The Wall Street artistes who have helped propel Facebook shares steeply higher despite an onslaught of negative news were temporarily stymied Wednesday when a damaging story broke around noon. Just when investors were starting to forget why Facebook was in danger of becoming a pariah for abusing users’ privacy, out pops this headline: Millions of Facebook Records Found on Amazon Cloud Servers. How bad is it? “In one instance,” reported Bloomberg, “Mexico City-based digital platform Cultura Colectiva openly stored 540 million records on Facebook users, including identification numbers, comments, reactions and account names. The records were accessible and downloadable for anyone who could find them online.” A nearby headline framed the coming response from D.C. legislators: Facebook Crackdown Options Abound as Washington Weighs Next Move.
I’d warned here recently that Facebook’s virtual empire could implode overnight if users’ tastes suddenly change and they abandon the social-media platform en masse. Even the rabid weasels who drive the company’s shares wildly up and down for fun and profit must be sensing by now that Facebook is no longer cool (think AOL) and that the company has seriously depleted its store of good will. A sharp, downward adjustment in the stock seems likely, and they will do everything they can in the meantime to distribute their holdings to the rubes. However, there is a lot of ruin in an empire, as the saying goes, and so we shouldn’t expect the stock to sink toward oblivion without a fight. Indeed, DaBoyz deftly put it in a holding pattern at 30,000 feet for two months while they waited for the most recent spate of bad news to blow over.
FB appeared headed to the moon on Wednesday, but the news concerning this latest privacy breach quickly knocked it down by $5, about 3.25%. Ironically, The Wall Street Journal was out with a pro-Facebook story that amounted to shameless puffery. It reported dubious new “research” that would purport to elevate Facebook, a glorified ad agency, to the economic status of companies that actually make things. Using poll data, the researchers determined that the benefits consumers derive from the social-media platform would add up to “tens of billions of dollars” if included in GDP calculations. This PR twaddle is based on a finding that consumers would need to be paid $42.17 to give up Facebook for a month.
If you are keen to short the stock, as you should be, be prepared for planted stories like this one to knock you off your game. That’s how DaBoyz work, deftly seeding and harvesting “news” so that they can synchronize their trades profitably with the stock’s ups and downs and use short-covering to promote powerful rallies even in the complete absence of bullish buyers. We’ll note with a dollop of cynicism that a 190.00 price target flagged here earlier is still in play. It lies 10% above current levels. _______ UPDATE (Apr 25, 12:13 a.m. ET): The 206.39 target shown here is the highest I can project using the intraday charts. (This assumes that we can nearly always count on one-off lows to get it right. For the record, though, and just to be safe, the ‘marquee’ low yields D=211.05.) _______ UPDATE (May 9, 9:23 p.m.): Add to the growing, global loathing of all things Facebook an op-ed piece in the New York Times by Chris Hughes, co-founder of the company. He thinks that Facebook and his former partner, Mark Zuckerberg, have grown far too powerful and that the social-media giant should be broken up. Here’s the link. _______ UPDATE (May 12): Expect the stock to drift lower until DaBoyz goose it again into another short-covering spasm. That’s how FB rolls, and it is how it could reach 211.05 against a mounting assault of well deserved bad press. _______ UPDATE (May 16, 4:26 p.m.): Buyers stalled precisely at the midpoint resistance of this pattern. If they can surmount it in the next day or two, that would put the 199.24 target in play. Are these guys good, or what!?