Campaign Heats Up, but Will There Be Blood?

With a little more than a month to go, what’s left of the Congressional campaign promises to be the nastiest, most entertaining political spectacle in many a year. Your editor covered the political scene himself as a fledgling reporter for the Atlantic City Press, and at times it was quite a thrill. The highlight of one particularly heated mayoral election that drew 32 candidates was when one of them jumped on the back of the police chief and sank his teeth into the cop’s head. In the end, the man who won the race subsequently went to prison — nothing unusual for Atlantic City, since that’s where most of the town’s mayors (and quite a few city supervisors as well)  wound up during the stretch of years between 1970 and 1990 that included the creation of the town’s ill-fated casino business.

Burr and Hamilton settle their differences the old-fashioned way

Even by Atlantic City standards, though, the rough and tumble of this year’s congressional elections is something to behold.  On Wednesday, New York Tea Party candidate Carl Paladino threatened to “take out” a New York Post reporter who’d asked Paladino to prove his accusation that Democratic challenger Andrew Cuomo had cheated on his now-ex wife. Paladino ducked the question and asked the reporter about a “goon” the Post had sent to photograph his daughter, who reportedly was born to a mistress and kept secret from his wife for a decade. Whom do you root for in these exchanges?  Probably half of the Post’s editorial staff really are goons – overweening, egregiously misguided muckrakers who would sell their children for an exclusive interview with…Lindsay Lohan. Paladino didn’t specify how he would make good on his threat, but if he should succeed, having one fewer editorial hack in this world would probably not be such a terrible thing.

Allred Smear Tactics

Over on the West Coast, publicity hound and erstwhile attorney Gloria Allred was busy executing a smear campaign against Republican gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman. With a straight face, Allred claimed that her client, one Nicki Diaz, Whitman’s housekeeper for  nine years, had been abused and that Whitman had known all along that the woman was an illegal alien. Although the evidence strongly suggested that Allred and her client were lying, Allred has had so much practice at it that Whitman had her hands full batting away the charges.  However, it didn’t help Allred’s case that Diaz apparently had been paid $23 an hour by Whitman, or that Diaz’s immigration papers were convincing forgeries.  Did we mention that Allred has financially backed the campaign of Whitman’s opponent, Jerry Brown?

We look forward to a raucous month of campaigning, one harkening back to the days of Aaron Burr.  We wouldn’t be entirely surprised if there were a homicide along the way — or if the murder strikes at least some voters as an act justified by principle.

(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • Chris T. October 2, 2010, 2:44 am

    …incoherent…

  • Bradley October 2, 2010, 12:36 am

    Can you imagine how mightily some central planner in China is laughing at all the yahoos in this country? My rights this and my rights that. Pretty soon, most of these Americans will be holed up in their tin foil walled Chongqing “nail houses” with big piles of ammo and little piles of gold, as the Chinese build skyscrapers around them.

    How about getting a job. Starting a business. Making a difference instead of just making noise…

    • bill October 2, 2010, 1:52 am

      Bradley…could you expound a bit more on those subjects; I’m not sure where you are coming from.

    • redwilldanaher October 7, 2010, 6:44 pm

      Since no one else has said something this direct to you, I will: Your closing comment is ridiculous. Part of the reason that Americans find themselves in this position is because they simply worried about working a job. Many of them want to start a business and are doing so. Are you advocating not paying attention to what is transpiring around you? It’s actually from not making noise/news and swallowing whatever the American Central Planners sent down the chute that Americans are in this position. If you don’t have freedom or a semblance of it then you have nothing.

  • Chris T. October 2, 2010, 12:33 am

    When posting above about electing a relation of a politician being voter-nepotism, but hopeing that Rand Paul would be an exception, I had not yet seen this piece by Justin Raimondo, which I recommend to any who thing highly of Rand Paul (as I did for a while, even with his then obvious difference on FP to the father)::
    http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2010/09/23/the-hollow-man-rand-pauls-father-complex/

    Very sad to see, and if one thinks about it, the betrayal of the father by the son pointed out here (forgot the discarding of libertarian values) is shameful.
    If I lived in that state, I would now just stay home.
    Thankfully I never donated to his campaign.

  • gary leibowitz October 1, 2010, 11:33 pm

    Find it amusing but inconsequential. The belief that we have a 2 party system is flawed. Just look at cold hard facts. Either party in office, for long or short periods, the recordable data suggests there is no difference. Statistical dead heat. Use the stock market, GDP, inflation, currency strength, consumer wealth, standard of living. It doesn’t matter. Just a side show. The bottom line is they all are beholding to their jobs by big business and lobbyists. Sure we might spend more or less on social programs or the military but at the end of the day it is a wash.

    How many really thought that the man that entered this 4 year term wasn’t going to get the brunt of the blame after the debacle? How many actually blamed BUSH for the most outrageous spending spree ever, the destruction of the dollar, entering an orchestrated war?

    When times are good we ignore facts that get in our way of staying in that feel-good moment.

    Let’s get some Sara Palin’s in office. Let the games begin!

    • Chris T. October 2, 2010, 12:16 am

      the more damage the president sustains, the more likely the secretary of state could become an in party challenger.
      Then we can have a real cat-fight in 2012!

    • Larry October 6, 2010, 12:36 am

      Well, a few of us got real queasy after Bush started spending in earnest. Then violently ill at the end of his term. Bush dug the hole. Obama laid in the corpus.

      In historical context, Roosevelt was deft at avoiding the stain that Hoover spilled. Roosevelt gets no blame for lengthening and deepening the Depression.

      I’m agreeing with Chris T.

  • JohnJay October 1, 2010, 8:20 pm

    It seems like the same top 1% that own so much of the wealth aren’t happy with that.
    Nope, they want the reins of power to boot.
    A frozen smile and a 100 million bucks or so does the trick!
    I quit voting a while ago, all those insipid rallies with all those shills jumping up and down for the criminal at the podium.
    I’m from Connecticut, and half the mayors there seem to be in jail, under indictment, or fresh out of jail.
    Big corruption in a small state.
    My favorite public works project was the 87 million bridge across the Housatonic river crossing of the Merritt Parkway that was two years late to completion.
    A few years earlier the Clark Bridge over the Mississippi cost 85 million and was done on time.
    CT bridge spanned 1600 feet, the other spanned 4600 feet.
    Someone got their moneys worth.

  • fallingman October 1, 2010, 6:22 pm

    Burr was a loathsome human being, but he did do us all a favor. We’d have arrived at this point of dissolution and fascist rule far faster had that rat bastard Hamilton lived. I would hope everyone who values freedom dutifully spits whenever they hear his name.

    My prediction is one more election…maybe two…after this one and then the ballot box charade will no longer contain the rage and it’ll come out sideways.

    END THE FED

  • Jill October 1, 2010, 4:38 pm

    The U.S. government is corrupt beyond belief. Read the Reuters article I cited above about newfound corruption at the Federal Reserve. We probably need to get rid of the corruption before we do anything else. Ideology of a politician is not as important as whether they are corrupt or not. Can you see this? Their ideology is often just one more corrupt lie, where they claim to believe whatever they think will get them votes in their particular region.

  • Bradley October 1, 2010, 4:02 pm

    As suggested above, “keeping ones personal opinions to oneself” sounds like a good idea, but the problem with that is that the government is involved with so many parts of our lives that there is almost no subject that one can have an opinion about that isn’t reflected in one government program or another. Saying that the gov shouldn’t be involved in so many things is a good idea, but the reality is that they are, so apart from “just saying no”, candidates who choose to not choose will seem out of touch rather than out in front.

    In a world where everyone’s opinion is paramount (in their eyes), a person without an opinion may stand out, but doesn’t stand a chance.

    • Benjamin October 1, 2010, 7:32 pm

      If airing laundry is dirty work that someone has to do, then drawing the line is diritier (and hence needed doing decades ago!). All the more reason to start rather than to wait for change. It won’t get better on it’s own.

    • Steve October 1, 2010, 9:56 pm

      Ben, are you saying that assent to lawlessness should stop because abortion is murder under the immutable Law, only assented to in anarchy by legislative act ? Maybe this is the part “. . . all persons born. . .” 14th Amendment, wherein the Law says the right of inheritance exists at quickening, and the administrative courts says ‘civil rights only begin upon the full exit of the fetus from the womb’ under the 14th amendment political act. Murder is murder; refusing to prosecute the way of the current anarchy against Immutable Law. Abortion is legal because the Law is refused by the will of corporations. License – permission from state to engage in Unlawful Acts.

      The law of Escheats says the state is the Lord because we cannot inherit our Rights. The current Roman Law does not apply until the child is full exit, and the umbilical cord severed. The Common Law is ignored in assent to Rebellion.

      Is that dirty enough ?

    • Benjamin October 1, 2010, 10:36 pm

      Steve,

      The state has no right providing abortion clinics. Why?

      Rather than take the usual, well-beaten path of overly boring point on point debate, I submit for your consideration that abortion clinics are a violation of the 5th amendment; they are a forced testimony to having commited a heinous act, which, under the 5th, is something government can’t force us to do.

      For those who want to protect a mother’s choice, I say government best protects the rights of the mother in NOT legalizing abortion.

      That should suffice to fulfil my own criteria in regards to debating opinions, as well as answering your questions. But if I DID put forth my opinion…

      I let God be the judge of another’s soul (especially since abortion isn’t winning on the genocide front, and is, in fact, on the decline since it’s legalization). More people are born than are aborted. All is well, and I feel that is all God asks of me, to see that surplus maintained, by the free actions of all. I can live with some trees falling in the forest.

      Now, which is most relevent? My stupid opinions or Principles?

  • Steve October 1, 2010, 4:02 pm

    Reconstruction Acts of 1867 – voluntary military voter registration – The State of Georgia v. Stanton sec. of State 73 U.S. 50. – voluntary democracy.

    If one fails to know, understand, and exercise one’s Rights; one subjects themselves to tyranny; and so deserves – (was that Jefferson ?) This statement is valid in the present, and in the future. It appears everyone suggests they want to advise the commander in chief upon which corporate enfranchisee slaves should be task masters. Same players under theory of The Prince – republican / democrat – same players on the same democracy field. (what do you expect with Public Education teaching we are a democracy – true – but; a threat to freedom, or should I kindly say inauthentic)
    Ya vote for democracy; Ya get democracy – (Federalist #46 – summary – democracy is a tyranny run by despots – leading to destruction) This statement is valid in the present, and in the future.

    Voter registration – United States, 28 U.S.C. 3002(15), a foreign corporation created A.D. 1872, territorial admission- Article I, sec. 8, cls. 17, Article IV, sec. 3, cls. 2 Const. Once there were Sovereign Electors, now; there are military registered voters to advise the commander in chief, and his executive body in an inferior house and senate in rebellion against Article II, sec. 2 Presidential Pardon (1865). Only 14th amendment enfranchisees claiming territorial status may register under perjury to scam The Prince and sway the center of social being by accepting under emergency, that that they should not accept at all.

    I “Stand”, and ‘they’ sway right and left having not morality, calling me radical left, or right; when in fact it is ‘they’ who swing radically in the wind to gain, and to control.

    What one does in the privacy of one’s own home is his business (Article IV of Amendment to the Const.). Drink, drive, kill in public – you shall be executed 3 days after your appeal to the governor of the state, after speedy trial, and conviction by two witnesses ( only one witness, circumstantial evidence – life in prison) Responsibility to Freedom, and from Free Peoples, Original American Common Law.

    THE TRUTH IS WHAT ONE FINDS NOT NECESSARILY WHAT ONE WANTS TO KNOW

  • Tom Paine October 1, 2010, 3:54 pm

    I don’t think sending paparazzi is quite the same thing as sending “goons”, but still not cool, but considering the allegations Paladino has made against Cuomo, he was kind of inviting something of the sort.

    Now I can thank the “Tea Party” movement for virtually forcing my hand to vote Cuomo, while the other holds my nose, and just when I had really wanted to vote 3rd party. I’m just afraid the “take you out” comment reveals more about Paladino than I’m willing to take my chances on. I wonder how many people he’s had “taken out” in the past.

    I really had hopes for the “tea party” movement eventhough I’ve been more of a liberal all my life. I even sent money to Campaign for Liberty, and would probably vote for Ron Paul for Prez if given the chance. But Sarah Palin?….eegads!

    • Steve October 1, 2010, 4:40 pm

      While no person in current reality is perfect; Palin has commercial fished the same waters I have fished. Palin has gathered her own food, as I have. Palin lives in a state where there is more compassion in the little toe than exists in the entire Great Cities of the Lower 48. I spent 10 years in Alaska. The mental state of “Helping Hands” exists in real form – ‘I’ll teach you to fish, but; I will never keep you from fishing’. Palin is pretty scary to a person who has never butchered their own meat after a week in the Bush finding it, putting it down with a clean kill, and living a life that has taught independence and self sufficiency. (this is not great buwanna from the city killing horns with a guide to take care of everything ‘dirty’) If one has never witnessed the fury of the sea with 70 knot winds while gathering the bounty of the oceans, it is pretty scary to be faced with a Woman who has. Palin without a doubt owns a gun, and knows how to use it. My ‘back’, I wouldn’t trust Cuomo 1/64 on inch, or no further than I could pitch him when it came to being armed, and able to defend the Nation as required by United States Statute I. Want soft hands, and skinny fingers – choose Cuomo. Palin appears to be real, and tough.

      As to putting my life in the hands of either Palin, or Cuomo – Cuomo appears to me to not know his ass from a hole in the ground when it comes to self sufficiency, and self determination. Palin knows where meat comes from, and has fished the seas in a 32′ boat (length limit in Bristol Bay) and is not afraid to provide for herself and family without “Big Brother”. Want to be controlled swing radically left. Don’t want to be responsible, swing Cuomo.

      This is an example of the disconnect in what was once a Nation. No STAND ! No Constant ! I can understand someone being intimidated by a Woman who knows how to subsist, has made meat, has lived free, and knows the evil is in big government control. I guess living in the big city creates a social norm of understanding that there is no way a person can take care of themselves. Big City means one must depend on government, no matter how tyrannical because the grocery shelves are already empty on Sunday night, and WE have no issues YET !

      Palin is not perfect, and the worse thing is that she ran with another swing in the wind political hack. Palin is ignorant in regard to territorial powers, and abuses. Palin does not understand the political foreign powers that govern decision making in congress. Palin does not understand corporatism and its abuses. I have not heard Palin speak about the tyranny of fiat banking, but; that might get her killed (ask Reagan). Cuomo – well I believe Cuomo knows corporate abuse, and legislative abuse and will continue what is tyranny. With Palin one could have real hope for Change, and with democratic Obama – no change, just a faster run downhill to the pit. It is all perspective isn’t it. I have lived Free, and I want to life Free, I want YOU to live free. What you do in the privacy of your home is your business. What is done in public is OUR business. Obama is not free and does not want anyone to be free.

      Real Choice is not voting for evil. If one is disenfranchised with the corruption – disenfranchise. This is the essence of peaceful revolution – do not play with resident evil – it is corrosive, and corrodes.

    • Chris T. October 1, 2010, 5:18 pm

      Cuomo?

      If you know nothing about this self-aggrandizing, Guilianiesque, Spitzeresque buffon, other than his familial relation, that alone should be enough for you to vote for anyone else (or not at all).

      If recent history has taught us anything, it’s that we don’t need voter-nepotism by electing the brother, son, spouse etc of a former national leader..

      Teddy Kennedy, George W. Bush, Hillary Clinton,
      and on, all worse than their mostly forgettable predecessors.
      There are exceptions perhaps, and hoping that Rand Paul will be one of those, but the only real exception was the second Pres. Adams, who after his term as President, went back to the House and was a quite decent representative for his state, dying at his desk in Congress…

      So, if you can’t support Paladino, just stay home.

    • Benjamin October 1, 2010, 7:26 pm

      Steve,

      With all due respect to her pioneering spirit, I’m not buying that Sarah Palin is “a good but ignorant gal”. Ron Paul has been saying It for decades now, and he’s still alive. He’s still managed to get himself elected. So she either doesn’t want to learn, know, and rock the boat or she has learned and knows, and sides with Them.

      To mention Rand Paul again, the same can be said. He has no good reason to be consulting with open arms those same people who have over the years smeared and lambasted his father, all the while stating “I’m a more reasonable man than my father is”.

      http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2010/09/23/the-hollow-man-rand-pauls-father-complex/

      No surprise, really, that Palin endorses him, but not Ron Paul.

    • Steve October 1, 2010, 9:45 pm

      I tend to like Ron Paul. Yet, he will not go to Article I, sec. 8, cls. 5, and Article I, sec. 10, cls. 1. Ron Paul has not introduced a bill to prosecute the governors of the several states for High Treason – the same ole’ drum – The Trial of Thomas Earl of Strafford. Ron Paul says enough to sound like the radical the democracy nuts need in the house. Given the choice Ron Paul will never say on the floor of the house “Give me Liberty, or give me Death”. Until Mr. Paul does make the declaration he is just an enfranchisee sucking the benefits of mobocracy under feudal law. Dr. Paul is hard on the head of the federal reserve, but; there is nothing real except the fact the Banking Act of 1913 is treasonous in its designs to destroy the Constitution. Mr. Paul is SCARED to tell the reality of the present situation with the brass “scaag gee wizza dollar” being a crime under current case law – high treason. Ron Paul is democracy sounding right, nothing more. Dr. Paul supports legislative branch skullduggery. Dr. Paul is a corporate enfranchisee of the new feudalism. Dr. Paul may be the best in office, but; it ain’t good enough.

    • Benjamin October 1, 2010, 11:05 pm

      Steve,

      I agree that Ron Paul is not the perfect defender of Liberty, but he has still said, done, and understands more than any of them. Which is why he is, imv, the current measuring stick. If Sarah Palin falls short of that, well, inches shouldn’t be mistaken for feet and yards. Maybe if she spent more time doing her homework than collecting outrageous speaking and appearance fees…

  • John Wilson October 1, 2010, 2:28 pm

    Rick,
    Traveling in Central America as I write this, and not particularly concerned about the politics of the U.S.A. Having thrown in the towel, to let those of you who think this charade of “Democracy” can be brought back to some sort of sanity. Your email is one of a few that I read to keep me up to date on the shenanigans going on in the U.S.
    Keep up the great work, and maybe if we are lucky, both sides lose?
    Cheers from Guatemala.
    John D. Wilson

  • Jill8 October 1, 2010, 7:41 am

    BTW, did U folks see this? Guess what happens at the Federal Reserve that you always suspected happened?

    http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE68S01020100930

  • Jill8 October 1, 2010, 7:38 am

    Benjamin
    ” I hope that in the next elections. the tea party has thrown off all attempts to assimilate it into a republican/necon platform.”
    Its origins are as a “republican/necon” organization masquerading as a grassroots movement. It’s financed by 2 brothers whose combined fortune is exceeded in the U.S. only by that of Gates and Buffett.
    http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/08/30/100830fa_fact_mayer
    One of the 2 brothers is CEO of “the second largest privately held company (after Cargill) by revenue in the United States.”
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_G._Koch

    What we really need is a real grassroots 3rd party, that puts up candidates who have pledged to accept no money from Special Interest Groups and never to talk to lobbyists.

  • don October 1, 2010, 6:37 am

    Watching rats eat their own kind is one kind of entertainment; not my preference.
    I’m not akin to allowing them free rent on my head or sight. happy trading……..

  • donniemac October 1, 2010, 6:02 am

    I agree with the assessment that this is going to be a fun election year, no matter what side of the fence you are on!
    But I have to take exception with Benjamin’s comment on Rand Paul. When I first got to know libertarian politics, I came to the conclusion that Libertarians were naive. And I have found others who have come to the same conclusions, and these friends, both liberals and conservatives, are in basic agreement with libertarian principles, just do not see how well you can govern from strictly adhering to that platform. And that is what I like about Rand Paul, his approach on many positions appear to me to be practical compromises with the obviously libertarian teachings from his dad. Yes, there are some neocon elements as well as some liberal tendencies, but I think he will be able to influence other congressman/senators much more effectively than his dad! And I see that as a good thing. Oddball liberal that I am :-). I just hope that his positions do not get lost in the soundbite reporting that seems to dominate both the liberal and conservative media that 90% of our fellow citizens use as their only information sources.

    • Benjamin October 1, 2010, 6:56 am

      Well, on the “bright side”, I suppose that if he turns out to be much less like his father, we’d be no better or worse off than we were before.

      Good enough for ya? 🙂

      As for Libertarianism being unworkable, I respectfuly and heavily disagree on that. It just doesn’t work with politics as usual, is all.

  • Martin Snell October 1, 2010, 5:19 am

    You have to wonder what is in it to win a Governorship.

    If you spend $190 million of your own money to land a job that pays a far sight less each year, you must either be a) expecting to make a killing some how, b) have an ego the size of California, or c) be a lousy business woman.

    No wonder the US is in such a mess. How can any reasonable candidate compete against $$$$.

    Then you have tea partier Christine O’Donnell. Ex-witch, deep thinker on Evolution (why don’t we see still see monkeys evolving into humans) , and serially confused on what education she did or did not get, to mention just the latest “howlers” … How do candidates like this get this far? Mind boggling.

    Oh and if you really are looking for some “blood” I’d suggest hanging around with the old witch O’Donnell.

    • Benjamin October 1, 2010, 6:48 am

      “Then you have tea partier Christine O’Donnell…”

      Can’t says I know anything important about her. As for the comments she’s made thus far, The Daily Bell recently did an interview with Tibor Machan, where he said…

      http://www.thedailybell.com/1381/Tibor-Machan-on-the-US-Tea-Party-Its-Influence.html

      “If a Tea Party candidate or leader is pressed for views on matters other than the proper scope of government, the answer should be: “No comment on that since it isn’t a part of politics proper, not in a free country!” Yes, it is judicious, prudent to simply refuse to get caught up in all the issues that people may bring to the political table by teaching the lesson that they really aren’t political, even if they are on the minds of millions of people.”

      That’s good advice for _any_ candidate. Keep your personal opinions where they belong. Besides, I really don’t think most Americans give a hoot one way or another what they are or aren’t. I believe that’s “them” trying to cultivate into us, year after year, the idea that personal crap matters.

      But I have it on good authority from PT Barnum that there’s exactly one sucker born every minute. Now let’s see… that’s 525,600 suckers every year, and the birth rate itself is much higher…

      So again, what’s up with that? Why is every election year a circus?!

      Mind boggling, indeed.

  • anon October 1, 2010, 4:49 am

    It took a matter of hours of for Allred to be exposed as a pathological liar. It won’t take a few days to spread the information all over the country.

    • Chris T. October 1, 2010, 5:06 pm

      “If you spend $190 million of your own money to …b) have an ego the size of California…”

      Let’s ask Jon Corzine.
      He did it twice, blowing a huge wad on the Senate race, bailing out of that within one term, to blow another wad on becoming a truly looser governor.
      b) is surely correct. Once you have 100’s of millions, money is not the object anymore,but the power–real or miagined– that it can buy.
      Or, and hardly ever the case, but not impossible, you really want to do good, and that is your motivator.
      If Ron Paul had Bloomberg money (another example for you btw), that would be a lone example…

      “…Christine O’Donnell. Ex-witch, deep thinker on Evolution…”

      What a great smear. People can change, especially to what they believe to be correct. In our system of indoctrination, most of us start out as brainwashed, propagandized individuals, that believe the junk we are taught. If we now know better, its only because we found a way to free ourselves from those chains, mainly through access to better information and a willingness to absorb it.
      If you would hold someones one-time beliefs against them, then vitrually none of us qualify for anything.

      That is a general comment, knowing nothing about this candidate, I couldn’t comment on her situation, but trusting the sound-bite smear snippets of the MSM I certainly wouldn’t.

  • Benjamin October 1, 2010, 4:36 am

    “…one of them jumped on the back of the police chief and sank his teeth into the cop’s head.”

    No kidding? Ha! I wonder if it looked anything like this…

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ql4Ooz95ulU&feature=related

    But seriously (can one be serious during campaign season?), I have to agree. This is going to be one campaign season for the history books. Or tabloids, rather, seeing as how there really aren’t all that many good candidates to look forward to.

    The only one I found worth in is Jake Towne, running for PA’s 15th district. He’s a pretty sharp tack, that one. Lot’s of slamming and/or ignoring from his opponents and critics. A threat to the status quo, for sure, though it’s not looking too good for him. I do hope he gets it, as we can always use another Ron Paul-type in the House.

    Rand Paul, on the other hand, is/was a disappointment, more a neocon than like his father. And Peter Schiff I presume isn’t running in CT anymore (I once read he was supposed to be, but I haven’t heard anything in a long while about that; I’m not even sure of the man’s politics, at any rate).

    Beyond that, it’s a chaotic wasteland. I hope that in the next elections, the tea party has thrown off all attempts to assimilate it into a republican/necon platform. Things would actually get quite interesting then, I think.

    • bill October 1, 2010, 2:36 pm

      Benjamin,you are correct about Jake Towne. I live in the 15th district of P.A. and have been involved with his campaign since March. He is for real and his website is refreshingly candid compared to most politicians. He does not accept money from any special interests and is depending on US.
      Another race of special interest is John Dennis…who is running against Queen Nancy Pelosi. Ron Paul is a strong supporter of Dennis. Talk about good vs evil.
      If we have any idea what is good for US, we need to support these and other like minded people with money and votes. Now is the time to act.

    • Tom Paine October 1, 2010, 4:06 pm

      I saw a guy on Keiser’s show yesterday, a Republican from NC, endorsed by Ron Paul, whom I must say seemed like a very reasonable guy. Unfotunetely, his main theme seemed to be the “fair tax”, which would be to eliminate income taxes in favor of a consumption tax. Is that fair? Seems to me the lower your income the greater a percentage of it that will be spent on consumption, making it a very regressive, not fair tax. Of course, that could be somewhat rectified by excluding essentials such as food and clothing, etc.

      I heard Max say that he wished for a coalition of Paul and Nader, which is like what I have been saying for a long time, except I was saying Paul and Sanders. I truly believe “the truth lies in the middle” somewhere between progressivism and libertarianism, but we need honest brokers to find the happy median. Right now honest brokers in government are few and far between IMO.

    • Larry October 1, 2010, 5:13 pm

      It sounds as though you are against gasoline taxes and state sales taxes because they are regressive and unfair, Tom.

      When John Kerry buys a yacht, he pays enormously more in consumption tax than a poor schlub buying a Slurpee at the convenience store.

      If anyone thinks income taxes are somehow fair with its phone-book code of credits and deductions, alternate taxes, nontaxable income and nondeductible expenses, they are easily fooled.

    • Benjamin October 1, 2010, 6:27 pm

      Hey guys,

      Bill: Awesome! And I’ve donated to Towne, actually. Not much more I can do, other than that. Do me a favor and “waste” your vote, huh? 🙂

      Tom Paine and Larry: Yes, most consumption tax (replacing income tax) proposals I’ve read about do make exceptions for nessecities. That said, taxes are, imv, an archaic device that spell their doom. We can do without them, still pay for government, and without borrowing from a central bank. Gotta get the spending knocked down… waaay down… first, as well as get back to Constitutional standards in regards to money.

      Haven’t heard the other names mentioned, but I’ll look them up. I can always use good news (read: Pelosi GONE!)

    • bill October 1, 2010, 8:11 pm

      Tom Paine…From your remarks it seems you do not understand the true nature of the “Progressive Income Tax”.
      It came in the same year (1913) as did the Federal Reserve System. BOTH have been used to systematically loot and control the wealth of this and many other countries. ANY tax on any form of PRODUCTION is an abomination.
      Jake Towne’s article on the income tax is a good starting point.

      taxhttp://www.campaignforliberty.com/article.php?view=182

      As for the “fair tax” http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer is a good place to look around.

      Benjamin…..Yes , I will most certainly will “waste” my vote on Jake and other lesser candidates, as in most cases it will be an upgrade.