    Do not worry about Law, Order, Peace, and Dignity; it does not exist. We get what we deserve, and that includes me because I understand the totality of the corruption. Worry about a civil trial for Goldman, when in fact the D.O.J. confesses to supporting the terror of an anti-constitutional banking scam that is by Case Law high treason. [d.o.j. is in breach of fiduciary obligation for beneficial use of trust office, but; who can prosecute the d.o.j. when the congress is the whore in high treason ?]

    We will not go to THAT level of truth because the people do not want to know the truth. It is better THAT the propaganda of the government allow everyone to just keep things as they are, and BE HAPPY, oh happy day that Goldman is going to pay a fine.

    There is a movie in which Jack said something like this TRUTH; YOU DON’T WANT TO KNOW THE STINKING TRUTH. Beautiful thing propaganda – I don’t need to address the crimes, and obligation to put forth trials against the high treason of the congress. Heck – why I don’t even need to vote in someone Honest, just give me a guy who brings home the bacon.

    Thanks for letting me tell a little tale Rick !

  • cameroni April 21, 2010, 6:04 pm

    I suspect there are more than a few documents lingering from the days the Republicans were in power that could quite conceivably be dredged up and put on public display implicating the Bush Government in some of the deception. Court cases and public commissions tend to send the rats scurrying and blame is plentifully shared all round. Past administrations always have a vested interest in keeping some skeletons firmly locked in the closets they were put in. God forbid a judge demand damning documents that bring to light the extent of a manipulation that might jeopardize the hopes of some Republicans and insiders in the next elections. Perhaps this is just what Obama and his team are hoping for. The discovery of that juicy bit that assures them a second term.

  • max keiser April 21, 2010, 5:38 pm

    Remember the “Wisdom of Crowds” on the way up?

    Now it’s the Madness of Mobs on the way down.

  • donniemac April 21, 2010, 4:31 pm

    Very interesting times we live in!
    In the 30s, banks were allowed to fail and we had a disaster. So what did scholars like Bernanke learn? That allowing banks to fail in an economic meltdown causes a depression.
    In the meantime, the corrective actions – lending regulations, etc. – were abolished or made toothless and protective devices – e.g. FDIC insurance – were allowed to erode through inflation. So when the crisis came under Bernanke’s watch, not allowing the banks to fail proved to be almost as bad as the 30s.
    Interestingly, we had an economic and banking crisis back in the 80/90s. Those institutions, savings and loans, were allowed to fail. FDIC (actually it may have been a different alphabet agency) stepped in and did what it was supposed to do as set up 40 or so years earlier. And the banking regulations and regulators had some bite, so the crisis was not allowed to get but so large.
    I know that protecting us from stupidity and avarice through regulations is a hot button for many on this board, but we really need to find that middle ground of regulations that allows private entities room to grow and prosper without allowing those same entities to run rough shod over both the ignorant and those who do not have the means to properly protect themselves.
    As the GS litigation winds it way through time and becomes history, it will be interesting to see what unintended consequences will be forthcoming.
    P.S. From my point of view, the economy is percolating just fine, I just hope it gets enough private footing before the spigot of federal funds gets cut off.

  • Mercurious April 21, 2010, 4:19 pm

    A lot of discussions on topics like this remind me of an empty theology more concerned with angels on pinheads than the pinheads who concocted that drivel.

    Who cares what the political split was? What difference does it make what “message” was being sent, or what nuanced shot across the bow was intended? A utilitarian view would just ask, “What’s the likely outcome of similar developments?”

    I think this whole thing could get away from the Masters of the Universe cadre that infests Wall St. and Washington. They know more about the surface of Venus than they do about what is going on out on the hustings. They are going to “control” this situation as they have everything before. After all, they’re still on top and in clover, right?

    There are subterranean dynamics already at work that could produce some extreme results, far away from just the markets. We are waiting for just one iconic event to light the fuse of a bigger Black Swan than even the ones we faced over the past few years. Never underestimate the possibility of things going over the cliff just when you need that the least…at least, if you’re the one trying to manage it all to your own exclusive benefit. Off with their heads…

    • Jim April 22, 2010, 4:55 am

      “Off with their heads!!”
      My favorite phrase these days!

      &&&&&

      If only. But I guess we can always dream… RA

  • bill April 21, 2010, 4:02 pm

    C’mon guys…Mario is right, this is nothing more than “summer theatre” for the gullible. They will haul the banksters before congress, beat them with wet noodles, force them to give up their pocket change to pay the “fines” and accept their heartfelt apologies. In the mean time Obamacare slips into the back ground and hopefully cap and trade can be pushed in under the cover of this misdirection.
    If the day ever comes when several dozen of these criminals are seen swinging in the breeze on the White House lawn and several thousand are locked up for life..THEN and only then, will WE have change we can believe in.

  • FranSix April 21, 2010, 12:50 pm

    Was reading in the National Post yesterday evening how Canada’s largest pension fund was clamouring to “insure” the mortgage market here. I would say that the conswervative minority in Canada opened the doors to the greatest pump and dump ever, first, by propping up the banks and relaxing regulations on lending, and then allowing the same kind of mortgage CDO abuses to occur here. Now, THIS is what you call a no-brainer.

    What most people won’t acknowledge is that building up a massive package of credit default swaps in mortgage CDO’s in 2005 – 2007 was clearly a risky bet, unless you believed that the discount rate would decline. If interest rates and/or prices moved against you, you would have gone bust.

    The illusion is that Paulson & Co. went into this bet without any risk, when actually they are part of a cornering of risk, or forming a risk cartel with others making the same bet. When you sign to a mortgage, you no longer own your own risk, somebody actively trades it and accumulates it into great pools of risk.

    What preceded the onset of financial crisis was a lengthy period of short term rates being higher than long term rates, effectively making borrowing short and lending long in the corporate bond market a license to print money. Going against that would have been seen as foolhardy.

    As you can see, the discount rate peaked in late 2000, and again at the beginning of 2007.

    http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=$IRX&p=M&b=5&g=0&id=p45163948136&a=191116053&listNum=2&listNum=2

    The start of the financial crisis is clearly yr. 2000, which has been ongoing for ten years. When they say that the U.S. accomplished in a few short months what Japan took 12 years to complete is sheer journalistic nonsense.

    • FranSix April 21, 2010, 10:39 pm

      Forgot to mention, that faulty CDO’s were sold primarily to pension funds and municipalities in the U.S., so if you’re a pension fund in Canada holding all the risk and trying to sell your no-brainer-set-to-fail mortgage CDO packages, just who tha heck are you supposed to sell them to? Hm???

      &&&&&&

      Maybe Goldman et al. will buy them back? Incidentally, Blankfein is claiming that Goldman’s culpability is diminished by the fact that the firm lost $90 million on the Paulson portfolio. In fact, that sum reportedly represents the piece of the deal Goldman was unable to sell to investors. RA

  • John Wilson April 21, 2010, 12:24 pm

    What amazes me is that it is a civil suit and not a criminal suit. How does a regulatory agency explain that it is not criminal to observe fiduciary responsibility , but it is a civil offense? What the banks did in their ponzi scheme, which was endorsed by the powers that be in Washington , is criminal.
    The government has endorsed corruption with a slap of the hand (similar to the small fine the B of A paid) , and told the American people that the money changers are the Gods of America. Serfdom has never looked so obvious since Obama came to power. Watch the rise of the United Socialist States of America, where the government and banks pickpocket the citizens, and tell them that it is good for them!

    • Robert April 21, 2010, 8:19 pm

      @ John Wilson- Bravo.

  • Edward0 April 21, 2010, 11:35 am

    “For if you assert in a of court law that Goldman defrauded its customers, you have implicated every bank in the big leagues.”

    I think this is spot on. And I said as much in my own blog last week.

    “The cat, as it were, is now out of the bag. The powers that be are almost certainly engaged in concocting yet more sham justice, but, in so doing, they have, in essence, admitted that which they have heretofore assiduously avoided admitting, namely that the system is rotten.”

    And it is rotten to the core. And for the purpose of making a larger, and what I hope crucial observation, I’ll reference an entry from another blog.

    http://www.oftwominds.com/blogapr10/gaming-system04-10.html

    The implications are clear, that TPTB have now created an incredibly perilous situation, by allowing the rot to permeate they are now in a box. Address the rot and risk utterly collapsing the system, continue playing “game the system” and insure that the next calamity is of such a magnitude that no remedial response, even if opted for, will assuage the trauma that accompanies it.

  • Other Paul April 21, 2010, 5:16 am

    The Fed Members’ View:
    Round 1, 2008: Bailouts from the Treasury or else the whole system goes down.
    Round 2, 2009: Here’s your money back, Uncle Sam.
    Round 3, 2010: Let us continue making money OUR way, or else we go back to Round 1.
    Round 4, 2011-2030: We’ll settle the hundreds of CIVIL lawsuits (ala Tobacco litigation) while continuing to make money OUR way. You want to go the CRIMINAL route, we go back to Round 1.

    Wildcard I: The Fed really is abolished and banks are nationalized (Don’t let a crisis go to waste approach; and one less major bulletpoint in the 2010 and 2012 non-Democratic national election platforms’ Power Point presentaton.)
    Wildcard II: Pitchforks, torches, bricks, broken windows.

  • mario cavolo April 21, 2010, 5:00 am

    …Rick, you’re on a roll, you’re last few essays better than ever…it was the last sentence of this one which spawned my reaction; “If they should somehow dodge the bullet, it would be evidence that the corruption that permeates the banking system has engulfed our judicial and political systems as well.”

    Surely your rhetorical question, as how did it all get this far if the corruption wasn’t already permeated throughout banking, judicial and political systems in concert together? Of course the judicial part sits and does nothing until the politicians or attorney general’s ask them to. But that would spoil the party. So why now? Because there has been a sort of unspoken or even specifically discussed sense that all have to now sufficiently lined their coffers, and that the public has had enough. Their strategy is simple; We’ve screwed over the country, we’ve lined our pockets with some wild number over 100 billion in profits just in the last year. Now we play the public blame game, start with the obvious GS and trickle down from there. We pay fines totalling a few billion, blah, blah, blah to placate the people and show justice. Some reforms take shape. Whoopie doo. We have our billions of profits we’ve already made. We did good!..very good!

    It will be as it now is Rick: a controlled, managed public lynching and retribution, just part of the needed show and PR campaign.

    Disgusting…human nature proven over and over again in history…the scorpion and the rabbit…the innocents suffer the world over at the hands of these fu*&^%#rs.

    Cheers, Mario

    • Robert April 21, 2010, 8:15 pm

      Right on the money, Mario and Rick…

      Also consider that as public disgust and contempt of this corruption boils over, it will no doubt create more pockets of “potential domestic terrorists”, also potentially labeled as “honest, liberty loving freedom fighters”.
      We can expect that the “corruption club” will sic their armed lap-dogs to dispatch these groups as they propagate.

      The truth, turned inside out, can then be used to persecute the honest and truthful.

  • Benjamin April 21, 2010, 4:33 am

    Here you have a private firm (and by implications, all such banks) that was allowed to take advantage of the taxpayer, with the blessing of a government that decidedly has come to hate liberty and the Constitution.

    So the obvious solution is to take out the private sector in a manufactured witch-hunt. After all, it’s proven itself corrupt beyond measure and if given the chance, they will only continue to wreck the good intentions the government (whom we all know, when left to manage every aspect of our lives, has _never_ steered us wrong).

    As for the useless partisan politics…. what does it matter? If the the three had gone the way of the two, or vice versa, then we’d still be in the same prison.

  • TKO April 21, 2010, 4:22 am

    As usual, Rick is right on the money with his insights into Goldman and its affairs. I can envision the hordes of recently excessed corporate lawyers, out of work immigration counselors, class action jurists—ambulance chasers of every stripe and persuasion lining up for the carrion. However, GS has plenty of defenses. The Salesman’s Defense–Caveat emptor–they were offering this crap to “investment professionals” who should have known better. The Mercantile Defense–they were just marketing a product to entities willing to take opposite sides of the trade. The Patriotic Defense–they were enabling the national housing policy of placing every citizen in a McMansion regardless of race, creed, color, or financial and mental capacity. The Capitalist Defense—Hey it was profitable. The Adolescent Defense—Everyone was doing it. The Religious Defense—This, too, is part of God’s work!
    They beat the rap and/or the consequences are trivial imho.
    Yes Rick, the market appears to be bomb proof with a top only coming after several days of panic buying—a real spike. GS stock exhibits the same strength, which brings me to the point of this long rant–to wit– barring a 10 for 1 stock split you have a date with destiny in Times Square ten months hence! Regards.

  • Martin Snell April 21, 2010, 2:32 am

    Personally I find the 2 dissenting votes to be incredible. Those 2 obviously must be holdovers from a time when the SEC was and was expected to be a toothless tiger. Weren’t they also the ones that voted against investigating Bernie Madoff because it might “rock the boat”, and against going after Enron because it might hurt the accountants?

    The best thing that could happen for the system would be to see the SEC start to bring and win some big cases. It might also put the word restraint back in bankers’ vocabularies.

    The last few years ion the markets has been like watching a football game where the refs are blindfolded and someone has stolen their whistles. Sure there are rules, but no one is following them. Interesting game but I’m not sure it is football.