Ricks Picks header image

Forensics Geeks Don’t Lie, nor Are They Crazy

4 comments

You need only watch Giuliani’s hearings on election fraud for an hour or so to understand how the computer geeks could overturn Biden’s win. It’s like having a seat behind the scoreboard for Bobby Thomson’s “shot heard ’round the world.” Forget all the supposed right-wing-conspiracy stuff, including charges that Dominion, the voting-machine company, shares DNA with Hugo Chavez. It turns out that this is verifiably true — has been verified, actually, even if no one from the Washington Post or the New York Times could be bothered with such a trivial task. Neither, quite evidently, have they looked at Dominion’s operator’s manual, which apparently explains in so many pages how to hook up their equipment to the internet. Dominion has flatly denied this can be done, so confident are they that no big-league reporters would think to ask them for a copy of the manual. No matter. The truth about the company will out eventually, but it’s not crucial to Trump’s case; nor for that matter are strong accusations from Trump himself.

Amidst the din of denial, The Wall Street Journal embarrassed itself last week with a laughable item about how the President has been telling those closest to him that he knows he’s lost the fight. Yeah, sure.  Watch him the next time he’s on TV and judge for yourself whether he’s ready to pack it in. With recounts continuing, the news media have sustained an ostentatious yawn for nearly a month. If this were Nuremberg, they’d be high-fiving Bormann’s defense team. Keep pretending nothing happened, you jag-offs, because the forensics whizzes are about to knock you on your ass. Their Einsteinian grasp of election math may not provide the hard evidence skeptics say has been missing, but it will point auditors in precisely the right direction to determine exactly how fraud was committed.  The data experts are right out of central casting, for sure — boring “suits” who drone on about variable integers and decimal stops. But they know what they know, and they know it so well that one of them actually said on TV that he’d stake his life on his conclusion that massive fraud took place in Pennsylvania.

Toppling a Wall of Denial

The news media have done a pretty good job smacking down a thousand incriminating moles that have popped up during testimony in five contested states. Unfortunately for Biden and Rachel Maddow, the power of just one small truth is enough to topple a towering wall of denial.  The naysayers seem to think that if they keep batting down the wing-nut stuff, eighty million Americans will just forget about some particularly troubling stories that are glowing radioactively and eventually will detonate. One of them literally recounts Biden’s amazing late-night comeback in some Michigan precincts where votes totaled as many as 130% of registrants. Another concerned a truckload of paper ballots that were transported from New York to an empty lot in Pennsylvania. Assuming this actually occurred, as one elections expert testified during Wednesday’s hearing in Lansing, it could only have been for the purpose of shuffling pallets of bogus paper into Pennsylvania’s tabulators. There are so many hundreds of these stories in play right now, most of them introduced via sworn testimony, that even if only a score of them turn out to be true the election would be irredeemably compromised.  To say there is ‘no evidence of fraud’, as nearly every major news outlet has been doing, is an affront to all decent Americans regardless of their politics. A lie this big cannot and will not stand.

 

Please do not ask trading questions!

  • Marc December 3, 2020, 4:20 pm

    Love your newsletter Rick!!
    I was thinking of moving to Florida, and would need a good tax accountant familiar with trading. Are you happy with yours?

    &&&&&

    Thanks for the kind words concerning Rick’s Picks, Marc. My accountant, whom I’ve used for years, including when I lived in Colorado, is based in Southern California. He knows his stuff and has served me well. I don’t know how specialized your needs are, but if you contact me privately at [email protected], perhaps I can help you. RA

  • James Watterson December 3, 2020, 12:47 pm

    This is the argument that cannot be disproven by anyone in the media, the Democrat or RINO parties or most importantly the Supreme Court of the United States. The majority of American voters believe its validity. If this election is not overturned successfully to our president’s satisfaction, the real Kraken will emerge. Then the future becomes bleaker because “the people” will make their wills known. There will be consequences because this will be the latest in a trend of the real inequalities. Future Historians will call it for what it obviously is…… Fraud against the will of the people.

  • Pan December 3, 2020, 4:04 am

    Wow, that’s amazing.. . . scary even! In fact you know what? I’m so convinced now that massive fraud took place that it’s entirely inconceivable that this can only ever have happened this time round, I mean, why now right?? In fact, I’d lay odds it’s been going on for years, no wait, think seriously about it, yeah … .. without a doubt this has been going on for decades!!

    &&&&&&&

    Yes, it has been going on, and for more than decades. But the Democrats, with the help of Soros money and the advent of computerized voting machines, have honed election theft to a fine science over the last decade or so. Before you wax more sarcastic, Pan, I would strongly suggest that you watch just an hour’s worth of Giuliani’s hearings. Their guy testifying in Georgia at this very moment is most impressive, even though none of it will ever find its way into the New York Piece of Shit Times or Rachel Maddow’s nightly rant. If you are a lover of truth, you owe it to yourself to find out what is being said at these hearings. It is not merely fascinating, but powerfully incriminating. The lock-out of GOP pollwatchers alone — something that occurred everywhere and which no one is denying — is legal reason enough to negate the election result. RA

  • Ben December 3, 2020, 3:52 am

    “A lie this big cannot and will not stand.”

    Didn’t someone famous and evil say something about telling a BIG lie vs a small lie, and how the former was actually the way to succeed at lying? I don’t know. It’s 3 AM, the cat woke me up, and I can’t get back to sleep any more than I can fully wake up!


Do you want up-to-the-minute technical analysis and forecasts for your favorite stocks, commodities, ETFs? Join our Take Request Session on January 19th!

No, I'm not Interested