The 3862.25 downside target flagged here last week is still my minimum objective for the near term. It can be bottom-fished, although I expect the futures to continue lower once they're done toying with this 'hidden' support. The 'mechanical' short recommended last week failed and should never have been attempted. I seldom recommend 'mechanical' entries at the red line to begin with, and this one went against a short squeeze Thursday afternoon that all but guaranteed a vicious pop on Friday morning. As it happened, a standard-issue 'mechanical' short from the green line would have worked beautifully, producing a profit by day's end of as much as $22,000 on four contracts. Pivoteers will recognize this particular set-up as the most reliable in our playbook: a precipitous countertrend move to the green line following a reversal from between p2 and D. The good news is that those who reported doing the trade in the chat room seem to have used this tactic rather than the red-line short I'd suggested.
Although I am on a busman's holiday and will not resume publishing The Morning Line until Sep 17, here's a timely note concerning AAPL. We've been using a 151.38 downside target that remains viable, but I expect the stock to go much lower in the months and years ahead -- well beneath $100, that is. When the company announced a week ago that iPhone sales were holding up pretty well, it was a clarion call to short the bejeezus out of the stock. Apple was alway going to be more vulnerable than most retailers to an economic downturn, and that downturn has finally arrived. A key market for the company's pricey, over-camera'd cell phones is Europe, which is headed into deep recession. The one-decision chimps of the portfolio world who have ensured AAPL's steady rise over the years are not going to go quietly into the night, however. They'll have their hands full distributing the biggest-cap stock ever to the rubes in a process that will take years. AAPL remains the key bellwether for the stock market as a whole, and it is the only stock one need get right to get the market right. The bear market will still be tricky to play, though, since everyone knows by now that we are in one. Wall Street's shameless shills, particularly the clueless, lazy hacks in the news media, will be talking up the resumption of the bull market each and every day until the Dow falls below 10,000. But if you can contrive to tune out their blather, you'll have a better chance of getting through the nation's slide into darkness without losing eveything, Here's a link to my interview on Friday with Jim Goddard of Howe Street. (Also interviewed for This Week in Money were Doug Casey and Ross
The futures were freefalling to the 4032.50 target shown when the closing bell left them a split-hair shy of it. Look for a tradeable turn from the pivot, although not necessarily an enduring one. Sliding point 'A' a step higher yields a slightly lower target at 4022.75 that might also work for bottom-fishing. As always, a decisive move through either of these 'hidden' supports on first contact would suggest the trend is likely to persist, even if there's an intervening bounce. The selloff damaged the intraday charts, but because it was tied ostensibly to news, there is no reason to think it will continue for much longer. ________ UPDATE (Aug 30, 4:45 p.m.): Sellers spent the entire day frolicking at p=3967.50 of this pattern, with a 3862.25 downside target. They'll need to crack p to drive this brick lower, but the pattern should continue to work unless stopped out above C. _______ UPDATE (Sep 1, 11:15 p.m. ET): One subscriber reported shorting this brick at 3967.50, per my 10:34 chat room instruction. The 4001.75 stop-loss advised implies entry risk of $6800 on four contracts, but you'll be on your own in any event. ________ UPDATE (Sep 2, 9:04 a.m.): The trade was stopped out by a lunatic leap ahead of the bell to 4002.00. Cool trick, wasn't it?
AAPL was overdue for a drubbing, especially since the stock could not have continued to hover in outer space when the broad averages finally got hit. Nor is there any compelling reason for the portfolio chimps who live off AAPL to put much effort into holding it aloft while other stocks continue to correct. You can see that a seemingly nasty fall to $150 would not change the menancingly bullish look of the chart or the likelihood of new record highs. Most immediately, there's a 162.40 downside target we can use as a minimum projection over the near term (30-min, A=174.90 on 8/18). ________ UPDATE (Aug 30, 5:06 p.m.): The bearish pattern shown in this chart, with a 151,15 downside target, is all we've got to work with at the moment, The impulse leg is not legitimate and the C-D leg has yet to touch p, but we'll give the pattern the benefit of the doubt as AAPL continues to make its way lower. Apple says iPhone sales are holding up fairly well, but with Europe headed into a possible economic depression, the market for overpriced/over-featured cell phones is about to crash along with consumer spending. ________ UPDATE (Aug 31, 11:40 p.m.): This chart revises the quite bearish target slightly upward to 151.38. Today's low just pennies from p=157.00 says the pattern is working and will yield good odds for trading its levels 'mechanically'. ________ UPDATE (Sep 3, 10:32 a.m.): 'Good odds', indeed! A straight-up 'mechanical' short at the green line would have produced an intraday profit of as much as $486 per round lot. The 151.38 target remains viable as a minimum downside objective for the near term. ______ UPDATE (Sep 7, 9:30 p.m.): My newly bullish outlook for the E-Mini S&Ps contrasts sharply with a still-bearish forecast for AAPL. I'll be
The futures did nothing last week to earn the somewhat ambitious bullish pattern shown. The 1985.40 target is theoretically viable because the green line was tagged, but the follow-through failed to reach p=1840.80, which is what we should expect at a minimum if this brick is going to have a shot at 1985.40. The selloffs have lacked vigor as well, so don't be surprised if the Decembe contract spends the next 2-3 weeks screwing the pooch. My moderate bias calls for a marginal breakdown below C=1696.1. _______ UPDATE (Sep 3, 10:38 a.m.): The 'C' low at 1696.10 held, albeit barely, but I do not trust a bounce coming from such an obvious place. Brace for a relapse, and don't get your hopes too high unless this dog vaults p=1840.80 (see inset). _______ UPDATE (Sep 7, 9:35 pm.): I'll lower the bar for this dog, stipulating that it must leap to 1758.00 to turn the hourly chart unambiguously bullish. That would exceded a key 'external' peak recorded on August 29. _______ UPDATE (Sep 8, 10:36 p.m.): The lowered bar (see previous update) was too high, since today's mere head-fake created a bullish impulse leg that cannot be ignored. Depending on how buyers handle p=1729.60, we'll be able to judge the odds of further upside to D=1745.50 or higher.
There is little to encourage in the daily chart (see inset), so perhaps contrarians should take heart? We'll continue to use downside targets at 17.37 and 16.22, although a tradeable turn from p2=18.19 his week is certainly possible (daily, A=21.57 on 6/27). If you'd prefer to be on a hair-trigger for the very first sign of life, set a screen alert at 19.89. A print there would generate a bullish impulse leg on the daily chart, exceeding an 'external' peak recorded August 18 on the way down. _______ UPDATE (Sep 3, 10:51 a.m.): The futures have bounced from within a hair of the 17.31 target shown in this chart, but don't get your hopes too high. _______ UPDATE (Sep 8, 10:03 p.m.): The criminally engineered swoon on the opening triggered an unrecommended 'mechanical' buy at the red line, implying that more upside to D=18.81 is a done deal. More bullish still would be an easy move through it on first contact.
Last week's rally could provide a crucial test for my bearish outlook, since it triggered an attractive 'mechanical' short at the green line after bouncing from a low in the pattern's sweet spot. The theoretical position was slightly profitable at the bell, but we are paper trading it in any event because the entry risk is about $22,000 on four contracts. To qualify the word 'attractive', it implies that a short from 94.24 has a better than 50% chance of producing a profit by falling to p=88.75, at least, before popping above C=99.75 to stop out the position. ________ UPDATE (Aug 31, 11:50 p.m.): So far so good. The futures produced a $22,000 profit on the paper trade with today's dive to p=88.75. Assuming half the position has been covered, let's shoot for p2= 83.25 on the third of four contracts shorted. Note the D target at 77.75, which, as noted here earlier, would imply pump prices below $3 gallon. _______ UPDATE (Sep 1, 11:24 p.m.): Use a stop-loss at 91.43 for the two contracts that remain. This should be worked o-c-o with an order to cover one contracts at p2=83.25. _______ UPDATE (Sep 7, 10:16 p.m.): The trade has been a monster, producing one of the biggest gains ever for an explictly actionable tout. The trend forecast itself went sharply against the crowd, with an extremely bearish forecast at a time when most other seers were expecting a run-up to above $100. That said, there has been almost no discussion of the trade, or even of crude oil, in the tradng room, so NYMEX futures will be eliminated from the core list of touts. However, I will still provide coverage of this vehicle and energy proxies on-demand in the trading room.
[The Morning Line commentary will resume on Sunday, September 17, to allow your editor a holiday break. In the interim I will continue to update 'touts' and to post in the Rick's Picks trading room as usual. RA] The way stocks plummeted on Friday, one could almost believe that Fed blatherer-in-chief Jerome Powell made it happen. We know better; for in fact, the selloff was caused by mysterious cyclical forces that were set in motion billions of years before Powell was born. Go ahead and try to prove the negative if you want, but that's how it works. Markets create the news, not the other way around. Count on Rick's Picks to ignore the headlines and tell it like it is, always disrespecting Fed quackery. The only thing the charlatans who run the central bank have caused to happen since they willed themsleves into existence nearly 110 years ago is the destruction of the dollar. Whatever you think about the Fed, a far more important concern is whether Friday's thousand-point avalanche in the Dow ended what has so far been a tedious, garden-variety bear-market rally. Athough it would seem so, the correct answer is no, it didn't. How do we know this? For starters, Jim Cramer supposedly said so on his show -- said, that is, that the June low will stand, presumably till the end of time. He is certain to be wrong about this eventually, but in the meantime, technical signs say higher prices are indeed coming. The bear rally technically has further to go because Friday's plunge followed on the heels of a 15% rally that had exceeded several important peaks on the daily chart. The implication is that the current selloff is merely corrective in the context of a bigger bear rally yet to
The dollar's feisty move last week past p=107.46 has all but guaranteed more upside to the D target at 110.27 over the next 5-7 days. Don't miss an opportunity to get long 'mechanically' on an unexpected swoon to x=106.06. The rally has also shortened the odds of a further leap to the 113.16 target of this compelling, far larger pattern on the weekly chart, one you've seen before. Although I've expected the bull market to test highs near 120 for many years, a substantial correction from 113.16 seems likely first. ______ UPDATE (Sep 8, 10:45 p.m.): DXY is correcting hard after topping a half-point above the 110.27 Hidden Pivot target noted in the original tout. Now let's see if the ''D' retracement target at 108.78 holds. It looks certain to be reached.
September Crude's balky descent is still targeted most immediately on D=78.73, which if achieved would probably correspond to pump prices below $3 gallon. The felicity of this might not last, given that the largest commodity market on earth has become just another carny crap shoot made so opaque by refiners and cartels that even the Houston Chronicle's intrepid energy reporters can't quite explain how the rip-off works. The pattern is certainly tradeable even if the daily-chart version of it has yet to yield a 'mechanical' short. Exploiting it profitably will take some 'camouflage' and elbow grease -- on your brain, that is -- provided you've got the chops to rein in entry risk to no more than around $180 per contract. _______ UPDATE (Aug 23, 6:30 p.m.): The October contract appears headed toward a 'voodoo' level at around 97.50 whence a potentially tradeable turn could come. This would NOT be an actual reversal point, just a place to anchor an rABC set-up.