August 2010

The Fallacy of ‘Bailing Out’ U.S. Cities and States

– Posted in: Commentary for the Week of March 8 Free

Amazing how far a really stupid idea can travel. Warren Buffett helped spread and legitimize one a couple of months ago, and now the Wall Street Journal has pitched in on the same topic with an op-ed piece written by one Eden Martin, a lawyer and Chicago muckety-muck.  Here is what Mr. Martin wrote:  “The next big issue on the national political horizon may be whether the federal government should bail out the many budget-strapped states and municipalities across the country, especially their overly generous and badly underfunded pension plans.”  And here’s Mr. Buffett on the same topic, testifying before Congress in June on the role the credit rating agencies played in nearly bringing the banking system down: “I mean, if the federal government will step in to help [states and major municipalities], they’re Triple-A. If the federal government won’t step in to help them, who knows what they are.” Buffett himself should know the answer to the question he has implicitly raised, since, no matter who is doing the bailing out, or what is used to pay for it, we – and not some entity called “the Government” -- will all pay heavily for it in one way or another. We’ll explain in a moment. But first, let us be clear that we are not holding our breath waiting for the Journal’s editors to provide responsible counterpoint to all of this bailout claptrap. Unfortunately, the business community's newspaper of record has always played an aggressive role in telling its readers not what is, but what they presumably want to hear. How else to explain why the Journal would continue to devote hundreds of column inches lately to the possibility that the economy just might be facing a double-dip recession? In plain fact, and as any of the paper’s two million

ESU10 – September E-Mini S&P (Last:1055.00)

– Posted in: Current Touts Free Rick's Picks

Yesterday's swoon just missed my target, although a couple of eagle-eyed pivoteers in the chat room noticed that by NOT using the one-off 'A' to do the calculation, as is my habit, one could have nailed the 1037.00 intraday low to-the-tick.  I'd do it again if faced with the same choice, however, since I've always been a sucker for hottie, one-off 'A's like the one in this case.  So now what?  The subsequent rally created a bullish impulse leg on the hourly chart, confirming my earlier suspicion that the market has been too, too resilient recently in the face of some of the worst economic news since the 1930s. But then,  I'd already mentioned my skepticism about the Hindenburg Omen, which has flashed three -- count 'em, t-h-r-e-e! -- signals lately. It couldn't have helped that even the Wall Street Journal took note of 'Hindenburg' this time around.  For my part, I'll simply go with the flow for now, drum-rolling the 1067.75 rally target shown in the chart.  Its sibling midpoint is 1060.75, and any rally that exceeds that number would imply more upside to the target itself. Of course, all bets would be off if the point ''C' low is breached first. As of around 2:30 a.m., it was still in play, albeit barely. Note to night owls:  I don't trust this one, but if a second point 'C' forms you should jump on the new 'X' trigger with a buy-stop. _______  UPDATE (12:04 p.m. EDT):  Waiting for a second 'C' to form as suggested would have worked nicely, triggering a long entry at 1057.25 and partial-profit-taking  at 1060.75, the Hidden Pivot midpoint of the pattern. The futures turned flaky 1.00 point above it, though, and went into gratuitous spasms on the regular-session opening.  They are trading slightly lower on the day at the moment, but it still looks like bears are

GCZ10 – December Gold (Last:1242.3)

– Posted in: Current Touts Free Rick's Picks

With the gold price just now making a new four-week uptrend high, the Hidden Pivot outlook is entirely bullish, on the eve of COMEX gold and silver options expiration.  Gold has rallied more than $84 since its July 28 low, and that leaves us with no meaningful bearish patterns to provide bottom-fishing levels.  Once again we will have to watch the action and judge the patterns as they take shape.  Is this lengthening rally going to continue and perhaps even accelerate, or will it reverse course soon for one last seasonal downtrend?  The attached graphic shows some levels where gold might make the turn, if it is going to do so.  Not shown is our elderly 1244.2 target, which has not yet been touched, let alone broken, and which seems to have blocked the market's progress for the better part of a day now.  Tonight's high is more than 99% of the way from "C" to the 1244.2 "D" target, which is a hit in my book.  Maybe the anti-gold cartel will launch the usual options-expiration takedown from right here.  (Posted by Doug McLagan)

Credit Card Rates Push the Envelope

– Posted in: Commentary for the Week of March 8 Free

You’ve got to wonder what the banks have in mind now that they’ve raised credit card rates to an average 14.7 percent, up 160 basis points from a year ago. Are lenders perhaps trying to tell us that they are no longer interested in advancing cash to users of plastic? After all, what shopper or diner would borrow a dime with a credit card if it carried such an exorbitant interest charge? And even if there were borrowers at such usurious rates, how many of them could be counted on to service their loans indefinitely (which is how long it would take to pay off such loans)?  It’s not as though the banks can go after delinquent borrowers with such time-honored tools of the loan shark as baseball bats, brass-buckled belts and straight razors. Still, we have to assume the banks know their business and that they think they can make a profit by charging economically lethal rates on unsecured balances. But if you or I were making such loans, we’d probably be asking ourselves up-front, How desperate does someone have to be to run up credit-card debt at 14.7%?  The answer, obviously, is:  the kind of person we would not want to lend money to. So why are the banks doing it anyway? It’s possible that although they don’t actually know how things will play out, they believe they’ve pegged rates high enough to compensate for new regulations that will make it more difficult for them to lend as they traditionally have – i.e., with the same loving kindness and respect for their customers as Frankie the Camel and rent-to-own furniture stores. And who cares about high delinquency rates when there will always be a few customers willing and able to pay $6 for $5 (and presumably much more

DJIA may be signaling a turn

– Posted in: Rick's Picks

I checked the Indoos as an afterthought and discovered that yesterday's bottom came even closer to a crystal-clear correction target than the E-Mini S&Ps.  This is not bullish on its face -- at least not yet -- but it does warrant our close attention, since an upturn from the low would be logical.

NEM – Newmont Mining (Last:57.12)

– Posted in: Current Touts Free Rick's Picks

Newmont slightly exceeded a key support yesterday -- a Hidden Pivot midpoint at 55.88 -- but only by seven cents, so we'll assume that it is still intact.  If the stock should close below the pivot, however, or trade more  than 10 cents below it intraday, that would indicate a likelihood of further slippage to as low as 51.54, our midpoint's 'D' sibling.

GCZ10 – December Gold (Last:1233.7)

– Posted in: Current Touts Free Rick's Picks

Tuesday's wild gold trading left us with confirmed patterns pointing both up and down on the daily chart, a technical picture which echoes the mixed short-term outlook based on other factors.  The low Tuesday morning marked the biggest pullback of the four-week uptrend, but most of that pullback was erased during the sharp two-hour rally that followed.  Duelling commenters in the chat room suggested (1) that the low of the day felt like the late-August seasonal low, but (2) that retail physical demand remains weak since the price rose above $1200.  Traders with seasonals in mind should not forget the late-October low of 2008 and the action in stocks and Treasury bonds at the time.  More immediately, COMEX gold and silver options will expire tomorrow, an event which often has a way of exerting downward pressure on price.  So long as the recent high of 1239.5 is not touched or surpassed, the new bearish targets shown on the left side of the graphic will remain active.  Both midpoint pivots, at 1193.2 and 1185.4, are potential buying levels.  Our orientation is toward getting long, but the bullish pattern on the right portion of the graphic does not give us a low-risk way to do so.  Traders should look for a camouflaged entry, especially one that involves an impulse to slightly above 1239.5. (Posted by Doug McLagan) _______ UPDATE (2:02 p.m. EDT): Shortly before 5:00 a.m. EDT, gold popped up to 1241.7, cancelling the bearish daily pattern.  The subsequent pullback gave us a good-looking pattern on the 15-minute chart (with A=1231.9) projecting to D=1243.6.  The futures obliged by peaking at 1243.4 and then dropping by more than seven dollars.  Alert pivoteers therefore had multiple opportunities to profit based on the morning's action.  The high of 1243.4, which has been hit twice, is

ESU10 – September E-Mini S&P (Last:1048.75)

– Posted in: Current Touts Free Rick's Picks

It was painful to watch bears struggle for yardage yesterday, even though they had the "best" bad news in months to help them out.  With the Guvmint's $8,000 tax credit no longer available to home buyers, housing starts have of course collapsed.  This could not have surprised anyone save Kudlow and a few thousand economists, really, but it is in the nature of Wall Street to feign "shock" whenever such truly bad news crosses the tape.  When the dust had settled, however, the Dow was off just 133 points, well off the day's lows; and the E-Mini S&Ps had yet to achieve our Hidden Pivot target at 1040.25, having gotten no lower than 1044.00.  I predicted a relapse to the target during yesterday's weekly tutorial session -- and it shall pass, I am sure, in the fullness of time -- but the target itself holds less and less appeal with each new day's failure to achieve it.  A 1038.75 stop-loss would be appropriate for traders who, bored out of their minds, are eager  to so "something" just to keep from rusting up.