Squeeze Could Hang Bears on Ropes Till 2011

Say one thing for DaBoyz, they have infinite patience to wait until things turn their way, as things nearly always do. Stocks had been grinding sideways for nearly two months, but yesterday the prop-desk provocateurs instantly transformed the picture to their liking, goosing the broad averages into a powerful short squeeze that could keep the market buoyant for the remainder of the year. What was most impressive about this feat is that it leveraged some employment news that wouldn’t have elicited so much as a yawn in the good old days. Supposedly, the private sector added 93,000 non-farm jobs in November, up from 82,000 a month earlier. This is surely better news than we’ve grown accustomed to, but it is not good news per se, especially considering that jobs would have to grow at several times the current rate for nearly a decade to replace the estimated eight million positions lost to the Great Recession. 

Based on anecdotal evidence, it’s hard to tell where the new jobs are coming from.  It surely is not from the professions, which, to hear it first-hand from friends who are lawyers, Realtors and stockbrokers, remain in the doldrums. Nor is it in the trades, although one Master Electrician we know has been working overtime on big commercial jobs in Denver for more than a year. In Boulder, where the economy has remained relatively strong, the biggest area of growth seems to be, no kidding, Mexican restaurants.  In nearly every instance where a moderate to expensive restaurant has closed and a new one taken its place, the replacement has been a tacqueria.  The only exception that springs to mind is a Ted’s Montana Grill that opened just off Boulder’s main pedestrian thoroughfare. The steak house, one of a chain of restaurants owned by Ted Turner, stays crowded by offering very good burgers for $12 and a wine list with some good selections for under $20. Another restaurant, a popular breakfast-and-brunch spot owned by a friend of ours, is always packed with CU students, perhaps because mimosas and Bloody Marys are $1. On the retail side, there are quite a few large storefronts that are vacant, including a cavernous one that was occupied by Borders books.  But smaller spaces seem to be about 80-90 percent occupied, and street vendors say business is good if not great.

Paradoxical Buyers

Concerning the potentially lingering effects of yesterday’s short squeeze, the rally was powerfully impulsive in that it blew past numerous old peaks on the intraday charts. Our price targets for the Dow and the S&P 500 were bearish at the close on Tuesday, but by the time yesterday’s session ended, most of the targets had been invalidated.  Some bears would have covered short positions early on in the session, but there are always going to be some risk-takers, including a handful of die-hards, who will fight the rally for as long as possible. Paradoxically, it is these traders who will be supplying the buying power as stocks head inexorably higher into year’s end. It will be called the Santa Rally, of course. This pursy metaphor, along with one that may be even worse – i.e., a “Green [$$] Christmas” —  resurfaces every year only because newspapers can no longer afford competent editorial help.

(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • Other Paul December 2, 2010, 8:16 pm

    “Don’t fight the Fed.”

    This rally in stocks, from the infamous S&P’s 666 low (and the President’s great call that this might be a good time to invest in stocks near the low) has reinforced in me the correctness of the old, standard axiom, above.

    The Fed can monetize more dollars that the shorts have to bet with. I don’t see why the Fed has to stop its cooperation/coordination with the Treasury. Where has the dollar index gone since trillions of deficit dollars have been spent? Where are the bruises on the dollar after all the monetization abuse?

    Again, I’ll ask about the quadrillion in derivatives “problem.” Where have we seen any evidence that this is a problem now?

    When “Da Boyz” decide to make money on the short side, we’ll have a correction. No, you’re not on their Action Alert email distribution list. But, hopefully, on Rick’s.

    • redwilldanaher December 2, 2010, 8:41 pm

      Let me get this straight, if you have a good view from your Habitrail Penthouse, then it’s all good? Y, I don’t know. I have this thing about leaving the well-being of my family in the hands of veteran psychopaths. I’m not a historian but I do seem to remember a few times when a strategy such as this didn’t fare to well in the end, something relating to mass murder, cleansings, prison camps etc. keeps popping up in the back of my mind.

  • Bradley December 2, 2010, 7:04 pm

    The bulls are so damned smug about nothing but upside between here and year end. (Not including you, Rick). Makes me want to see some serious downside whippy action just to smack them on their big floppy bovine ears….

    (And heck, I’m not even short!)

    • redwilldanaher December 2, 2010, 8:32 pm

      Agreed Bradley. But it is rare when they are not. It never bothers me when I hear one of them make a technical case for it but when I find myself listening to the same BS over and over again my ears begin to bleed. Look at what’s been required to stitch the illusion draperies back together. So much has been needed to orchestrate this farce and yet they’re out there spinning as if nothing has ever gone wrong or could go wrong again. We only know a little of what the FED actually (and theoretically illegally) engaged in to save the collective bacon of the brain dead/intentionally lying bulls but apparently it’s only served to convince these empty suits that the US Govt./FED PUT is more reliable than ever. I find myself in agreement with Gary for a change. You never can know for sure but without a free and honest press the illegal games and increased centralization of power will continue for as long as they want. I think though what bothers me more than the bulls are the “go along, get along” rationalizers that would rather see this con continue than to reclaim something like what was originally intended by the founders of the USA. I guess the narcotic effects and conditioning efforts that were written of by those famous 20th century authors weren’t too far of a drive from Mainstreet USA after all. Every time the I hear “How could the German people have gone along with it….?” or laughter at the story of the Indians trading Manhattan in exchange for trinkets, I just shake my head and walk way. I like that deal a lot more than trading what was once a good way of life for poorly manufactured disposables from the other side of the world and remaining happily bewildered while looking to the black hand for what it’s willing to give to them. What % of Americans have any clue at all as to how the cartel/MIC use US “resources” to loot the world in the name of “freedom”?

  • gary leibowitz December 2, 2010, 6:50 pm

    Seasonality and the last gasp spike up for equities combines for a great story book ending. We have now entered the spin-zone where everything will be seen with pink tinted glasses. Once the ominous Oct/Nov debacle months failed to shake the markets it resulted in clear sailing till after the holiday celebration is over.

    The 2 year anniversary will be this February. I expect at the very least a sharp pull back at that time. The Fed has been relying on one major assumption that will be tested next year. If the markets and economy is propped up long enough then old behaviors will return. The only problem with that scenario is that the big players, banks and corporations, are not on board. In fact it can be argued that corporate profits have soared during their austerity policies and they would be foolish to reverse that trend. On the consumer side we have years to go before we see any stability to home prices.

    My assumptions will also be tested in the first quarter of next year. I have always assumed that no matter how governments fix or manipulate the economy a natural equilibrium will take place. In simple terms a society that relied on debt and easy money can’t be sustained indefinitely. When that society pushes that philosophy to the extreme there will always be a snap back situation where the economy must go thru the consequences of such actions. An economic pendulum that has swung so far one way is not likely to be tempered on the reverse swing. The Fed is testing that theory and is trying to temper most of the negative effects.

    If the world governments succeed then hyper-inflation is a given; if not then a deep deflationary spiral will result. The result of this 2 year experiment should be seen in 2011.

    &&&&&&

    I agree with you point-for-point, Gary. RA

  • Dale December 2, 2010, 5:32 pm

    I think Nathan Martin says it very well in his blog today. “SPX 1200 will now act as support and it appears that we have a wave 5 underway. This wave will be based on nothing but phony money, while real people with what little money they have left continue to withdraw their money from the markets, now into our 31st week of continuous mutual fund outflows. Wave 5’s are notoriously difficult to play – sometimes they truncate, sometimes they extend. They are the distribution wave, the wave that causes people to capitulate just in time for the real reversal to finally come. Front running, as I’ve repeatedly said, is a fool’s game – as is this entire market at this juncture in history.”

    Nathan’s Economic Edge @ http://economicedge.blogspot.com/

  • JohnJay December 2, 2010, 4:55 pm

    TPTB more or less operate in a vacuum now.
    The steady erosion of the wealth, civil rights, and political power of the average citizen has run it’s course.
    The chosen few are the government employee, or upper level corporate types.
    We are here to pay taxes to support government workers or provide .0077 percent 28 day loans to big banks etc.
    So politics is moot in the sense of little or no practical value to you and me.
    However, their footprints are all over the charts and you can make some money if you are nimble and pay attention.
    Just like those fish that follow sharks around and eat the remnants of their kills.
    Make some money and feather your nest, the looting will continue unabated in any case.

  • Rantly McTirade December 2, 2010, 4:55 pm

    Or, in an athletics analogy, the debt deflation depression
    side fumbles the ball away inside the red zone, once again confirming that said ddd simply will not be occuring, since it hasn’t occured so far under the most advantageous conditions for it in 75 years.
    Itulips’ Ka-Poom wins(and that’s in no way a positive
    outcome), ddd loses

    &&&&&

    Wake up and smell the quadrillion-dollar asset implosion!! Ka-Poom was, and is, the stupidest theory I ever heard — deaf, dumb and blind for the last three years to all that has actually occurred. RA

  • Wyz December 2, 2010, 4:48 pm

    And yet again it was an overnight, pre-opening move! By the time regular trading started the squeeze was on. The large number of short positions reported over the past few days concerned me because of the real possibility of a short squeeze.

  • redwilldanaher December 2, 2010, 4:03 pm

    And don’t forget, we got 3D TVs, we got Smartphones, we got Volts and Leafs, we got Google and Apple TV, we got NetFlix, we got Chipotle, and we got great business leaders like Trump and Uncle Warren, and great Congressional leaders like Pelosi and Boehner, and we got the greatest orator and most intelligent man that’s ever walked the face of the earth and we’re lucky enough to have it that he’s the President. If this doesn’t scream “wealth creation” and “real problem solving” and “visionary” to you then you need to watch more CNBC.

  • redwilldanaher December 2, 2010, 3:52 pm

    One of the main problems, from my perspective, is that its nearly impossible for the masses to collectively “call them” on anything. This is just another way of saying that they can lie, cheat, steal, reshuffle the deck, change the game, change the rules of any game, end the game early, extend the game, define the game (you get the idea)… and never get called on it because we do not have a free press. There are so many things that go into it all, and we’ve covered many here over the course of time but some are worth noting again and again. Let’s take the conditioning, especially of Americans. They’re numb to most of this because they find it inaccessible. “Trillions” no longer shocks the majority of them. Most folks probably end up in the middle of the curve with these sentiments: “I don’t care what they do, I just want them to fix the problems.” Seems like most people are content to live their lives out in a thoroughly corrupted matrix as long as they can carve out a little customization of it for themselves. “What’s that?, You say the Corporate Accounting is a fraudulent joke, as are nearly all of the government statistics.” The attitude: “Well I’m not so sure about that, I mean there are rules and standards. They’d be prosecuted. The free market and thus the value of the “scoop” will incentivize the media to cover this and I’ve heard nothing about this myself. AND, if one is cheating then they all are and that’s how it is and if our stats are a fraud it doesn’t matter because that’s what everyone has agreed to focus on and thus that’s what we have to work with to be on the same page…” The rationalization will never end until it ends. Intentionally undereducated Americans. Craftily Conditioned over time through the MSM by the black hand. Too far removed from what made the USA the USA before now becoming the USSA. Now pressured on nearly all sides with little energy and time left to see through the illusions and a desire for things to remain “fantastic”. And finally, when the Matrix experiences severe technical difficulties, they start to see a few mere glimpses of reality before the Cartel slams the door shut with authority. How would you now feel if you were the Cartel? Emboldened? I think so. They’ve point-blank lied and cheated for all the world to see and they’ve gotten away with it. Cleanly. There will be a few dumb fall-guys as there always have been and that’s it. They’ve actually benefited greatly from “these difficult times” as was to be expected. They have more money and more power as a result of the crises. Naturally feeling emboldened they’re now considering franchising as a way to expand, from CNBC:

    US Ready to Back Bigger EU Stability Fund: Official
    Published: Wednesday, 1 Dec 2010 | 2:20 PM ET

    The United States would be ready to support the extension of the European Financial Stability Facility via an extra commitment of money from the International Monetary Fund, a U.S. official told Reuters on Wednesday.

    “There are a lot of people talking about that. I think the European Commission has talked about that,” said the U.S. official, commenting on enlarging the 750 billion euro ($980 billion) EU/IMF European stability fund. “It is up to the Europeans. We will certainly support using the IMF in these circumstances.”

    Just a whiff of this was enough to propel yesterday’s short squeeze as Rick has accurately noted.

    Where does this leave us? IMO, it leaves us in a time and place where nothing that has historically or theoretically mattered should still matter… should matter at all. It’s whatever they want it to be whenever they want it to be and they reserve the right to redefine the terms without prior notice. How is this possible? Reread from the top: They can’t be called on anything.

    • Steve December 2, 2010, 6:34 pm

      Mirror reflection of the morality of the masses. Its not a crime if you don’t get caught, or the guy you voted for doesn’t prosecute you. Thanks Redwill

  • sam spetzigue December 2, 2010, 1:59 pm

    Who would pay $12 for a burger?
    And wine to go with it?
    That’s a class menu.

    &&&&&

    Comes with a bottomless bucket of great dill pickles, fries and quite a bit more atmosphere than Burger King, Sam. RA

  • Benjamin December 2, 2010, 9:15 am

    I’m not normally one to say “look on the bright side”, but, well, look on the bright side… Better employed at a Mexican restaurant than one of the millions of unemployed that won’t be getting anymore unemployment checks in their stockings.

    But on the other hand, the way things are looking, the tax cuts will expire, extended to no one. So serving tacos might not be worth the slaving (for all that people will be going out to eat even less than they already are).

    So there it is. The crystal ball says we will continue to be depressed 🙁 going into 2011.