Soon, We’ll All Be $1.8 Trillion ‘Richer’!

(Wow!  Are we getting rich already, or what!? Yesterday’s 219-point rally in the Dow was a windfall downpayment on the “wealth effect” that Ben Bernanke’s latest gift to all humanity is supposedly going to create. For our part, we’re doing our patriotic best to spend every dime of our anticipated share of QEII, pulling our sons out of the horrid public school system and enrolling them at Le Rosey. We’ve also put a good-sized chunk of change down on a candy-apple red Veyron,  although it set us back an extra $75k to bump a few Hollywood types down the waiting list.  Because the commentary below attracted a slew of great responses in the forum – see, for one, Roger Erickson’s post on how QEII does not actually create money — we’re running it for a second consecutive day.  To those of you who are taking the Hidden Pivot Webinar, see you tonight in class…  RA)

The Dow finished up a measly 26 points the other day on word of that the Fed plans to “buy” $800B of Treasury debt over the next eight months. The news caused pundits round-the-world to breathe a nervous sigh of relief.  The turgid action in stocks was taken to mean that there were no surprises for investors: not in Tuesday’s election results, which saw Republicans take solid control of the House of Representatives, though not the Senate; not in President Obama’s subsequent press conference, which appeared to have cracked the door open ever-so-slightly for compromise on Obamacare and cap-and-trade; and not in the announcement itself that the Fed is about to rev up the money supply at a prodigious rate.  Could it possibly get any better than that?

We ask the question facetiously, since anything one might find to like about the day’s major news events could be spun negatively. We’ll concede nonetheless that the Republican landslide in the House is probably good news, since the deadlock it will produce on Capitol Hill means we are not likely to see any more legislative neutron bombs like Obamacare for the remainder of Mr. Obama’s term. However, we doubt the President’s sincerity in suggesting that he is eager to work out differences with the Republicans and Tea Partiers.  His extended hand reminds us of the recurring joke in the wickedly funny 1966 film “Mars Attacks!” Every time the Martians arrive on the scene with an olive branch in hand, they whip out an atomic ray-gun and reduce every living thing in sight to cinders.  Such, we fear, is the quality of Mr. Obama’s sincerity.

 $280B Dollop for Good Measure

Putting the day’s political Sturm und Drang aside, there was still the not-so-small matter of the $900 billion stimulus.  The marquee number was actually $600 billion – just a tad above the $500 billion rumor that had been floated as a lowball estimate. But there was more, in the form of $35 billion each month, for eight months, to purchase an additional dollop of Treasurys with proceeds from mortgage bonds the Fed plans to retire.  We have ceased to be dumbfounded that the news media buy into this shell-game whenever it is run.

To be fair, there are more than a few economist who think that it will produce no economic result at all. They’ve got it about half-right, since the Fed will itself be paying for all of that Treasury debt with…IOUs.  However, most pundits see only the supposedly “good” effects of the inflation that all of this double-entry accounting is intended to produce. A CNBC talking head, for one, averred that if the Fed buys $600B of U.S. debt, it will produce a “wealth effect” three times as large, or $1.8Tr. We could digress by rolling on the ground, convulsed with laughter, upon hearing that this gargantuan Ponzi scheme is evidently thought by some to create “wealth.”  We’ll leave it to Rick’s Picks readers to savage this idiotic idea in the forum. But for the record, let us warn — as stridently as possible — that whatever “wealth effect” QEII appears to create in the stock market, it will be no less illusory or fleeting than the real estate “wealth” that so many were literally banking on just a few short years ago.

(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • Jill November 8, 2010, 6:02 am

    Hey, F. Beard

    I hope you don’t leave, but if you do, please let me know where else you post. I have enjoyed conversing with you. Clearstation COMPX board is free and easy to post on. Come on over there, if you feel you must leave here. But I think Rick just objected to you and me taking up a large % of the space here. That’s mostly my doing, not yours; I need to try to be more brief.

  • F. Beard November 8, 2010, 4:55 am

    And if you and Jill want to log-roll, please take it private. RA

    I can’t speak for Jill but I’ve had my say and have apparently outstayed my welcome here too.

    So,
    adios

  • F. Beard November 8, 2010, 4:34 am

    … take an important step in your life and read McCarthy’s “The Grand Jihad”. RA

    Not necessary. To my shame, I believed similarly myself a few years ago. If the Muslims hate US, well who wouldn’t if their lands were occupied by foreign troops?

    And now the US has once more proved that its economic system is unstable thereby diminishing our influence abroad. Perhaps we should perfect our system before trying to impose it on others? And then they would freely accept it without the need for force?

  • Jill November 7, 2010, 11:12 pm

    I am starting this book. So far, to me, it has the flavor of the author being enraged and terrified before ever writing a word, & of his letting his rage & terror unduly influence his writing, reasoning, & conclusions. It seems he dislikes (to put it mildly) Islam, the Arab world, & Obama– and is going to great lengths to link the 3 together, whether they belong together or not.

    I have no trouble believing that some radical Islamists pose a threat to the U.S. & its interests. I just think that the case would be better argued by a more clear-headed approach– rather than an approach where the author uses demeaning language to describe those he disagrees with, & interprets every little faux pas on the part of such folks as being pure evil–e.g. interpreting Obama’s bow to the head of Saudi Arabia (which, I admit, was a mistake for him to do) as meaning that he had a shared Islamic dream–something for which there is no evidence whatsoever. Obama is just one more of a long line of U.S. presidents who has catered to the Saudis, primarily because they have oil. GW Bush used to hold hands with some Saudi leader, as numerous photos on the web show, & his family had a long-standing relationship with the Saudi Bin Ladens. But the author likes G W Bush, so he finds nothing wrong with Bush’s actions, & instead finds reasons to justify them. Perhaps the reasons are correct; however, it is not facts but the author’s interpretations of the facts that he is running on here.

    I can understand the terror & rage. I have relatives who have had their young lives at risk multiple times, in multiple tours of duty, as members of the U.S. armed forces in the Middle East. However, I think that we need to find ways of calming down– so as to think & speak, & write very objectively– in order to make progress, even on life’s most terrifying problems.

    • F. Beard November 8, 2010, 1:51 am

      Jill,
      For what it’s worth, I agree with you with regard to paranoia over the Muslims. Our MIC and Military Keynesianism always needs enemies and new debt.

      &&&&&

      FB, take an important step in your life and read McCarthy’s “The Grand Jihad”. And if you and Jill want to log-roll, please take it private. RA

  • dennis November 6, 2010, 3:30 pm

    FYI, I just saw “Inside Job”, the movie. If there is some unifying theme or common ground in otherwise diverse opinions exressed in this forum I think they come alive in the movie — which is not perfect, but well worth watching.

    …And sorry, I just cant resist this one…..
    re: Robert, who apparently thinks that Obama should produce a birth certificate so as to prove he is not guilty of not being born in U.S., so as not raise suspicions among those who think he was not. I rest my case. I am suspicious that all hard-core male conservatives were actually girls at birth who had sex change operations so as to be more electable, not to mention avoid waiting in longer lines at restrooms on the campaign trails. I insist that they produce their birth certificates to clear the air — and if they have nothing to hide then why wouldn’t they just do it. ? ..And I mean the real thing; phony replicas or facsimilies will only make me more suspicious

    • Rick Ackerman November 7, 2010, 8:27 pm

      Read McCarthy’s “The Grand Jihad” before you tee off on those who would question Obama’s provenance.

  • Jill November 6, 2010, 8:05 am

    I am sure all Special Interest Groups would prefer that all elections be about God, guns, gays, & abortion, since this would keep distracting everyone, as they continue to rob us all blind. The only way out I can see is for folks to start voting only for candidates who pledge to enact campaign finance reform & to never accept one cent from Special Interest Groups.

    It’s interesting to see how many folks are centered on one issue entirely or primarily. My issue is being robbed blind. Maybe Rick’s is terrorism, although I don’t think he’s fond of being robbed blind either. Many people will endure anything from a political party, as long as their favorite issue is pushed in their direction.

    Our diversity in the U.S. is a big strength. Is it also a big weakness? I do wonder what, if anything, can bring us together to solve problems– other than the desire to increase their billions by folks who already have more money than they can spend in a life time. The greed must be really addictive, because it pushes a small number of people to push very hard to get their way, past the far larger group of people whose actual physical survival may be at risk.

    • F. Beard November 6, 2010, 3:19 pm

      I am sure all Special Interest Groups would prefer that all elections be about God, guns, gays, & abortion, since this would keep distracting everyone, as they continue to rob us all blind. Jill

      Yep, I’m sure they would. However, I can’t and won’t budge on basic humaneness. Being poor isn’t the worse thing.

      The greed must be really addictive, because it pushes a small number of people to push very hard to get their way, past the far larger group of people whose actual physical survival may be at risk. Jill

      He who loves money will not be satisfied with money, nor he who loves abundance with its income. This too is vanity. Ecclesiastes 5:10

  • Jill November 6, 2010, 4:04 am

    So fascism, with abortion outlawed, would be a fair tradeoff in your book? Now that I do find odd. OTOH, it actually doesn’t make any difference whether we vote or not, as the Special Interest Group lobbyists own the politicians of both parties. As long as they can keep robbing the country blind, I am sure they would campaign on either 1) free abortion on demand for all or 2) no abortions allowed, even in the case of the mother and fetus both facing certain death if the abortion were not performed or 3) anything in between. Doesn’t matter to them, if they think the voters will go for it and elect their own cronies to office.

    • F. Beard November 6, 2010, 4:44 am

      So fascism, with abortion outlawed, would be a fair tradeoff in your book? Jill

      I didn’t say I’d vote for the fascists; I said I’d stay at home on election day. I did imply that I would even vote for full blown socialism if only the Left will get HUMANE on abortion.

      Doesn’t matter to them, if they think the voters will go for it and elect their own cronies to office. Jill

      That’s irrelevant to me since I’ll never again vote for them. But I would probably vote on that single issue for the Demos regardless (probably) of the rest of their platform. You should remember that Roman Catholics were traditionally Democratic voters till that party drove them into the arms of the Republicans. It would not take much to get them back, imo.

  • usamnesia November 6, 2010, 3:03 am

    From an outsiders perspective:
    The global race over the cliff has begun. Gentlemen. Start your engines. Some of those logical predictions appear to be starting. Fed floods market with counterfeit cash by bond repurchases and I’m betting Goldman Sachs is unloading to beat the band. Goldman takes excess liquidity and goes commodity speculating. I’ll bet they also shorted the hell out of bonds worldwide which wasn’t noticed by the proletariat because the fed covered it with the bond monetization. There must be traders who passed out at GS from fatal extended intense orgasm. Watch for the rest of the GS game plan. Can’t be sure of exact timing but a couple of days of this ought to suck out all the money hiding in bonds and money markets as the masses can no longer stand the anguish of watching the meltup train leave the station without them, but I suspect the harvest will occur by maybe the middle of November if GS can get everybody in. Can you say whipsaw. What a plan, nowhere to hide. If you try to avoid the whipsaw by staying in fiat…they’ll have you set up for the great currency devaluation fleecing. This causes further commodity price explosion so GS has effectively moved your cash into commodities. As commodities explode economies can’t function and implode, then giant crash blows up commodities as massive selling occurs to raise liquidity, GS the instigator will be out at the high before the selling.Viola instant depression where cash relative value climbs as everything else deflates. By this time with their various maneuvers GS has all the cash and owns everything due to everybody else panic selling and margin calls. GAME OVER GS wins. Now would anybody like to play again. The entire world economy seems nothing more than a card game where one player not only gets to see all the cards as they’re dealt but also knows precisely how they’ll be played.

  • Jill November 6, 2010, 2:29 am

    No, I don’t find it odd, especially as you explained it. But I don’t find many other conflicting points of view odd either, e.g. that the government should stay out of the hospitals & health clinics, despite the fact that things may be done by doctors at some of those places which some people/religions consider to be immoral but others do not.

    I do hope that all– or enough– of us Americans can come together in agreement on some issues, to be able to solve together the worst problems facing us now.

    • F. Beard November 6, 2010, 2:49 am

      I do hope that all– or enough– of us Americans can come together in agreement on some issues, to be able to solve together the worst problems facing us now. Jill

      How about we decide to fight our common enemies before we turn on ourselves? But dang it! Why do the Demos make it so damn hard to vote for them? I could accept full blown socialism right now but you have to get reasonable on the abortion issue or I’ll stay home on election day and let the fascists win.

  • F. Beard November 6, 2010, 2:21 am

    Libertarians who don’t, a Libertarians who wants the government to stay out of most things but demands that they march into women’s health clinics to dictate when abortions can take place– only on or before a certain particular day which turns out to be number 40. Jill

    Well, before 40 days the fetus has no brain waves and I presume has no awareness. So for me it is mere application of the Golden Rule: Would I prefer to be painfully executed or painlessly executed? And if I pick “painlessly” should I not insist that others be executed painlessly, particularly if they are innocent?

    Do you find that particularly odd?

  • Jill November 6, 2010, 1:21 am

    The list below is not my own point of view, but it makes some good points. Someone I know sent it to me in email. And since the Fox/Repub/Libertarian Voting as Repub, points of view are over-represented here, I submit the following in the interest of going toward being more “fair and balanced.”
    ——————————————————-
    You didn’t get mad when the Supreme Court stopped a legal recount and appointed a president.

    You didn’t get mad when Cheney allowed Energy company officials to dictate Energy policy and push us to invade Iraq .

    You didn’t get mad when a covert CIA operative got outed.

    You didn’t get mad when the Patriot Act got passed.

    You didn’t get mad when we illegally invaded a country that posed no threat to us. You didn’t get mad when we spent over $800 billion (and counting) on said illegal war.

    You didn’t get mad when Bush borrowed more money from foreign sources than the previous 42 presidents combined.

    You didn’t get mad when over $10 billion in cash just disappeared in Iraq .

    You didn’t get mad when you found out we were torturing people.

    You didn’t get mad when Bush embraced trade and outsourcing policies that shipped 6 million American jobs out of the country.

    You didn’t get mad when the government was illegally wiretapping Americans.

    You didn’t get mad when we didn’t catch Bin Laden.

    You didn’t get mad when Bush rang up $10 trillion in combined budget and current account deficits.

    You didn’t get mad when you saw the horrible conditions at Walter Reed.

    You didn’t get mad when we let a major US city, New Orleans, drown.

    You didn’t get mad when we gave people who had more money than they could spend, the filthy rich, over a trillion dollars in taxbreaks. You didn’t get mad with the worst 8 years of job creations in several decades.

    You didn’t get mad when over 200,000 US citizens lost their lives because they had no health insurance.

    You didn’t get mad when lack of oversight and regulations from the Bush Administration caused US Citizens to lose $12 trillion in investments, retirement, and home values.

    No.

    You finally got mad . . .

    When a black man was elected president and decided that people in America deserved the right to see a doctor if they are sick.

    Yes, illegal wars, lies, corruption, torture, job losses by the millions, stealing your tax dollars to make the rich richer, and the worst economic disaster since 1929 are all okay with you, but helping fellow Americans who are sick . . . Oh, hell no!!

    &&&&&&&

    Jill: Could you and Mr. Beard please take this discussion private. Thank you. RA

    • F. Beard November 6, 2010, 2:29 am

      I am a libertarian and I got mad at many of those things. I voted for Bush in 2000 but stayed at home in 2004. As for 2008, I wrote in Ron Paul but preferred Obama to McCain. I still have hope that Obama will find his backbone and take on the bankers.

  • F. Beard November 5, 2010, 6:55 pm

    Sounds like man of the people right? Obviously you have a soft spot for them. Good luck with that. redwilldanaher

    You have lept to a conclusion, friend. Still, I prefer honest thieves, the Democrats, to hypocritical ones, the Republicans. I could never vote for a Demo, though unless he/she got sensible about limiting abortion to the first 40 days after conception.

    As for me, I am a libertarian, but a patient one. Let’s figure out how to do genuine capitalism and then transition to it without punishing the victims of the current fascism including myself!

    • Jill November 6, 2010, 1:13 am

      Interesting. Everyone has so many different opinions, yet thinks some party or another is great and would/will grant their own particular wishes if elected. Dems or people who like certain Dem ideas of certain Dem administrations but don’t like Obama. Repubs who look forward to the perfect country now that the Repub demi-gods control the House. (Warning: Don’t hold your breath waiting for it), Libertarians who like wars and Libertarians who don’t, a Libertarians who wants the government to stay out of most things but demands that they march into women’s health clinics to dictate when abortions can take place– only on or before a certain particular day which turns out to be number 40. I hope there is something we can all get together on and push for, something that will help out this country in our hour (soon to become decade or century?) of need.

  • ben November 5, 2010, 5:35 pm

    To see deflation and inflation in microcosm…I propose playing two games of Monopoly with the following modifications…

    Play a game in which every time you pass GO you pay $50 instead of collecting $200. You will find after a dozen turns around the board that nobody can afford to buy anything…if you are lucky enough to have some unmortgaged property, you almost never have enough to put any houses up. The game is depressing as people just go around the board landing on unowned properties that they can not buy, or mortgaged properties in which you pay no rent, and waiting for the inevitable bankruptcy from passing GO with no cash left. The only sources of excitement is landing on Chance and hoping for a bank error in your favor. This is deflation/depression.

    Then play a game where everyone gets $1000 for passing GO. Eveyrone is buying properties. Everyone has hotels up…and everyone is able to afford paying for landing on those hotels. The price of even Electric Company and Water Works is thousands of dollars. Nobody goes bankrupt…everyone stays in the game indefinitely. Everyone is happy. This is inflation…endless fiat money printing…maybe something akin to the Roaring 20s when the Federal Reserve set us on the road where are on today.

    Of course in the real world there are finite resources, and people have to eat (and work to produce that food), and can’t just lazily roll dice and go around a board collecting $1000 every time. So while the monopoly inflation scenario can last for some time…we all know the Greatest Depression follow those Roaring Twenties.

    • Robert November 5, 2010, 5:56 pm

      The newest craze in Monopoly is the new “ultra-short” version of the game:

      1) Everyone agrees on which player will be the banker.
      2) That player wins.

    • Rick Ackerman November 7, 2010, 8:08 pm

      Speaking as someone who grew up on Atlantic Avenue just a mile from Marvin Gardens, and who has played Monopoly hundreds of times, I think your analogy is spot-on. It precisely explains what is happening right now in real estate, and why deflationary forces will render moot any attempts by the Fed to counteract the drag.

  • roger erickson November 5, 2010, 3:19 pm

    Since no one’s listening, I may as well try again.

    In all likelihood, QE isn’t going to work as expected. It didn’t in Japan. What makes people think it will work as advertised here?

    QE [didn’t work] JAPAN
    http://pragcap.com/qe-equities-move-higher-japan
    “In fact, anyone buying in front of the QE announcement in Japan ultimately got crushed in the ensuing few months and years. When the BOJ initially announced the program in March 2001 the equity market rallied ~16%. But the euphoria over the program didn’t last long. In the ensuing two years the Japanese stock market fell a staggering 43%!”

    BERNANKE SAYS QE2 Won’t HELP MAIN STREET
    http://pragcap.com/bernanke-confirms-qe2-bank-bailout

  • Benjamin November 5, 2010, 6:30 am

    According to Bizarro World, the wealth’s as good as created. Here’s a sample of market headlines this late evening/early morning, off my yahoo homepage…

    Asian stocks rally on US gains, Fed stimulus
    Stocks set highs for 2010 after boost from the Fed
    Pitching its IPO, GM sees large profits on horizon
    Fed plan will let healthy banks boost dividends
    Stocks rally around the world after Fed action
    Kraft Foods increases prices, marketing in 3Q
    Trucks outsell cars by widest margin in 5 years
    Retailers’ modest October may spur holiday deals
    Cable subscribers flee, but is Internet to blame?
    Applications for jobless aid rise sharply

    I bet the jobless aid applications are really people too rich to keep on looking for a job that they don’t need, who want to assit other, mega-wealthy individuals in giving up that silly idea that they need to work. Some people, you know… they just need help adujusting!

  • mario cavolo November 5, 2010, 5:55 am

    We are going to inflation hell…

    Though the intelligent banter in this forum is always a pleasure, this is not complicated. We are going to inflation hell and worse. We’ve been well on this path during the past two years, led by China, and now it is going to become more and more apparent across the globe…this is going to be very painful. We have rising demand for basics with the APAC/emerging market expansion led by Chindia, and so those prices are ratching up relentlessly to new highs for everyone to feel.

    And that in fact is the point for these dear gov’t banking political bastards; by choosing the route they have, they are spreading the pain wide causing the entire world to suffer economically due to their own self-serving greed and games as they manipulate the world of capitalism to their favor.

    Rick and anyone, my confusion is my ignorance, just not getting my head around this deflation/inflation point. When you say this IS a “deflationary collapse happening” you mean that an inflation of goods/services all around the economy along with a collapse of currency value is essentially a deflationary collapse….?

    Cheers, Mario

    • Benjamin November 5, 2010, 6:44 am

      “When you say this IS a “deflationary collapse happening” you mean that an inflation of goods/services all around the economy along with a collapse of currency value is essentially a deflationary collapse….?”

      Beats the heck outta me as to what anyone else will say, but if I had to guess I would say that the lack of shopaholism accounts for the glut of things, and the falling currency accounts for the lack of shopaholism. It’s like…

      How am I supposed to buy a peice of paradise at the top of Burj Khalifa (that building in Dubai) when the falling elevetor can’t even take me there?

    • Robert November 5, 2010, 9:13 pm

      It’s a debt collapse.. plain and simple.

      The 30’s was a debt collapse exascerbated by monetary hoarding and falling prices on most things, but go back and look at what the price of apples did during the 30’s- they tripled from 3 cents apiece to 10 cents apiece. Look at what the cost of butter did, or beef, or cooking oil…

      same then, same now.

      You need to stop thinking in terms that fail to accurately describe the message you are trying to get across. I prefer to refer to modern times as “suck-flation” – that is- wealth is being sucked from those who don’t understand it to those that do.

      Houses? c’mon- basic supply demand fundamentals- there are too many houses available for sale, and too few people wanting (or able) to buy a house. Fundamentals ALWAYS trump the type of flation that one is trying to lump everything into.

      Just wait for price inelasticity to relieve it’s tenuous grip on houses- everyone will be praying at the Rick Ackerman deflation alter (except everyone who continues to complain about the cost of tortilla chips and beer)
      Is it really deflation that has adjusted the average price of a single family starter home from 400 ounces of Gold in 2000 to 71 ounces just 10 short years later?

      Or, is it that in today’s world, Gold is more valuable than a roof over your head? Who could possibly sell anyone on that argument? And yet, the pricing facts paint that EXACT picture?

      Or, is it simply that markets tend to move along trend lines that are actually too long for any of us to accurately see exactly what is really going on?

      Sometimes, what we see happening is not what is really happening.

      now, if you’ll excuse me, I’m busy trying to calculate how many apples I need to grow over the next 3 years in order to pay off my mortgage…

  • dennis November 5, 2010, 4:52 am

    Jill November 5, 2010 at 2:52 am
    Redwildanaher , you said
    “Arguing for an end to contrived serial foreign wars, arguing for the elimination of the income tax and the IRS and much of the other parts of the federal slave-master apparatus falls more in line with “right thinking” in my opinion. ”

    Jill: When you find the TV station where that view is accepted and given significant attention and time, please let me know. That should be an experience to watch.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++
    I’m with Jill on this. The idea that the media is ‘controlled’ be leftists is absurd. According to a reliable opinion poll, only 8% of americans believe that 95% of them will pay fewer taxes than they did when Bush left office. Add that to the fact that 18-20% believe that Obama is a muslim, after 9/11 someone close half the nation thought that the perpetrators were from Iraq, and that we still have enough people wanting to see Obama’s birth certificate so as to be scary. There are many more examples, and in the aggregate they just do square with the idea that the ‘media’ is domimated with ‘leftists’ , unless you can show me where we hear those ideas being promoted anywhere but by self-identified ‘conservatives’. PS : I did not vote for the guy, nor would I ever; and my father was a cop who hated the NRA because everyday he had to go to work wondering if he would meet bad guys who could outgun him with armour-piercing bullets and ak-47’s.

    • redwilldanaher November 5, 2010, 3:35 pm

      Non-sequiturs and denial. I don’t even know where to start. Print dominated by liberal establishment types. Magazines the same. Film, the same. TV, except for FOX, the same. You’re in denial or you do not understand of what you type. David Broder and David Gergen have both been presented as “conservative” counterweights over the years by CNN et al. Gergen worked for Clinton if memory serves. FOX may have many viewers now but the number of outlets that offer leftist lunacy on a regular basis greatly outnumber those of the so-called “right” which are about as “right” as George Bush was a “conservative”. I can’t help you too see it. You must see if for yourself.

    • Larry D November 5, 2010, 4:54 pm

      @dennis

      Interesting collection of facts that aren’t germane to the argument of which philosophy dominates the media. Here’s a few more factoids for your collection, without the exactitude of percentage figures from Mother Jones, The Nation, or any unnamed reliable opinion poll:

      1/3 of Americans believe in ghosts.
      1/3 of Democrats believe GWB orchestrated 9/11.
      1/3 of admissions to Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, Michigan are Canadians.
      Michael Moore (Fahrenheit 911) is an NRA member.

      (I won’t attempt to divine the political leanings of people who believe historic religious personalities have performed supernatural acts, or those who think the Apollo moon landings were a hoax, or believe that we are being visited by aliens and that UFOs are a government cover-up, or that crop circles are signs made by mysterious visitors from outer space, or that the cure for cancer is being suppressed by drug companies and that laetrile can cure cancer, or that Big Oil long ago bought the patent to the 100 MPG carburetor.)

      PS: I know several cops who are NRA members.

    • Robert November 5, 2010, 8:42 pm

      “we still have enough people wanting to see Obama’s birth certificate so as to be scary. ”

      Why is that scary?

      The fear could be 100% alleviated if he would simply produce the document, instead of trying to bluff his way out using the insane forgery that was posted on the Web by the White House- a forgery so obvious that they couldn’t even get his ethnicity referred to using the period-correct term.

      A person who has nothing to hide- hides nothing.

      College records, elementary school records, there is indeed something “scary” contained in all these hidden records… for if there wasn’t, then the President who promoted governmental transparency as a cornerstone of his platform would not be exposing himself as such a blatant hypocrite.

  • BobB November 5, 2010, 3:20 am

    Our gov/fed is truly a gang of completely incompetent morons, and the fed really needs to be eliminated. How can this institution come up with a plan that will impoverish virtually 98% or so of the population via currency destruction, so we can have headline stock price surges? That is the plan btw. Meanwhile the gap in wealth distribution widens dramatically. These are the seeds for a “French Revolution” type of ending.

    • redwilldanaher November 5, 2010, 6:28 pm

      Hi Bob, that’s just it though. They’re not incompetent they just want it to appear to be incompetence. They’re engaged in sophisticated, multi-level, multi-faceted fraud aided and abetted by our “free press” that they have ownership of. The odds are long with respect to a “french revolution” in the USSA. Remingtons, Savages and Marlins might deliver good bang for the buck in the woods but a disorganized militia would stand no chance against the highly weaponized police state forces. If you don’t buy that then try buying something from Just in time Inventory system that they control. If an army led by Lee couldn’t do it then, just imagine the results now. I call it “lockdown”. You’re welcome to join us in the peaceful secession movement. It’s the only way out of their matrix. Deo Vindice!

  • F. Beard November 5, 2010, 2:53 am

    … but I sure enjoy the interesting & relevant Bible quotes you have found. Jill

    That is to your credit and not mine. 🙂

    • F. Beard November 5, 2010, 3:11 am

      Dang it! Forgive my false humility; maybe I’ll get some credit. Here’s a relevant quote though I don’t claim to be a prophet; I just quote them:

      ” He who receives a prophet in the name of a prophet shall receive a prophet’s reward; and he who receives a righteous man in the name of a righteous man shall receive a righteous man’s reward. Matthew 10:41

      Peace.

  • Jill November 5, 2010, 2:52 am

    Redwildanaher , you said
    “Arguing for an end to contrived serial foreign wars, arguing for the elimination of the income tax and the IRS and much of the other parts of the federal slave-master apparatus falls more in line with “right thinking” in my opinion. ”

    When you find the TV station where that view is accepted and given significant attention and time, please let me know. That should be an experience to watch.

    Actually, I would most love to see a station that is not all one-sided, and not demonizing just one of our 2 nearly identical political parties and raising the other to godlike heights through its adulation, would be a breath of fresh air.

    ” If you shouldn’t let a crisis go to waste then just think what you could achieve when hundreds of millions of Americans are wishing for the good old days of mere crisis. Frankly, I think that you’re a lot smarter than your FOX comments indicate.”

    All or almost all presidential administrations probably believed that same idea about not letting a crisis go to waste. Someone in the Obama administration just made the mistake of saying it out loud. I don’t think they have any more intentions of creating crises than previous administrations. Of course, all of them have had the goal of granting the wishes of the mega-banks and other big Special Interests that paid for their election campaigns. So they may easily create crises by just ignoring the interests of ordinary citizens– just like all their predecessors risked that. The thing that is dumb to me about Fox is this unwarranted paranoia about this particular administration. It’s bad, but no worse than its predecessors. This is just one more case of the cartoon at this url.

    http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread525810/pg1

    Obama is not the anti-Christ. Just constantly criticizing & demonizing his administration, and raising Repubs to godlike heights, is not helpful. The Grand Ole Tea Party is not going to save us from the dilemma in the cartoon.

    • F. Beard November 5, 2010, 3:14 am

      Just constantly criticizing & demonizing his administration, and raising Repubs to godlike heights, is not helpful. Jill

      Many Republicans are pious hypocrites who support theft of purchasing power from the poor via the government backed banking cartel (for their own good, of course).

    • redwilldanaher November 5, 2010, 3:27 pm

      @f. beard, and what say you of the poverty pimp democrats? And of the destruction courtesy of Barney Frank and Chris Dodd and all the Clintoon admin. scum that littered Fannie and Freddie while they drained it dry and left the decaying carcass cleanup to the American taxpayer? Please, this and Jill’s response only make my point that the entire thing is a charade. I’ll bet I can produce more evidence to eviscerate democorp. than you could of republicorp. What would the exercise gain for us? This admin. is worse than its predecessors. You need merely check the pathetic record. They’ve mishandled everything at exactly the wrong time. Dramatically worsened an awful situation in record time in terms of the deficit. Put their dream policies and wasteful pork spending ahead of anything else at exactly the wrong time. Sanctioned what could be the final round of dollar destruction and had Timmy lie about it (and be laughed at as he did it) directly to the Chinese. They’ve ratcheted up the police state apparatus as he’s surrounded himself with oodles of communists. The poor are about to get clobbered as the prices of necessities ramp higher. They maintained the bankster/wall st./d.c. axis of evil so that they could keep American debt slaves in their place. It goes on and on. In short, they’ve mishandled everything and even pulled off the impossible and now have the MSM tilting away from blindly supporting them. Sounds like man of the people right? Obviously you have a soft spot for them. Good luck with that.

    • Tom Paine November 5, 2010, 7:58 pm

      The Tea Party started with promise as I rightly or wrongly saw Ron Paul as its leader. However, it seems to have been mainly co-opted by the Koch Bro’s and more mainstream corporatists (neocon)interests, fronted by the dog and pony show of Beck and Palin.

      I’m not completley in with Ron Paul’s agenda, but it is a good alternative to the neocons on the right, and was hoping maybe the left would abandon the Democrats and we could get behind some green party candidates.

      nope

      &&&&&

      Anyone who takes a shot at Glenn Beck quite obviously never watches him. He speaks plain truth, period. RA

  • JohnJay November 5, 2010, 2:16 am

    “My advice to you is to start drinking heavily!
    John “Bluto” Blutarsky to “Flounder”

    • donniemac November 5, 2010, 3:18 am

      Sounds good to me!
      I always thought that Dean Wormer was wrong in his advice to Flounder LOL.

  • F. Beard November 5, 2010, 2:03 am

    Have you filled [priced] a shopping cart lately? RA

    No, I figure I have to eat so why bother? I suppose I will have to get more careful though. I’m trying to eat more simply [and cheaply] anyway to lose weight.

    @Larry D,

    Excellent quote. Here’s another:

    One hand full of rest is better than two fists full of labor and striving after wind. Ecclesiastes 4:6

    • Jill November 5, 2010, 2:34 am

      Thanks, F. Beard. I am not a very religious person, but I sure enjoy the interesting & relevant Bible quotes you have found.

  • F. Beard November 5, 2010, 1:57 am

    Well, there’s Buffett, who’s always screaming for more taxes now that he’s walled all of his billions behind a charitable trust. RA

    Buffet was who I had in mine. His pious platitudes irk me.

  • R Kuester November 4, 2010, 10:58 pm

    Frankly,
    I would love to understand what all this comment really means for the average citizen. there seems to be a lot of intelligence in these columns, but too many try to impress others with their pretense to solid insight in obscure ramblings , the true meaning of which readers can only guess.In my opinion , it’s an extremely inefficient conveyance of knowledge you may have to share. Don’t we get enough twisted communication?

  • F. Beard November 4, 2010, 9:40 pm

    Silly me. I used to think investing was about picking a good company and buying its stock for the long run. Instead, it appears to be about gaming a fundamentally dishonest and unstable money system.

    My question is how anyone who understands the system well enough to profitably game it hasn’t been screaming for fundamental reform (at least after they have “earned” their first billion or two)?

    • Rick Ackerman November 4, 2010, 11:37 pm

      Well, there’s Buffett, who’s always screaming for more taxes now that he’s walled all of his billions behind a charitable trust.

    • Larry D November 4, 2010, 11:40 pm

      Do not weary yourself to gain wealth, cease from your consideration of it. Proverbs 23:4

      Maybe you should just forget about the whole thing.

  • F. Beard November 4, 2010, 9:28 pm

    But you can still wake me when it’s possible to sell one’s home for a quadrillion dollars. Toilet paper, milk, bread and eggs may reach that price first. RA

    Via commodity speculation? Folks (or the banks) will chase yields via driving up the cost of food? How much of that will be financed with leverage (counterfeiting) from the banks?

    From that Great Book on economics:
    He who withholds grain, the people will curse him, but blessing will be on the head of him who sells it. Proverbs 11:26

    But don’t worry food speculators:
    Like a sparrow in its flitting, like a swallow in its flying, so a curse without cause does not alight. Proverbs 26:2

    Oops! Maybe you should worry.

    When are we going to reform our money system so that recurrent “dearths of investment opportunity” do not lead “investors” to speculate in basic needs?

    • Rick Ackerman November 4, 2010, 11:40 pm

      I was joking, but only sort of. Have you filled a shopping cart lately? Relative to the price of practically everything but gold, silver and some other commodities, groceries have soared — maybe 10% in just the last month.

  • Steve November 4, 2010, 8:49 pm

    The rounding off process of a market top is long and dreary. There is a debt bubble of unheard proportion that is being worsened by the day by Bernanke, and the congress. Instead of allowing the market to fix the mortgage bubble Bernanke created more debt that cannot be paid using never before tried abuses to drive down interest rates by creating more unpayable debt.

    Supposed inflation is rising, and hyperinflation is beating down the door. Where is the increased wage/wealth in the hands of the people to chase too little of what? There is too little honesty, and far too little suppport for the Republic. Food is rising, fuel is rising, cost of government is rising, yes ! But, it isn’t the people chasing too little of anything that is driving up prices. Mass forced devaluation only works for a time. TC, what then ? The banks and banksters are still making their spread and gaining from 600b in forced loans against YOU. Tell me that the 200 point romp on the Dow today was not BUBBLE.

  • roger erickson November 4, 2010, 8:00 pm

    Mosler has an revealing review of how the public is getting duped again. (There is no money being created, all current money flows are by people who THINK money is being created. You have to know the real operations, not just the patina.)

    QE still driving portfolio shifting
    http://moslereconomics.com/2010/11/04/qe-still-driving-portfolio-shifting/

    excerpt:

    “both believers in QE and those who believe others believe in QE are piling on.

    The fact remains that QE does nothing apart from alter the term structure of rates.

    There are no ‘quantity’ effects, though from the following article and market reactions much of the world still believes there are substantial quantity effects.

    And what we are seeing are the effects of ongoing portfolio shifting and trading based on the false notions about QE.”

    Conclusion? There will be buying opportunities here in the states – if confused policies don’t destroy the entire economy first. Every other country has politicians as dumb or dumber than ours, and even more desperate populations.

    Coddled idiots in multiple countries are triggering a financial WWIII by expressing levels of insular ignorance not seen since WWI. This is really unbelievable.

    It’s basically a conflict between population-wide hoarding behavior and the urge to explore options. We’re failing to find ways to hoard less and build more exploratory intelligence.

    • tony November 5, 2010, 6:39 pm

      Could you explain what is meant by “only shifting the structure of the rates”

      From my limited understanding, QE is the process of the Fed buying treasuries, thereby funding the government, but the Fed doesn’t actually have anything of value given to the Treasury, they are borrowing money into existence themselves with “Federal reserve NOTES”. These fed reserve notes are the only legal tender so are THE money supply. The action of where they are intervening in the rate structure is the effect, but the Treasury is getting money from the Fed which creates money from nothing of value. [The normal mechanism of selling a bond is a exchange of value for debt, not debt for debt] -Where did I go wrong?

      &&&&&&

      Boy, did you eve nail it with this one. Every voter, every politician, every banker, every economist, every reporter, every news editor — every thimble-rigging liar who serves as Fed chairman — should be made to answer the question: When the Fed “buys” Treasury bills, bonds and notes, what, of value, have they given in return? RA

    • Robert November 5, 2010, 8:23 pm

      “Where did I go wrong?”

      you went wrong as soon as you juxtaposed “legal tender” with “money…

      They are not the same. Legal Tender (and “money supply” are both constructs of the corrupt system.

      Money is any substance that facilitates trade for the things we want/need.

  • TC November 4, 2010, 6:33 pm

    Rick…

    We get it… home prices are not rising parabolically like everything else. It was the last bubble and is lagging.

    Still if this is the “deflationary collapse” I have been reading about here for quite some time it sure is odd.

    • Rick Ackerman November 4, 2010, 7:43 pm

      Where, pray tell, is the evidence that this is NOT a deflationary collapse? Like all inflationists, you seem to be looking in the lettuce bin — or at the stock and commodity markets — for evidence. I suggest looking instead at asset valuations underlying the late, great quadrillion-dollar derivatives bubble.

  • warren November 4, 2010, 3:59 pm

    Inflation……here we come

    • Rick Ackerman November 4, 2010, 4:46 pm

      Yeah, sure. But you can still wake me when it’s possible to sell one’s home for a quadrillion dollars. Toilet paper, milk, bread and eggs may reach that price first.

  • JH November 4, 2010, 3:09 pm

    Mars Attacks – 1996 instead of 1966. And the blonde that sneaks into the white house reminds me of the current politicians. They look OK, but underneath the disguise you see they are completely comprised of martians, i.e. special interest groups and lobbyists.

  • Jill November 4, 2010, 8:42 am

    A libertarian fight is what you would like to see? But everyone thinks they already have that, through the Grand Ole Tea Party.

    • Benjamin November 4, 2010, 9:08 am

      Hello again Jill,

      How much pressure to turn a solid into a liquid, then into a gas, then into plasma?

      I don’t know either, but if the prison is encompassing enough, then change becomes an absolute must. Whatever the Tea Party will change into along the way, it’s guaranteed to become the Liberty Party, in time (and perhaps sooner rather than later; just because it isn’t right now does not mean never).

  • Jill November 4, 2010, 8:32 am

    Wow, Steve. What you say is very interesting, although I don’t know what it refers to specifically. The fighting part I mean. What particular fight do you wish Americans would take up? We certainly do get involved in a lot of wars, and we have a lot of fights between members of our 2 almost identical political parties, so I assume you mean some other fights?

    • Larry D November 4, 2010, 6:10 pm

      What he means is that as we creep, then trot, toward a more perfect authoritarian state, most folks just want their panem et circenses.

  • Steve November 4, 2010, 8:04 am

    What happens when the shoving on the markets and gold stops? Billions forever, or bubbles forever ?

    Republican Wave Crashes in Cal. Senate not taken by Republicans. Jill, some times it just isn’t worth it to punch the tar baby. Most cannot see the Blue Bird inside the block of wood. Most babies just lay there and don’t fight the kerchief placed over their face. Most people in this country don’t know what a Nation is. Fully three quarters of the population are cowards that would not fight for their own country, so came here. Of those that will fight, they only fight when they are 1000 times stronger than some back woods rabbit.

    • Steve November 4, 2010, 8:35 am

      I’ll reply to my Self !!! I was born Free with no debt 60 years ago, with the Right to inherit Allodial Estates, and the Covenant of Abraham [Unalienable Rights]. The next child that hits the ground is a corporate enfranchisee in debt 400k, who may only inherit the Fee of the Tenant under Escheats under the Lord Paramount in succession.

      Allodial Estate – 1828, nearly all lands are held in allodium in America, and this estate is the opposite of feudal as practiced in England, under the Crown. FEE Simple Absolute versus Allodial. I know, I know, I know, I know – the word Allodium, Allodial, Allodialist isn’t even in the dictionary today – go figure a liberal would destroy a word because they do not want the People to find it, and the reality of ____________!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Benjamin November 4, 2010, 9:01 am

      If I may present another point of view…

      The Vikings came over here, apparently for no other reason than to explore. One has to admire that. But then there’s the emerging story (history, actually) of the Knights Templer, in modern day Minnesota. Of course, they were trying to escape something as well. The Pilgrims, too.

      I guess the point I’m trying to make is that the macro and the micro was the same; you’re born to your parents and have to live by their rules, until you’re old enough to go out on your own. Don’t like your king? Move. Simple as that.

      But in this day and age, unless one has plans to go to, say, Mars, your pretty much out of options if you got better ideas on how your life should be lived. So we’re at a new point in our evolution, one which historical man has never had to face… the possibility of nowhere else to go. Perhaps this accounts for his tolerance of tyranny more than anything else does today, and, by extension, the delay in finally standing up for himself.

      It’s a certainty, in fact, because pressure only builds when it can’t escape. Try as the powers might, there is just no getting around that. If one is certain of no other thing in nature, it is that they fear the people they try to rule over, until they can rule over them no more.

  • Cameroni November 4, 2010, 6:59 am

    So much expectations and anticipation. So little real substance or news despite the buildup. Whew! That was a close call (or not). So the focus is back on precious metals again. A big pullback looks less certain now and odds are good that Silver is primed for a moonshot given just a little time and a few gentle nudges from an adoring crowd and a bunch of hungry overseas buyers.

    I love the markets some days!

    • Cameroni November 5, 2010, 3:01 am

      Holy Macaroni Batman,
      Did we get our wish on Silver today or what!! And I still consider it cheap with plenty of upside to go.

      The market sure spoke today. Loud and clear. So much confidence in the dollar has been lost overnight that the certainty of continued devaluation may even be the trigger for significant Treasury dumping.

      About the worst thing that could happen right now would be if Asia started selling off Treasuries ahead of percieved Dollar carnage thus reinforcing further monetization and bringing us all quickly to the brink of the dreaded hyperinflation.

      Let’s hope sane heads prevail.

  • Jill November 4, 2010, 4:24 am

    “However, we doubt the President’s sincerity in suggesting that he is eager to work out differences with the Republicans and Tea Partiers. His extended hand reminds us of the recurring joke in the wickedly funny 1966 film “Mars Attacks!” Every time the Martians arrive on the scene with an olive branch in hand, they whip out an atomic ray-gun and turn every living thing in sight into smoldering charcoal. Such, we fear, is the quality of Mr. Obama’s sincerity.”

    Interesting viewpoint. Don’t understand where you see signs that this is so.

    BTW, I was really serious, Rick, the other day, not kidding, that Fox has the most viewers by a huge number, according to the ratings, & this was repeated on election night. So Fox is the most influential media outlet. So I really seriously do not understand how you consider the media to be Left-tilting. Please elaborate.

    • Rick Ackerman November 4, 2010, 7:15 am

      Look nearly anywhere but Fox and the evidence should overwhelm you. Asking me to elaborate is like asking for evidence that the Earth is round.

      Concerning the “true” Barack Obama, read McCarthy’s “The Grand Jihad,” a very important book that you won’t hear about on Oprah.

    • Benjamin November 4, 2010, 8:31 am

      Jill,

      I see Rick has answered, but I’m curious… One right-wing outlet, compared to how many on the left?

      If I didn’t know any better, I’d say the left invested too much in media networks just so they could point to a meaningless number and say what stupid, backwards hillbillies we all are (honestly, they make critical thought too easy these days, god bless the desperate lackwits). Including you, btw, because you’re not one of them. That’s what they think of you. Why, the very idea that a peasant can be considered a part of such high and mighty, blue-blooded elite group that knows best for everyone…!

      Forget the whole left/right vendetta. Come back down to earth and join the freak show, with the rest of us. And hey, it feels good to be their greatest worry!

    • redwilldanaher November 4, 2010, 4:49 pm

      @Jill, I’ve read your comments within the forum many times and I’ve appreciated much of what you’ve contributed but I can’t begin to fathom your thoughts with respect to the MSM. There’s only one reason why FOX and the WSJ have been thriving and the rest of the leftist/statist media has been floundering: The leftists overplayed their hand. It’s simple, people got tired of reading, listening and watching a statist media that messaged in lock-step. BTW, FOX and the WSJ aren’t even close to what was traditionally referred to as right wing which I’m sure you realize. They both argue in favor of the state in general. See empire building, foreign wars, getting behind things like the VAT, not covering the palpable fraud that exists everywhere in the government and the markets. Arguing for a 35% top marginal tax rate over 39% doesn’t constitute a right wing position. Arguing for an end to contrived serial foreign wars, arguing for the elimination of the income tax and the IRS and much of the other parts of the federal slave-master apparatus falls more in line with “right thinking” in my opinion. Obama, just like Bush, Clinton/Gore, and Bush before him, is a disgrace. He had no experience. He got installed in the Senate and was a poor excuse for a Senator before announcing that he’d run for president. Think about the arrogance required to have done nothing and then almost immediately announce that you’d like to be the president. The guy is a nothing that did nothing before the decision was made to have the MSM raise him up at Billary’s expense. He was installed there as well. He littered his administration with Marxists. He took a bad situation and dramatically exacerbated it in less than 2 years. Granted he’s merely a puppet as they all are but this is about the surface level after all. Anyone with any common sense would know that the exact wrong time to attempt to initiate his policy objectives would have been when he tried to do them. Even the crooked advisors that he surrounded himself with knew that. But this is where we have to depart from the easy surface level argumentation. As in, maybe the real objective wasn’t to improve the economy after all. If you shouldn’t let a crisis go to waste then just think what you could achieve when hundreds of millions of Americans are wishing for the good old days of mere crisis. Frankly, I think that you’re a lot smarter than your FOX comments indicate.

    • RTS November 4, 2010, 8:26 pm

      Fox has the largest viewership because its the only game in town with respect to “conservative” televised news outlets. ABC, CNN, CBS, and NBC are decidedly liberal in their broadcast content. Ergo, (ABC+CNN+CBS+NBC) > Fox, but (ABC+CNN+CBS+NBC)/4 < Fox.

    • Tom Paine November 5, 2010, 3:41 pm

      Here is how I parse the MSM issue.

      The media definitely leans left on social issues. Why? Because big corporations pretty much don’t care about your lifestyle as long as you are not so debauched that you can’t work for them. Even then they don’t really care all that much, because it works out better for them to get the middle class to pay your welfare, while they hire cheap labor in some country that is so desperate for their jobs that they can treat workers like slaves and poison their environment.

      Also, if you have enough porn, drugs and rock and roll, and your not starving to death, you’ll be distracted enough to perhaps not notice or care just how corrupt and unjust our society has become.

      Because they are basically mouth pieces for corporate interests, the MSM strongly supports free trade and globalization. These policies are generally rejected by progressives and the hard-right, so ironically, both these groups think the MSM is against them. Hence the claim by right-wingers that the media is leftist, which progressives see as insane.

      To put it another way:

      The way I see it, the left in this country are generally civil libertarian, but economic statists. Whereas, the right wing in America tends to be in favor of imposing their religious morality on others while being economic libertarians. I see the MSM as being in neither camp. As pointed out, they are corporatist, supporting globalism, free-trade, the welfare state (but not for the same reasons as the left) and “liberal” social causes (again for different reasons than most progressives).

  • F. Beard November 4, 2010, 4:03 am

    I wonder how much debt relief $600 billion could provide?

    Lets’s see: 600e9 / 330e6 = $1,818 = $7272.73 for a family of four.

    Probably not enough to fix all the underwater mortgages.

    I leave it to the number crunchers to figure out how much it would take.

  • ricecake November 4, 2010, 2:32 am

    “A CNBC talking head, for one, averred that if Fed buys $600B of U.S. debt, it will produce a “wealth effect” three times as large, or $1.8Tr.”

    That mean all the QE money all go high fry overseas over the emerging, market blow the biggest bubble you can imagine! The speculators are all hungry and itchy. Soros already arranged his feast party in Hong kong planning to grab big money big time. But whether the Emerging markets, such as China, are lying on the butcher’s table waiting to be carved is remain to be be seen. I have read so far that they are also building their fens such as capital inflow control, foreign taxes, and traps etc to discourage the QE hot money inflow or outflow.

  • Benjamin November 4, 2010, 1:20 am

    I just finished reading a story about the official stimulus of 600 billion. Sheeze, I used to think they would start looking under every couch cushion and coffee cup holder for every bit of loose change. They are, and will continue to do so, but they’re also hiding borrowed nickles and dimes whenever they can. Nuts.

    So while the lunatics are entertaining themselves with lots n lots of moolah-lah-lah, here’s an idea…

    We start living different lives, like rolling dice in order to find out how far we move that day. Free Parking, for everyone, too. Build some hotels, and even Baltic Avenue becomes a cash cow of $100 every time someone visits. Not as rent, but paying THEM to stay there. Or better yet, just as our way of saying thank you for passing by. Or, no, wait… Screw Baltic Ave and hotels. Every square is Go and we can collect 200 dollars for passing it!

    It’ll create jobs over there in the Parker Brothers factory and we’ll be independant of the Fed and Big Govt Spending, once and for all (and just think of how the thimble industry will florish afterwords!).