Statistical trivia has been garnering more than its fair share of attention lately, suggesting that stocks may be ready to head lower for a while, if perhaps only out of boredom. Yesterday’s selloff, half of which was recouped in the final half-hour by a relatively docile short squeeze, was attributed to energy sector weakness. Specifically, there was word of rising oil inventories – a red herring that we stopped paying attention to long ago. Weren’t these inventories supposedly tightening just a day earlier, when crude futures hit a seven-month high? No matter. Chevron and Exxon Mobil were getting whacked, and that fact alone was enough to sap the inflation mindset so crucial to Wall Street’s scenario for economic recovery.

From a technical standpoint, recent highs in the broad averages have hit some key thresholds. Our friend Peter Eliades notes that, for one, the weekly bars of the S&P Cash Index are rubbing up against at 189-week cycle, portending a potentially important trend change. And the ever-astute Garrett Jones finds on the same chart a trend line going back to 1990-1994 that was kissed by yesterday’s highs. And let’s not overlook a Bradley turn date on June 3. Bradley, to remind you, saw planetary alignments as an excellent timing indicator. Sounds crazy, we know, but the guy was right so often that his methods are more popular now than ever.
Out of Their Minds?
Technical runes aside, we think any investor who sees value in U.S. stocks right now must be out of his mind. There is so much economic trouble in the pipeline that stocks would be a lousy buy at half their current prices. We don’t begrudge investors a little comic relief now and then, but they had better be storing up a year’s worth of belly laughs, since the next leg down is going to wipe the smirk from a lot of bulls’ faces. We suspect the implied cascade of stocks will come later in the summer, when Wall Street’s kids are minding the store. It’ll be a relief to see the markets tracking reality once again rather than the ridiculous notion that recovery can come at all for an economy that not only has lost its manufacturing base, but its smoke-and-mirrors wunderkind, the banking sector. What’s left? Starbucks, manicure salons and Hollywood movies?
(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)
Friends, Bradley did not always have it right.
Sometimes the system was early, late or 180 degrees off.
Depends on how people act on and react to the same stimuli,
the madness of crowds.
With Fed and Treasury Super Liquidity Programs, GS and JPM traders may tweak the market indefinitely no matter how silly bobble heads come off in public.
Unless or until 4.581% long bonds go considerably higher in yield, the inverse 21 P/E multiple they now suggest gives institutions client cover to the upside for dividend paying stocks selling at lower P/Es to go higher. So what if earnings aren’t real and may fall further down the cliff? Wylie coyote, man.;
Hope Springs eternal E’s will recover, or so the current DC herd think goes.
Which brings up another point: coupons versus dividends.
One is fixed until it defaults. The other can be changed to suit conditions.
So which is more flexible, opportunistic and likely to survive tough times, debt or equity?
Regards*Rich
http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/Favorites.CServlet?obj=ID3251493