March 2009

Why Dow Will Sink to 5794

– Posted in: Current Touts

Has the stock market put in an important low? We doubt it, and we’ll tell you why in a minute. But we should acknowledge that some technicians we know are apparently impressed by the saucer bottom traced out by the Dow Industrials and other key indexes over the last three days. The pattern is shown in the chart below, and if one were a reader of tea leaves looking desperately for positive signs, this classic formation might do in a pinch. Even considered from a Hidden Pivot perspective – that’s the technical method we use – prospects don’t look all bad. Notice how yesterday’s high exceeded the tiny peak made on the way down Tuesday before buyers got cold feet. Subtle as the overshoot was, it’s an encouraging sign. This is notwithstanding the fact that the selloff that followed was nasty, wiping out 40% of yesterday’s 250-point gain in the final 25 minutes of the session. To understand why stocks behave the way they do, we prefer to ascribe human traits to their price movement. And why not, since the ups and downs of stocks and commodities are driven by alternating waves of very human fear and greed? In fact, no more perfect analog could be found for mob behavior than a stock chart. In this instance we see a rally that looked back on its own progress, saw the little peak from Tuesday sticking up, and conquered it before taking a rest. In our anthropomorphic way of looking at things, we would characterize yesterday’s rally as a real scrapper, ready to take on any challenge it encounters, big or small. The 6883 Factor So why are we still bearish? The answer comes down to a number: 6883, a Hidden Pivot support. Some of you may recall that we billboarded

Mar. 4, 2009: Taking it One Leg at a Time

– Posted in: Tutorials

We spent some time making usable sense of the E-Mini S&P’s vacillations in a strongly bullish trend. Is there a way to avoid false triggers? Indeed there is, provided you have the patience and diligence to find the warning signs on the lesser charts. On request, we also scrutinized charts of Kraft and UNG, finding relatively riskless ways to buy the latter even though it had been falling hard. We also considered the possibility that, over the next 3-4 years, global liquidity will dry up, making it increasingly difficult or even impossible to trade.

Imagine a World Without Newspapers

– Posted in: Current Touts

Print news is dying, and we shouldn’t kid ourselves that the Internet will somehow replace it. In the last week alone, the 150-year-old Rocky Mountain News folded and the San Francisco Chronicle was talking about a possible bankruptcy. Nearly every large paper in the country could be gone within three to five years. The trend is unstoppable, and it threatens to drastically limit the quality and variety of news that we receive and have come to depend on each day. Many Americans evidently think they’ll be able to get their news from the Web and that the death of newspapers is no big deal. In fact, it is a very big deal, since nearly all of the news published online is gathered and written the old-fashioned way – i.e., by a vast, global network of reporters employed by brick-and-mortar newspapers. That network has been dwindling rapidly, however, and it is unlikely the casualties will ever be replaced. In order to save on newsprint costs, newspapers have been shrinking to survive. That leaves less space for news, reducing the need for reporters. As a result, it is now almost impossible for journalism-school graduates or even veteran reporters to find work. We have many friends in journalism, having worked as a reporter and editor from 1971-78. One of them searched extensively for a managing editor’s job, finally landing a spot with a small paper in the Midwest. This man had talent and experience to burn, including a stint running a bureau for the Associated Press. But even with his excellent professional connections, it took him six years to get hired. Another friend of ours, a top state-house reporter and Pulitzer winner, recently took a buy-out from the troubled Newark Star-Ledger to work for the state treasurer. And a third, also a Pulitzer