Does Your Kid Want to Be a Journalist?

A degree in journalism is the worst college investment you can make, according to Salary.com.  Fresh out of college, your kid could expect to earn $37,393 working as a reporter. That would add up to a measly $2.2 million over a 30-year career, for a return on one’s college dollar of about 17%. Even social workers, pastors and dieticians do better than that. At newsroom pay, it might take one 50 years to sock away enough for retirement. Of course, that’s assuming one keels over dead at 82, before one’s savings have been depleted. Death would have to come even earlier to leave enough for a decent funeral.

Actually, starting pay of $37,393 sounds pretty good to me, since my first job, working on the rewrite desk of the Atlantic City Press, paid $120 a week. That was in 1971, and I was living like a king, even though I owned a vintage BMW whose maintenance costs consumed about half of my discretionary income.  The apartment I shared was $225 a month and offered spectacular views of New Jersey’s marshlands and sunsets on the bay. I and my 20-Something cohort partied till dawn every night after the morning edition had been “put to bed.”  Gotham was just two hours north on the Garden State Parkway, and a big night on the town might have included a Broadway show, drinks at Sherry Netherland’s, and a limo ride to Lutece. Years later, after I became a family man, my big night on the town was Tuesday night.  That’s the night when kids ate free at Lyon’s.

Appetite for News Undiminished

My fellow reporters at the Atlantic City Press were the brightest and most talented bunch I’ve ever worked with.  Two of them, Joe Donohue and Tom Turcol, went on to win Pulitzers. But none chose to stay in journalism. Most left the newsroom for careers in law – a pragmatic choice, since the only reporters making enough money to support a family were network news anchors.  The irony is that opportunities in journalism have never been brighter. Sure, brick-and-mortar papers are dying. But the demand for news itself remains undiminished. In a city of 100,000, five good reporters could cover the news, and cover it well. Hire a managing editor, rent a storefront office, and the total cost of putting out an online edition would be around $350,000.  That’s relative pocket change compared to what brick-and-mortar papers spend on truck fleets, newsprint, machinery and office space.

This could spell opportunity for anyone with the entrepreneurial drive to start an online newspaper from scratch. If you think your kid, or a friend, has what it takes, have him or her get in touch with me.  I have two ideas he or she can use that would produce monster revenues in just a few years.  One involves building a network of stringers to cover local sports. The other is an action line-type feature that has yet to be executed correctly buy any news publisher or entrepreneur.

  • Chris T. April 3, 2013, 4:35 am

    “The ability to disseminate ultra left and right wing biased reporting has mushroomed”

    YEAH, because the mainstream media was such a paragon of balanced independent reporting, that never tried to persuade the readership of it’s pet cause

  • gary leibowitz April 2, 2013, 4:48 pm

    Tough business these days to make a living. The problem is not just the proliferation of news on all the different media platforms, its the trend change away from the written news. With easy integrated visual media and apps that consolidate the news headlines I wonder just how much time people spend reading an in-depth article. Not many newspapers make a profit today. The ability to disseminate ultra left and right wing biased reporting has mushroomed. Cost is no longer the issue. The message now is geared to certain segments of the populace in order to pull a steady readership. If a blog can receive enough advertisement endorsements then it can be a money maker.

    The Bush administrations total control on all the news media before, during, and after the Iraq invasion was a testament to the lack of independent speech, even during a time of explosive internet use. The use of the word “unpatriotic” was used whenever a reporter at those news conferences strayed too far. We learned that our own defense department repeatedly told the president that there was no evidence of WMD’s and that he in turn demanded they revise their assessment. This was not known till the “war” sentiment changed. We even had major newspapers apologizing for their lack of integrity.

    In a perverse way the total lack of control by big corporations to present the news has allowed circus reporting with no need to verify their source. No one knows what is real anymore. To back track and contradict myself I think Mr. Murdoch used his enormous news media power to distort or make outright lies in order to maintain a certain readership. In this case a very powerful man that controls a vast media monopoly went out of his way to distort reality in order to get his own point across. Mr. Murdoch however is the exception, not the rule.

  • Chris T. April 1, 2013, 11:55 pm

    [please excuse the off topic]

    @ mava, yesterday:
    “I enjoyed it, especially the historical comparisons, – I am always looking out for those.”

    The other day I was reading on wiki about some of the founders of the major dept. stores in the 19th century (Macy, Wanamaker, Bloomingdales, etc), and came across an interesting list of prices:

    10c ladies stockings
    $10 man’s wool suit
    $147 upright piano

    Here is the gold value / today’s price of each:
    (using the Eagle as metric, 1 Eagle = $10 = 15gr gold (rounding down from actual) , price at 1600/tr.oz or $51.40/g)

    stockings = 0.15 g AU= $7.70
    suit = 15g AU = $770
    piano = 220.5g = $11300

    Talk about maintaining purchasing power between about 1885 and 130 years later!

    If those $-prices seem higher than what one would see today hard to say, because of the quality comparability not being available.
    The major difference is prob. the higher productivity of today (technology , etc) flowing through to help lower the price
    (Thanks once again, Mr Katz!)
    So

  • redwilldanaher April 1, 2013, 5:53 pm

    I love the idea of trying to get the unfiltered truth out to people. Anything that is an alternative to corporate controlled media lies and programming is a positive in my book. Count me in!

    • DK April 1, 2013, 9:43 pm

      I, too, am all for more real news and far less sociopathic manure.
      Rick, I hope you find some prospects and are able to nurture a successful launch.
      Best of luck!!

      ***We now return you to the smoldering remains of this failing (defunct) economy and your daily dose of brainwashing.***