What a Lovely Day It Was…

Yesterday’s newsworthy satisfactions were marred only by the passage of a spending bill that unfortunately will allow the U.S. Government to avoid shutting down.  Putting aside this disappointment, which was not unexpected, all seemed right with the world: stocks got bitch-slapped for a change, bullion prices screamed, Charlie Sheen and Col. Qadaffy appeared headed for well-deserved oblivion (Sheen could conceivably fare better than his Libyan counterpart, since there will be no Kadhafi reruns), and winter temperatures here in Boulder, Colorado, hovered near the mid-60s. What more could one have asked?  Actually, our perfect day would have doubled or even tripled the Dow’s 168-point decline, since every significant selloff helps bring America closer to the day when investors and the world-at-large forsake the matrix of lies, delusions and hubris that have made true economic recovery all but impossible. 

Alas, the spinmeisters and news media, if not the rest of us, continue to cling to the Bernanke narrative that the economy is returning to health, albeit very slowly. That’s despite deflation in the real estate sector so severe and prolonged that even optimists no longer regard it as cyclical; soaring food and energy prices; and budget crises at all levels of government that will ultimately push unemployment to heights not seen since the 1930s. Under the circumstances, you can hardly blame us for betting against every stock-market rally. We’ve been doing this reflexively for months: getting short at each minor Hidden Pivot rally target in expectations that one of them will prove to be The Top – the whimpering end of the Granddaddy of All Short Squeezes launched almost exactly two years ago. 

Locking in Gains 

Our strategy has benefited from consistent (although not necessarily repeatable) success at predicting tradable tops, even if none has proved particularly enduring. A week ago, for instance, Rick’s Picks prepared subscribers to short the QQQ, a popular trading vehicle, if it hit a “Hidden Pivot” resistance at 57.96.  A tedious grind higher achieved that target four days later, and so we got short using a very tight stop-loss to theoretically limit our risk.  Specifically, we bought four March 57 puts for a total of $244, and although we stood ready to dump them if the QQQs had gone even slightly higher, hitting 58.12, the rally never exceeded 58.05. Since then, we have taken partial profits so that we have just one put option remaining for every four originally purchased. Adjusting its costs basis for gains already booked gives it a carrying cost of negative 0.12, meaning the worst we can do, even if the QQQs turn savagely higher, is make $12 on the trade before commissions. At yesterday settlement price of 1.12, we had a theoretical gain of $125 for each put still held. 

The purpose of such trades is to initiate highly leveraged bets, but also to vent our permabearish bias without putting much money at risk.  In practice, it has been possible to short this market the entire way up, and to be wrong each time but still make money.  We sometimes refer to this tactic as a “cheap parlor trick,” since anyone can learn to identify “hidden” price-reversal points.  If you’re interested in learning how to do it yourself, click here for more information about our proprietary Hidden Pivot Method for trading and forecasting. 

(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • jagno March 7, 2011, 5:29 pm

    Rick, I really thought there was little chance of making it past the censor and I do appreciate you publishing my comment. I simply wanted to support Resolute’s politely stated viewpoint that some words are inherently, well, sensitive. And donniemac, your comment is right on, I don’t give a damn either. I just don’t want to see this great forum crippled by turning a deaf ear or a blind eye to a simple and civil observation.

  • donniemac March 7, 2011, 3:36 am

    If the word is a used as a putdown, I try not to use the word.
    If someone decides to take offense from the use of a rather simple, but accurate word, tough. But don’t let me stand in the way of one’s right to be offended. Just don’t expect me to give a damn.
    But I have to take issue with your comment about attracting the super-sensative Rick, as they need yours, and many of the regulars, insight as much, if not more, as the next person. 🙂

  • jagno March 5, 2011, 6:53 am

    Resolute,

    I’m with you, pay no mind to those respondents trying to justify the use of ‘bitch-slap’ as just a phrase, never mind that it’s sexist. Well, hey, let’s work in some ageism, how about ‘old dried-up bitch-slap’; racism is easy, ‘nigger bitch-slap’ or how about ‘jewboy bitch-slap’.

    If it’s distressing to Rick that he might be ‘attracting sensitive, politically correct readers’, then let the flood gates open and let’s use every offensive phrase we can think to slur with on this site. That ought to keep things real in here.

    &&&&&&

    You’re welcome to test my limits, Jagno, although “jewboy bitch-slap” flunks so badly as metaphor that it hardly offends. RA

  • Tim March 3, 2011, 8:15 am

    Well you might say he can’t think of a word to express how he feels and just wrote the word the first came off his mind.

  • mario cavolo March 2, 2011, 9:52 pm

    Off the cuff I would have said a trillion is a 100,000 million while feeling even that number is far beyond our grasp. To clarify it is indeed a million million simply reminds us that rising prices and falling currency values are a reality approaching like the light at the end of the tunnel but to find the light is fire at the gates of hell not a sunny day in Central Park. Except for the Wall Street folks that is…

    Cheers, Mario

    • Robert March 3, 2011, 6:45 pm

      Yeah,

      I guess all this new money will just serve as the starting gun in the race to see who can be the first Trillionaire on Forbe’s top 100 list…. Makes me want to vomit.

      Suddenly, Tiger Woods accomplishment as the first Billionaire in Professional Sports seems pale and boring, When there are Global financiers who are aggressively trying to position themselves to be able to buy Tiger Woods a thousand times over…

      Ridiculous.

  • Rich March 2, 2011, 9:17 pm

    In putting together a two-hour presentation on Big4 for TSAA-SF at 1 PM on Saturday 19 March 2011, preceeded by such illuminaries as Rick Ackerman, Jon Najarian, Martin Pring and Bob Prechter, came across some interesting links to $583 T BIS Derivatives, Ed Thorp’s 2003 45 year Paper in Quantitative Finance, PCoast Sr VP Ken Uston who beat the dealers and died at 52 in Paris, and this one to Alex Jones: The Most Paranoid Man in America, in Rolling Stone, which covered The Vampire Squid last year:
    http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/talk-radios-alex-jones-the-most-paranoid-man-in-america-20110302?print=true

  • Roger Erickson March 2, 2011, 7:42 pm

    Rick,
    It’s impressive to see how much work you’ve put into educating currency users on protecting themselves from the madness of crowds lacking understanding – in this case of the purpose of issuing their own currency in the first place.

    In the end, however, currency management by currency users is at best only a local hedge against the more serious goal of managing our own, national degree of coordination. When the Marines someday fail to uphold rigorous war-fighting doctrine, how would you make the call to either find a way to invest in group coordination vs desert? As US citizens, how do we invest in return-on-coordination, rather than just stay alive while considering when to abandon a sinking ship?

  • Robert March 2, 2011, 7:34 pm

    Resolute-

    We hold these truths to be self-evident- That all men who can’t look past the verbality of terms chosen to express one’s emotional inclination toward the world around them, probably needs a good bitch-slap themselves…

    🙂

  • Resolute March 2, 2011, 4:15 pm

    Rick,
    You might want to eliminate the term ‘bitch slapped’ from your vocabulary for reasons that should be self evident.
    Thanks

    &&&&&&

    Couldn’t you just unsubscribe? It’s distressing to think I might be attracting sensitive, politically correct readers. RA

    • Steve March 2, 2011, 4:38 pm

      Resolute, What is the problem with reality. Get a grip, and then go to Australia to learn how to be grounded in reality. “A rose by any other name is still a Rose !!!!!!!!!!!!” The word “spin” is just fancy for LIAR. The word “gay” is still cover for HOMOSEXUAL.

      Just get over it.

      Is the word “Allodial”, “Allodialist”, “Allodium” known in real meaning ? Is the word “Republic” known in real meaning? Propaganda works by changing the meaning of words to reflect something the REAL ITEM is not. Republic and Democracy mean the same thing. And, if one does not believe they are the same then how about Representative Democracy , which is still a tyrany run by despots leading to violent destruction, based in the language and meaning of the Framer Mr. James Madison.

      Please check out the Outback for a tune up!

  • John Jay March 2, 2011, 3:45 pm

    Red and Martin,
    You are both right.
    The only thing that will solve those problems is for the Federal government to go bankrupt and shut down, then to emerge at the size and power that the Founding fathers intended.
    There are no political solutions to this mess, only financial ones.
    Since Congress has just cut a whole two billion form the budget so far, it won’t be too much longer.
    Washington DC and suburbs remain the only boom town left in America because government is the only growth industry left here.
    Until the dollar collapses.

    • Benjamin March 2, 2011, 7:03 pm

      “The only thing that will solve those problems is for the Federal government to go bankrupt and shut down, then to emerge at the size and power that the Founding fathers intended.”

      I disagree, JJ. How is that a government long since bankrupt is still avoiding shut-down?

      Because they have… checks! Beautiful, blank, accetable checks by the boatload! And if it bounces, no prob, man. Just write a check for that check!

      People _are_ going to have to wake up and become much more assertive.

  • redwilldanaher March 2, 2011, 3:32 pm

    Lovely in some respects Rick but the real news that is no longer covered yielded a long list of loss of freedoms and heretofore inconceivable intrusion into the private lives of “citizens”. I can’t decide between the TSA lying about patting down a 9 year old AFTER his transportation journey had ended, the potential swabbing of DNA or the high radiation scanners, again from our friends at TSA, the Justice dept. playing video games instead of prosecuting videotaped voter intimidation or the former intelligence offer that was roughed up by big brother when he literally turned his back in silent protest upon hearing more of Hilary Clinton’s lies in-person. The slow process mass-conditioning continues as the rapid decline accelerates.

  • Martin Snell March 2, 2011, 3:09 pm

    I am of the opinion that one of the reasons the sheeple and the MSM don’t see the size of the issue is that most people can not “handle” large numbers – basically we did not evolve the ability to be comfortable with billions and trillions.

    So show a crowd of people to someone and few would be able to even come close to estimating its true size. Now take this into the economics arena. Deficits of billions seem like “a lot of money” and deficits of trillions “seem like a lot of money”, but few can comfortably “feel” the scale of the difference.

    I once asked people on a blog to quickly answer the following question – How many millions in a trillion? Of the people that responded only 60% got the answer right (a million).

    Unfortunately there is no easy fix for this number illiteracy, and it does make addressing the entire financial crisis that much more difficult.

    In my discussions with others, when they mention the economy is improving, I continue to try to use simple examples to show how much stimulus is being applied (the deficit) and how small the impact is from this stimulus.

    Every time retail sales beat by .1% I say “look the federal government every day is pumping 5 times what WalMart sells into the economy, of course retails sales are going up … but shouldn’t they being going up by a lot more?”

    Sure car sales are up (and financing remains amazingly cheap), but at a 13 million annual unit pace, that’s only about total annual sales of $250 billion (at $20,000 a car), or about 2 months deficit spending.

    So in simple terms, a move to cut the deficit in half would be equivalent to removing more than everything sold at WalMart and every new car sold from the economy. Yup, a mess!

    Just wondering if we are going to see a Wil-E- Coyote moment, or just a long slow decline.

    • redwilldanaher March 2, 2011, 4:33 pm

      Martin, I agree wrt the sheeple and the “numbers” but the MSM grasps them perfectly which is one reason then treat them like the plague.

      “All media exist to invest our lives with artificial perceptions and arbitrary values.” – Marshall McLuhan

      It’s just part of the MSM’s marching orders from TPTB. The MSM is mendacious mis/dis -information and distraction. A powerful herding tool. Turn on CNBC and you’ll see that today’s over the top fist-pounding propaganda is the equivalent to a barrel of lying roid-monkeys performing a circus show act when compared to the late 90’s when CNBC was merely fixed in a permanent state of dubiety.

    • Benjamin March 2, 2011, 6:55 pm

      In regards to the numbers, I think it’s worse than the “unfathomability” of trillions. And maybe even it’s not that, but something else.

      The government could/should/dammit, NOW!, even if there are later consequences. We’ll deal with those when we get there. But tomorrow never seems to come. Instead, you get a bunch of grinning politicians, nervously dry-washing their hands, that “can’t”. The genie is out of the bottle. You can’t put a genie back in the bottle. The vagaries of politics and economics, you see. This gives way to emboldened defenders that simply _won’t_, under any circumstances.

      Along that line, and because I hate NASA so much, you get people that see their cut as “just a snowflake on Antarctica. Go blame someone else. Shoo!”. Back when _one million dollars_ (pinky to lips) was a lot of money is where trillion dollar debts were born. Back when it was alot is where too-big-to-fail was raised.

      So really, when you think about it, it’s not trillions. It’s millions, and probably less. What people don’t see until it’s too late is the snowball effect. Or, if they do, no problem. That’s the future’s mess to deal with.