Peak…Everything

[Crude oil is just one of many things the world is running out of, says our friend Tom McCafferty, a frequent contributor to Rick’s Picks, in the guest commentary below. Never one to pass up an opportunity, Tom, author of Options Demystified and numerous other books on trading, suggests using puts and calls to manage short-term risks while investing for the long haul in “real entities that produce real products.” RA]

We are all familiar with all the hullabaloo in recent years over Peak Oil.  Dozens of books and websites devoted an enormous about of space to scaring the pants off of us. In a few years, we would be all be sitting in a dark, cold room without access to “Dancing with the Stars”.  Man …that will be a bummer. Before you get your blood pressure back under control, I’m here to tell you the Peak Oil is just the beginning. The World is facing more peaks that it can handle in the next few decades. For example:

•  Peak Water:  The World does not have enough water for crops or the increasing population.  Every wonder why China was so aggressive to control sleepy little Tibet?  Guess where the origins of the five great Chinese rivers are located?  Or why it is importing so many tons of soybeans?  When thinking about food importation, think of it as just a substitute for importing water.  China is not alone.  In India, the Green Revolution is now a disaster.

•  Peak Population:  How many people can the World sustain?  I’m afraid we are going to find out the hard way.  More specifically, how many senior citizens can it take care of … think of our Social Security system and then think of countries like Russia or Italy that have an even more serious aging challenge.  China is right in line because of its one-child policy.

•  Peak Money: How much fiat currency can the World float?  Remember, there has never a fiat currency that did not collapse.

•  Peak Weather:  Global Warning or long-term cycles?  It doesn’t matter.  Oceans and temperatures are rising.  Go long hip boots.

•  Peak Politics:  It has always been a mess and it only seems to get worse.  Are there any politicians or leaders that are not just out for themselves?  Sadly, it also applies to their constituents.

•  Peak Taxes:  Will there every be enough tax money to solve every problem?  Can our cities, states and national governments every balance a budget and reduce their deficits?  If we can’t, how are the poorer countries going to cope?

My point is there are more than enough problems facing the World and its investors to keep all the prognosticators busy.  My advice is to trade short-term using options to manage the volatility and long term invest in real entities that produce real products that are needed to soften the critical “peak” areas.

(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • mike May 24, 2011, 3:39 am

    there is a finite amount of ipods on this planet. is there a problem with ipod supply? are we seriously threatened that we might not get enough ipods come next year? what makes them magically appear out of the ground? could it be the price?

    what if we proclaim a right to ipod, and make them cheaper to those not willing to produce, while at the same time transfer the control over ipod manufacturing from Jobs to the government? encourage people to share the ipods, introduce quotas on ipod use, and roll out world-wide campaigns designed to prompt us all to “save the ipod”?

    which way would this influence the ipod supply come next year?

  • Basher May 21, 2011, 11:37 pm

    Peak Water, Peak Oil, Peak Trees….

    Rick, you should know that there is no such thing as peak of resource (Reisman G, Capitalism, – the treatise on economics). As prof. Reisman puts it: – “Whole earth is nothing but a ball of resources.”

    George Carlin didn’t know it, but he had enough common sense to feel instinctively that all the “Peak” worries are foolish.

    Ok, I’ll explain. Let us take “peak water”:

    (1) Every resource used must be paid for, and if it is not paid for then the shortage develops.

    Currently, we live in (almost) world-wide socialism. The result of socialism is always a depletion of resources and shortages, just rewind that USSR history in your mind.b Why should it be so? Because, as Mises pointed out in 1928, the Socialism has a giant deadly flaw, – it can not know what is too much and what is not enough, because it doesn’t have a price discovery mechanism. You have nothing to worry about, he said, they will weed themselves out.

    Now, that is a prediction. Fast forward about 70 years. That is exactly what has happened. I am retelling the past history here to show that the principle (1) above holds, and we would do well if we allow ourselves to be guided by it.

    As we do live in (almost) world-wide socialism, then, we must have (almost) world-wide shortages developing. And indeed they are all around us, water shortage is just being one of them. Water (available for immediate use) is short, because, we have banned the price discovery mechanism for it. What different did we expect?

    Currently, the water price is NOT based on free market principles (bigger consumer gets lower offer, besides that everyone else gets the same price). Instead, the price for water is based on (chuckling uncontrollably) and being the obverse-proportional to the “need” for water. Instead of letting people decide how much water at the current prices they are willing to consume, we install “water saving features” in their faucets, and lowering the price of water for those doing the least productive things with it.

    We should not be surprised, therefore to observe more and tighter shortages of water.

    Switch the pricing of water back to free market price discovery, and the magic of capitalism will turn it all on it’s feet once again, and prove that there is no end to the available water supplies.

    This is not how it looks to the government officials in Washington and other similarly socialized countries. Not having any education to speak of, but the government schools, the leaders of our world are blind and incapable of leadership, for they don’t know how the world works. What they have learnt in their government schools is of no use in real world, where fairy-tales don’t count.

    To these uneducated individuals, it obviously look like a crisis (the one of their own making). Do you expect them to solve it as if they knew what they are doing? Of course not. They will proceed with the only solution they see – depopulation.

    • A. Rand Fan May 22, 2011, 6:32 am

      Very good point about fair market pricing. However, the amount of water is a constant. The Earth is a closed system.

    • mario cavolo May 23, 2011, 3:13 am

      Basher, we get your point but you can’t apply it so generally. China has a genuine, serious water problem, despite that issue currently taking a back seat to other headlines. No matter the politics, the problem is real.

  • Basher May 21, 2011, 11:10 pm

    “They, like investors in India, cannot afford much gold. They can, however, afford silver (currently).”

    Oh yeah? So, you’re saying that a $50 worth of Silver is more affordable than a $50 worth of Gold?

    If that is you basis of thinking, I hope you didn’t invest accordingly.

  • Anon May 21, 2011, 6:03 pm

    Still MORE reasons why silver will outperform gold, over the next decade:

    I’m A Crazy Silver-Bug…Why Aren’t You?, by Bix Weir
    (Or, 33 Reasons To Buy SILVER Instead of Gold)
    http://www.roadtoroota.com/public/597.cfm

    The Silver Bullet and the Silver Shield
    http://dont-tread-on.me/the-silver-bullet-and-the-silver-shield/

    Crash JP Morgan – Buy Silver (Episode 96, Keiser Report)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wN0rcNJXFfI

  • Anon May 21, 2011, 6:02 pm

    It is clear, that silver will outperform gold, long-term. Why? Because, 99.999% of the earth’s population are POOR. They, like investors in India, cannot afford much gold. They can, however, afford silver (currently). Chinese buyers are (currently) favoring gold, although, they are buying both gold and silver – in droves. Eventually, Chinese investors will favor silver, too.

    • mario cavolo May 23, 2011, 3:10 am

      Chinese can buy small purchases in per gram quantities so they can afford either. It is only a question of which may bring better returns.

  • Anon May 21, 2011, 6:01 pm

    What is needed, are U.S. Treasury-issued (ie, Sovereign-issued) Notes, NOT Rothschild-Goldman-Sucks’-’Fed’-issued Notes. We DO NOT need a return to a ‘gold-standard’ as is often bandied-about. This would simply allow the self-proclaimed ‘elites’, to regain control over the new gold-backed currency, since they already own all the gold… (Thus, the correct answer is: U.S. Treasury-issued Notes. Period.) Until this happens, LOAD UP ON SILVER.

  • Anon May 21, 2011, 5:44 pm

    Peak…silver…by 2020

  • mario cavolo May 21, 2011, 7:40 am

    Peak China Gold…:)

    “China itself now accounts fro 25% of global gold investment demand, compared to India’s 23%. WGC MD for Far East Albert Cheng said that in March 2010, the organization predicted that gold demand in China would double by 2020, but now, such doubling may be achieved sooner on inflationary expectations as well as rising income level in the country.”

    The question about China is to identify where the buying is coming from…what % is institutional or individual…Chinese funds, etc….

    It is important to note…imagine your online checking or savings bank acct back in the good ‘ol USA with a simple precious metals window to buy and sell 24 hours a day from the real time chart of PM price…gold,silver and platinum.

    From this we conclude, to the masses in China PM purchases are incredibly convenient. Chinese have a different mentality…they think very wisely about where to store their precious saved assets…far less social security / govt support nets here so they have learned to save soooo well. So do they put their HUGE amounts of cash into real estate ?….neutral choice, that market is a bit flat now after the stellar run up of the past 3 years, 2nd tier cities are good choices but there won’t be huge returns….so how about stocks?…yes, not bad, but they also feeling peaky and speculative, so they are not in such great favor, especially considering interest rate increases and other bank tightening happening here…one could conclude fairly confidently that Chinese will more and more find PM’s as a reasonable choice for asset store, sitting there like an empty apartment :), and so this will keep continued upward pressure on PM prices. Caveat, like many, may patiently wait for further dips to accumulate which may or may not materialize…

    Cheers, Mario

  • Marc Authier May 21, 2011, 2:12 am

    Wrong question. How many Americans Dreams can the Earth sustain ? Answer. Certainly not a China American Dream or India American Dream. Just imagine one fraction of second seing all of China and India consuming the same amount of oil as USA. Guaranteed WW III and yes it will be about oil like WW II.

  • F. Beard May 21, 2011, 1:01 am

    I assure you that the only peak we need be concerned about is peak immorality.

    And since our money system is based on government backed theft of purchasing power from the entire population including and especially the poor then we should be concerned indeed.

    But hey, pretend shiny metals will fix things. Except they won’t.

  • BDTR May 20, 2011, 11:44 pm

    A wholly appropriate essay and commentary for the eve of end of the world as we know it. And, yes, I feel fine.

    Peak existence, as it were, will take care of the markets Monday after a contemplative Sunday, for all of you left-behinders at least. It’s probably why the Donald peaked, then rested his bid for terrestrial glory, and why finally having to say you’re sorry came to Newt as if in a dream. I’m afraid it was too little to late for them both, but I’m confident that they’ll feel right at home in the bosom of the many horned one.

    In any case, I won’t be needing my hedge hoard of PM’s anymore since there’s absolutely no doubt of my inclusion in the celestial event scheduled for 6pm sharp on Saturday. I just wanted to say farewell to all of you unlucky and undeserving mortals that will continue to have to deal with subservience to the anti-Christ.
    But after eight years of Bush/Cheney and two plus with Obama, it won’t likely pose too difficult an adjustment or even seem like anything out of the ordinary.

    Thanks, Rick, for the memories of massive and peak IN/DE debate of late. Sorry that you, too, will have to continue guiding the hell-bound to peak depth, Mario, Steve, John Jay, Chris T. and the rest. (Although, good news for Benjamin, much to everyone’s surprise here!)

    So, be good, even though it’s way too late for you. You can at least short everything Monday when the market from Hell opens it’s gaping, fiery maw of desolation to consume all who enter. As a final gesture of defiance, …go long marshmallows, …for the hell of it.

    We’ll be looking down on you all with best wishes, of course, for an eternity of peak success. It’s as close as you’ll get.

    Ever.

    • Cam Fitzgerald May 21, 2011, 2:34 am

      Ha ha, that was a pretty damn good post.I will be ready. Going to hell myself, no doubt. I could short it all but whats the point if I can’t enjoy the proceeds.

  • Jacques Redou May 20, 2011, 7:24 pm

    QUOTE:

    “Carol May 20, 2011 at 4:53 pm

    Great point or put another way ….

    If you took the current population of the world ~ 7 billion and gave them each a 5×2 (10 square feet) of space to stand in you would NOT take up the total area of an average sized COUNTY in any state in this country. The “belief” that we are over populated in bs BUT it does serve the elites agenda (depopulation) to get rid of all us “useless eaters”.

    So beleive on if you want to it is all propoganda!”

    Carol,

    How About we look at this another way………….?

    “• 62,860 trees must be cut to provide pulp for a single edition of the Sunday New York Times. ” -from the City of Miami waste/recycling website

    “Apr 26, 2010 … In the last year, circulation at The New York Times dropped 5.2 percent on Sunday, to 1.4 million copies” – from NYTimes.com

    World Population is:

    “World 6,919,599,344
    13:16 UTC (EST+5) May 20, 2011”
    from ‘world population clock.com’

    So, Carol, suppose the population of the world comes to Your County and everybody wants to read the Times on Sunday?

    62,860 trees
    divided by
    1,400,000 copies of Sunday NYTimes (current approximate circulation)

    is

    .0449 trees per copy
    multiplied by
    6,919,599,344 people standing (or sitting)
    on ten foot squares

    gives 310,690,010 trees that need to be Cut.
    that’s 310 Million plus (if I did the arithmetic right) Trees – just for one day’s edition.

    that’s 22 copies of the NYTimes Sunday Edition per tree.

    So, you are right, there is no Overpopulation Problem. There is a Tree Cutting problem.
    Of course, I guess they could just pass one Copy around.

    • Carol May 20, 2011, 8:19 pm

      Lol that is hilarious.

      Yes everyone on the earth needs to have their own paper copy of the DEAD MSM(main stream media) rag containing nothing but propaganda.

      Oh and BTW trees are a RENEWABLE resource.

    • Cam Fitzgerald May 21, 2011, 2:29 am

      Tell that to an Ethiopia where 97% of all forests have now been cut and every time a small sapling grows big enough someone cuts it down and turns it into charcoal for cooking.

      Coming from the land of big timber I was astounded to learn that more than 80 million people in a single country already live without the benefit of an easily renewable natural resource that I just take for granted.

      No trees? That is just crazy. And they did not disappear because aliens came to earth and took them all. They were cut and sold long ago. Too many people cannibalized what few remained standing so now open plains are the norm.

      Ever take a close look at the pictures of the terrain in Afghanistan? It’s on the news almost every night. It looks like a moonscape. Just rocks and bare earth. The place does not look capable of supporting even single edition of the NYT.

      Peak population is definitely a concern. We are running out of almost everything that used to be freely and easily available. I think Tom is just saying the obvious and it asks us to confront the fact that we are seriously damaging our own environments almost everywhere.

      Perhaps a rethinking of what a thriving economy really means will finally come about one day and we will realize it pays economic dividends to replant and replace what we have taken away without regard for those who are next in line.

      Hell, lets put environmental remediation as a line item in GDP and then see how countries really stack up against one another.

      I know this will sound crazy, but if we are granting social benefits to everyone and his dog anyway who is not employed in any gainful way can we not also ask them to make a contribution to the health of the environment. You know, for everyones good.

      Can’t anyone take the time to plant a seed anymore?

  • Hillbilly May 20, 2011, 7:17 pm

    The real worry for the world is peak idiocy. Too many fools are worrying about things they know nothing about. Fascists try to create alarm so that they can gain control and power.

    According to Ehrlich the world was overpopulated and doomed by 1970. Systems find equilibrium. Cycles play out. Some people fail and some thrive. The planet will be just fine thanks.

  • AndyB May 20, 2011, 4:57 pm

    How about peak silver; it will be gone from the planet in less than 20 years, at current levels of demand.

  • Ray May 20, 2011, 4:44 pm

    Has somebody calculated how much oxygen will be left after we burn (oxidize) all the shale gas, light crude, tar sands, natural gas, methane, crude oil and rain forests on the planet? Sounds like Peak Air to me.

  • PhotoRadarScam May 20, 2011, 4:33 pm

    He didn’t mention peak gold…

  • Robert May 20, 2011, 3:43 pm

    Nice essay Tom.

    Just another reminder that our time in this life short- so enjoying it can be the only rational primary onjective.

    If you enjoy trading and if it makes you feel productive, then you are doing the right thing.

    Tom’s article also serves to remind that humans are unique among the animals in that we can conceptualize the demise of ourselves, and our civilization- this has given us egregious advantage as a species, but that advantage has been lopsided to favor those people who perceive themselves as the farmers (wealthy, politicians) versus those who see themselves as the productive livestock (the GDP generators).

    In times when GDP is shaky, the livestock become nervous- maybe due to some fear that the farmer will be serving them for dinner instead of letting them graze the pasture all day… I don’t know; all I do know is that the farmers don’t suffer when the sheep don’t have enough grass to graze on.

    Ask yourself what economic recession really means. Why is it such a terrible thing? Is it due to the fear that if you do not produce as much milk as the next cow in line that you might be pulled out and sent to the beef processing plant?

    Milk cows never think that way… so why do we?

    Or, is it something deeper? perhaps another by-product of the rational nature of humans- we realize during stressful times that we have forgotten (or never even learned) how to properly take care of ourselves.

    Don’t worry, Ray Kurzweil will save us all- The Singularity is Nigh 🙂

  • Mark Schafer May 20, 2011, 3:21 pm

    Buy physical silver, stockpile food and become self-reliant.

    • Robert May 20, 2011, 3:59 pm

      Or, just move somewhere with a beach and enjoy your impending demise with a cold beer and a sense of serenity…

      🙂

  • Radek May 20, 2011, 2:51 pm

    Wow. This has got to be the longest streak of depressing and negative comments I have encountered on Rick’s site to date.

    Yes, I know it’s the subject of conversation, but I’m not letting you guys bring me to “peak fun” with these crappy attitudes. I will continue to live my life with maximum excitement and experience acquisition until I die. No regrets on my death-bed!

    We’re pretty versatile and adaptable, as a race. I think we’re going to make it, although there will be some major setbacks along the way. I look at the future as something that is going to happen regardless, so I embrace it, and try to have as much fun as possible getting there. To me, it’s an incredible life challenge to prepare for “peak everything”: studying survivalism, self-reliance, firearms/farming/medical training, and learning how to build a sustainable community if/when things really do collapse to that scary level.

    If it doesn’t happen during my lifetime, great! At least I had fun, learned and experienced a lot, and taught my friends/family/kids how to continue the learning and preparation process in a positive and productive way.

    Ultimately, we’re all standing on a tiny little fragile ball of matter in a giant galaxy/universe that can be erased from history in a split second, should the Great Cosmos Lottery choose to deliver something nasty our way.

  • Benjamin May 20, 2011, 2:44 pm

    What do you get when you…?

    a) Add up all the land mass on earth
    b) Less three Antarcticas of area…
    c) …Less Australia
    d) …Less Canada
    e) …Less Russia
    f) For some reason, halve the remaining area
    g) Round current population to 10 billion
    h) Triple that to 30 billion

    The approximate answer is Bahrain, population density 2,846/sq mi; GDP $29.712 billion ; per capita income $21,733. That’s the worst that can happen, even in the very unlikely extreme that we reach those population numbers while losing 4/5ths of all land on earth. Thankfully though, we have nearly 5 times as much land, but only 1/4 the population of that future world (that isn’t even here yet, and might never be, but wouldn’t be all _that_ bad when/if it does).

    I am Scarecrow and here’s my challenge… If I only had a brain! Someone, please, make an idiot out of my complete lack of worry about peak this and that (other than the collapse of the deeply flawed financial and monetary systems and the resulting idiotic panic from that event).

    • Carol May 20, 2011, 4:53 pm

      Great point or put another way ….

      If you took the current population of the world ~ 7 billion and gave them each a 5×2 (10 square feet) of space to stand in you would NOT take up the total area of an average sized COUNTY in any state in this country. The “belief” that we are over populated in bs BUT it does serve the elites agenda (depopulation) to get rid of all us “useless eaters”.

      So beleive on if you want to it is all propoganda!

    • C.C. May 20, 2011, 6:13 pm

      @Carol –

      I have never met or read the writings of a ‘peak’ theorist who was not also a huge proponent of population control – either voluntary, or Mandatory. One could argue that population control is the raison d’etre of the entire ‘peak’ movement. Of course, the conversations never start out that way – openly stating so is still somewhat offensive and not everyone is yet on board with enforced eugenics, but that trend of thought is gaining traction.

      Expect to see these sentiments become more ‘out of the closet’ as time progresses and economic/environmental scapegoating against large families and 3rd-world targeting for ‘family planning’ increase.

      The planet simply can no longer handle all of the CO2 produced by useless eaters…

    • SD1 May 24, 2011, 1:25 am

      It’s NOT how much space WE take up …. it’s all the space we take up to feed and house ourselves (ie rain forest devestation, etc). Is that so hard to figure out?

  • John Jay May 20, 2011, 2:10 pm

    Mario,
    The United States already has some “Ghost Cities” of it’s own, Detroit and Las Vegas for example.
    Perhaps “Legacy Cities” is a better description for them in the USA.
    Detroit represents the old manufacturing Legacy, Las Vegas represents the HELOC, credit card, easy money to waste Legacy.
    In the USA, we’re decaying at the fringes, and DC is waiting at the core of the apple, oblivious to the reality that surrounds it.

  • roger erickson May 20, 2011, 2:10 pm

    Carlin had it right. There’s always peak-of-what’s-currently used, awaiting new methods. Planet’s likely peak-human.

    To enjoy what time we have left, just think peak banksters. And peak economists, and peak ideologies.

    Only current concepts that don’t obviously peak are adaptation and the coherent operations used to continuously pursue that. And even data on that may have peaked, for all we know. Peak “audacity of dope”?

  • greg palmer May 20, 2011, 2:00 pm

    Rick, it all may be true, but TODAY I’m having a cold one, and smell the proverbial roses. You can, and will go crazy if you try to game every possibility. Even great minds like yours need a break. Have a good weekend.

  • Marc Authier May 20, 2011, 8:55 am

    Peak American Dream and peak globalism, which is the same thing.

    http://www.silver-investor.com/blog/silver-market-update/the-great-american-nightmare/

  • Marc Authier May 20, 2011, 8:38 am

    Time for a good thermo nuclear war. Dick Cheney, that American Nazi will be really happy. Him and Rand Corporation. Full spectrum extermination coming. In reality WW III started in Irak a couple of years ago. Naturally unsuspecting shmucks still believe that 19 fanatics with 19 exacto knives are the cause of all this. Guns oil drugs and concentration camps. When I hear somebody talking about peak and too much people, Adolf Hitler’s shadow is never far away. The question must be asked. Does the American Dream has a future in China, in India or USA. Nope. Kill the American Dream instead of killing people.

  • Chris T. May 20, 2011, 7:59 am

    For another way to put it, funnier than all of us could, see the master himself here:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eScDfYzMEEw

    Too bad George isn’t around anymore, he would have had a field day with the “yes we can” world.

  • John Jay May 20, 2011, 4:29 am

    Erin, I’ve read that in Greece people have already begun moving out of the cities, and are going out into the rural areas where the living is cheaper and safer.
    It is not a flood of humanity just yet, but the same thing happened when the Roman Empire fell apart.
    The Roman government at the end taxed everyone to the max to support the military and bureaucrats, and debased their silver coins down to about 2% silver.
    Sound familiar?

    • mario cavolo May 20, 2011, 6:37 am

      Hi John Jay,

      This point you make on “housing” speaks to the how and why China will do so much better facing and managing whatever economic hell the world faces.

      Here in China and most of Asia, 90% of the populus live in apartment buildings, ride bikes, scooters, have access to abundant well-established public transportation and inexpensive medical care. Then where’s your big, fat expenses? There aren’t any… battling rising food prices and costs yes, but that’s still a relatively small percentage of a monthly budget.

      Its much much easier to be poor, to live a simple, low budget lifestyle here in Asia than in the West.

      In the four 1st tier coastal cities, we all understand that property values have skyrocketed, but as I recently heard Jim Rogers perfectly point out, that’s not representative of the overall condition of the property market.

      Meanwhile, let’s add PEAK MEDICAL to today’s essay:

      My wife and I got a bill for $1000 from the St. Mary’s hospital in LA for a 15 minute doctor consultation with no tests done; if we had done a blood, urine and ultrasound, which we declined, the bill would have been $2500; because it was a Sunday, so it is automatically regarded at the emergency room standard $1000 rate. Another money scam system for the healthcare and insurance industries to feed each other which has nothing to do with reality for real people.

      It gets worse. When we walked in the door to the registration desk, I asked how much a doctor visit would cost, she said “Its against the law for us to discuss that with you. Everyone can receive treatment and deal with the bill later, whatever it is.”

      Then they gave us a phone # to call if we feel the “need” to discuss possibly reducing the bill if we can prove we are “not able to pay”. Not able? How about not willing? How about objecting to such an outrageous fee? What lower to middle class American can afford $1000 for an emergency room visit?

      Absurd beyond absurd. What a system.

      Cheers, Mario

    • PhotoRadarScam May 20, 2011, 4:31 pm

      I’ve always wondered what there is to stop people with the means to pay from pretending to be illegal immigrants who can’t pay. An illegal immigrant walks in with no ID and still gets treated and released without questions; however, I feel that if I walked in they wouldn’t believe me if I said I didn’t have ID or an SSN.

      But you’ve identified one of the major reasons why healthcare costs so much. It’s one of the only things we buy without ever really asking, ‘how much is it’ or doing comparison shopping. The system is just setup that way. And with someone else (insurance) paying most of it, who is going to care what they charge?

      I theorize that I could open up a ‘cash-only’ clinic and probably end up charging rates that are pretty close to what insurance co-pays are. The only problem is the government wouldn’t allow it.

  • Brian May 20, 2011, 4:12 am

    Please repeat after me. There is no global warming. There is no global warming. There is no global warming. There is no global warming…..

    • C.C. May 20, 2011, 8:36 am

      There is no Global warming.

      * At least none that hasn’t already occurred in on/off cycles throughout history for thousands of years, regardless of man made CO2 emissions.

      What there Is, is plenty of crafty politicians in bed with those who see $$$ potential like they’ve never seen before under a Cap & Trade system -and the stifling regulatory environment that would basically make them economic Dick-tators for life.
      And of course, their dutiful foot soldiers who see dissent in the scientific community as some kind of new age heresy that should be criminally punishable for even suggesting otherwise –

  • SD1 May 20, 2011, 1:09 am

    There are no problems facing the world. The world will be just fine.

    Humans?

    That’s another story altogether.

    According to wikpedia (whom I assume would use relatively reliable sources) 90% of all the species that have ever lived on this planet are extinct.

    Quite frankly, I don’t like our odds.

    If humans were a stock on the NYSE, they’d be both a technical and fundamental short.

    • Robert May 20, 2011, 3:56 pm

      “If humans were a stock on the NYSE, they’d be both a technical and fundamental short.”

      That is one of the most awesome allegories I’ve read in a long time!

    • Benjamin May 20, 2011, 5:44 pm

      I see a lot of 90%-ers out today, so I’m going to take that opportunity to do some mud-slinging…

      a) First, if I don’t say it, someone will. 90% of all species sounds like a 10% of brain-power misconception. That probably came out wrong, so the point is… it sounds like a number I’m just supposed to believe is true and always will be.

      b) But hey, maybe it is right. Now, of the 90%, how many were diversified enough to survive whatever happens on the local/regional levels?

      c) Of those that were global enough to survive localized extinction, how many of those were able to see/detect asteroids heading for earth?

      d) And able to perhaps nudge them away, if not destroy them?

      e) And, if all else fails, able to send vital supplies and people out into orbit, to return after things settled down? Maybe even live out there for a while?

      Right. We’re not the average 90%. We’re an exceptional 90%! So exceptional, that I’d bet that there would be enough people on earth that would survive the dreaded, dinosaur-ending asteroid strike.

      I didn’t say it’d be the best time ever but the species would probably survive. Then again, with all politics and bad banking necessarily swept aside, maybe it would be a smashing good time! So… anyone got a spare asteroid I can borrow? 🙂

    • SD1 May 21, 2011, 2:17 am

      Benjamin, you make valid points. Humans are perfectly capable of doing a lot of things. I don’t doubt we could one day re-direct an asteroid and even stave off an ice age.

      However, we don’t blend with anything: We don’t blend with the environment, other animals nor one another. Even lions and hyenas (who’ve had ongoing territorial wars for countless centuries) have the inherent knowledge to realize when, “enough is enough.” People don’t seem to have that capability, unfortunately.

      When is enough … enough? Certainly our inability to figure that much out has led us to some great accomplishments along the way. But there’s been no other species … ever …. who have waged war with one another and wiped out countless other creatures in the snap of a finger. Hyenas and Lions battles are mainly kept to themselves, and while there may be some collateral damage (I don’t know of any, just giving the benefit of doubt), there is nothing that would even remotely match the effects of Hiroshima, for example.

      Everyone has their own beliefs on how old the earth really is and how long humans (in our present form) have been on it. I personally subscribe to the 4.5 billion year old world and 100,000 year modern day human history. You may have other ideas, and that’s your choice. My calculations might be wrong, but it would seem that if we put it in context where the earth was a year old, people have been here about 11 and a half minutes. If my math is even remotely close, then you will have to forgive me if I don’t quite comprehend our own arrogant self-importance.

      There are asteroids, ice ages, solar flares, gigantic volcanoes, continental shifts, earth quakes and who knows what else lurking in the shadows.

      Plenty to deal with. From where I stand, however, the biggest threat to humans, right now, at this particular point in time ……are humans.

    • SD1 May 21, 2011, 4:15 am

      And …. FINALLY! I was going to write a commentary for Rick for this week similar to this and begged off because it sounded like someone had said some of the things I was writing about ….. Chris T (several comments below) was the reminder I was looking for. I knew I’d heard some of the things I was trying to get across from somewhere else.

  • John Jay May 20, 2011, 12:31 am

    Peak Politics + Peak Taxes = Peak Government
    When the folly of borrowing $.43 of every dollar the Federal government spends finally ends, there will be big fallout.
    No more disaster relief for floods, fires, tornados and hurricanes, the victims will be left to fend for themselves.
    The same goes for Food Stamps, Section 8 housing, Student Loans, Agriculture subsidies, you name it,
    probably half the country is on some sort of Federal dole.
    I keep expecting someone in Congress to stand up on the floor of the House or the Senate and say, “We don’t have the money to do that.”
    Because we don’t.

    • Erin May 20, 2011, 4:06 am

      “We don’t have the money to do that.”

      It seems almost inconceivable (fabulous line from the movie “princess bride” comes to mind) that a member of congress besides Ron Paul would even understand the meaning of not having the money.

      We have went so long unchecked with our printing press that the notion of something like that is really not part of any rational conversation for these people. They really believe that we do have the money and we will just pay it back later…and they are right!

      Everytime we need money for something we just fire up the press. Nothing will ever change until they are cut off. Can anyone really imagine that happening at any point? Not a chance because every crises we have and every future crises will only be solved with more money to save the system again which just creates a loop that goes on and on and on!

      This country needs someone like Ron Paul to protect the value of our money but scumbag politicians, members of congress and the rat bastards at the fed right now still have the edge because they have the weapon of mass destruction and that keeps the public confused. What a vicious loop were in!

      This quote by Thomas Jefferson says it all…

      “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.
      Thomas Jefferson, (Attributed)
      3rd president of US (1743 – 1826)

    • Robert May 20, 2011, 3:55 pm

      Erin-

      There are perfectly valid and reasonable alternatives to printing press money.

      Use the printed coupons to secure the real resources you need, and understand how to properly employ those resources for economic gain, and you will always be fine…

      Notice, I did not say “borrow credit from a bank and start a taxable business” – that process firmly entreches you in the false/shadow economic/government system.

      Remember, all coupons have an expiration date. Even though currency coupons do not have that date printed on them (which is deliberate, of course)- realization of the fact that they will expire worthless (or decline in value indefinitely) will help you realize what a complete waste of time saving them is.

      Save the things you can USE, and save the things that you VALUE. Don’t worry about whether anyone else values them or not.