Big Business Breeds Failure in New Jersey

[One of my oldest and closest friends, Glenn Klotz, is also one of the most politically liberal.  Although I usually assume that many, if not most, of those on the left are factually impaired, that is surely not the case with Glenn. He is up on his facts, well read, and can hold his own in any argument.  Following is a letter he wrote me when I challenged his heavy skepticism toward New Jersey’s new Governor, Chris Christie. I think the guy will be great for New Jersey, and that he may even prove to be presidential material. Glenn thinks he is just another Jersey pol who ultimately will favor the interests of Big Business over the little guy. RA]

The long and the short of my position politically these days is this: I’m not an ideologue of either the left or the right. I am however anti-Corporatist. As I see it, the problem in this country today, and in particular in New Jersey, is that BIG is everything. Big Business. Big Government.  Together, the two dominate the landscape to the exclusion of anything or anyone else. With their overwhelming political power, economic clout and their sheer size, these dinosaur-sized Enterprises and Orgs, both public and private, are squeezing out smaller public and private businesses and institutions. On the private side, you could call it the “Wal-Mart-ization of America” if you like; and on the public side, the tyranny of Big Government over all that is small.

The Borgata in Atlantic City: a symbol of corporate failure in NJ?

Now, why do I say the tyranny over the small and not the large?  Simply because I believe statistics and facts show that in America today, size counts when it comes to how you are treated by public-sector regulators, law enforcement and, especially, politicians. In New Jersey today, and nationally, there is a phrase that sums it up: “The Public/Private Partnership”. The  political servants of both parties – corporatists, all —  have been promoting this as a good thing for the country, but is it?  I believe not. The revolving door lies at the heart of this odious idea, and I know plenty of people who move through these doors — from public agencies to private companies to boardrooms.  This used to be called corruption, but these days we seem to accept it as a – LOL! — public virtue to be desired. The result of this so-called partnership in New Jersey and many other states is the near death of small business. Big Corporations such as the ones that run the Atlantic City Casinos are an example. Contrary to what you might think or have heard about the casinos being heavily regulated, they have in fact been given every kind of break — from having their own ABC (Alcoholic Beverage Commission), to endless tax easements, all with very little oversight by the State of New Jersey ( no matter what you may have read to the contrary).

Killing the Golden Goose

I could cite many other large enterprises as examples of how this corporatist model works pervasively. And, again, contrary to what you have heard or read, New Jersey doesn’t have a problem with Big Business, which is neither overregulated nor overtaxed; it is small businesses that are both over regulated and over taxed – nearly to death — and this is the real reason why New Jersey is considered such a poor a place for business start-ups. As for the Public side of the equation, I agree that the relatively generous wages, extravagant pension and health plans so common in the public sector are leading toward disaster. But things got this way because New Jersey killed the golden goose (i.e., small businesses), and because Big Business dominates the State.  You can take my word for it.  I’ve been to meetings where I’ve heard the pols swear that New Jersey loves Big and hates small anything, business-wise.  No matter what either party says, this is how the state’s policies have worked out. So don’t get so excited about [New Jersey’s new Gov. Chris Christie]. He’s just another Corporatist politician that thinks everything will be fine if you just feed the top 2% .

Incidentally, the article you sent me from National Review is dead wrong when it asserts that the rich have fled New Jersey. It’s simply not true. New Jersey has some of the wealthiest suburbs in the country and is filled with wealthy people who want their taxes cut by this Governor because they — like everyone else in New Jersey — feel overtaxed, Overtaxed they are not, though.  It is the average slob who is heavily overtaxed. And here’s the problem: If you say the whole mess is the fault of the Public sector, and you react by laying off tens of thousands of teachers, cops, firemen, etc, then the economy will go even deeper in-the-tank. All you will have done is set in motion a downward spiral when the people you have thrown out of work wind up competing with the rest of the 10% unemployed for whom there are no jobs and little hope at the moment .

Wage Freeze Needed

What’s needed, in my opinion, is a wage freeze for all public employees and a re-examination of benefits that everyone agrees are way out of line. On the private side, I’d lower business taxes for all small business ( i.e., fewer than 25 workers) immediately, and also end the sales tax on the services and products provided by these companies. We especially need to encourage young people to open new businesses of every kind in New Jersey, and to give them help in getting started. As things stand, we discourage this; instead, the Corporatists think these folks should either see jobs at Big Companies, or opt for Public jobs (few and far between right now). So we’re locked into a bad place, with little job-creation because all the air ($$) has been sucked out of the room by the public sector for, yes, overly generous pay and benefits; or by large private-sector companies, most notably healthcare firms, insurers, Big Pharma and chemical companies.

As you know, I am not a Reaganite believer in voodoo economics, in that I’m a Progressive. I firmly believe that we had a vibrant “middle class” in this country only because the government created ways to re-distribute income south rather than north. Trickle-down doesn’t work, in my opinion – in fact, does work just the opposite from how it is billed.  Attempts over the last generation to grow the economy by making the rich richer have failed the test.  All the statistics show that over the course of the last 30 years, despite solid Corporatist politics and voodoo economic policies, the average wage earner has gotten far worse, and wealth distribution is back to what it was in 1928, just prior to the Great Depression.  Like the old Progressives of Teddy Roosevelt’s time, and of the FDR era, I believe, as J. Paul Getty once said, that money is like manure –- you have to spread it around or nothing grows. The problem today is that too few good jobs are being created, and that too many obscenely wealthy people aren’t investing in America or its future.

Fortune 500 Rules

Both political parties are wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Fortune 500, and I blame them both for following Corporatist-inspired policies. I laugh when I hear the Right call Obama a Socialist. I wish he were; alas his behavior and his polices speak otherwise. He’s a solid Corporatist if ever there were one. He is in word and deed to the right of Nixon. LOL! Okay, so from a right-winger’s point of view I’m a Commie. But let me ask you this: Do Commies promote small business? We do! Look at China, where there are more small start-ups than everywhere else on the planet combined! How is this possible? It appears the Chinese Communists are more Capitalistic then we are right now, and maybe we should look at why? Anyway, I also believe we need some more large cooperative-type enterprises where workers run and manage their companies. Another Commie idea that seems to be working pretty well today where it has been put into practice.

As for New Jersey, Gov. Christie is popular, but not because of his policies. In fact they are not popular, even if he is. How is this seeming paradox possible? Well, New Jersey voters like strong, male leaders. The people want a Tony Soprano, Mussolini-type at the helm, especially Conservatives who believe in top-down leadership rather than consensus government. The problem for Christie is that he has a Democratic Assembly and Senate to deal with, and they’re going to sabotage him at every turn. Why?  Simply because that’s how the game is played in New Jersey. So don’t expect much to change in this state. Christie will end up banging his head against many immovable objects in New Jersey politics, and he will eventually either give up ( the usual route for New Jersey pols) or he’ll compromise his principles away, end up feeding the Corporatist beast as always seems to happen here.

(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • Bill S September 9, 2010, 4:13 am

    I have to agree. We work with two big companies that have just about put us out of business. We have them on anti trust, accounting fraud and securities fraud but can’t find a law firm to take the case because the big boys will just tie us up with legal fees. Like Clinton, they blatantly commit these crimes because they can. Until small businesspeople unite and educate their employees, the plunder of America will continue. Let’s hope that there is something left for us to rebuild with once the house of cards collapses.

  • ful_karboy September 9, 2010, 3:33 am

    Calls for 70-90% income tax?
    That’s either a recipe for mediocrity or corruption. IF the tax system is so obviously unfair, people will feel OK about avoiding it, bribing lawmakers or just give up, kick back and join their fellow moochers. Capital and brainpower will move out of the country, corruption will skyrocket and then we’ll be Mexico.

    WHO drove high paying jobs overseas with high corporate taxes, Union meddling, predatory lawsuits, runamuck regulation and eco-nazi obstructionism? Mostly so called “progressives”. {Marxist class struggle under a new label} THEN they mention china? Worldclass pollution and disregard for human rights. A basket case without their currency manipulation schemes.

    But then they can build massive hydropower dams, nuke plants and coal plants. Here, our “watermelon greens” even block windfarms! Meanwhile our “Central Planner in Chief” wonders why small business, already reeling from more and more changing regs and less credit, is reticient about hiring? Typical limosine liberals with no clues as to actually running a business for profit!

    Who forced banks to lower lending standards in the middle of a housing bubble? Ah yes… “progessives”. Seems like the Cloward-Piven strategy is advancing the Gramscian Agenda to the detriment of the proletariat, but that makes them easier to radicalize. Right comrades?

  • keith September 9, 2010, 12:31 am

    [you can’t tax them very much or what they loan to government falls, which would disallow the Federal Reserve to fulfill their purpose, which is to buy Treasuries when the market does not, so as to maximize government credit.]

    A very good point made by Chris T.

    It reminds me of when Obama put the screws to the bond holders of GM just because they had the “money”. If we start down the path of “getting the rich” it will only cause capital to flee the U.S.

  • keith September 9, 2010, 12:23 am

    I don’t know anyone, democrat or republican who openly admits that small business should be squashed under the weight of big corporations. Even Obama has said over and over that he wants to help small business (waiting for the proof). But even if Big Government raised taxes on corporations it still wouldn’t lower them on the middle class. Instead, the leaders would find some way to waste it.

    Where I believe the writer of this article is dead wrong is when he believes that government can create wealth by distribution.

    The government IS the problem.

    China? Big Government = prosperity and small business growth? Yes, but consider this, the Chinese government isn’t spending money and going into debt to the point where they can’t even raise enough taxes to pay the interest. China worked and saved their way to prosperity (even under a communist type system). America has consumed and spent it’s way out of prosperity.

    This crisis is a monetary one of mass proportions: debt and fiscal mismanagement of government. I find it hard to comprehend how everything could just heal itself if we simply redistribute the money between classes. How could that possibly solve the debt problem? Hey, let’s just be serious here for a second. If over a trillion dollars have just been pumped into the economy over the last couple years and it hasn’t done a single thing for job growth or improving the lives of the regular person then how is taxing the rich and doing the same thing going to help? You think the government will be able to put the money in the right places because it’s taxed vs. borrowed via bonds and easing? Please.

  • charlie r September 8, 2010, 11:10 pm

    It looks as if your friend likes a communist type goverment, if this is the case, why doesnt he move to say, cuba, or venezuela or maybe north korea or perhaps china.–no, i guess not china, they have seemed to have let a little capitalism slip into their nation. Oh well, he can just stay here & get rid of all the Kulaks.

  • fallingman September 8, 2010, 6:51 pm

    Couldn’t agree more that what we’re seeing is corporatism. That was Mussolini’s preferred name for “fascism,” but we can’t call a spade a spade, now can we? Too “radical.” Too “fringe.”

    The insider elites call it the “government/business partnership.” And, oh, is it ever nice to be a partner. Just ask Lloyd Blankfein or Franklin Raines or Al Gore.

    Couldn’t agree less that having the government tax anybody and redistribute the wealth is a good thing.

    Any entity that has the power to give you anything you want has the power to take everything you have. And guess who has controlled the government since Grover Cleveland left office? The insider “elites” … JPMorgan, Goldman, and the rest of the white shoe boys. They have owned both parties for a long time.

    If you think either of the Roosevelts was some sort of crusader for regular folks in the middle class, you either don’t know much real history … or you’re delusional. They were puppets just as much as Nixon, Ford, Reagan and the Bushes were puppets and as much as Truman, Kennedy, Johnson, Carter, Clinton, and Obama were/are puppets. Any “history” that suggests otherwise is just government school propaganda. Dig a little.

    Eisenhower played along. I guess he didn’t want to die, but he clearly knew the score, as revealed in his famous “military/industrial complex” speech.

    Big isn’t the problem, per se, when it comes to business, although I take the point. Big is a symptom. When government colludes with privileged interests to provide them with protection from competition, subsidies and other special advantages, they get big. Surprise!

    The ability of those with insider influence and money to game the system is the problem. I don’t know how you fix that. It’s so entrenched and Jefferson and Jackson are dead.

    But what irks the hell out of me is when good folks think that if you could just get the right people into the government with a wholesome agenda, things would get better. So, they support the corrupt process and the corrupt institutions it has spawned…SEC, CFTC. FEMA, Fannie Mae, etc. etc. etc.

    Corporatism is the problem precisely because we didn’t stay vigilant and allowed the government to dole out favors. We allowed it to get BIG. And guess who gets the lion’s share? The people who had the money and influence to buy those favors in the first place. They throw crumbs to the plebes to keep us quiet. Bread and circuses redux.

    Sic semper tyrannis. Those with the power will always find a way to enrich themselves at the expense of others. So, the key is to not give them the power. But they have us in a headlock now. So, what do we do?

    Let’s put aside the silly partisan squabbling. The elites want us to argue about red and blue. Instead, how about we start chopping away at the foundation of their power? Let’s deep six the Fed.

    Can we not all agree on that? It’s the corporatists most essential tool for protecting, subsidizing, and funneling money to themselves.

    END THE FED!

  • DDoc September 8, 2010, 6:29 pm

    We can now call it the military/ industrial /corporate complex

    ugh

    • Robert September 8, 2010, 7:47 pm

      More accurately, the:

      Military/Industrial/Political/Corporate/Legislative/Judicial/Financial …. Complex

      In other words- the power of the many, subjugated to the whims of the few.

      God bless capital destruction.

  • Robert September 8, 2010, 4:02 pm

    We are all tap-dancing around the basic tenent that all judicial law should be fair by design, and yet, in the modern world it is not, and the unfairness sways to the side of anything BIG.

    Small business can not even get started, because the BIG system decrees that you must be BIG in order to survive. You must, in fact, be TOO BIG to FAIL in order not to fail, and if you do fail, then your BIGness will guarantee your perpetual existence in the BIG system, as a BIG zombie-ward of the BIG state.

    Fairness is all we need- not BIGness. FAIRNESS

    • BDTR September 8, 2010, 6:15 pm

      And a very big fairness, …it appears.

  • gary leibowitz September 8, 2010, 3:51 pm

    The fat lady already sang but most were talking on their cell phones or blogging away.

    This argument needed to be started 10 years ago. The path we follow has been warn away from repeated use. I am afraid we will be talking about this in one hundred years.

    A capitalist society is mandated to follow this path. Power and money will always gravitate to the dominant players.

    It will be interesting to see if the 30’s style political arena is played out.

  • Chris T. September 8, 2010, 2:57 pm

    “… wealthy people who want their taxes cut by this Governor because they — like everyone else in New Jersey — feel overtaxed, Overtaxed they are not, though. ”

    Also living in this nice, messed-up place, I have to disagree here.
    It is precisely these wealthy people why our property taxes are so high. They are the ones that have NO real interest in seeing them lowered, because they are the only ones who can afford them.
    With 55% of my town’s budget goeing to the schools (2500 kids, school budget 60 million, overall budget 105 million), one just has to go to a school board meeting: all one ever hears is: we want this for the kids, we want that for the kids, its for the children…
    Then you run into these people, and who are they? Those NYCers that have ruined our financial system for decades, looking for a more tranquil place, and “I used to pay 35k a year for each of my three kids, now they’re in the public school, so with my 30k property tax, I’m saving 70 grand”.
    And strangely enough (not really, but on the surface), as they have moved in, we started getting Democracts elected. The self-styled party of the little guy was brought in by very beneficiaries of the BIG that the authors criticizes.
    For a long time on a local level, the Republicans were not like their state and national counterparts, they had the lets do less not more attitude. That is long gone, and these towns are doing everything they can to keep the average Joe out, by making it impossible to stay.
    Even if you get a house here for free from a relative, unless you earn a well-into 6 figure salary, you leave or will be tax-liened out.
    Sure there is our famous ultra-liberal Supreme Court, with its famous Mt. Laurel decision (something the author probably likes, even though it was really only good for rich developers), plunking down low-income people, but those are not average Joes either. The middle — the epitome of SMALL business– is squeezed out.

    And where is the logical congruence?
    On the one hand you bemoan the BIG, then you criticize the state for a lack of regulation, oversight, etc. Well it would take even more of a big government to do exactly that.
    NJ is one of the proving grounds of Progressivism (viz W. Wilson), and it is that agenda, maskerading as for the little guy, but really created by, and implemented solely for the rich guy, that is at the root cause.
    Its too bad that observant, well meaning “liberals” such as the author can’t see that.

    As to Christie, Rick I hope you are right, but I have my doubts. He certainly is better than Corzine, but like the author, I still think he will end up being Whitman II.
    And the LAST thing this country needs is ANOTHER grandstanding ex-US Attorney who wants to go to DC.
    This part of the US breeds these people like cockroaches — Guliani, Cuomo II, Christie, Blumenthal, etc. That alone was reason enough for me not to vote for Christie.

  • Benjamin September 8, 2010, 5:15 am

    I can’t comment on this Christie, but a wage freeze for public employees and more support for small business?

    I say we take it to the ultimate level. A wage freeze is politically undoable, so if we’re going exert massive effort in changing things, it might as well be exerted in throwing out the whole tamale.

    “So we’re locked into a bad place, with little job-creation because all the air ($$) has been sucked out of the room by the public sector for, yes, overly generous pay and benefits; or by large private-sector companies, most notably healthcare firms, insurers, Big Pharma and chemical companies.”

    Actually, the corporations ARE over-regulated, and that “forces” them to hire a bunch of lawyers and lobbyists so that, being too big to fail, forces them to rely on more credit. Now, where O where could a coporation possibly get that much credit? From the BIG spender of first and last resort, the government. I don’t think I have to explain how that works, but what the hey… You buy our bonds, and, because we (govt) guarantee them, why, you just leverage those into more credit for yourselves to buy more of our bonds with. The Fed will take care of valuing them higher.

    _One_ of the great troubles of doing things this way, you can’t tax them very much or what they loan to government falls, which would disallow the Federal Reserve to fulfill their purpose, which is to buy Treasuries when the market does not, so as to maximize government credit.

    Wait. Isn’t that “a bit” contradictory? Couldn’t the Fed just buy more?

    No. That would kill confidence. Kind of like what it’s doing now. In order to maintain that confidence, the Fed needs to maintain that image of being the lender of LAST resort. Not ONLY. So for the coporations to have more to kick in, they can’t be heavily taxed. Besides, whatever “shortfall” the Fed makes up for adds up to more credit for Uncle Sammy.

    Of course, you can’t build this massive fraud using small businesses. That would be like giving a doctorate degree to every newborn, and claiming that our futures are assured. But even if the absurdities were overlooked (and really, they would be, just as they are now), we’d only be bossed around by small business interests, rather than corporate ones.

    And would we see more job creation from small businesses, by shifting favor? Of course we would. As corporations emptied, that would have to happen. But like Big Corp, Inc making minimal investment in job creation, small business would at some point stop growing in order to maintain the pool of credit… which means that wage freezes and cutbacks in the govt sector wouldn’t come about. It would make no difference who was favored, big or small as things are inherently corrupt, only capable of growing the governmetn sector or nothing at all. That’s the whole purpose of the system, what our glorious parasites have been trying to make humanity accept for millennia, that we need them, that nothing could EVER work without them.

    So, we need to get rid of the whole fraudulent thing. Let the configuration of big and small business work itself out in a truly free market, so as to minimize dependence on government spending and employment. And a truly free market can only come about with a return to hard money. But that’s definitely not doable, right? The powers that be simply won’t allow that! Well, to that I say… As the crushing, spiked ceiling of unpayable debt comes down on us all, we’ll just have to accept that it’s hard money, or else…

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyLpNZiOZUc

    …We. Are going. To DIE! 🙂

  • JohnJay September 8, 2010, 4:45 am

    Looks we are all in agreement.
    Now if we can just get through to the citizens watching American Idol, Oprah, and the Laker game!

  • Tom Paine September 8, 2010, 4:27 am

    Glenn has got it. As I’ve said before, the Democratic and Republican parties are just the two wings of one giant corporatist vulture party.

    I hope this might be the last election where people will still believe that voting out one of those two parties and replacing them with the other is going to make any meaningful difference as to the direction in which this country is headed, which is in the direction of a greater and greater concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a super elite that inahbit the spaces around the revolving doors of power between Washington, Wall Street, the Military/Industrial Complex, other mega corporations and Ivy League Institutions.

    • BDTR September 8, 2010, 2:48 pm

      Don’t get your hopes up, Tom.

      If we truly want to understand what structurally underlies a psychopathic culture of corruption that permeates ALL of our public institutions, political framework and business/banking environment let’s acknowledge it’s ingrained, viral matrix.

      A fact filled, thumbnail view of exactly what dominates the cumulatively expansive process to our moral, ethical, and intellectual subversion with it’s attendant abandonment of principle, truth and equity in economy one need only consult ‘The Complex’, by Nick Turse.

      Thereafter, a disciplined work of true historical credibility will flesh out exactly what it means for our future in Chalmers Johnson’s trilogy; ‘Blowback’, The Costs and Consequences of American Empire’, ‘Sorrows of Empire’, Militarism, Secrecy and the End of the Republic, and ‘Nemesis’, The Last Days of the American Republic.

      This is a definitive work, readable in a weekend, for understanding why we are where we are as a nation, and preoccupied as we are in a divisive cacophony of a media managed, wide-screen confusion, whilst unwittingly contributing to our ignominious end.

  • Steve September 8, 2010, 2:37 am

    The national and state *****, not being foreign to one another, as the State ***** are, but; subordinate parts of one complete system of government. . . Bennett v Bennett 1 Deady 307.

    I agree with the corporate argument in regard to Congress going into rebellion in 1872 to create a “federal union of states” (citing justice O’Conner) replacing the “several States” union, and then using the private political corporate act 14th amendment (1868 fraud – Ore. S.R.J. 3 1866, Ore. S.R.J. 4, 1868) to create legislative enfranchisees of one body in corporate mobocracy having 300m cells. Big owns the system, and no person gets to congress without owing one side of corporatism or the other. I believe progressivism to always end in tyranny. It is deeply rewarding to have a progressive admit his communist origins. Without being bigoted, the Republican theory is progressive corporatism as well, with no member rising to succession within the new feudal monarchy without the ‘say’ of the corporate controllers. Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Ronnie, and the bunch are just players of a bigotry created by a few educator elite professors. The danger of liberalism is its essential bigotry to let Free men live as they would, instead of within the mold of the few, or the will of the mass’s anarchy – which is one of the definitions of ‘democracy’. Thank you for the fresh honesty, and a look beyond Obama, Bush, and the crew in succession. Truly the definition of a corporation as a ‘veil’ upon which men can act illegally with immunity is well founded. Read “The Prince” and learn the necessity of conflict between competing factions as required for the controller to win, and accomplish that which would never be allowed without the emergency.

  • Martin Snell September 8, 2010, 2:29 am

    Exactly.

    That there is even any debate about not extending the bush tax cuts for high income earners defies belief. The “golden years” of America were a period where top marginal rates were 70-90%. I think it is time to try it again – it can’t do worse than trickle down economics.

    Of course so much money has been stolen (why was SS ever put “on budget” – only to fund tax cuts for the rich) and so much money wasted (on wars/military), that even raising taxes will do little to dent the deficit. Many years of payback/hard times lay ahead.