Testifying on Capitol Hill, The ‘Nank Said…What?

With The ‘Nank in the hot seat on Capitol Hill Wednesday, our good friend Doug – “the savviest financial advisor we know”  – called to ask whether we were seeing any signs of a paradigm shift on our charts. That would be logical, he said, since the Fed Chairman appeared to be preparing his Congressional inquisitors and the news media for nothing less than The End of Quantitative Easing. Our own reading of Mr. Bernanke’s intentions, based on news reports, was that he was preparing us for more of the same, although he did pay lip service to the idea that, at some point, the Fed would have to tighten. Dow Jones wire service paraphrased him as follows: “[Mr.] Bernanke…sought to reassure lawmakers the Fed wouldn’t allow inflation to take root in the U.S. by waiting too long to tighten monetary policy, but gave no indication he is ready to do so right now.”  Although The ‘Nank’s bloviations were much less opaque than the cryptic double-talk we used to hear from Mr. Greenspan, they didn’t provide much reason for us to think that monetary austerity is about to become an actual policy option any time soon.

Whatever the case, there was no paradigm shift evident on our charts. T-Bond futures, for one, did not surge to create a bullish impulse leg on the hourly chart (although they could conceivably do so today, so we’ve reserved judgment).  We credit the Dow Industrial Average for having read the Nank’s performance just about right, ending the day up an insignificant seven points. That is not to say traders failed to give the Fed chief his due. In fact, they added a little buying frillip at the close that hauled the blue chip average out of the red, where it had languished for the previous four hours.  It also extended Wall Street’s latest winning streak to eight days, providing the news anchors with a positive note for their one-sentence wrap-up of yet another sunny day on Wall Street.

Are You Ready?

Concerning the prospect of an end to quantitative easing, if you think that would be a good thing, don’t get your hopes too high.  In the first place, there is no reason to believe ‘The ‘Nank has stopped using the housing market as his yardstick for measuring the supposed economic recovery.  Under the circumstances, he is not about to tighten, since it would turn a real estate market made fragile by the financial equivalent of pancreatic cancer into a corpse. In the second place, although we’ll concede that ending QE will be necessary to put the economy back on track, doing so will initially throw the nation into a deep depression. Are you ready for it? We didn’t think so. The fact that stocks barely budged yesterday suggests that no one else is either.

(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • Steve February 11, 2011, 9:57 pm

    Fact – + 50% support democratic corruption. This is unlikely to change until bread costs go up up up up, can you say Egypt. Yet, if we look at Egypt they are not fighting to create Freedom, but; the right to serve a corporate democracy in Fee, fife, feod, feud, peon, serf, slave. The Rights of the individual no longer matter under the corporate structure. Now, tell me whatcha gona do?

  • John Jay February 11, 2011, 8:13 pm

    From all the comments on this and other “government is the problem” posts by Rick, it seems obvious more and more Americans are ready for a big, big change in the way this country is run.
    We all agree on the problem, that’s step one.
    If we continue to debate possible solutions we can reach a consensus, and then decide on a course of action.
    Eventually the right thing to do will be clear to us all.
    We already have a virtual “Committees of Correspondence” thanks to the internet and web sites like this one.
    Hopefully it is not too late to salvage our Country!

    • DG February 13, 2011, 8:29 pm

      John Jay:
      I disagree with your statement “We all agree on the problem (being big government)”. I agree with you, but the size of government is staggering, implying that a massive number of folks are all in with the big government program. Cisco stock got creamed Thursday last week when they implied softer sales in the future and a concern that one of their customers would likely decrease in the future. That customer? Government —22% of Cisco sales. I was stunned with the size of sales which went to govt (don’t follow CSCO that much anymore as it has been a decade long dog with fleas). A quarter of their business is our tax dollars. Now do you think the Cisco lobby is going to take shrinking government lying down? How the heck will they keep giving their management hundreds of millions in bonuses decreasing sales by reducing their number one customer? And do you think that government purchasing agent is paying the lowest price for that equipment? (right – it is probably as profitable as the drugs supplied to medicare – off the charts). So not only will a shrinking government kill sales, but destroy profits….in places that seem “private”.
      It is FUBAR and systemically intractable because there are too many powerful hands on the steering wheel. The irony, though, is even companies like Cisco, who benefit from the corrupt nature of the system, still cannot benefit their shareholders….GE? same story. Corn farmers in Iowa. It is a long list and very depressing. It will only end when the water is drained from the well, not due to outrage, as justified as that outrage is.

  • Robert February 11, 2011, 6:10 pm

    Als0- regarding the debasement curve- consider that the “magic line” in the income tax code today is 250K per year.

    How can anyone dare to assume that the money masters aren’t setting things up so that the majority of Americans will soon be earning 250K plus, thereby guaranteeing that the tax-pig will get fatter and fatter?

    This is all about sleight of hand. If you believe that the Magician is truly super-natural, then you are a sucker who deserves your bread and circuses… and no more.

  • Robert February 11, 2011, 6:03 pm

    The puppet-man went into the shoebox theater yesterday and talked of his folly in the wonderful world of false-economics.

    same-o, same-o

    The Fed is only buying treasuries to reduce interest rates, but they are “being careful not to disrupt the bond market”…?

    Say again?

    Treasuries do not adhere to basic supply-demand fundamentals- they are of infinite supply. There is no “market” for US Treasuries, because the demand will always be whatever the supply requires it to be… That is the Fed’s guarantee to the world.

    The only thing the US is successfully creating in excess these days (and is thereby exporting the surplus) is higher prices on essentials.

    But, Bernanke assures us it is not related to the Fed’s policies. It is all related to weather.

    I think my brain is going to explode.

    There are only two directions things can go from here on a “super-macro” level :

    1) The rest of the world complacently allows the price rises until standards of living globally are all centered around a level and fair global price structure on all things.

    or

    2) The rest of the world (mostly China) finally figures out that the US is out to screw them, and they start dumping Treasuries, forcing Ben to buy all the new issuance that his BFF’s at the Treasury are cranking out PLUS all the new supply coming in from disenfranchised sellers…

    Current events in Egypt and across the Middle East should tip you off to the liklihood of number one being viable.

    Regarding number 2- remember that when people sell US Treasuries- they are paid in US dollars, so those dollars will have to be spent immediately, so ANYTHING that acts as a viable liquidity sink (aka a store of value) is going to be in accelerating demand in such a scenario. Real Estate COULD be a good option, but the real estate would have to be priced in dollars, leaving the US as the most likely target, but the more foreign buyers that come into the US real estate market, the more likely state, local and federal legislation will reduce the ability of foreign ownership for speculative purposes. So where else will the dollars go?

    You simply can’t look past the fungible requirement of your core wealth managing instruments over the next 10 years. If you do, then you will certainly find yourself one day as the Millionaire who is wearing rags.

    You think that’s impossible? Hah- just consider that a 10k per year salary in 1970 only supports the same standard of living as a 100K salary today, and the rate of this divergence is going parabolic. It will not take 40 years for the next 10x move. The debasement trend suggests it should take 10 years.

    The only thing that will stop it is a massive, Rick Ackerman style deflationary collapse, and such a deflation can only happen if the Creature from Jekyll island gets a sword through the heart first.

  • Benjamin February 11, 2011, 2:17 am

    Steve and Everyone…

    Steve: “There is no need to argue that the Act of 1985 re-established Specie Money and the ‘value’ at 1 Dollar, and 50 Dollar ‘value’ Eagle. What needs to be argued is the fact that the masses don’t want Lawful because that would mean responsibility without the limited liability of democracy and anarchy.”

    RE: One dollar, fifty dollar.

    Um… Said who? Would it be any different if the queen of England just up and decided that the national currency was +/- x% over the previous year? Does it matter that we elect our tyrannts?

    I maintain and will continue to maintain that regulating the value and fixing the weight and measures is not the same as determining them. If the Framers had meant for Congress to determine the weight of a dollar, they would’ve said that. So, the only way the new weight works without seeming to violate the Constitution is to butcher language. Thus, tyranny “regulates” everything these days, when it is in fact determining all.

    But what’s the dang difference, you (and everyone) ask?

    Allowing Congress to determine to the weight gives them infinite ability to over-ride opposition. Don’t want to engage in military adventerism to “nation build”? Don’t want “free” healthcare”? No problem. Congress will just do it anyway, by re-establishing the dollar weight to suit their purposes. Want to break people of their savings because they could do with a lesson, for their defiance? No problem. Up the weight! One dollar = TWO ounces of fine silver, until we decide otherwise. Crush them, and let the private banking establishment oversee them in their debt slavery!

    But with that power in the hands of the people, EVERYTHING changes.

    For one, people wouldn’t weigh the dollar high unless absolutely necessary (war or great natural disaster), for the reasons stated above: They would want to hold their savings. Which means, most of the time we retain personal and collective power to commit more price inflation (through retaining most of our savings) in greater amount than Congress, who, by virtue of the fact that we save, has far less. Also, our saving keeps the debt managers from ever doing more than honest banking. They cannot become overseers keeping us in debt slavery.

    Therefore, we’d have the veto power that JohnJay seeks through that “fourth branch”, which is best described as the people casting their votes through the Mint. And until we can do that, we are not living in rebellion. That Congress established a new weight means we still live under tyranny. It is meaningless.

    I am not sure if Ron Paul realizes there is difference. But I’ve no reason to expect that he would be against it. As for people in general…

    The reason people are not out using eagles is simple enough to see: They didn’t determine the weight (and consequently, the Mint is always struggling with shortages. Hmm…). They can buy the coins, paying the steep cost because of the shortage and rising gold/silver price, but then what? They don’t know. They only see an investment into a “bubble”, where they know to look at all, and so they pass.

    So, what people need to be taught is not that they are rebels, but rather that that one ounce coin, say, is worth as much domestic currency as there are atoms of pure element in that coin, or as little as only one very small portion of the entire supply (ie, entire supply = 1 dollar). They need to learn that THEY decide how many dollars an amount of weight and purity creates, by what they coin at the Mint and then extend to government as credit.

    And in case anyone is wondering…. How would we coin a ridiculously small amount, like a microgram of silver? The same way that Gold Money and Bullion Vault do things: Allocated ownership within a single, large bar. One could credit government by simply declaring as such whatever weight they have and want to credit.

    • bozzy February 11, 2011, 10:42 am

      Amazing passion, demonstrating that many Americans do still have a pulse.

      Amongst the outrage and logic, there remains a question alluded too above. Exactly what should be done? “Austerity” may be a popular word, but we shall reap the whirlwind by this path, just as surely as by applauding and maintaining Ben Bernanke in his flight of academic fancy.

      I am not in a hurry to see insurrection widespread throughout the world – many innocent lives would be lost. The regional conflicts which would erupt would take decades to reslove. The warmongering administrations and arms manufacturers would shake hands with the bankers once again and freedom would be the victim.

      I was drawn to the the idea of a a plebiscite, mooted here at Rick’s Picks.

  • Rich February 10, 2011, 10:21 pm

    With Rick, the only paradigm shift I see is inflated debt Fed Fiat and Fiscal operations sowing the seeds of an even greater depression. Stay tuned and prepped as a sea of red presents the markets’ verdict on the Mubarak non-event (New Boss same as the old Boss)…

  • VegasBob February 10, 2011, 10:06 pm

    Regarding Bernokio, there are two certainties. First, the man cannot foresee the consequences of any of the Fed’s policies. Second, Bernokio is a pathological liar.

    Whenever the subject of Bernokio is raised, I am reminded of Harry Truman’s comment about Richard “Tricky Dick” Nixon during the 1968 presidential campaign: “…a shifty-eyed g****mn liar…who talks out of both sides of his mouth and lies out of both sides too.”

    • mikeck February 11, 2011, 12:59 am

      Wow! Truman spoke that much truth…too bad he did not add something along these lines, ‘just like all politicians who preceded me, myself, and likely all of those who will follow.’

    • DonF February 11, 2011, 3:10 am

      The agenda of the bankers and their politician stooges: Steal as much as possible without being noticed. And if noticed, pass the blame onto the scapegoat of the day: Muslims, drugs, Mexicans, terrorists, queers, HIV, H1N1, Communists, Chinese, currency manipulators, Socialists, the other lying politicians. The list goes on and on.

      The bankers solution for the economic problems they think we don’t know they created is the one world government. Iceland, for one, just might not go along with their plan. Iceland has already arrested and jailed some bankers.

      WE must ensure that Bernokio has his day on the gallows. Strike that. I mean his day in court.

  • David February 10, 2011, 9:13 pm

    Re: CPI–it conveniently omits: Food; Energy; Education; Medical; and Housing. Let’s see, what does that leave? Basically whatever you buy at the local Walmart or big-box store. Those are all subsidized by low-paid labor overseas, esp. China. I know, I’m (perhaps over-) simplifying, but wow.

    Re: Secession–That was tried about 150 years ago. 630,000 corpses later it was determined that we can’t do that. “When Johnny comes marching home again, hurrah…” So much for self-determination.

    • redwilldanaher February 10, 2011, 11:04 pm

      “Re: Secession–That was tried about 150 years ago. 630,000 corpses later it was determined that we can’t do that. ”

      – What do you mean to say exactly? Can you expand on this please? Thanks.

    • DonF February 11, 2011, 3:03 am

      “Secession”
      Oh, is that what you call the Great Lincoln Lie?

      Maybe you’ve been reading revisionist history. Unfortunately that is continually force-fed to us all. Try “Lincoln Unmasked” by Thomas J. DiLorenzo.

    • Steve February 11, 2011, 6:45 am

      It is all history in the possession of the winner. The North went into rebellion in 1861. The Senate and Congress are still in rebellion under the Reconstruction Act of 1867 a.k.a. The 1867 voter scam is miliary. For Crikey sakes look at the colors flown by the Commander in Chief over your state governments. It is military power, not civil power which controls the rebellion of the people. Wake up ! Please !

  • David February 10, 2011, 8:57 pm

    John Jay,
    Interesting proposal. But frankly, I’m a little afraid of a constitutional convention. Knowing how many power-hungry types are out there, this seems like too juicy an opportunity for them. Can you imagine how many sharks, piranhas, and barracudas would be swimming in those waters? Just a thought.

    • John Jay February 11, 2011, 12:31 am

      David,
      We have slid so far down the slope of tyranny in the USA we need to do something fast to get the Federal government under control.
      They ignore the Constitution as a matter of everyday policy now anyway.
      I trust in the good sense of three quarters of the states to do the right thing, and since nullification is all the rage at the State level now, it is an idea whose time has come.
      Tribune of the People, or an Amendment that allows a vote by three quarters of the States to veto any law Congress passes, or S. C. judgement, we need something along those lines as soon as possible.
      We are bankrupt and have a Federal government that views the people as their enemy.

  • mikeck February 10, 2011, 8:16 pm

    Thanks Red, and ditto. “Us: OK, well it is and here’s why… Oh and by the way I’m leaving anyway. Farewell with it.” A polite way of saying Molon labe?

    Steve,
    “means that you have never cleaned up the messes created by YOUR “. . .fellow man. . .”.” True, but only because my fellow man can vote to dictate control of my life…their irrational belief in authority makes it near about impossible to clean things up at this point.

    “Anarchy works where there is so much expanse that no man sees another.” Thomas Pain would disagree with you…see below quote. BTW, I also disagree. Growing up in North Alabama 60+ years ago put me very near anarchism…we survived.

    I did not find your quote, but I like, and believe, the following one from Mr. Paine.

    “The instant formal government is abolished, society begins to act. A general association takes place, and common interest produces common security.”
    Thomas Paine

    • Steve February 10, 2011, 8:53 pm

      Yes, But in context Mr. Paine was talking about the Feudal System of England when he wrote. Paine was indicted by the feudal system of Britain and fled. In real terms Mr. Paine could be talking about the current governmental form in the federal corporation. It is probable that I summarized Paine to the point a search would not be successful. Will look and requote instead of summarize. In my belief Man is best when there is no earthly King as in King George I, II, III, 43, or King Barrack 44, and acts responsibly in the Common Law where one is held accountable only when he damages another directly, or damages property directly. This is why Bernanke is such an affront to those who are self governed, and so loved by those who wish to be kings. Then there are the persons who will fight to be slaves.

    • Steve February 10, 2011, 8:56 pm

      I’ll add this also. I grew up on the Banks of the South Umpqua River in near Freedom, and traveled/moved to Alaska in 1978 staying until about 1987, my last year fishing in Bristol Bay. There was no anarchy in my youth, but; great freedom to be responsible and not harm others.

    • mikeck February 11, 2011, 1:52 am

      Steve,

      What I think of as anarchy has nothing to do with complying with the wishes of others unless that is my desire…who has “authority” to tell you and/or me what we can and cannot do when our actions do not step on their toes? That is the main problem I have with government…it ends up being majority rule and treads on my rights.

      I think Mr. Paine WAS “talking about the current governmental form in the federal corporation.” Who, among us on this blog, thank you Rick, cannot predict what out grandchildren will be faced with?

      It must be the river influence, I was in the Tennessee River Valley…at the time it surely contributed to my sense of freedom.

      All the best,
      Mike

    • Steve February 11, 2011, 6:36 am

      And there we have final agreement. No one has a right to say what we do unless we commit an offense against an actual Man, or his property.

  • Steve February 10, 2011, 6:16 pm

    Figures don’t lie, liars figure. 53 years since unemployment dropped .8 over the course of 2 months. ‘Hedonic adjustments’ Can joe sixpack understand the term ‘hedonic’?

    Yet the remaining and all telling unasked question has been and will remain nullity. How can something like the federal reserve, which is utterly null and void constitutionally, remain a force enforced by threat and intimidation by an alphabet agency?

    The simple answer is because that is what the majority of this democracy want, and joe assents to that outlawry. Red, all of you here; it appears you are really getting it right. Yet, each of the suggestions, like ‘avoidance’ has its limitations in that one can only avoid for so long, or only do so with limited exposure to gain (commerce) by some means.

    Ron Paul should know what needs to be done. Is he just a smart man moving slowly to dismantle an anti-constitutional democracy monetary scheme, or is Mr. Paul a dolt for not telling the truth? There is no need to argue that the Act of 1985 re-established Specie Money and the ‘value’ at 1 Dollar, and 50 Dollar ‘value’ Eagle. What needs to be argued is the fact that the masses don’t want Lawful because that would mean responsibility without the limited liability of democracy and anarchy.

    Benanke is disingenue and inauthentic, as is Ron Paul. Which one is good, and which one is bad I do not know. All I know is that hiding the truth, limiting the truth, coloring the truth, is the same thing under the Mosaic Law. It is really quite simple. The democracy and congress is utterly null and void. We need no succession from the union, the democracy is a ‘Nullity’. Now whatcha gona do?

    • mikeck February 10, 2011, 6:32 pm

      Given a choice, I would chose true anarchy any day over a police state and interventionist policies. To oppose anarchy is to show a total lack of faith in our fellow man and a worship of government.

      “If men are good, you don’t need government; if men are evil or ambivalent, you don’t dare have one.” — Robert LeFevre

      “If you’re waiting around for “government” to pass a “law” giving you permission to be free, then: a) you’ll be waiting a long time, and b) you’re not even free inside your own head yet. As long as you are begging any master to endorse your freedom, you will remain a slave.” Larken Rose

    • redwilldanaher February 10, 2011, 6:52 pm

      “Now whatcha gona do?” – Secede still. Then raise the fact that the democracy and congress are null and void. Nothing like a secessionist movement to raise the profile of that info and there’s no reason not to shoot for peaceful secession regardless. And then, if the State capitol gets out of hand, my county will secede. And then my town if necessary. And then my neighborhood if need be and then my property if it must be so.

      Us: Your so-called democracy is null and void.

      Them: “No it isn’t.”

      Us: OK, well it is and here’s why… Oh and by the way I’m leaving anyway. Farewell with it.

      As for mikeck’s comments and qoutes: GREAT JOB!

      Deo Vindice!

    • Steve February 10, 2011, 6:55 pm

      milkick, Anarchy like communism in its pure form is the best of governmental forms. One is personal government, the other organized government.

      Experience dictates that; “To oppose anarchy is to show a total lack of faith in our fellow man and a worship of government.” means that you have never cleaned up the messes created by YOUR “. . .fellow man. . .”. Anarchy works where there is so much expanse that no man sees another. Communism works when there are no people. The conclusion is delusion unless one removes man from the equation (this the Al Gore theory of practice).

      In agreement with “Larken Rose”. Sorry I don’t have the quote anymore, Ya Got It – Thomas Paine – ‘An Englishment will fight to remain a peon serving a king’, and will refuse to fight to be Free’.

    • Steve February 10, 2011, 7:26 pm

      Red, nullity is peace. Succession, you have the answer already in history via the War of Northern Aggression. (maybe this is all words instead of meaning, ie: succession in your view=nullity in my view) Look to Texas v. White, or is it White v. Texas which states a “new texas” (my belief ‘territorial texas’) cannot leave the union. This ‘theory’ violates Article I, sec. 1 of the Oregon Constitution werein the People retain the right to ‘abolish’ the government. (conflict)

      I agree with both you and mil that ultimately anarchy in its pure form for the individual is the only answer in Order to be free. The issue then becomes who’s anarchy is the ‘right’ anarchy because all will need to conform to that ‘anarchy’ to have peace. Your anarchy will attack my anarchy to create peace by elimination. Therein one now has government based in what is ‘true anarchy’ because one must walk to the same drum, if not to the same music. Today we face world religous anarchy based in private ordinaces that were outlawed 2000 years ago, thus; the Jew, the Christian, and the Muslim fight. All three claim the same Authority, and yet operate with different ordinances created by men based upon a belief in their ‘power’, not “authority”.

      I believe anarchy to be self-government for the individual, ie; “Laws of Nature”, which when put into a society become individuals acting under the “Laws of Nature”, but; in conflicting ways that lead to distructive forces. Family is the first step away from anarchy because family is a recognized governmental form that is held together by a leader. We had Patriarchal family, matriarchal family, and now getriarchal goverment. I make my anology by walking through a grocery store and seeing who is in charge of the family government. (please don’t jump on me here because I know the majority in this thread are not like that)

      I’m going to stop because this discussion could, and should go on for months and with reams of paper. Where is the “Rule” one will follow under the various thoughts put forth here, as very good thoughts, leading to a Law that says “What a Man does that does not injure another, or another’s property is HIS BUSINESS and no others? That is where we were 200 years ago. Who’s anarchy against that idea now function in real time?

    • anon February 13, 2011, 7:15 am

      Hi Steve, Will you elaborate on why you say “How can something like the federal reserve, which is utterly null and void constitutionally …”

      While I don’t like our 3rd central bank, I fail to see how it is unconstitutional for Congress to sub-contract to a private firm some of Congress’s work. Congress still has oversight and the power to repeal the Fed authorization.

      Quick legislative solution is to allow competition in currencies.

      Thanks!

  • Tim February 10, 2011, 6:08 pm

    The problem to me seems as awfully simple as this –

    Once you paint yourself into a corner by taking decades worth of bad decisions in a fundamentally bad money system, you aint got much room to move. Any way is the wrong way.

    Take the UK for example which is famously doing the right thing and going the other way from the US with austerity. Its either now apparent or soon will be that in a debt based society with both the gov. and its citizens up to their necks in red ink, austerity albeit the right choice is not really an option. As always the problem comes back to fractional reserve banking and the necessity to infinately expand the debt in order to stop collapse.

    What really gets me is that for the media this either seems a concept unknown to them, or in the very least a subject on which they cannot write. BUT this is the crux and its high time people started talking about it.

    Continuing the status quo with fractional reserve money means no solution but massive deflation what ever happens in the long run, the only question being whether we get (hyper)inflation first.

  • T'inker February 10, 2011, 5:20 pm

    Spell-check solution: write your comments in any text editing program and then copy and paste here. I did this with Open Office which is free to download and at least par to MS Word.

    • mikeck February 10, 2011, 5:31 pm

      Tiny spell is also a good solution…free download and it works almost anywhere you are working, even in email subject line. http://tinyspell.numerit.com/

    • bozzy February 11, 2011, 10:23 am

      Par? Naaah – show some religion – it{“(‘?)”, “”}s incomparably better, but deep repsect for the carefully assembled moniker.

  • gary leibowitz February 10, 2011, 4:14 pm

    The only option Uncle Ben has is to calm the credit markets by declaring the Fed is the backer. No other option is available.

    The best outcome would be a bout of inflation, rather than severe deflation which would result in all sides losing.

    My money is still on deflation winning out, even though current economic data suggests otherwise.

  • Rick February 10, 2011, 6:29 am

    Thank you for your trenchant comments, Erin. I’ll ask my webmaster about spell-check, but I seem to recall his saying long ago that it wasn’t an option for the WordPress publishing application that I use. Alas, even if it were, it wouldn’t correct the ubiquitous error of using “it’s” as a possessive pronoun.

    • Alexander Pope February 10, 2011, 12:19 pm

      Hey Rick – that(‘?)s a bit “eats(,?) shoots and leaves” isn’t it?

  • Benjamin February 10, 2011, 6:22 am

    “[Ending QE] will initially throw the nation into a deep depression. Are you ready for it? We didn’t think so.”

    That probably explains this little doozy I read the other day…

    http://finance.yahoo.com/banking-budgeting/article/112029/what-is-the-us-governments-credit-score

    Q: Are they good for thier debts?
    A: I cannot tell a lie… Their credit will never be better than it is today!

  • Erin February 10, 2011, 6:06 am

    First off….It was very disappointing to see Paul Ryan so overmatched. He clearly has no game at all and does not understand the monetary side of things. A few charts instead of the stupid newspaper article he pulled out would have helped him a lot more than opening his mouth. It pains me to say this..But the brainiac (a superintelligent, villainous alien) toasted him!
    We have a problem in this country right now in that the brainiac has the money to keep propping up the equity side and pretend that things are getting better and the general public (no disrespect intended) remains clueless as their retirement accounts continue to rise to the heavens while they pile trillions of dollars of debt onto the backs of the American people.
    And how much longer do I have to listen to the talking heads from the administration telling us how much profit their making with GM, Tarp and the AIG scams? How do you fight this crap until the next meltdown comes? Are we really that uneducated as a society to believe that things are getting better while we exchange debt for rising stock prices? I remain perplexed by the complete ignorance of our society!
    One more thing…Why is their no spell check on this entry page Mr. Ackerman? When I get angry I can’t spell and I have to keep going to the dictionary and it really slows me down. I have a lot of anger to get out!

    • Benjamin February 10, 2011, 6:36 am

      “I remain perplexed by the complete ignorance of our society!”

      You’re in good company, Erin. But I wouldn’t say ignorance is entirely to blame. More like fear. If QE was stopped and we were thrown into deep depression (and it would happen). Then we’d have to think of a solution that didn’t involve anything else than hard money and new ways to work with it (which is “laughably barbaric” because we all know gold is good for nothing).

    • bozzy February 10, 2011, 12:21 pm

      Erin, what you say.

      Salut!

    • redwilldanaher February 10, 2011, 4:59 pm

      Hi Erin, I don’t think you can fight it. I think you have to circumvent it. I don’t rate the brainiac as highly as you do. Ron Paul put the brainiac on the spot and the brainiac perjured himself on recorded video that anyone can see. As awful as he was, I think Easy Al had more gray matter firing to aid his equivocations and snow-job creations.

      As far as education, I thought as you seem to be at one time before I realized that TPTB have intentionally under/miseducated folks and then burdened them with many other items as well so that most of them haven’t the resources to see the truth.

      So the ignorance is by design as well as the maintenance of it. We have a centrally planned economy and stock market now.

      If Paul Ryan were really worth anything, he wouldn’t have proceeded as he has since it’s just a “tougher” face on the same ol, same ol.

      The real demands he should make on the ‘Nank are: Prove the constitutionality of the FED and prove that it is federal and that it has reserves. Prove that it isn’t owned by foreign interests that are antithetical to those of the American people.

      Anything else is a continuation of the Great Con and merely a charade of a lesser kind as are all in our times.

    • redwilldanaher February 10, 2011, 5:19 pm

      Just spotted this. This is closer to being “real” IMO. This is from Yahoo’s Tech Ticker today. I added the CAPITALs for emphasis but notice the bluntness of RP’s description. It is what it is. Someone that’s high profile has to have the “GUTS” to take on these malevolent sociopaths that have RIGged our world:

      “As for inflation, “I think there’s plenty,” Rep. Paul says, citing “skyrocketing” commodity prices and rising food prices. One problem is the Fed’s reliance on core CPI, which famously excludes food and energy and relies on hedonic adjustments. “They RIG that number,” he says. “[Bernanke] looks at government stats that are fudged to reassure him he doesn’t have to do anything.”

  • John Jay February 10, 2011, 5:59 am

    Bernanke is just another piece in the jigsaw puzzle of corruption that our country has become.
    Since I have grown weary of despair, I have a political solution to offer the average American.
    I propose we create a fourth branch of the Federal government, and bring back the ancient Roman “Plebeian Tribune” position.
    Since the other three branches have been bought and paid for by the corporations, ( sorry, Supremes) the average American needs someone with a Veto power over the other branches.
    If the majority of the populace are routinely ignored as we go to war, give trillions to corporate criminals, and see our civil rights eviscerated, we need a simple way to assert our will.
    When we have reached the point where 60 to 70 percent of the electorate oppose laws passed by the federal government and are ignored, I don’t see any other simple solution.
    It will take a Constitutional Convention to make it happen, because there is not a chance in hell of getting Congress to iniate this Amendment.
    Proposal by a Convention of States is in the Constitution, thank you Founding Fathers.
    It seems we could even bypass the State legislatures if need be and use ratification by “state conventions” . instead of “state legislatures”.
    We need three quarters of the states to approve it, but only by a simple majority in each state I believe.
    We could do it.
    No one really believes we are going to get anything other than more of the same in the 2012 elections, do you?

    • redwilldanaher February 10, 2011, 5:11 pm

      There’s no point in remaining a party to something as thoroughly unwieldy in so many respects as the modern USSA IMO. This wasn’t what was envisioned and conceived by the FFs and for good reason as most of us would likely agree.

      Signing onto maintaining the “Union” is the equivalent of agreeing to forego a surgical removal in favor of never-ending chemotherapy. The FED will still be “there”. The M I C will still be there. The Media I C will still be there. The Whore on the Potomac will still be there. AND, even if there is initial success, “IT” will all start to reassemble itself faster than the T2 but with the attitude of the T3.

      Best to avoid playing a game that can’t be won IMO.